Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 53
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pancreatology ; 22(5): 590-597, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35469754

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States (US). However, there is paucity of data on pancreatic cancer hospitalizations in the US. METHODS: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to identify all hospitalizations of pancreatic cancer from 2008 to 2017. Hospitalization characteristics, adverse outcomes, and the disease burden on the US healthcare system was highlighted and further analyzed with respect to the US population. P-values ≤0.05 were statistically significant. RESULTS: We noted an increase in the total number of pancreatic cancer hospitalizations from 37,123 in 2008 to 37,635 in 2017 (p < 0.0001), but a decline was noted for per million US population from 122 in 2008 to 116 in 2017. The 65-79 age group had the highest hospitalizations with an increasing trend from 41.6% in 2008 to 45.9% in 2017 (p < 0.0001). In 2008, a slight female predominance was noted (51.9 vs 48.1%, p < 0.0001); however, in 2017, a slight male predominance was observed (50.9 vs 49.1%, p < 0.0001). Whites made up a majority of the study population. Furthermore, emergent/urgent hospitalizations (50.7 vs 49.3%, p < 0.0001) were slightly more frequent than elective hospitalizations in 2017. The mean length of stay (LOS) decreased from 8.4 days in 2008 to 7 days in 2017 (p < 0.0001) and the all-cause inpatient mortality decreased from 10.1% in 2008 to 7.6% in 2017 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Although the total number of pancreatic cancer hospitalizations increased, there was a decline for per million US population. Additionally, mean LOS and inpatient mortality decreased between 2008 and 2017.


Asunto(s)
Pacientes Internos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
2.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 56(7): 618-626, 2022 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34107514

RESUMEN

GOALS: We aimed to assess outcomes of patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent therapeutic or diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to determine whether these patients had different outcomes relative to patients without cirrhosis. BACKGROUND: ERCP is an important procedure for treatment of biliary and pancreatic disease. However, ERCP is relatively technically difficult to perform when compared with procedures such as esophagogastroduodenoscopy or colonoscopy. Little is known about how ERCP use affects patients with liver cirrhosis. STUDY: Using patient records from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we identified adult patients who underwent ERCP between 2009 and 2014 using International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision coding and stratified data into 2 groups: patients with liver cirrhosis and those without liver cirrhosis. We compared baseline characteristics and multiple outcomes between groups and compared outcomes of diagnostic versus therapeutic ERCP in patients with cirrhosis. A multivariate regression model was used to estimate the association of cirrhosis with ERCP outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1,038,258 hospitalizations of patients who underwent ERCP between 2009 and 2014 were identified, of which 31,294 had cirrhosis and 994,681 did not have cirrhosis. Of the patients with cirrhosis, 21,835 (69.8%) received therapeutic ERCP and 9459 (30.2%) received diagnostic ERCP. Patients with cirrhosis had more ERCP-associated hemorrhages (2.5% vs. 1.2%; P <0.0001) compared with noncirrhosis patients but had lower incidence of perforations (0.1% vs. 0.2%; P <0.0001) and post-ERCP pancreatitis (8.6% vs. 7%; P <0.0001). Cholecystitis was the same between groups (2.3% vs. 2.3%; P <0.0001). In patients with cirrhosis, those who received therapeutic ERCP had higher post-ERCP pancreatitis (7.9% vs. 5.1%; P <0.0001) and ERCP-associated hemorrhage (2.7% vs. 2.1%; P <0.0001) but lower incidences of perforation and cholecystitis (0.1% vs. 0.3%; P <0.0001) and cholecystitis (1.9 vs. 3.1%; P <0.0001) compared with those who received diagnostic ERCP. CONCLUSIONS: Use of therapeutic ERCP in patients with liver cirrhosis may lead to higher risk of complications such as pancreatitis and postprocedure hemorrhage, whereas diagnostic ERCP may increase the risk of pancreatitis and cholecystitis in patients with cirrhosis. Comorbidities in cirrhosis patients may increase the risk of post-ERCP complications and mortality; therefore, use of ERCP in cirrhosis patients should be carefully considered, and further studies on this patient population are needed.


Asunto(s)
Colecistitis , Pancreatitis , Adulto , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Colecistitis/etiología , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/epidemiología , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Pancreatitis/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Am J Ther ; 29(4): e444-e446, 2022 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33590992

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: We report a case of acute pancreatitis that developed after four days of remdesivir therapy in a patient being treated for COVID-19. Despite improvement in patient's respiratory status, abdominal pain worsened and clinical signs and symptoms progressed to a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis 4 days after initiation of remdesivir therapy. Withdrawal of remdesivir paired with medical management of acute pancreatitis led to the resolution of pancreatitis within three days. To our knowledge, this is the first case report depicting remdesivir as a possible cause of acute pancreatitis.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Pancreatitis , Enfermedad Aguda , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Pancreatitis/inducido químicamente , Pancreatitis/diagnóstico
4.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 96(6): E585-E592, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32790163

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Cardiac transplant patients are at increased risk of Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy which requires percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: We aim to determine national epidemiology describing trends, mortality, and morbidity risks in patients with heart transplant undergoing PCI. METHODS: We used Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) data from 2002 to 2014 to identify adult hospitalizations with PCI using ICD 9 codes. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI), cardiac transplant status and complications were identified using validated ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. Endpoints were in-hospital mortality and peri-procedural complications. Propensity match analysis was performed to compare the end-points between DES and BMS. RESULTS: Total 8,613,900 patients underwent PCI, of which 1,531(0.002%) patients had prior heart transplant status. Among these 1,531 PCIs, 311(20%) were due to AMI including 125(8%) due to STEMI. 74% of PCIs were done in males and 78% of the PCIs were performed in the 60-79 age group. Out of 1,380 stents placed, 1,090 were DES (79%) and 290 (21%) were BMS. Mortality was higher in the BMS versus DES (8.34% vs. 3.45%, p = .012), CONCLUSION: We concluded that majority of the population who underwent PCI were older males. DES was used more than BMS. The use of BMS is associated with increased mortality, cardiac complications and Acute Kidney Injury requiring dialysis compared with DES which likely is representative of preferential use of DES in these patient population.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Trasplante de Corazón , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Femenino , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Corazón/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
5.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 96(6): E576-E584, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32725872

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to describe characteristics of liver transplant patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) as well as in-hospital outcomes including the mortality and peri-procedural complications from the largest publicly available inpatient database in the United States from 2002 to 2014. BACKGROUND: Outcomes of PCI are well studied in patients with end-stage liver disease but not well studied in patients who receive liver transplant (LT). METHODS: Data derived from Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) were analyzed for years 2002-2014. Adult Hospitalizations with PCI were identified using ICD-9-CM procedure codes. LT status and various complications were identified by using previously validated ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. Endpoints were in-hospital mortality and peri-procedural complications. Propensity match analysis was performed to compare the endpoints between two groups. RESULTS: During the study period, 8,595,836 patients underwent PCI; 4,080 (0.04%) patients had prior LT status. 93% of patients were above age 59 years, 79% were males and 69% were nonwhites. Out of the total patients with LT status, 73% had hypertension, 57% had diabetes mellitus, and 47% had renal failure. Post-PCI complications were studied further in both liver and non-LT patients after 1:1 propensity match which showed the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was higher in LT group (12.3 vs 10.7%, p = .024) but dialysis requiring AKI was similar. CONCLUSION: Among the LT recipients undergoing PCI, majority were nonwhite males. Almost more than half of the recipients had diabetes mellitus and renal failure. Incidence of AKI was higher in LT group, but other peri-procedural complications were comparable.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Incidencia , Pacientes Internos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Hígado/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
6.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 53(2): 81-88, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30383567

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic drainage (ED) with or without necrosectomy, and minimally invasive surgical necrosectomy (MISN) have been increasingly utilized for treatment of symptomatic sterile and infected pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). We conducted this systematic review to compare the safety of ED with MISN for management of WON. METHODS: We searched several databases from inception through November 9, 2017 to identify comparative studies evaluating the safety of ED versus MISN for management of WON. MISN could be performed using video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement or laparoscopy. We evaluated difference in mortality, major organ failure, adverse events, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Six studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 4 observational studies) with 641 patients (326 ED and 315 MISN) were included in this meta-analysis. Rates of mortality for ED and MISN were 8.5% and 14.2%, respectively. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval was 0.59 (0.35-0.98), I=0% in favor of ED. On subgroup analysis: no difference in mortality was seen based on randomized controlled trials [OR, 0.65 (0.08-5.11)], while ED had improved survival in observational studies [OR, 0.49 (0.27-0.89)]. Development of new major organ failure rates after interventions were 12% and 54% for ED and MISN, respectively. Pooled OR was 0.12 (0.06-0.31), I=25% in favor of ED. For adverse events, pooled OR was 0.25 (0.10-0.67), I=70% in favor of ED. There was no difference in risk of bleeding [OR, 0.68 (0.44-1.05)], while ED was associated with a significantly lower rate of pancreatic fistula formation [OR, 0.20 (0.11-0.37)], I=0%. Length of stay was also lower with ED, pooled mean difference was -21.07 (-36.97 to -5.18) days. CONCLUSIONS: When expertise is available, ED is the preferred invasive management strategy over MISN for management of WON as it is associated with lower mortality, risk of major organ failure, adverse events, and length of hospital stay.


Asunto(s)
Drenaje/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/terapia , Desbridamiento/métodos , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Endoscopía/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/patología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
7.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 53(9): e376-e381, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30614941

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been attracting attention lately as the most common hospital acquired infection. Patients with neutropenia because of malignancy seem to be at an increased risk for developing CDI. There is currently limited data that assesses the national burden and outcomes of CDI in Febrile Neutropenia (FN). METHODS: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for all subjects with discharge diagnosis of FN with or without CDI (ICD-9 codes 288.00, 288.03,780.60, and 008.45) as primary or secondary diagnosis during the period from 2008 to 2014. All analyses were performed with SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute). RESULTS: From 2008 to 2014 there were total 19422 discharges of FN patients with CDI. There was a rising incidence of CDI in patients with FN from 4.11% (in 2008) to 5.83% (in 2014). The In-hospital mortality showed a decreasing trend from 7.79% (in 2008) to 5.32% (in 2014), likely because of improvements in diagnostics and treatment. The overall mortality (6.37% vs. 4.61%), length of stay >5 days (76.45% vs. 50.98%), hospital charges >50,000 dollars (64.43% vs. 40.29%), colectomy and colostomy (0.35% vs. 0.15%), and discharge to skilled nursing facility (10.47% vs. 6.43%) was significantly more in FN patients with CDI versus without CDI over 7 years (2008 to 2014). Age above 65 years, Hispanic race, hematological malignancies, urban hospital settings, and sepsis were significant predictors of mortality in febrile neutropenia patients with CDI. DISCUSSION: Despite the significant decrease in mortality, the incidence of CDI is rising in hospitalized FN patients with underlying hematological malignancies. Risk factor modification, with the best possible empiric antibiotic regimen is imperative for reducing mortality and health care costs in this cohort.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Colitis/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Neutropenia Febril/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Clostridium/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Colitis/microbiología , Colitis/mortalidad , Colostomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Neutropenia Febril/epidemiología , Neutropenia Febril/etiología , Femenino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
8.
Am J Ther ; 26(4): e462-e468, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29683840

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV involves using antiretroviral drugs to prevent individuals at high risk from acquiring HIV infection. Most practicing primary care providers believe PrEP to be safe and effective, but less than half have prescribed or referred for PrEP. Attitudes and prescribing patterns among house officers have not been well described previously. STUDY QUESTION: Can an educational intervention enhance HIV PrEP practices among internal medicine house officers? STUDY DESIGN: This study relied on a pretest/posttest design. All categorical trainees at a medium-sized internal medicine program were offered a baseline survey to assess their knowledge on PrEP. This was followed by a PrEP-focused educational intervention and a postintervention survey. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Likert scales captured perceptions regarding safety, effectiveness, barriers, factors that would promote PrEP use, potential side effects, impact on risk-taking behavior, and provider comfort level in assessing behavioral risks and in PrEP prescribing. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Significance was accepted for P < 0.05. RESULTS: Forty-eight (100%) trainees participated in the educational session, 45 (94%) in a preintervention survey, and 36 (75%) in a postintervention survey. Before PrEP training, 22% of respondents were unaware of PrEP, 78% believed PrEP was effective, 66% believed PrEP was safe, 62% had fair or poor awareness of side effects; 18% of residents had referred for or prescribed PrEP, and 31% believed they were likely to prescribe PrEP in the next 6 months. After the intervention, 94% of trainees believed PrEP was effective (P < 0.001), 92% believed PrEP was safe (P < 0.001), and two-thirds believed they were likely to prescribe PrEP in the next 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Brief, focused training on HIV prevention promotes awareness, acceptance, and likelihood of prescribing PrEP by internal medicine trainees.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/educación , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Medicina Interna , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos
9.
Clin Infect Dis ; 64(2): 116-123, 2017 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27986669

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that among patients receiving vancomycin, receipt of concomitant piperacillin-tazobactam increases the risk of nephrotoxicity. Well-controlled, adequately powered studies comparing rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) among patients receiving vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) compared to similar patients receiving vancomycin + cefepime (VC) are lacking. In this study we compared the incidence of AKI among patients receiving combination therapy with VPT to a matched group receiving VC. METHODS: A retrospective, matched, cohort study was performed. Patients were eligible if they received combination therapy for ≥48 hours. Patients were excluded if their baseline serum creatinine was >1.2mg/dL or they were receiving renal replacement therapy. Patients receiving VC were matched to patients receiving VPT based on severity of illness, intensive care unit status, duration of combination therapy, vancomycin dose, and number of concomitant nephrotoxins. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI. Multivariate modeling was performed using Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: A total of 558 patients were included. AKI rates were significantly higher in the VPT group than the VC group (81/279 [29%] vs 31/279 [11%]). In multivariate analysis, therapy with VPT was an independent predictor for AKI (hazard ratio = 4.27; 95% confidence interval, 2.73-6.68). Among patients who developed AKI, the median onset was more rapid in the VPT group compared to the VC group (3 vs 5 days P =< .0001). CONCLUSION: The VPT combination was associated with both an increased AKI risk and a more rapid onset of AKI compared to the VC combination.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Cefalosporinas/efectos adversos , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Vancomicina/efectos adversos , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefepima , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Ácido Penicilánico/efectos adversos , Piperacilina/efectos adversos , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico
11.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 60(6): 3743-50, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27067325

RESUMEN

Despite their common use as an empirical combination therapy for the better part of a decade, there has been a recent association between combination therapy with vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam and high rates of acute kidney injury (AKI). The reasons for this increased association are unclear, and this analysis was designed to investigate the association. Retrospective cohort and case-control studies were performed. The primary objective was to assess if there is an association between extended-infusion piperacillin-tazobactam in combination with vancomycin and development of AKI. The secondary objectives were to identify risk factors for AKI in patients on the combination, regardless of infusion strategy, and to evaluate the impact of AKI on clinical outcomes. AKI occurred in 105/320 (33%) patients from the cohort receiving combination therapy with vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, with similar rates seen in those receiving intermittent (53/160 [33.1%]) and extended infusions (52/160 [32.5%]) of piperacillin-tazobactam. Independent risk factors for AKI in the cohort included having a documented Gram-positive infection, the presence of sepsis, receipt of a vancomycin loading dose (odds ratio [OR], 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05 to 4.71), and receipt of any concomitant nephrotoxin (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.41 to 4.22). For at-risk patients remaining on combination therapy, the highest rates of AKI occurred on days 4 (10.7%) and 5 (19.3%). The incidence of AKI in patients on combination therapy with vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam is high, occurring in 33% of patients. Receipt of piperacillin-tazobactam as an extended infusion did not increase this risk. Modifiable risk factors for AKI include receipt of a vancomycin loading dose, concomitant nephrotoxins, and longer durations of therapy.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Vancomicina/efectos adversos , Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Lesión Renal Aguda/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/patología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/patología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Michigan/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Penicilánico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Penicilánico/efectos adversos , Piperacilina/administración & dosificación , Piperacilina/efectos adversos , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vancomicina/administración & dosificación
12.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 87(5): 955-62, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26699085

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the in-hospital outcomes in cirrhosis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus those undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). BACKGROUND: Over the last 10 years, TAVR has emerged as a therapeutic option for treating severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients. Cirrhosis patients have a high risk of operative morbidity and mortality while undergoing cardiac surgery. This study's hypothesis was that TAVR is a safer alternative compared to SAVR in cirrhosis patients. METHODS: The study population was derived from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for the years 2011-2012 using ICD-9-CM procedure codes 35.21 and 35.22 for SAVR, and 35.05 and 35.06 for TAVR. Patients <50 years of age and those who concomitantly underwent other valvular procedures were excluded. ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes were used to identify patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and esophageal varices. Using propensity score matching, two matched cohorts were derived in which the outcomes were compared using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: There were 30 patients in the SAVR and TAVR group each. Compared to the TAVR group, the patients in SAVR group had significantly higher rate of transfusion of whole blood or blood products (p = 0.037), longer mean postprocedural length of stay (p = 0.006), and nonsignificantly higher mean cost of hospitalization (p = 0.2), any complications rate (p = 0.09), and liver complications rate (p = 0.4). In-hospital mortality rate was same in the both the groups. No patients in the TAVR group required open-heart surgery or cardiopulmonary bypass. CONCLUSION: TAVR could be a viable option for aortic valve replacement in cirrhosis patients.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/terapia , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Transfusión Sanguínea , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/economía , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios Transversales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/economía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
13.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 87(1): 23-33, 2016 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26032938

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We studied the trends and predictors of drug eluting stent (DES) utilization from 2006 to 2011 to further expound the inter-hospital variability in their utilization. BACKGROUND: We queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2006 and 2011 using ICD-9-CM procedure code, 36.06 (bare metal stent) or 36.07 (drug eluting stents) for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). Annual hospital volume was calculated using unique identification numbers and divided into quartiles for analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We built a hierarchical two level model adjusted for multiple confounding factors, with hospital ID incorporated as random effects in the model. About 665,804 procedures (weighted n = 3,277,884) were analyzed. Safety concerns arising in 2006 reduced utilization DES from 90% of all PCIs performed in 2006 to a nadir of 69% in 2008 followed by increase (76% of all stents in 2009) and plateau (75% in 2011). Significant between-hospital variation was noted in DES utilization irrespective of patient or hospital characteristics. Independent patient level predictors of DES were (OR, 95% CI, P-value) age (0.99, 0.98-0.99, <0.001), female(1.12, 1.09-1.15, <0.001), acute myocardial infarction(0.75, 0.71-0.79, <0.001), shock (0.53, 0.49-0.58, <0.001), Charlson Co-morbidity index (0.81,0.77-0.86, <0.001), private insurance/HMO (1.27, 1.20-1.34, <0.001), and elective admission (1.16, 1.05-1.29, <0.001). Highest quartile hospital (1.64, 1.25-2.16, <0.001) volume was associated with higher DES placement. CONCLUSION: There is significant between-hospital variation in DES utilization and a higher annual hospital volume is associated with higher utilization rate of DES. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Internos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/economía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Diseño de Prótesis , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
16.
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol ; 15(1): 92085, 2024 Apr 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38682025

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Short bowel syndrome (SBS) hospitalizations are often complicated with sepsis. There is a significant paucity of data on adult SBS hospitalizations in the United States and across the globe. AIM: To assess trends and outcomes of SBS hospitalizations complicated by sepsis in the United States. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was utilized to identify all adult SBS hospitalizations between 2005-2014. The study cohort was further divided based on the presence or absence of sepsis. Trends were identified, and hospitalization characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared. Predictors of mortality for SBS hospitalizations complicated with sepsis were assessed. RESULTS: Of 247097 SBS hospitalizations, 21.7% were complicated by sepsis. Septic SBS hospitalizations had a rising trend of hospitalizations from 20.8% in 2005 to 23.5% in 2014 (P trend < 0.0001). Compared to non-septic SBS hospitalizations, septic SBS hospitalizations had a higher proportion of males (32.8% vs 29.3%, P < 0.0001), patients in the 35-49 (45.9% vs 42.5%, P < 0.0001) and 50-64 (32.1% vs 31.1%, P < 0.0001) age groups, and ethnic minorities, i.e., Blacks (12.4% vs 11.3%, P < 0.0001) and Hispanics (6.7% vs 5.5%, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, septic SBS hospitalizations had a higher proportion of patients with intestinal transplantation (0.33% vs 0.22%, P < 0.0001), inpatient mortality (8.5% vs 1.4%, P < 0.0001), and mean length of stay (16.1 d vs 7.7 d, P < 0.0001) compared to the non-sepsis cohort. A younger age, female gender, White race, and presence of comorbidities such as anemia and depression were identified to be independent predictors of inpatient mortality for septic SBS hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: Septic SBS hospitalizations had a rising trend between 2005-2014 and were associated with higher inpatient mortality compared to non-septic SBS hospitalizations.

18.
Arch Med Sci ; 19(3): 600-607, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37313180

RESUMEN

Introduction: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is associated with gastrointestinal haemorrhage (GIH), which may result from coagulopathy, systemic inflammation, reduced gastric perfusion, and arteriovenous malformation from non-pulsatile blood flow. Data are limited regarding the burden of this complication in the United States. Material and methods: We analysed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for the years 2007 to 2011 to identify hospitalisations in which an ECMO procedure was performed. Hospitalizations complicated by GIH in this cohort were then identified by relevant codes. Results: Between 2007 and 2011, ECMO hospitalisations increased from 1869 to 3799 (p < 0.01). The proportion of hospitalisations complicated by GIH increased from 2.12% in 2007 to 7.46% in 2011 (p < 0.01). Gastrointestinal haemorrhage was more common in men (56.7%) and in Caucasians (57.4%). Common comorbidities in this population were renal failure (71%), anaemia (55%), and hypertension (26%). All-cause inpatient mortality showed a numerical but nonsignificant increase from 56.7% to 61.9% (p = 0.49). The average cost of care per hospitalisation with GIH associated with ECMO use increased from $132,420 in 2007 to $215,673 in 2011 (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Gastrointestinal haemorrhage during ECMO hospitalisations occurred in small but significantly increasing proportions. The inpatient mortality rate and costs associated with GIH were substantial and increased significantly during the study period.

19.
Cureus ; 14(5): e24755, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35686277

RESUMEN

Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a clinical condition characterized by the formation of painful lumps under the skin. It often affects intertriginous areas like armpits and groin. There is a paucity of contemporary data on patient and hospital-level characteristics of HS in the United States. Methods We analyzed the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) for retrospective analysis to calculate the frequency and yearly rates of HS hospitalizations, demographic variations, rates of comorbidities, and length of stay. Results The rate of hospitalizations with HS as a primary diagnosis increased from 7.9 per 100,000 all-cause hospitalizations in 2008 to 11.6 per 100,000 all-cause hospitalizations in 2017 (p < 0.0001). The mean age ± standard error of hospitalized patients was 39.5 ± 0.2 years. The age group of 18-34 years was the most affected. Women showed a higher preponderance of the disease than men (56.6% vs. 43.5%, p < 0.0001). The Black race was the most affected out of all the racial groups (59.9%). Most hospitalizations were in large, urban teaching hospitals. Hypertension (34.9%), skin and subcutaneous tissue infections (26.5%), and diabetes mellitus (25.9%) were the most common comorbidities. Out of the total hospitalizations with HS, 12.7% were found to have a major or extreme loss of function and 3.5% were at a major or extreme likelihood of dying. Conclusions HS disproportionately affects young adults, women, and Black patients. A significant proportion of these patients are at a major risk of major loss of bodily function or death. Prospective studies are needed to identify the risk factors for hospitalizations in these patient populations and devise appropriate prevention and treatment strategies.

20.
Cardiol Rev ; 29(6): 310-313, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33337656

RESUMEN

Uremic pericarditis occurs as a result of inflammation of the pericardium due to toxins and immune complexes in patients with renal disease. The initial clinical manifestations of pericarditis and acute coronary syndrome may be similar, and initial EKG findings may overlap. The management of this disease needs the combined efforts of internists, cardiologists, and nephrologists. Its incidence has been reduced since the introduction of renal replacement therapy. Dialysis continues to be the mainstay of treatment.


Asunto(s)
Pericarditis , Diálisis Renal , Uremia , Humanos , Incidencia , Pericarditis/epidemiología , Pericarditis/etiología , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Uremia/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA