RESUMEN
Introduction The knee joint, an extraordinary feat of biomechanics, is prone to injuries, with the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) often being a common victim. The intricate coordination of joint movements relies heavily on the ACL's screw-home mechanism, a crucial element for synchronizing knee movement with neighboring joints. Despite its indispensable role, the ACL is susceptible to injury, necessitating surgical intervention. While many patients experience positive outcomes following ACL reconstruction surgeries, a significant proportion face the challenge of procedure failure. The key to success lies in the healing process within the tibial and femoral bone tunnels. The post-ACL reconstruction phase introduces its own set of challenges, particularly in the context of returning to sports (RTS), underscoring the importance of reinstating neuromuscular and motor function. The trajectory of rehabilitation is influenced by factors such as graft healing, patient age, gender, pain levels, and concurrent injuries. Materials and methods This prospective observational study spanned 2.5 years, enrolling 71 patients with diagnosed ACL injuries. Arthroscopic reconstruction utilized hamstring autografts and peroneus longus autografts. A nine-month post-surgery follow-up employed the Lysholm scoring system for comprehensive evaluations. Results Over 2.5 years, 87.3% of male and 12.6% of female participants underwent arthroscopic reconstruction. Lysholm scores revealed 28.1% excellent, 45.0% good, and 26.7% fair outcomes, with no participants in the unsatisfactory range. Lysholm scores demonstrated positive outcomes, indicating the efficacy of arthroscopic reconstruction in enhancing knee function. Findings align with existing literature, emphasizing positive results from ACL reconstruction techniques and specific implants. Comparisons with related studies highlight challenges in standardized return-to-sport guidelines and underscore the need for outcome measure standardization. Conclusion The study contributes nuanced insights into ACL reconstruction outcomes, emphasizing positive functional recovery trends at the nine-month follow-up. Lysholm scores indicate favorable outcomes, supporting the procedure's effectiveness. Consideration of specific implants adds practical value. Despite limitations, this study enriches ACL reconstruction research, promoting advancements in patient care and outcomes. Ongoing research with extended follow-ups and larger cohorts will enhance understanding and refine ACL reconstruction strategies.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Rotator cuff tears frequently lead to shoulder pain and impaired function, often necessitating surgical intervention to achieve the best results. The choice between mini-open and all-arthroscopic techniques remains a subject of debate, with each approach offering unique advantages and challenges. This study seeks to evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of surgical repair utilizing these two techniques, offering valuable insights into their relative effectiveness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted at Shree Krishna Hospital, Karamsad, involving patients treated surgically for rotator cuff tears over the past five years. Clinical records were reviewed to identify patients who underwent either mini-open or all-arthroscopic repair. Follow-up assessments were conducted using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) score and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. A statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients were included, with 16 undergoing mini-open repair and 17 undergoing all-arthroscopic repair. The mean follow-up duration was 31.06 months for mini-open repair and 20.4 months for all-arthroscopic repair. No statistically significant variances were observed in the postoperative Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) scores or Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores between the two groups. Both techniques demonstrated satisfactory functional recovery and pain relief at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence of comparable outcomes between mini-open and all-arthroscopic techniques for rotator cuff repair. Despite limitations such as a small sample size and the subjective nature of Quick DASH scores, both approaches offer promising results in terms of functional improvement and pain reduction. Further research is needed to assess short-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and patient satisfaction, but our findings support the continued use of both techniques in clinical practice.
RESUMEN
Background and aim Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries often occur along with menisci tears. ACL reconstruction with meniscectomy has long been the preferred technique for such injuries; however, it has been postulated to increase the chances of osteoarthritis (OA). Therefore, recent techniques have involved preserving menisci while reconstructing ACL to prevent OA and improve overall functional outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes of arthroscopic meniscal repair performed concurrently with ACL reconstruction at six months post-surgery. Methodology We conducted a cross-sectional study at a tertiary care center after getting appropriate ethics committee approval. A total of 67 participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study after obtaining informed consent. Their demographics were recorded retrospectively from hospital records, while their Lysholm Knee Score (LKS) responses were collected prospectively during their sixth-month follow-up visit to our department. Analysis was done using Microsoft Excel. Appropriate statistical tests including chi-square, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and independent t-tests were applied to keep an alpha of 0.05. Results We found that the mean age of participants was 35 years. The mean LKS of patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction (ACLR) was 86.02 ± 9.38. For those who underwent ACLR plus meniscus repair (MR), the mean LKS was marginally higher at 87.4 ± 7.41 during their sixth-month follow-up, with a P-value of 0.27. Furthermore, the mean LKS of patients who underwent ACLR plus meniscectomy was 86 ± 10.48. Comparing the means of all three groups revealed no statistical difference among any surgical approach with a P-value of 0.69. A total of 33 (49.25%) participants achieved an LKS falling within the Good category (84-94). Comparing between three surgical groups and their LKS categories also revealed no statistical difference with a P-value of 0.7. Conclusions Short-term functional outcomes in patients undergoing ACLR or ACLR plus MR using patient-reported knee scores like LKS demonstrate favorable outcomes but fail to demonstrate statistical significance. On a longer follow-up period, a reduction in the prevalence of OA is a possibility with the preservation of menisci; however, conflicting evidence in the literature about the approach to ACL injuries with menisci involvement warrants large-scale randomized controlled trials to decide upon the standard of care.
RESUMEN
Sensorineural hearing loss is relatively well established in the squamosal chronic otitis media. However, its association with mucosal COM is still debated. The present study aimed at evaluating the prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss in unilateral mucosal COM. The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, and 60 patients with unilateral mucosal chronic otitis media were recruited. Pure tone thresholds were ascertained for air and bone conduction in an acoustically treated room and matched against certain patient and disease characteristics. In this study, the combined prevalence of SNHL/Mixed Hearing loss in mucosal COM was found to be 8.3%. A statistically significant association between SNHL/Mixed HL was seen in the 40-50-year age group (p-0.004). Prevalence with a disease duration of more than 10 years was 33% (p-0.019). All the patients who presented with SNHL/Mixed HL had an actively discharging ear. 80% of the patients who presented with SNHL/Mixed HL had large perforations. SNHL/Mixed HL prevalence of 28.6% was found in smokers, compared to 5.7% in non-smokers (p-0.039). The risk of developing SNHL/Mixed HL increased with increasing patients' age, disease duration, and size of the perforation and smokers.
RESUMEN
Introduction The role of endoscopes in the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) field has been described since the 1980s; It started with endoscopic nasal surgeries, followed by otological and laryngological procedures, and, since then, it has experienced a rapid evolution. Endoscopes help otologists understand how to approach difficult areas of middle ear, as well as the physiology of middle ear cleft. Objectives Despite the introduction of endoscopes in the field of otology, microscopes are still widely used in clinics and in operation theaters either alone or with endoscopes. The present study, which was conducted amongst otologists in India, is on their experience with and knowledge of the use of the endoscope compared to microscopes. Methods A Google form-based questionnaire comprising 18 questions was developed and sent online to otologist all over the country. The final dataset included responses from 354 active otologists. Results Out of 354 participants, only 3% had more than 5 years of experience in endoscopic ear surgery (EES), and 16.1% had never worked with an endoscope. Endoscopes were used in clinics and in operation theaters by 74.9% of the participants. Conclusion There has been a rise in the acceptance and use of endoscopes among Indian otologists and otology surgeons in last few decades.
RESUMEN
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a prevalent head and neck cancer, especially in Southeast Asia. Although its potential for distant metastasis is well established, metastasis to the breast has seldom been reported. To the best of our knowledge, this is the fourth report of a case of nasopharyngeal carcinoma metastasizing to bilateral breasts. A 35-year-old patient presented with left nasal obstruction, epistaxis, and a palpable mass in her left breast, without any cervical or axillary lymph nodal enlargement. Radiological examination with contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance and imaging of breast revealed the presence of enhancing mass lesions in bilateral breasts. Histopathology of the nasal mass was suggestive of undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Breast fine needle aspiration revealed an abundance of metastatic squamous cells. Immunohistochemistry examination was positive for chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and cluster of differentiation-56, confirming the diagnosis of a primary nasopharyngeal malignancy metastasizing to bilateral breasts. Differentiation between metastatic disease and a coexisting second primary is imperative for planning appropriate treatment and defining the further outcomes.
RESUMEN
Abstract Introduction The role of endoscopes in the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) field has been described since the 1980s; It started with endoscopic nasal surgeries, followed by otological and laryngological procedures, and, since then, it has experienced a rapid evolution. Endoscopes help otologists understand how to approach difficult areas of middle ear, as well as the physiology of middle ear cleft. Objectives Despite the introduction of endoscopes in the field of otology, microscopes are still widely used in clinics and in operation theaters either alone or with endoscopes. The present study, which was conducted amongst otologists in India, is on their experience with and knowledge of the use of the endoscope compared to microscopes. Methods A Google form-based questionnaire comprising 18 questions was developed and sent online to otologist all over the country. The final dataset included responses from 354 active otologists. Results Out of 354 participants, only 3% had more than 5 years of experience in endoscopic ear surgery (EES), and 16.1% had never worked with an endoscope. Endoscopes were used in clinics and in operation theaters by 74.9% of the participants. Conclusion There has been a rise in the acceptance and use of endoscopes among Indian otologists and otology surgeons in last few decades.