In AF, CHA2DS2-VASc 1 subgroups did not differ for predicting risk for arterial thromboembolism at 1 y.

SOURCE CITATION: Østergaard L, Olesen JB, Petersen JK, et al. Arterial thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and CHA2DS2-VASc 1: a nationwide study. Circulation. 2024;149:764-773. 38152890.

Atrial Fibrillation Detection and Load: Knowledge Gaps Related to Stroke Prevention.

Atrial fibrillation is a major cause of ischemic stroke. Technological advances now support prolonged cardiac rhythm monitoring using either surface electrodes or insertable cardiac monitors. Four major randomized controlled trials show that prolonged cardiac monitoring detects subclinical paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in 9% to 16% of patients with ischemic stroke, including in patients with potential alternative causes such as large artery disease or small vessel occlusion; however, the optimal monitoring strategy, including the target patient population and the monitoring device (whether to use an event monitor, insertable cardiac monitor, or stepped approach) has not been well defined. Furthermore, the clinical significance of very short duration paroxysmal atrial fibrillation remains controversial. The relevance of the duration of monitoring, burden of device-detected atrial fibrillation, and its proximity to the acute ischemic stroke will require more research to define the most effective methods for stroke prevention in this patient population.

Patent Foramen Ovale Management for Secondary Stroke Prevention: State-of-the-Art Appraisal of Current Evidence.

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is frequently identified in young patients with ischemic stroke. Randomized controlled trials provide robust evidence supporting PFO closure in selected patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke; however, several questions remain unanswered. This report summarizes current knowledge on the epidemiology of PFO-associated stroke, the role of PFO as a cause of stroke, and anatomic high-risk features. We also comment on breakthrough developments in patient selection algorithms for PFO closure in relation to the PFO-associated stroke causal likelihood risk stratification system. We further highlight areas for future research in PFO-associated stroke including the efficacy and safety of PFO closure in the elderly population, incidence, and long-term consequences of atrial fibrillation post-PFO closure, generalizability of the results of clinical trials in the real world, and the need for assessing the effect of neurocardiology teams on adherence to international recommendations. Other important knowledge gaps such as sex, race/ethnicity, and regional disparities in access to diagnostic technologies, PFO closure devices, and clinical outcomes in the real world are also discussed as priority research topics.

Neurologists Preferences on Basic and Advanced Cardiac Imaging Utilization in Ischemic Stroke Patients.

INTRODUCTION: It is unknown how cardiac imaging studies are used by neurologists to investigate cardioembolic sources in ischemic stroke patients. METHODS: Between August 12, 2023, and December 8, 2023, we conducted an international survey among neurologists from Europe, North America, South America, and Asia, to investigate the frequency of utilization of cardiac imaging studies for the detection of cardioembolic sources of ischemic stroke. Questions were structured into deciles of percentage utilization of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), ECG-gated cardiac computed tomography (G-CCT), and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). We estimated the weighted proportion (x¯) of utilization of each cardiac imaging modality, both globally and by continent. We also investigated the use of head and neck computed tomography angiography (CTA) as an emerging approach to the screening of cardioembolic sources. RESULTS: A total of 402 neurologists from 64 countries completed the survey. Globally, TTE was the most frequently used cardiac imaging technology (x¯ = 71.2%), followed by TEE (x¯ = 15.8%), G-CCT (x¯ = 10.9%), and CMRI (x¯ = 7.7%). Findings were consistent across all continents. A total of 288 respondents routinely used a CTA in the acute ischemic stroke phase (71.6%), but the CTA included a non-gated CCT in only 15 cases (5.2%). CONCLUSIONS: This survey suggests that basic cardiac imaging is not done in all ischemic stroke patients evaluated in 4 continents. We also found a substantially low utilization of advanced cardiac imaging studies. Easier to adopt screening methods for cardioembolic sources of embolism are needed.

Extended Computed Tomography Angiography for the Successful Diagnosis of Cardioaortic Thrombus in Acute Ischemic Stroke and TIA: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac imaging is one of the main components of the etiological investigation of ischemic strokes. However, basic and advanced cardiac imaging remain underused in most stroke centers globally. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the supra-aortic and intracranial arteries is the most frequent imaging modality applied during the evaluation of patients with acute ischemic stroke to identify the presence of a large vessel occlusion. Recent evidence from retrospective observational studies has shown a high detection of cardiac thrombi, ranging from 6.6 to 17.4%, by extending a CTA a few cm below the carina to capture cardiac images. However, this approach has never been prospectively compared against usual care in a randomized controlled trial. The Extended Computed Tomography Angiography for the Successful Screening of Cardioaortic Thrombus in Acute Ischemic Stroke and TIA (DAYLIGHT) prospective, randomized, controlled trial evaluates whether an extended CTA (eCTA) + standard-of-care stroke workup results in higher detection rates of cardiac and aortic source of embolism compared to standard-of-care CTA (sCTA) + standard-of-care stroke workup. METHODS: DAYLIGHT is a single-center, prospective, randomized, open-blinded endpoint trial, aiming to recruit 830 patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) being assessed under acute code stroke at the emergency department or at a dedicated urgent stroke prevention clinic. Patients are randomized 1:1 to eCTA versus sCTA. The eCTA expands image acquisition caudally, 6 cm below the carina. All patients receive standard-of-care cardiac imaging and diagnostic stroke workup. The primary efficacy endpoint is the diagnosis of a cardioaortic thrombus after at least 30 days of follow-up. The primary safety endpoint is door-to-CTA completion time. The diagnosis of a qualifying ischemic stroke or TIA is independently adjudicated by a stroke neurologist, blinded to the study arm allocation. Patients without an adjudicated ischemic stroke or TIA are excluded from the analysis. The primary outcome events are adjudicated by a board-certified radiologist with subspecialty training in cardiothoracic radiology and a cardiologist with formal training in cardiac imaging. The primary analysis is performed according to the modified intention-to-diagnose principle and without adjustment by logistic regression models. Results are presented with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. CONCLUSION: The DAYLIGHT trial will provide evidence on whether extending a CTA to include the heart results in an increased detection of cardioaortic thrombi compared to standard-of-care stroke workup.

Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: New Data and New Controversies on Cardiac Monitoring and Anticoagulation.

Embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS) represent 9%-25% of all ischemic strokes. Based on the suspicion that a large proportion of cardioembolic sources remain undetected among embolic stroke of undetermined source patients, it has been hypothesized that a universal approach of anticoagulation would be better than aspirin for preventing recurrent strokes. However, 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with different degrees of patient selection, failed to confirm this hypothesis. In parallel, several RCTs consistently demonstrated that prolonged cardiac monitoring increased atrial fibrillation detection and anticoagulation initiation compared with usual care in patients with ESUS, and later in individuals with ischemic stroke of known cause (e.g., large or small vessel disease). However, none of these trials or subsequent meta-analyses of all available RCTs have shown a reduction in stroke recurrence associated with the use of prolonged cardiac monitoring. In this article, we review the clinical and research implications of recent RCTs of antithrombotic therapy in patients with ESUS and in high-risk populations with and without stroke, with device-detected asymptomatic atrial fibrillation.

Readmissions After Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Previous Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.

Background: We examined the frequency and risk factors associated with readmission after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with and without previous ischemic stroke and/or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Methods: Hospitalizations for LAAC were identified from the US National Readmission Database, 2016-2018. The primary outcome was the first unplanned readmission after LAAC, with readmission times stratified into those occurring within 0 to 30 days vs within 31 to 180 days. Patients were stratified based on the history of previous stroke and/or TIA. Results: Of 12,901 discharges after LAAC, 28% had previous stroke and/or TIA, and 8.2% had a readmission within 30 days while 18% had a readmission within 31 to 180 days. The rates of in-hospital complications and readmissions at both periods were not significantly different between individuals with vs without previous stroke and/or TIA. Cardiac causes accounted for 28% of readmissions within 30 days and 32% of those within 31 to 180 days, and congestive failure, bleeding, and infections were the most common readmission diagnoses. New stroke and/or TIA accounted for 4% and 6% of the total noncardiac readmissions within 30 days and 31 to 180 days, respectively, and the incidence was higher among those with previous stroke and/or TIA. Female sex and index hospitalization length of stay (LOS) > 1 day were factors independently associated with readmission within 30 days, whereas LOS, diabetes, renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and anemia were among the factors associated with readmissions within 31 to 180 days. Conclusions: Unplanned rehospitalizations were common after LAAC and had similar frequency for patients with vs without previous ischemic stroke and/or TIA. Female sex and index hospitalization LOS > 1 day were among the strongest factors that were independently associated with readmission within 30 days.

Contexte: Nous avons examiné la fréquence et les facteurs de risque des réadmissions consécutives à une fermeture de l'appendice auriculaire gauche (FAOG) chez les patients ayant ou non subi un accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) ischémique et/ou un accident ischémique transitoire (AIT). Méthodologie: Les hospitalisations pour une FAOG ont été recensées au moyen de la US National Readmission Database (base de données nationale des réadmissions aux États-Unis) pour la période 2016-2018. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la première réadmission non prévue après une FAOG, avec stratification du moment de la réadmission selon que celle-ci était survenue de 0 à 30 jours ou de 31 à 180 jours après l'intervention. Les patients ont été stratifiés en fonction des antécédents d'AVC et/ou d'AIT. Résultats: Parmi les 12 901 patients ayant reçu leur congé de l'hôpital après une FAOG, 28 % avaient des antécédents d'AVC et/ou d'AIT; 8,2 % des patients admissibles ont été réadmis dans les 30 jours et 18 %, entre le 31e et le 180e jour suivant l'intervention. Aucune différence significative n'a été observée entre les patients ayant subi un AVC et/ou un AIT et les patients qui n'en avaient pas subi en ce qui concerne les taux de complications hospitalières et de réadmission durant ces deux périodes. Les causes cardiaques représentaient 28 % des réadmissions dans les 30 jours et 32 % des réadmissions entre le 31e et le 180e jour. L'insuffisance cardiaque congestive, les hémorragies et les infections ont été les causes les plus fréquentes de réadmission. Les nouveaux cas d'AVC et/ou d'AIT ont respectivement été à l'origine de 4 % et de 6 % de l'ensemble des réadmissions de cause non cardiaque dans les 30 jours, et entre le 31e et le 180e jour, et leur fréquence a été plus élevée chez les patients ayant des antécédents d'AVC et/ou d'AIT. Le sexe féminin et une durée d'hospitalisation initiale > 1 jour ont été des facteurs indépendants associés aux réadmissions dans les 30 jours, tandis que la durée de l'hospitalisation, un diabète, une néphropathie, une maladie pulmonaire obstructive chronique et une anémie faisaient partie des facteurs associés aux réadmissions entre le 31e et le 180e jour. Conclusions: Les réhospitalisations non prévues ont été courantes après une FAOG, et leur fréquence a été similaire en présence ou en l'absence d'antécédents d'AVC ischémique et/ou d'AIT. Le sexe féminin et une durée d'hospitalisation initiale > 1 jour ont été les facteurs les plus importants associés aux réadmissions dans les 30 jours.

Toward More Personalized Management of Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation.

This Viewpoint discusses the need to individualize the management of subclinical atrial fibrillation according to burden (among other factors) by modeling stroke risk.

Diagnóstico y tratamiento de la enfermedad carotídea aterosclerótica extracraneal asintomática / Diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic extracranial atherosclerotic carotid artery disease

La enfermedad aterosclerótica asintomática de la arteria carótida interna extracraneal alcanza una prevalencia de hasta el 12.5%. La angioplastia carotídea todavía no ha demostrado ser lo suficientemente segura y eficaz para prevenir el ACV isquémico en estos pacientes. Estudios aleatorizados demostraron que la endarterectomía carotídea es superior al tratamiento médico en cuanto a reducción del riesgo de ACV isquémico si es realizada por equipos con tasas de complicaciones (ACV o muerte) menores que 3%. Sin embargo, los pacientes evaluados en estos estudios comenzaron a reclutarse hace más de 25 años, cuando la utilización de antiagregantes plaquetarios era menor que la actual, el tratamiento de la hipertensión arterial era menos efectivo y todavía no se usaban estatinas como componentes fundamentales de los esquemas de prevención vascular. La optimización de la calidad del tratamiento médico en las últimas décadas ha llevado a una significativa reducción del riesgo de ACV en pacientes no intervenidos quirúrgicamente. En base a estas observaciones y con la excepción de casos específicos, el tratamiento médico es la opción terapéutica de elección en pacientes con enfermedad aterosclerótica carotídea extracraneal asintomática.

The reported prevalence of asymptomatic atherosclerotic disease of the extracranial internal carotid artery is up to 12.5%. Carotid angioplasty has not yet proven safe and effective enough to prevent ischemic stroke in these patients. Randomized studies showed that carotid endarterectomy is superior to medical therapy in reducing the risk of ischemic stroke when performed by surgical teams with complication rates (stroke or death) of less than 3%. However, recruitment of these patients began more than 25 years ago, when the use of antiplatelet agents was lower than today, the treatment of hypertension was less effective than currently, and statins were not considered as key components of vascular prevention strategies. Optimizing the quality of medical treatment in recent decades has led to a significant reduction in stroke risk in patients not undergoing surgery. Based on these observations and with the exception of specific cases, medical therapy is the treatment of choice for patients with asymptomatic atherosclerotic disease of the extracranial carotid arteries.

Profilaxis con drogas antiepilépticas en enfermedades neurológicas / Prophylactic treatment with antiepileptic drugs in neurological conditions

El uso profiláctico de drogas antiepilépticas en enfermedades neurológicas como el accidente cerebrovascular isquémico y hemorrágico, la hemorragia subaracnoidea, el traumatismo de cráneo y los tumores cerebrales ha sido motivo de controversia durante muchos años. Estas drogas son indicadas con el fin de disminuir el daño neurológico secundario a las crisis epilépticas. Sin embargo, la escasa evidencia científica disponible para avalar esta hipótesis, las potenciales interacciones farmacológicas, los efectos adversos y algunos informes sobre neurotoxicidad generan dudas en cuanto a esta conducta terapéutica. En esta revisión, analizamos la evidencia acerca del uso profiláctico de drogas epilépticas en las enfermedades neurológicas arriba mencionadas.

Prophylactic use of antiepileptic drugs in neurological conditions such as ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, head injury, and brain tumors has been matter of debate for many years. These drugs are used for reducing secondary neurological damage caused by epileptic seizures. However, the evidence supporting this indication is scarce. Potential drug interactions, side effects, and even neurotoxicity related to these drugs have raised concern about this therapeutic approach. In this review, we examine the evidence on the prophylactic use of antiepileptic drugs in the neurological disorders above mentioned.