RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The phase 3 SPARTAN study evaluated apalutamide versus placebo in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and prostate-specific antigen doubling time of ≤10 mo. At primary analysis, apalutamide improved median metastasis-free survival (MFS) by 2 yr and overall survival (OS) data were immature. OBJECTIVE: We report the prespecified event-driven final analysis for OS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1207 patients with nmCRPC (diagnosed by conventional imaging) were randomised 2:1 to apalutamide (240mg/d) or placebo, plus on-going androgen deprivation therapy. After MFS was met and the study was unblinded, 76 (19%) patients still receiving placebo crossed over to apalutamide. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: OS and time to cytotoxic chemotherapy (TTChemo) were analysed by group-sequential testing with O'Brien-Fleming-type alpha spending function. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At median 52-mo follow-up, 428 deaths had occurred. The median treatment duration was 32.9 mo for apalutamide group and 11.5 mo for placebo group. Median OS was markedly longer with apalutamide versus placebo, reaching prespecified statistical significance (73.9 vs 59.9 mo, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.78 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.64-0.96]; p=0.016). Apalutamide also lengthened TTChemo versus placebo (HR: 0.63 [95% CI, 0.49-0.81]; p=0.0002). Discontinuation rates in apalutamide and placebo groups due to progressive disease were 43% and 74%, and due to adverse events 15% and 8.4%, respectively. Subsequent life-prolonging therapy was received by 371 (46%) patients in the apalutamide arm and by 338 (84%) patients in the placebo arm including 59 patients who received apalutamide after crossover. Safety was consistent with previous reports; when adverse events were adjusted for treatment exposure, rash had the greatest difference of incidence between the apalutamide and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Extension of OS with apalutamide compared with placebo conferred impactful benefit in patients with nmCRPC. There was a 22% reduction in the hazard of death in the apalutamide group despite 19% crossover (placebo to apalutamide) and higher rates of subsequent therapy in the placebo group. PATIENT SUMMARY: With data presented herein, all primary and secondary study end points of SPARTAN were met; findings demonstrate the value of apalutamide as a treatment option for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/mortalidad , Tiohidantoínas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Estudios Cruzados , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Efficacious antitumor immune responses must overcome multiple suppressive mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment to control cancer progression. In this study, we demonstrate that dual targeting of suppressive myeloid populations by inhibiting CSF-1/CSF-1R signaling and activation of antigen-presenting cells with agonist anti-CD40 treatment confers superior antitumor efficacy and increased survival compared with monotherapy treatment in preclinical tumor models. Concurrent CSF-1R blockade and CD40 agonism lead to profound changes in the composition of immune infiltrates, causing an overall decrease in immunosuppressive cells and a shift toward a more inflammatory milieu. Anti-CD40/anti-CSF-1R-treated tumors contain decreased tumor-associated macrophages and Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. This combination approach increases maturation and differentiation of proinflammatory macrophages and dendritic cells and also drives potent priming of effector T cells in draining lymph nodes. As a result, tumor-infiltrating effector T cells exhibit improved responses to tumor antigen rechallenge. These studies show that combining therapeutic approaches may simultaneously remove inhibitory immune populations and sustain endogenous antitumor immune responses to successfully impair cancer progression. Cancer Immunol Res; 5(12); 1109-21. ©2017 AACR.