Adequate versus deep response to ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis: To what extent and under what conditions is normal alkaline phosphatase level associated with complication-free survival gain?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Normal alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels in ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)-treated patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are associated with better long-term outcome. However, second-line therapies are currently recommended only when ALP levels remain above 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (×ULN) after 12-month UDCA. We assessed whether, in patients considered good responders to UDCA, normal ALP levels were associated with significant survival gains. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 1047 patients with PBC who attained an adequate response to UDCA according to Paris-2 criteria. Time to liver-related complications, liver transplantation, or death was assessed using adjusted restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis. The overall incidence rate of events was 17.0 (95% CI: 13.7-21.1) per 1000 out of 4763.2 patient-years. On the whole population, normal serum ALP values (but not normal gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or aspartate aminotransferase (AST); or total bilirubin < 0.6 ×ULN) were associated with a significant absolute complication-free survival gain at 10 years (mean 7.6 months, 95% CI: 2.7 - 12.6 mo.; p = 0.003). In subgroup analysis, this association was significant in patients with a liver stiffness measurement ≥ 10 kPa and/or age ≤ 62 years, with a 10-year absolute complication-free survival gain of 52.8 months (95% CI: 45.7-59.9, p < 0.001) when these 2 conditions were met. CONCLUSIONS: PBC patients with an adequate response to UDCA and persistent ALP elevation between 1.1 and 1.5 ×ULN, particularly those with advanced fibrosis and/or who are sufficiently young, remain at risk of poor outcome. Further therapeutic efforts should be considered for these patients.

Obeticholic acid as a second-line treatment for low phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Low phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis (LPAC) syndrome is a rare genetic cause of hepatolithiasis. A pathogenic variant of the ABCB4 gene is reported in half of all patients. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the only drug approved. However, in some patients, UDCA fails to prevent recurrence of symptoms and complications. Experimental evidence suggests that agonists of the farnesoid-X receptor (FXR), the main transcription factor regulating ABCB4, may be beneficial in this context. AIM: To study the efficacy of obeticholic acid (OCA) in patients with LPAC syndrome with an inadequate response or intolerance to UDCA. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with LPAC syndrome treated with OCA, a selective FXR agonist. RESULTS: We reviewed the records of five OCA-treated patients (4 women; median age 29; ABCB4 variant in 4; no hepatic fibrosis). All patients received OCA at an initial dose of 5 mg daily and then 10 mg daily for a median period of 36 months in combination with UDCA (4 patients) or as a monotherapy (one patient). There were no adverse effects reported. Four patients had improvement in their symptoms - three completely and one partially. One patient had no clinical benefit. Abnormalities of blood liver tests persisted in one patient despite resolution of symptoms. Radiological signs of hepatolithiasis persisted in three of the four patients who responded clinically to OCA. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary observations suggest that OCA may have the potential to effectively treat LPAC syndrome in patients with inadequate response or intolerance to UDCA. Larger studies are needed to confirm these data.

The necroptosis-inducing pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase domain-like regulates the adipogenic differentiation of pre-adipocytes.

Receptor-interacting protein kinase-3 (RIPK3) and mixed lineage kinase domain-like (MLKL) proteins are key regulators of necroptosis, a highly pro-inflammatory mode of cell death, which has been involved in various human diseases. Necroptotic-independent functions of RIPK3 and MLKL also exist, notably in the adipose tissue but remain poorly defined. Using knock-out (KO) cell models, we investigated the role of RIPK3 and MLKL in adipocyte differentiation. Mlkl-KO abolished white adipocyte differentiation via a strong expression of Wnt10b, a ligand of the Wnt/ß-catenin pathway, and a downregulation of genes involved in lipid metabolism. This effect was not recapitulated by the ablation of Ripk3. Conversely, Mlkl and Ripk3 deficiencies did not block beige adipocyte differentiation. These findings indicate that RIPK3 and MLKL have distinct roles in adipogenesis. The absence of MLKL blocks the differentiation of white, but not beige, adipocytes highlighting the therapeutic potential of MLKL inhibition in obesity.

[Primary biliary cholangitis]. / Cholangite biliaire primitive.

PRIMARY BILIARY CHOLANGITIS Primary biliary cholangitis (formally primary biliary cirrhosis, PBC) is the most common chronic cholestatic liver disease in humans. It is a presumed autoimmune liver disease, characterized by inflammation and progressive destruction of small bile ducts. Without treatment, PBC progresses towards liver fibrosis and, ultimately, cirrhosis. Women older than 40 are more likely affected. Pruritus and tiredness are the most common symptoms but they are frequently lacking. Diagnosis is made by the association of chronic biochemical features of cholestasis (parallel increase in ALP and GGT) and presence of specific auto-antibodies (particularly M2 anti-mitochondrial antibodies). Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), which is the standard of care treatment for PBC, has dramatically improved the prognosis of the disease. However, 30 % to 40 % of patients have an inadequate biochemical response to UDCA and continue to be at high-risk of complications. In this situation, second-line treatments, including obeticholic acid or fibrates, should be considered in association with UDCA.

CHOLANGITE BILIAIRE PRIMITIVE La cholangite biliaire primitive (ou anciennement cirrhose biliaire primitive, CBP) est la maladie cholestatique chronique la plus fréquente. Il s'agit d'une affection présumée auto-immune caractérisée par une inflammation et une destruction progressive des petits canaux biliaires, aboutissant, en l'absence de traitement, à une fibrose hépatique puis à une cirrhose. Elle atteint majoritairement les femmes (90 % des cas) de plus de 40 ans. Les signes cliniques révélateurs (prurit et asthénie) sont inconstants et peu spécifiques. Le diagnostic repose sur l'association d'une cholestase biologique (élévation concomitante des PAL et de la GGT) chronique et la présence d'auto-anticorps spécifiques (en particulier anti-mitochondrie de type 2). Le traitement de référence est l'acide ursodésoxycholique (AUDC) qui a fortement amélioré le pronostic de la CBP. Dans 30 à 40 % des cas, la réponse biologique à l'AUDC est insuffisante et des traitements complémentaires sont nécessaires, parmi lesquels figurent actuellement l'acide obéticholique et les fibrates.

Combination of fibrates with obeticholic acid is able to normalise biochemical liver tests in patients with difficult-to-treat primary biliary cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: Obeticholic acid (OCA) and fibrates are second-line therapies for patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) with an inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). AIM: To know whether OCA and fibrates, administered together in combination with UDCA, have additive beneficial effects in patients with difficult-to-treat PBC. METHODS: PBC patients treated for ≥3 months with UDCA, OCA and fibrates (bezafibrate or fenofibrate) due to failure of either second-line therapy were included in a multicentre, uncontrolled retrospective cohort study. Changes in biochemical liver tests and pruritus were analysed using a generalised linear mixed-effect model. RESULTS: Among 58 patients included, half received OCA as second-line and fibrates as third-line therapy (Group OCA-Fibrate), while the other half had the inverse therapeutic sequence (Group Fibrate-OCA). The mean duration of triple therapy was 11 months (range 3-26). Compared to dual therapy, triple therapy was associated with a significant gain in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) reduction: 22% per first year (95% CI 12%-31%), an effect that was stronger in OCA-Fibrate than in Fibrate-OCA group. Triple therapy was associated with a 3.4 (95% CI 1.4-8.2) odds ratio (OR) of reaching normal ALP and with a significant decrease in gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and total bilirubin. The ORs of achieving the Paris-2 and Toronto criteria of adequate biochemical response were 6.8 (95% CI 2.8-16.7) and 9.2 (95% CI 3.4-25.1) respectively. Finally, triple therapy significantly improved pruritus in OCA-Fibrate but not in Fibrate-OCA group. CONCLUSIONS: Triple therapy with UDCA, OCA and fibrates is able to normalise biochemical liver tests and improve pruritus in patients with difficult-to-treat PBC.

In Vitro and In Vivo Models of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Critical Appraisal.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), including non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), represents the hepatic manifestation of obesity and metabolic syndrome. Due to the spread of the obesity epidemic, NAFLD is becoming the most common chronic liver disease and one of the principal indications for liver transplantation. However, no pharmacological treatment is currently approved to prevent the outbreak of NASH, which leads to fibrosis and cirrhosis. Preclinical research is required to improve our knowledge of NAFLD physiopathology and to identify new therapeutic targets. In the present review, we summarize advances in NAFLD preclinical models from cellular models, including new bioengineered platforms, to in vivo models, with a particular focus on genetic and dietary mouse models. We aim to discuss the advantages and limits of these different models.

Systematic switch from innovator infliximab to biosimilar infliximab in inflammatory chronic diseases in daily clinical practice: The experience of Cochin University Hospital, Paris, France.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate effectiveness of systematic switching treatment from innovator infliximab to biosimilar infliximab, and its associated factors. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, all adult patients receiving maintenance therapy with innovator infliximab in Cochin University Hospital were systematically switched to biosimilar infliximab. Effectiveness was assessed by the retention rate of biosimilar infliximab at the time of the third infusion. Sensitivity analyses for effectiveness included changes of disease activity parameters and infliximab trough levels between baseline and the last visit as well as the occurrence of adverse events leading to drug discontinuation. Factors associated with biosimilar infliximab discontinuation at the last visit were explored. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including 31 rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 131 axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and 64 inflammatory bowel diseases. The retention rate was 85% (221/260 patients) at the time of the third biosimilar infusion. Between baseline and the last visit (mean follow-up of 34 weeks), 59 patients (23%) discontinued biosimilar infliximab, mainly due to experienced inefficacy (n = 47, 80%). No clinical or biological factors were associated with biosimilar discontinuation. No serious adverse events occurred. No change in objective disease activity parameters or infliximab trough levels was detected. However, a significant increase of BASDAI (2.94 ± 2.20 vs. 3.18 ± 2.21, P = 0.046, before vs. after switch, respectively) was observed in patients with axSpA. Innovator infliximab was re-established in 47/59 patients (80%). CONCLUSION: No changes in drug trough levels or objective parameters were observed after the systematic switch to biosimilar infliximab in a real clinical practice setting. Only changes in patient-reported outcomes were observed, suggesting attribution effects rather than pharmacological differences.