Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 88(7): 1046-1055, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26707858

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the RadiCure study 505 catheterization procedures were 1:1 randomized to use or no use of real-time radiation monitoring. Use of the Bleeper Sv monitor resulted in a significant reduction in operator radiation exposure. METHODS: We examined the association between several baseline and procedural parameters with operator and patient radiation exposure using univariable and multivariable analysis in the 505 patients that were enrolled in RadiCure. All baseline demographic and procedure characteristics recorded were included in the univariable analysis. RESULTS: Median fluoroscopy time was 6.2 (2.5-12.5) minutes, median patient air kerma dose was 0.908 (0.602-1.636) Gray and median first operator exposure was 10 (5-22) µSv. For analysis purposes, the 505 procedures were dichotomized based on the median operator exposure (10 µSv) and median patient radiation dose (0.908 Gray). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with high (above median or >10 µSv) first operator radiation exposure included radial access (odds ratio [OR] 5.44, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 2.88-10.76), chronic total occlusion (CTO) intervention (OR 12.78, 95% CI 4.42-43.60), real-time radiation monitoring (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26-0.66), and use of a radioabsorbent drape (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.28-0.96). High patient radiation dose (above median or >0.908 Gray) was associated with body mass index>30 kg/m2 (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.99-5.29), prior MI (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.29-4.04), prior cerebrovascular disease (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.75), hypertension (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.05-5.82), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.40-4.39) and CTO intervention (OR 12.93, 95% CI 3.28-87.31), but was not associated with real-time radiation monitoring and use of a radioabsorbent drape. CONCLUSIONS: Several clinical and procedural factors are associated with higher patient and operator radiation exposure. Real-time radiation monitoring and use of disposable radiation shields were associated with lower operator, but not patient, radiation dose. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Alarmas Clínicas , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Dosis de Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación/prevención & control , Monitoreo de Radiación/instrumentación , Protección Radiológica/instrumentación , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Anciano , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Salud Laboral , Oportunidad Relativa , Seguridad del Paciente , Equipo de Protección Personal , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Texas , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 84(4): 670-5, 2014 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24327476

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aortocoronary dissection can complicate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTOs). METHODS: We retrospectively examined the frequency and outcomes of aortocoronary dissection among 336 consecutive CTO PCIs performed at our institution between 2005 and 2012 and performed a systematic review of the published literature. RESULTS: Aortocoronary dissection occurred in six patients (1.8%, 95% confidence intervals 0.7%, 3.8%). All aortocoronary dissections occurred in the right coronary artery (CTO target vessel in five patients and donor vessel in one patient). The baseline clinical characteristics of patients with and without aortocoronary dissection were similar. Compared to patients without, those with aortocoronary dissection were more likely to undergo crossing attempts using the retrograde approach (25% vs. 67%, P = 0.036) and experience a major complication (2.4% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.008). Technical and procedural success rates were similar in both groups. Of the six patients with aortocoronary dissection one underwent emergency coronary bypass graft surgery (CABG), four were treated with ostial stenting, and one was treated conservatively without subsequent adverse clinical outcomes. Systematic literature review provided 107 published cases of aortocoronary dissection during PCI, that occurred mainly in the right coronary artery (74.8%) and were treated with stenting (49.5%), emergency CABG (29%), or conservatively (21.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Aortocoronary dissection is an infrequent complication of CTO PCI and although it can be treated with stents in most patients, it may infrequently require emergency CABG.


Asunto(s)
Aorta , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Oclusión Coronaria/terapia , Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Lesiones Cardíacas/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/terapia , Anciano , Aorta/lesiones , Enfermedad Crónica , Angiografía Coronaria , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico , Vasos Coronarios/lesiones , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Femenino , Lesiones Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Lesiones Cardíacas/etiología , Lesiones Cardíacas/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía
3.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 27(6): 269-76, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26028653

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The BridgePoint system consists of the CrossBoss coronary catheter and Stingray CTO system (Boston Scientific) for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs), and the Viance crossing catheter and Enteer re-entry system (Covidien) for peripheral CTOs. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature on the BridgePoint system published between October 2008 and August 2014, in accordance with the standards set forth in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. RESULTS: We identified a total of 20 studies: 12 studies on coronary CTOs (10 retrospective with 2 prospective case series) and 8 studies on peripheral CTOs (all retrospective). Among 320 patients undergoing coronary CTO intervention, pooled technical success and major adverse cardiac event rates were 77.1% and 3.8%, respectively. Among 175 patients undergoing peripheral CTO intervention, pooled technical success and major adverse events were 82.2% and 4.6%, respectively. Only 1 study reported long-term outcomes after use of the coronary BridgePoint system, demonstrating similar incidence of major adverse cardiac events between BridgePoint-treated and non-BridgePoint treated patients; however, the study had low power. CONCLUSIONS: The BridgePoint system is associated with high procedural success rates and low complication rates when used for crossing both coronary and peripheral CTOs.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Catéteres Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Oclusión Coronaria/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Enfermedad Crónica , Humanos , Incidencia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 27(7): 313-6, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26136277

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Daily radiation exposure over many years can adversely impact the health of medical professionals. METHODS: Operator radiation exposure was recorded for 124 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) performed at our institution between August 2011 and May 2013: 69 were chronic total occlusion (CTO)-PCIs and 55 were non-CTO PCIs. A disposable radiation protection sterile drape (Radpad; Worldwide Innovations & Technologies, Inc) was used in all CTO-PCI cases vs none of the non-CTO PCI cases. Operator radiation exposure was compared between CTO and non-CTO PCIs. RESULTS: Mean age was 64.6 ± 6.2 years and 99.2% of the patients were men. Compared with non-CTO PCI, patients undergoing CTO-PCI were more likely to have congestive heart failure, to be current smokers, and to have longer lesions, and less likely to have prior PCI and a saphenous vein graft target lesion. CTO-PCI cases had longer procedural time (median: 123 minutes [IQR, 85-192 minutes] vs 27 minutes [IQR, 20-44 minutes]; P<.001), fluoroscopy time (35 minutes [IQR, 19-54 minutes] vs 8 minutes [IQR, 5-16 minutes]; P<.001), number of stents placed (2.4 ± 1.5 vs 1.7 ± 0.9; P<.001), and patient air kerma radiation exposure (3.92 Gray [IQR, 2.48-5.86 Gray] vs 1.22 Gray [IQR, 0.74-1.90 Gray]; P<.001), as well as dose area product (267 Gray•cm² [IQR, 163-4.25 Gray•cm²] vs 84 Gray•cm² [IQR, 48-138 Gray•cm²]; P<.001). In spite of higher patient radiation exposure, operator radiation exposure was similar between the two groups (20 µSv [IQR, 9.5-31 µSv] vs 15 µSv [IQR, 7-23 µSv]; P=.07). CONCLUSIONS: Operator radiation exposure during CTO-PCI can be reduced to levels similar to less complicated cases with the use of a disposable sterile radiation protection shield.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Equipos Desechables , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Equipo de Protección Personal , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Oclusión Coronaria/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dosis de Radiación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 7(6): 744-50, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25423958

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Radiation Reduction During Cardiac Catheterization Using Real-Time Monitoring study sought to examine the effect of a radiation detection device that provides real-time operator dose reporting through auditory feedback (Bleeper Sv; Vertec Scientific Ltd; Berkshire, UK) on patient dose and operator exposure during cardiac catheterization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 2012 and May 2014, 505 patients undergoing coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, or both were randomized to use (n=253) or no use (n=252) of the Bleeper Sv radiation monitor. Operator radiation exposure was measured in both groups using a second, silent radiation exposure monitoring device. Mean patient age was 65±8 years, most patients (99%) were men, and 30% had prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar in the 2 study groups. Radial access was used in 18% and chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention constituted 7% of the total procedures. Median procedure time was 17 (12-27) minutes for diagnostic angiography, 42 (28-70) minutes for percutaneous coronary intervention, and 27 (14-51) minutes in the overall study population, with similar distribution between the study groups. First (9 [4-17] versus 14 [7-25] µSv; P<0.001) and second (5 [2-10] versus 7 [4-14] µSv; P<0.001) operator radiation exposure was significantly lower in the Bleeper Sv group. Use of the device did not result in a significant reduction in patient radiation dose. The effect of the Bleeper Sv device on operator radiation exposure was consistent among various study subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a real-time radiation monitoring device that provides auditory feedback can significantly reduce operator radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01510353.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Salud Laboral , Dosis de Radiación , Monitoreo de Radiación/instrumentación , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Anciano , Percepción Auditiva , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Alarmas Clínicas , Angiografía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Retroalimentación Psicológica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Ropa de Protección , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Texas , Factores de Tiempo
6.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 6(2): 128-36, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23352817

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to perform a weighted meta-analysis of the complication risk during chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The safety profile of CTO PCI has received limited study. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of 65 studies published between 2000 and 2011 reporting procedural complications of CTO PCI. Data on the frequency of death, emergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery, stroke, myocardial infarction, perforation, tamponade, stent thrombosis, major vascular or bleeding events, contrast nephropathy, and radiation skin injury were collected. RESULTS: A total of 65 studies with 18,061 patients and 18,941 target CTO vessels were included. Pooled estimates of outcomes were as follows: angiographic success 77% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 74.3% to 79.6%); death 0.2% (95% CI: 0.1% to 0.3%); emergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery 0.1% (95% CI: 0.0% to 0.2%); stroke <0.01% (95% CI: 0.0% to 0.1%); myocardial infarction 2.5% (95% CI: 1.9% to 3.0%); Q-wave myocardial infarction 0.2% (95% CI: 0.1% to 0.3%); coronary perforation 2.9% (95% CI: 2.2% to 3.6%); tamponade 0.3% (95% CI: 0.2% to 0.5%); and contrast nephropathy 3.8% (95% CI: 2.4% to 5.3%). Compared with successful procedures, unsuccessful procedures had higher rates of death (0.42% vs. 1.54%, p < 0.0001), perforation (3.65% vs. 10.70%, p < 0.0001), and tamponade (0% vs. 1.65%, p < 0.0001). Among 886 lesions treated with the retrograde approach, success rate was 79.8% with no deaths and low rates of emergent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (0.17%) and tamponade (1.2%). CONCLUSIONS: CTO PCI carries low risk for procedural complications despite high success rates.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Oclusión Coronaria/terapia , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Anciano , Taponamiento Cardíaco/diagnóstico por imagen , Taponamiento Cardíaco/etiología , Taponamiento Cardíaco/terapia , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Enfermedad Crónica , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión Coronaria/mortalidad , Vasos Coronarios/lesiones , Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Femenino , Lesiones Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones Cardíacas/etiología , Lesiones Cardíacas/terapia , Humanos , Enfermedades Renales/inducido químicamente , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA