Hydrothermal carbonization combined with thermochemical treatment of sewage sludge: Effects of MgCl2 on the migration of phosphorus and heavy metal.

Phosphorus (P) is a non-regenerative and finite raw material. Due to its decreasing availability, and to protect the environment, recycling methods are needed. With the focus on closing nutrient cycles, sewage sludge (SS) is a potential source for P recovery. The objective of this study was to produce a mineral P-reach fertilizer. For this purpose, the treatment of SS in a multi-stage process, consisting of a hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and thermochemical post-treatment was examined and compared with a direct thermochemical treatment. The focus was on the transformation of P and the migration of the heavy metals during the processes. In addition, the role of MgCl2 as an additive was examined. During the HTC, most of the P remained in the HTC-char, so that the P content increased in the HTC-char compared with the SS. The addition of MgCl2 to the process resulted in lower transportation rates of P in the liquid phase and higher P solubilities in water, citric acid, and alkalic ammonium citrate out of the solid phase. The thermochemical treatment of SS and the HTC-chars further concentrated P in the ash. Retention rates of >97% were achieved, and P2O5 contents in the ash were as high as ∼16 wt-%. The presence of the additive resulted in (i) higher retention rates of P in the ashes (ii) higher P-solubility and (iii) higher removal rates of easily volatile heavy metals such as Pb and Zn, and the treatment of HTC-char favored these effects compared with the direct treatment of SS.

Evaluation of the energetic and environmental potential of the hydrothermal carbonization of biowaste: Modeling of the entire process chain.

This study outlines the entire process chain related to an industrial-sized hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) plant, which treats the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. A parameter study, carried out in laboratory-scaled experiments, was used to create a model starting with the substrate preparation and ending with the production of electricity. It was designed to be infinitely variable with respect to different reaction intensities within certain boundary conditions. Contrary to previous research endeavors, all components related to the HTC process and modules for the post-treatment of co-products including heat recovery and process water treatment were integrated. Based on this model, the claim that HTC-char is a more environmentally friendly energy carrier than lignite was investigated. In the realm of a life cycle assessment, a GWP of 0.45-0.70 kg CO2,Eq/kWhel was revealed for the electricity production from HTC-char. It, thus, outcompetes the electricity production from lignite (1.05-1.40 kg CO2,Eq/kWhel).

Economic and environmental life cycle assessment of organic waste treatment by means of incineration and biogasification. Is source segregation of biowaste justified in Germany?

In the realm of the German scope, four different waste treatment options for the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW) were evaluated against the environmental and economic background: (i) anaerobic digestion followed by composting, (ii) incineration of OFMSW, (iii) incineration of separately pre-dried OFMSW and (iv) a cascaded treatment system, which couples anaerobic digestion with incineration (i.e. incineration of digestate). Environmental life cycle assessment (eLCA) and a calculation of the levelized costs of exergy (LCOE) were performed to map the sustainability aspects of the different product systems. Within a hybrid approach, consisting of literature data evaluation, theoretical modelling, the conduct of lab-scaled experiments and a substrate analysis, a comprehensive assessment was compiled. Within the eLCA, the main drivers of the total environmental impact were the categories global warming potential (GWP) and the fossil depletion potential (FDP). (i) Anaerobic digestion followed by composting and (ii) incineration were hereby characterized by the fewest environmental impacts. With regards to the base case, the GWP was calculated to ~500 g CO2-Eq/kWh exergy for these options. The FDP was <0.05 kg oil-Eq/kWh exergy for anaerobic digestion and ~0.075 kg oil-Eq/kWh exergy for incineration. The other examined treatment options were characterized by a significantly higher GWP and FDP. The economic assessment showed median LCOE of 27 ct/kWh exergy for anaerobic digestion followed by composting and thus outcompeted incineration (median: 55 ct/kWh Exergy). Separate pre-drying prior to incineration increased the economic burdens marginally. Anaerobic digestion followed by incineration showed the highest economic expenses (89 ct/kWh exergy). In conclusion, anaerobic digestion followed by composting was marked by an overall preferential environmental and economic constellation and source segregation is thereof justified and should further be maintained.