An exploratory study of the use of advance directives by US oncologists.

PURPOSE: This study sought to determine the rate of advance directive completion among US oncologists and factors influencing such a decision. METHODS: We surveyed 7590 members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology using a web-based questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate was 8.1%. Most respondents (59%) had completed at least 1 document: 9% living will, 9% power of attorney for health care, and 41% both. Respondents who were older, men, married, with children, working in the community setting, radiation oncologists, and practicing general oncology were more likely than their counterparts to have an advance directive. Among those who had one, 95% and 36% had discussed their wishes with their loved ones and health care providers, respectively. Factors including experience at work, spouse, children, family, and religion had the most influence on respondents' decision. The majority of those without an advance directive reported either no reason or lack of time. Those who had them were more likely to report having a comprehensive review of their wishes with those closest to them, being more knowledgeable, having more routine discussions with their patients, and being more comfortable helping their patients complete one. CONCLUSION: Only about half of US oncologists who responded to our survey have completed an advance directive.

Identification and collection of quality indicators for perinatal care.

We describe the development of a database of quality indicators and outcomes for perinatal care as part of a multi-institutional collaborative quality improvement project, Neonatal Intensive Care Quality 2002. Important principles of developing such a database are also discussed including eligibility criteria that identify high-risk patients without burdening data collectors, clinically important and well-defined measures, development of systems within each hospital to ensure identification of all eligible patients, use of data collectors with knowledge of perinatal care, appropriate design of paper and electronic data-collection tools, multiple pilot tests, and periodic feedback of data to participating hospitals.