Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Muscle Nerve ; 69(4): 409-415, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38323736

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) and myography (MRM) are emerging imaging methods for detecting diseases of the peripheral nerve system (PNS). Most patients with PNS diseases also undergo needle electromyography (EMG). This study examined whether EMG led to lesions that were detectable using MRN/MRM and whether these lesions could impair image interpretation. METHODS: Ten patients who underwent clinically indicated EMG were recruited. MRN/MRM was performed before and 2-6 h after EMG, and if achievable, 2-3 days later. T2 signal intensity (SI) of the tibialis anterior muscle (TA) was quantified, and sizes and SI of the new lesions were measured. Visual rating was performed independently by three neuroradiologists. RESULTS: T2 lesions at the site of needle insertion, defined as focal edema, were detectable in 9/10 patients. The mean edema size was 31.72 mm2 (SD = 14.42 mm2 ) at the first follow-up. Susceptibility-weighted imaging lesions, defined as (micro) hematomas were detected in 5/10 patients (mean size, 23.85 mm2 [SD = 12.59 mm2 ]). General muscle SI of the TA did not differ between pre- and post-EMG examinations. Lesions size was relatively small, and the readers described image interpretation as not impaired by these lesions. DISCUSSION: This study showed that focal edema and hematomas frequently occurred after needle EMG and could be observed using MRN/MRM. As general muscle SI was not affected and image interpretation was not impaired, we concluded that needle EMG did not interfere with MRN/MRM.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Humanos , Electromiografía , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Miografía , Edema , Hematoma
2.
Ann Surg ; 276(2): 215-221, 2022 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36036988

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Predicting R status before surgery for pancreatic cancer (PDAC) patients with upfront surgery and neoadjuvant therapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Negative surgical margins (R0) are a key predictor of long-term outcomes in PDAC. METHODS: Patients undergoing pancreatic resection with curative intent for PDAC were identified. Using the CT scans from the time of diagnosis, the 2019 NCCN borderline resectability criteria were compared to novel criteria: presence of any alteration of the superior mesenteric-portal vein (SMPV) and perivascular stranding of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Accuracy of predicting R status was evaluated for both criteria. Patient baseline characteristics, surgical, histopathological parameters, and long-term overall survival (OS) after resection were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 593 patients undergoing pancreatic resections for PDAC between 2010 and 2018 were identified. Three hundred and twenty-five (54.8%) patients underwent upfront surgery, whereas 268 (45.2%) received neoadjuvant therapy. In upfront resected patients, positive SMA stranding was associated with 56% margin positive resection rates, whereas positive SMA stranding and SMPV alterations together showed a margin positive resection rate of 75%. In contrast to these criteria, the 2019 NCCN borderline criteria failed to predict margin status. In patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, only perivascular SMA stranding remained a predictor of margin positive resection, leading to a rate of 33% R+ resections. Perivascular SMA stranding was related to higher clinical T stage (P = 0.003) and clinical N stage (P = 0.043) as well as perineural invasion (P = 0.022). SMA stranding was associated with worse survival in both patients undergoing upfront surgery (36 vs 22 months, P = 0.002) and neoadjuvant therapy (47 vs 34 months, P = 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: The novel criteria were accurate predictors of R status in PDAC patients undergoing upfront resection. After neoadjuvant treatment, likelihood of positive resection margins is approximately halved, and only perivascular SMA stranding remained a predictive factor.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirugía , Humanos , Márgenes de Escisión , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
3.
Pancreatology ; 21(5): 957-964, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33775565

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) can be associated with severe postoperative morbidity. This study aims to develop a preoperative POPF risk calculator that can be easily implemented in clinical routine. METHODS: Patients undergoing PD were identified from a prospectively-maintained database. A total of 11 preoperative baseline and CT-based radiological parameters were used in a binominal logistic regression model. Parameters remaining predictive for grade B/C POPF were entered into the risk calculator and diagnostic accuracy measures and ROC curves were calculated for a training and a test patient cohort. The risk calculator was transformed into a simple nomogram. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients undergoing PD in the period from 2012 to 2018 were included. CT-imaging-based maximum main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter (p = 0.047), CT-imaging-based pancreatic gland diameter at the anticipated resection margin (p = 0.002) and gender (p = 0.058) were the parameters most predictive for grade B/C POPF. Based on these parameters, a risk calculator was developed to identify patients at high risk of developing grade B/C POPF. In a training cohort of PD patients this risk calculator was associated with an AUC of 0.808 (95%CI 0.726-0.874) and an AUC of 0.756 (95%CI 0.669-0-830) in the independent test cohort. A nomogram applicable as a visual risk scale for quick assessment of POPF grade B/C risk was developed. CONCLUSION: The preoperative POPF risk calculator provides a simple tool to stratify patients planned for PD according to the risk of developing postoperative grade B/C POPF. The nomogram visual risk scale can be easily integrated into clinical routine and may be a valuable model to select patients for POPF-preventive therapy or as a stratification tool for clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Fístula Pancreática , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Humanos , Páncreas/cirugía , Conductos Pancreáticos/cirugía , Fístula Pancreática/epidemiología , Fístula Pancreática/etiología , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Pancreatology ; 21(1): 155-162, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33309623

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive gastrointestinal malignancy characterized by early loco-regional invasion. Portal vein resection (PVR) during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for PDAC is performed if tumor cell invasion to the venous wall (PVI) is suspected. The aim of this study is to evaluate radiological criteria for predicting PVR and PVI. METHODS: Patients undergoing PD for PDAC were identified from a prospectively maintained database. On the basis of CT- and MRI-based imaging portal vein tumor contact (PV), stranding of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and any alterations of the superior mesenterico-portal vein (SMPV) were evaluated. The accuracy of PVI and PVR prediction based on the radiological parameters was calculated. RESULTS: 143 patients were included in the study. 48 patients underwent PVR (34%), PVI was diagnosed in 23 patients (16%). Median overall survival was 22 months. Prediction of PVR (sensitivity 79%, negative predictive value 88%, p = 0.010) and PVI (sensitivity 95%, negative predictive value 99%, p = 0.002) was most accurate for any SMPV alterations as compared to the other radiological parameters. SMPV alterations qualified as an independent prognostic parameter (26.5 months vs. 33.5months, p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Radiological evaluation of any SMPV alterations is a simple preoperative method to accurately predict PVI. Assessing SMPV alterations may help to identify candidates for neoadjuvant therapy.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Porta/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Venas Mesentéricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Vena Porta/cirugía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
5.
Psychother Res ; 30(2): 267-278, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30309293

RESUMEN

Objective: Childhood maltreatment, interpersonal fear and a specific kind of interpersonal skills deficit (preoperational thinking) have all been associated with persistent depressive disorder (PDD). We hypothesize that interpersonal fears mediate the association between childhood maltreatment and preoperational thinking.Method: A total of 108 matched participants have been examined cross-sectionally (31 healthy controls, 30 patients with episodic depression and 47 patients with PDD) with the following instruments: the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ-SF), a measure of interpersonal fear (CBASP Interpersonal Questionnaire) and the Lübeck Questionnaire of Preoperational Thinking.Results: Patients with PDD reported significantly more childhood maltreatment than patients with episodic depression (d = 0.65) and healthy controls (d = 1.29). They also had more interpersonal fears (d = 0.71 and d = 2.11 respectively) and higher levels of preoperational thinking (d = 0.90 and d = 2.78 respectively). The association between childhood maltreatment and preoperational thinking was mediated through interpersonal fears.Conclusions: Our findings might have important implications for psychotherapy of PDD because they demonstrate how specific problems in social interactions can be associated with interpersonal fears that arise secondary to childhood maltreatment.


Asunto(s)
Adultos Sobrevivientes del Maltrato a los Niños , Experiencias Adversas de la Infancia , Trastorno Depresivo/fisiopatología , Miedo/fisiología , Trauma Psicológico/fisiopatología , Interacción Social , Habilidades Sociales , Pensamiento/fisiología , Adulto , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
6.
Eur J Pediatr Surg ; 33(4): 319-327, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35853469

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the upper extremity are common traumatic injuries in children. Nerve lesions are a rare but typical complication of these fractures. Additional to physical, electrophysiological, and sonographic examinations, magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) can be used to assess the degree and exact localization of nerve damage. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the potential role of this examination technique for children and to test a proposed MRN classification of traumatic nerve injury according to Chhabra in a pediatric cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pediatric patients undergoing MRN for traumatic nerve injury from January 2016 to December 2020 were retrospectively identified. A total of 12 consecutive patients with sufficient clinical data, an MRN, and if available follow-up examination were enrolled and analyzed. RESULTS: In 10 of 12 cases one or more nerve lesions could be identified by MRN using the classification proposed by Chhabra et al. MRN was used to assess nerve injuries, imaging results were compared with clinical course. Clinical follow-up examinations of 10 patients showed an overall good clinical recovery, even in one case with severe trauma and nerve surgery. CONCLUSION: MRN as a noninvasive procedure can help in the evaluation of nerve injury, especially for the identification of lower grade nerve damage and to objectify suspected nerve damage in case of uncertain clinical examination results; thus, can help in decision making whether surgical revision or conservative treatment is preferable.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/patología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/cirugía , Extremidad Superior/patología , Ultrasonografía
7.
J Neurol ; 270(5): 2349-2359, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36820915

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infection which can affect the central nervous system. In this study, we sought to investigate associations between neuroimaging findings with clinical, demographic, blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters, pre-existing conditions and the severity of acute COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective multicenter data retrieval from 10 university medical centers in Germany, Switzerland and Austria between February 2020 and September 2021. We included patients with COVID-19, acute neurological symptoms and cranial imaging. We collected demographics, neurological symptoms, COVID-19 severity, results of cranial imaging, blood and CSF parameters during the hospital stay. RESULTS: 442 patients could be included. COVID-19 severity was mild in 124 (28.1%) patients (moderate n = 134/30.3%, severe n = 43/9.7%, critical n = 141/31.9%). 220 patients (49.8%) presented with respiratory symptoms, 167 (37.8%) presented with neurological symptoms first. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) was detected in 70 (15.8%), intracranial hemorrhage (IH) in 48 (10.9%) patients. Typical risk factors were associated with AIS; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy and invasive ventilation with IH. No association was found between the severity of COVID-19 or blood/CSF parameters and the occurrence of AIS or IH. DISCUSSION: AIS was the most common finding on cranial imaging. IH was more prevalent than expected but a less common finding than AIS. Patients with IH had a distinct clinical profile compared to patients with AIS. There was no association between AIS or IH and the severity of COVID-19. A considerable proportion of patients presented with neurological symptoms first. Laboratory parameters have limited value as a screening tool.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/complicaciones , Hemorragias Intracraneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragias Intracraneales/epidemiología , Hemorragias Intracraneales/etiología , Neuroimagen , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología
8.
Front Psychiatry ; 11: 652, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32733297

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Deficits in social cognition, referred to as preoperational thinking, are assumed to play a key role in the pathogenesis of persistent depression. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of preoperational thinking on the two-year course of depressive symptoms in a sample of persistently depressed, episodically depressed as well as healthy participants. METHODS: We recruited 43 persistently depressed participants, 26 episodically depressed participants and 16 healthy control participants. Preoperational thinking was assessed at baseline with the Luebeck Questionnaire for Recording Preoperational Thinking. Over the period of two years, the course of depressive symptom severity was measured every three months using the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology. RESULTS: Using linear mixed model analysis we found a significant effect for the influence of preoperational thinking on the severity of depressive symptoms in the observation period. We found a non-significant statistical trend for an association of preoperational thinking with the change of depressive symptom severity. CONCLUSION: Our analyses suggest that a high degree of preoperational thinking is associated with a higher severity of depressive symptoms and possibly less symptom improvement. These findings support the notion that preoperational thinking is a relevant factor for the further course of depression and might indeed contribute to the maintenance of persistent depression.

9.
Cancers (Basel) ; 12(4)2020 Apr 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32260453

RESUMEN

Background: Borderline resectability in pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is currently debated. Methods: Patients undergoing pancreatic resections for PDAC were identified from a prospectively maintained database. As new borderline criteria, the presence of any superior mesenterico-portal vein alteration (SMPV) and perivascular stranding of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) was evaluated in preoperative imaging. The accuracy of established radiological borderline criteria as compared to the new borderline criteria in predicting R status (sensitivity/negative predictive value) and overall survival was assessed. (3) Results: 118 patients undergoing pancreatic resections for PDAC from 2013 to 2018 were identified. Forty-three (36.4%) had radiological perivascular SMA stranding and 55 (46.6%) had SMPV alterations. Interrater reliability was 90% for SMA stranding and 87% for SMPV alterations. The new borderline definition including SMPV alterations and perivascular SMA stranding was the best predictor of conventional R status (p = 0.040, sensitivity 53%, negative predictive value 81%) and Leeds/Wittekind circumferential margin status (p = 0.050, sensitivity 73%, negative predictive value 79%) as compared to established borderline resectability definition criteria. Perivascular SMA stranding qualified as an independent negative prognostic parameter (HR 3.066, 95% CI 1.078-5.716, p = 0.036). Conclusion: The radiological evaluation of any SMPV alteration and perivascular SMA stranding predicts R status and overall survival in PDAC patients, and may serve to identify potential candidates for neoadjuvant therapy.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA