Comparison of High-Flux, Super High-Flux, Medium Cut-Off Hemodialysis and Online Hemodiafiltration on the Removal of Uremic Toxins.

INTRODUCTION: Online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and hemodialysis (HD) using high-performance membranes such as adsorptive, medium cut-off (MCO), and super high-flux (SHF) dialyzers have been implemented to enhance the removal of middle molecules (MM). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different dialysis strategies and dialyzers on small solutes and MM reduction ratio (RR) and mass removal. METHODS: We performed a prospective study in 8 HD patients. Each patient underwent 9 dialysis sessions: seven sessions on HD using either Theranova 500™, Elisio 21H™, Renak PS-2.0W™, Filtryzer BK-2.1F™, Vie 21X™, TS-2.1UL™ or FDY 210-GW™ dialyzers and two sessions on OL-HDF using Elisio 21H™ or Renak PS-2.0W™ dialyzers. RESULTS: Urea mass removal and RR were similar between all dialysis strategies. The lowest beta2-microglobulin RR was achieved with Filtryzer BK-2.1F™ HD (p < 0.05). Compared to Elisio 21H™ HD, Renak PS-2.0W™ OL-HDF produced higher beta2-microglobulin mass removal (181 ± 46 vs. 317 ± 161 mg, p < 0.05). Theranova 500™ HD, Vie 21X™ HD, FDY 210-GW™ HD, Elisio 21H™ OL-HDF, and Renak PS-2.0W™ OL-HDF induced higher RR for kappa and lambda FLC, as compared to Elisio 21H™ HD and Filtryzer BK-2.1F™ HD (p < 0.05). Renak PS-2.0W™ OL-HDF achieved higher kappa FLC mass removal compared to Elisio 21H™ HD (563 ± 515 vs. 141 ± 47 mg, p < 0.01) and to Renak PS-2.0W™ HD (563 ± 515 vs. 153 ± 25 mg, p < 0.05). Albumin loss varied from 0.02 ± 0.05 to 7.6 ± 3.8 g/session with Elisio 21H™ HD and Renak PS-2.0W™ OL-HDF, respectively. Compared to all other strategies, Renak PS-2.0W™ OL-HDF induced a significantly higher albumin loss (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study confirms that albumin loss and removal of MM are similar using conventional Elisio 21H™ OL-HDF, MCO-HD, and SHF type V dialyzers. Although Renak PS-2.0W™ OL-HDF provides high performance for MM depuration, this protein-permeable dialyzer should not be used in OL-HDF because of excessive albumin loss.

Results of a nation-wide cohort study suggest favorable long-term outcomes of clone-targeted chemotherapy in immunotactoid glomerulopathy.

Immunotactoid glomerulopathy is a rare disease defined by glomerular microtubular immunoglobulin deposits. Since management and long-term outcomes remain poorly described, we retrospectively analyzed results of 27 adults from 21 departments of nephrology in France accrued over 19 years. Inclusion criteria were presence of glomerular Congo red-negative monotypic immunoglobulin deposits with ultrastructural microtubular organization, without evidence for cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis. Baseline manifestations of this cohort included: proteinuria (median 6.0 g/day), nephrotic syndrome (70%), microscopic hematuria (74%) and hypertension (56%) with a median serum creatinine of 1.5 mg/dL. Nineteen patients had detectable serum and/or urine monoclonal gammopathy. A bone marrow and/or peripheral blood clonal disorder was identified in 18 cases (16 lymphocytic and 2 plasmacytic disorders). Hematologic diagnosis was chronic/small lymphocytic lymphoma in 13, and monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance in 14 cases. Kidney biopsy showed atypical membranous in 16 or membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in 11 cases, with microtubular monotypic IgG deposits (kappa in 17 of 27 cases), most commonly IgG1. Identical intracytoplasmic microtubules were observed in clonal lymphocytes from 5 of 10 tested patients. Among 21 patients who received alkylating agents, rituximab-based or bortezomib-based chemotherapy, 18 achieved a kidney response. After a median follow-up of 40 months, 16 patients had sustained kidney response, 7 had reached end-stage kidney disease, and 6 died. Chronic/small lymphocytic lymphoma appears as a common underlying condition in immunotactoid glomerulopathy, but clonal detection remains inconstant with routine techniques in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance. Thus, early diagnosis and hematological response after clone-targeted chemotherapy was associated with favorable outcomes. Hence, thorough pathologic and hematologic workup is key to the management of immunotactoid glomerulopathy.

Comparison of the injection of low-molecular weight heparin in the arterial vs. venous blood line for preventing extracorporeal circuit clotting during hemodialysis.

Low-molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are widely used for preventing clotting during hemodialysis (HD). Although injection in the venous blood line is recommended to avoid initial loss of LMWH through the dialyzer, LMWH is still frequently administered in the arterial blood line at the start of dialysis. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the same enoxaparin dose administered through the venous blood line or arterial blood line. We also evaluated antifactor Xa (aXa) activity according to the injection route and dialysis modalities: high-flux (HF) HD, medium cut-off (MCO) HD, and online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). Forty-three patients were studied over 18 consecutive dialysis sessions using a fixed enoxaparin dose (20 or 40 mg), first administered through the arterial blood line bolus and then through the venous blood line for another 18 sessions. Compared to arterial blood line administration, venous blood line bolus resulted in a significant increase in median post-dialysis aXa activity: 0.16 (0.1-0.6) IU/ml versus 0.31 (0.1-1.3) IU/ml, respectively, p = 0.006. After arterial blood line bolus of 40 mg enoxaparin, median post-dialysis aXa activity was significantly lower with OL-HDF compared to HF-HD: 0.14 (0.1-0.35) versus 0.32 (0.15-0.49), p = 0.02. A trend for lower clotting within lines and bubble trap using venous blood line bolus was observed. In conclusion, venous blood line enoxaparin injection is safe in OL-HDF patients. However, in HF-HD and MCO-HD, venous blood line injection of 40 mg enoxaparin may increase overdosing risk. Thus, aXa activity should be monitored in HF-HD and MCO-HD patients at risk of bleeding and/or on vitamin K antagonists and careful surveillance is required when administering a 40 mg enoxaparin dose through the venous blood line route.

Randall-Type Monoclonal Immunoglobulin Deposition Disease: New Insights into the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Management.

Randall-type monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD) is a rare disease that belongs to the spectrum of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS). Renal involvement is prominent in MIDD, but extra-renal manifestations can be present and may affect global prognosis. Recent data highlighted the central role of molecular characteristics of nephrotoxic monoclonal immunoglobulins in the pathophysiology of MIDD, and the importance of serum free light chain monitoring in the diagnosis and follow-up disease. Clone-targeted therapy is required to improve the overall and renal survival, and the achievement of a rapid and deep hematological response is the goal of therapy. This review will focus on the recent progress in the pathogenesis and management of this rare disease.