Left Ventricular End-Systolic Diameter May Predict Persistent Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Patients with persistent heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have a poorer prognosis than those with HF with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF). However, data on the predictive value of echocardiographic parameters for persistent HFrEF are lacking. We retrospectively studied 443 patients who were diagnosed with HFrEF (EF ≤ 40%) during hospitalization and underwent echocardiography at the 1-year follow-up. We divided them into the 2 groups: HFimpEF (EF > 40%) and persistent HFrEF group at 1-year follow-up, and assessed the predictive value of echocardiographic parameters at discharge for persistent HFrEF. In total, 301/443 patients (68%) were diagnosed with persistent HFrEF and 142/443 (32%) with HFimpEF at the 1-year follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the persistent HFrEF group had a poorer prognosis than the HFimpEF group (log-rank, P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.75; cutoff value: 55 mm) among various echocardiographic parameters. LVESD was an independent predictor of persistent HFrEF at the 1-year follow-up (odds ratio: 1.07, 95%CI: 1.02-1.12) upon multivariable logistic regression analysis. The incidence of persistent HFrEF was higher in patients with an LVESD ≥ 55 mm than in those with an LVESD < 55 mm (81% versus 55%, Fisher's exact test, P < 0.001). In conclusion, an LVESD (≥ 55 mm) was associated with persistent HFrEF. Focusing on LVESD in daily practice may help clinicians with risk stratification for decision-making regarding management in patients with advanced HF refractory to guideline-directed medical therapy.

Prognostic Impact of Landiolol in Patients with Acute Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Ventricular Rates: A Pilot Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend ventricular rate control to <130 bpm during atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) to avoid aggravating deteriorations in cardiac outputs. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of landiolol in patients with ADHF and AF. METHODS: This observational study included 60 patients who were urgently hospitalized with ADHF and presented with AF and a heart rate (HR) ≥130 bpm at admission. The patients were assigned to the landiolol group (n = 37) or the reference group (n = 23) based on their intravenous landiolol use within 24 h after admission. The primary endpoint was death from any cause. RESULTS: The groups' baseline characteristics were similar. A significant HR reduction occurred in the landiolol group at 2 h after admission. Compared with the reference group, the HR was significantly lower (111.6 vs. 97.9 bpm, p = 0.02) and the absolute HR reduction was greater (-32.2 vs. -50.0 bpm, p = 0.006) in the landiolol group at 48 h after admission. The landiolol group's mortality rate was significantly lower than that in the reference group (log-rank test, p = 0.032). landiolol use within 24 h after admission was independently associated with lower all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.02-0.92). CONCLUSION: Patients with ADHF and AF who received landiolol for rate control during the acute phase had better prognoses than those who did not receive landiolol.

Prognostic impact of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure on regular hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASi) and ß-blocker provide prognostic benefits as guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, there is limited data for the favorable effects in such patients receiving regular hemodialysis. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of RASi and ß-blocker in patients with HFrEF who receive regular hemodialysis. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center, observational study, from 2110 consecutive patients hospitalized for HF and who survived to discharge, 97 with HFrEF who received regular hemodialysis were included for analysis. They were classified into three groups according to prescribed medication at discharge following index hospitalization: both RASi and ß-blocker (Dual-GDMT group: n = 55), either RASi or ß-blocker (Mono-GDMT group: n = 34), and neither RASi nor ß-blocker (No-GDMT group: n = 8). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and rehospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: The mean age was 66 years and 79% of the patients were men. During the median follow-up of 501 days, the primary endpoint occurred in 43 patients (44%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the Dual-GDMT group had the lowest rates of the primary endpoint (log-rank test for trend: p < 0.001). Even after adjustment for diverse covariates (multivariate Cox regression), the Dual-GDMT (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.005-0.32) and Mono-GDMT (HR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01-0.50) groups had better prognoses than the No-GDMT group. CONCLUSIONS: The prescription of RASi and/or ß-blocker was associated with a lower adverse-event rate after discharge in patients with HFrEF who were on regular hemodialysis.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitor exerts prognostic effects in HFpEF patients with low baseline chloride level.

BACKGROUND: Few interventions have shown improved prognosis in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Serum chloride levels, which are affected by serum renin secretion, are associated with the prognosis of HFpEF patients. However, the relationship between serum chloride levels and the effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in HFpEF patients remains unclear. We investigated whether the prognostic benefit of RASi depends on baseline serum chloride levels in HFpEF patients. METHODS: This observational study included 506 hospitalized patients with HFpEF (ejection fraction ≥50%) who were discharged. They were divided into two categories based on serum chloride levels at admission (cutoff level: 101 mEq/L) according to previous reports. In each chloride category, all-cause mortality, the primary endpoint, was compared between patients who received RASi and those who did not. RESULTS: Patients who received RASi had a significantly lower mortality rate after discharge than those who did not, but only in the lower chloride category (log-rank, P = 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed the effect of risk reduction by RASi on all-cause mortality in the lower chloride category (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.31, 95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.84). The prognostic advantages of RASi were evident in the lower chloride category, but not in the higher chloride category, at admission (P for interaction = 0.027). CONCLUSION: RASi administration was associated with an improved prognosis only in HFpEF patients with a low baseline serum chloride level. Clinicians should consider RASi administration if patients' serum chloride levels are low, to improve the long-term prognosis of HFpEF patients.

Prognosis and diastolic dysfunction predictors in patients with heart failure and recovered ejection fraction.

There is limited data on whether diastolic dysfunction in patients with heart failure (HF) and recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) is associated with worse prognosis. We retrospectively assessed 96 patients diagnosed with HFrecEF and created ROC curve of their diastolic function at the 1-year follow-up for the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF readmission after the follow-up. Eligible patients were divided into two groups according to the cutoff value of E/e' ratio (12.1) with the highest AUC (0.70). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that HFrecEF with high E/e' group had a significantly poorer prognosis than the low E/e' group (log-rank, p = 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the high E/e' group was significantly related to the composite endpoint (hazard ratio 5.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-24.1). The independent predictors at discharge for high E/e' ratio at the 1-year follow-up were older age and female sex after adjustment for covariates (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.13 and OR 4.70, 95% CI 1.08-20.5). In conclusion, HFrecEF with high E/e' ratio might be associated with a poor prognosis. Older age and female sex were independent predictors for a sustained high E/e' ratio in patients with HFrecEF.

Nutritional status during hospitalization is associated with the long-term prognosis of patients with heart failure.

AIMS: The CONtrolling NUTritional status (CONUT) score represents the nutritional status of patients with heart failure (HF). Although high CONUT scores on admission are associated with increased risks of cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with HF, the impact of CONUT changes during hospitalization on their long-term prognosis is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of CONUT score changes on the clinical outcomes of patients with HF after discharge. METHODS AND RESULTS: This observational study included 1705 patients hospitalized with HF who were discharged alive. The patients were categorized depending on their CONUT scores at admission and discharge into persistently high, high at admission and normal at discharge, normal at admission and high at discharge, and persistently normal CONUT groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of CV death and readmission for HF after discharge. The primary endpoint occurred in 652 patients (38%) during the median 525 day follow-up period. Patients with persistently high CONUT scores had the highest composite endpoint rate (log-rank trend test: P < 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, the hazard ratio for the composite outcome was significantly lower for the patients with high CONUT scores at admission and normal CONUT scores at discharge than that for those with persistently high CONUT scores (hazard ratio: 0.69; 95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional status changes in patients with HF that occurred during hospitalization were associated with CV events after discharge. Improving the nutritional status of patients may improve their clinical outcomes.

Effect of Renal Dysfunction on Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Renal dysfunction is a known risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with ischemic heart disease. However, the association between renal dysfunction and sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) patients remains unknown. This study investigated the significance of an impaired renal function for the sudden death risk in a cohort of patients with HC. We included 450 patients with HC (mean age 52.9 years, 65.1% men). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was evaluated at the time of the initial evaluation. Renal dysfunction was defined as an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Renal dysfunction was found in 171 patients (38.0%) at the time of enrollment. Over a median (IQR) follow-up period of 8.8 (5.0 to 12.5) years, 56 patients (12.4%) experienced the combined end point of sudden death or potentially lethal arrhythmic events, including 20 with sudden death (4.4%), 11 resuscitated after a cardiac arrest, and 25 with appropriate implantable defibrillator shocks. Patients with renal dysfunction were at a significantly higher risk of sudden death (Log-rank p = 0.034) and the combined end point (Log-rank p <0.001) than patients without renal dysfunction. After adjusting for the highly imbalanced baseline variables, the eGFR remained as an independent correlate of the combined end point (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.24 per 10 ml/min decline in the eGFR; 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.47; p = 0.013). In conclusion, an impaired renal function may be associated with an incremental risk of sudden death or potentially lethal arrhythmic events in patients with HC.

B-type natriuretic peptide and outcome in patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Although elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels predict outcome in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the association between BNP levels and outcome in patients with the apical phenotype of HCM remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of elevated BNP levels on outcome in a cohort of apical HCM patients. METHODS: Among 432 HCM patients, 144 with an apical phenotype were examined. Plasma BNP levels were measured at the time of the initial evaluation. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) BNP level at initial evaluation in these patients was 188.5 (72.0-334.4) pg/mL. During a median follow-up period of 9.5 years, 34 patients experienced HCM-related adverse outcomes, including 2 patients with sudden death, 5 with appropriate implantable defibrillator shocks, 3 with stroke-related death, 8 with non-fatal stroke, and 16 with heart failure hospitalization. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the prognostic value of BNP for the combined endpoint gave an area under the ROC curve of 0.756, and optimal BNP cut-off point of 226.0pg/mL. Patients with high BNP levels (≥226.0pg/mL) were at significantly greater risk of the combined endpoint (log-rank p<0.001) than patients with low BNP levels. Multivariable analysis that included BNP levels and potential confounders showed that high BNP levels were an independent determinant of the combined endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.71; p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Measuring BNP may help stratify the risk of HCM-related adverse outcome in apical HCM patients.

Prognostic Implication of First-Degree Atrioventricular Block in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Background The association between first-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) and life-threatening cardiac events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains unclear. This study sought to investigate whether presence of first-degree AVB was associated with HCM-related death in patients with HCM. Methods and Results We included 414 patients with HCM (mean age, 51±16 years; 64.5% men). The P-R interval was measured at the time of the initial evaluation and patients were classified into those with and without first-degree AVB, which was defined as a P-R interval ≥200 ms. HCM-related death was defined as a combined end point of sudden death or potentially lethal arrhythmic events, heart failure-related death, and stroke-related death. First-degree AVB was noted in 96 patients (23.2%) at time of enrollment. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up period of 8.8 (4.9-12.9) years, a total of 56 patients (13.5%) experienced HCM-related deaths, including 47 (11.4%) with a combined end point of sudden death or potentially lethal arrhythmic events. In a multivariable analysis that included first-degree AVB and risk factors for life-threatening events, first-degree AVB was independently associated with an HCM-related death (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.27-4.58; P=0.007), and this trend also persisted for the combined end point of sudden death or potentially lethal arrhythmic events (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.28-5.27; P=0.008). Conclusions In this cohort of patients with HCM, first-degree AVB may be associated with HCM-related death, including the combined end point of sudden death or potentially lethal arrhythmic events.

Prognostic Significance of the Mitral L-Wave in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

A mitral L-wave indicates advanced diastolic dysfunction with elevated left ventricular filling pressure. Previous studies have reported that the presence of a mitral L-wave is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with heart failure. However, whether the L-wave can predict adverse events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) is still unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of a mitral L-wave in patients with HC, and the prognosis of patients with or without an L-wave. We analyzed 445 patients with HC. The end points of this study were HC-related death, such as sudden death or potentially lethal arrhythmic events, heart failure-related death, and stroke-related death. A mitral L-wave was defined as a distinct mid-diastolic flow velocity after the E wave with a peak velocity >20 cm/s. The prevalence of an L-wave was 32.4% in patients with HC. Patients with an L-wave were significantly younger, more likely to be women, had higher New York Heart Association functional class, and had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation than did patients without an L-wave. Patients with an L-wave had a significantly higher incidence of HC-related death compared with those without an L-wave (log-rank, p < 0.001). The L-wave was an independent determinant of HC-related death in multivariate analysis adjusted for imbalanced baseline variables (adjusted hazard ratio 2.38; 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 4.01; p = 0.001). In conclusion, the presence of a mitral L-wave may be associated with adverse outcome in patients with HC.