RESUMEN
Editor's Note.-RadioGraphics Update articles supplement or update information found in full-length articles previously published in RadioGraphics. These updates, written by at least one author of the previous article, provide a brief synopsis that emphasizes important new information such as technological advances, revised imaging protocols, new clinical guidelines involving imaging, or updated classification schemes.
Asunto(s)
Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales , Neoplasias del Timo , Humanos , Neoplasias del Timo/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Timo/patología , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/patologíaRESUMEN
Thymic imaging is challenging because the imaging appearance of a variety of benign and malignant thymic conditions are similar. CT is the most commonly used modality for mediastinal imaging, while MRI and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT are helpful when they are tailored to the correct indication. Each of these imaging modalities has limitations and technical pitfalls that may lead to an incorrect diagnosis and mismanagement. CT may not be sufficient for the characterization of cystic thymic processes and differentiation between thymic hyperplasia and thymic tumors. MRI can be used to overcome these limitations but is subject to other potential pitfalls such as an equivocal decrease in signal intensity at chemical shift imaging, size limitations, unusual signal intensity for cysts, subtraction artifacts, pseudonodularity on T2-weighted MR images, early imaging misinterpretation, flow and spatial resolution issues hampering assessment of local invasion, and the overlap of apparent diffusion coefficients between malignant and benign thymic entities. FDG PET/CT is not routinely indicated due to some overlap in FDG uptake between thymomas and benign thymic processes. However, it is useful for staging and follow-up of aggressive tumors (eg, thymic carcinoma), particularly for detection of occult metastatic disease. Pitfalls in imaging after treatment of thymic malignancies relate to technical challenges such as postthymectomy sternotomy streak metal artifacts, differentiation of postsurgical thymic bed changes from tumor recurrence, or human error with typical "blind spots" for identification of metastatic disease. Understanding these pitfalls enables appropriate selection of imaging modalities, improves diagnostic accuracy, and guides patient treatment. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.
Asunto(s)
Timoma , Neoplasias del Timo , Humanos , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias del Timo/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Timo/patología , Timoma/diagnóstico , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , RadiofármacosRESUMEN
Malignant mesothelioma is a rare tumor arising from the mesothelial cells that line the pleura, pericardium, peritoneum, and tunica vaginalis. Imaging plays a primary role in the diagnosis, staging, and management of malignant mesothelioma. Multimodality imaging, including radiography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT), is used in a variety of scenarios, including diagnosis, guidance for tissue sampling, staging, and reassessment of disease after therapy. CT is the primary imaging modality used in staging. MRI has superior contrast resolution compared with CT and can add value in terms of determining surgical resectability in equivocal cases. MRI can further assess the degree of local invasion, particularly into the mediastinum, chest wall, and diaphragm, for malignant pleural and pericardial mesotheliomas. FDG PET/CT plays a role in the diagnosis and staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) and has been shown to be more accurate than CT, MRI, and PET alone in the staging of malignant pleural mesothelioma. PET/CT can also be used to target lesions for biopsy and to assess prognosis, treatment response, and tumor recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Mesotelioma Maligno , Mesotelioma , Neoplasias Pleurales , Humanos , Mesotelioma Maligno/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Pleura/patología , Neoplasias Pleurales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pleurales/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Mesotelioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Mesotelioma/patología , Pericardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Pericardio/patologíaRESUMEN
The normal immune system identifies and eliminates precancerous and cancerous cells. However, tumors can develop immune resistance mechanisms, one of which involves the exploitation of pathways, termed immune checkpoints, that normally suppress T-cell function. The goal of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy is to boost T-cell-mediated immunity to mount a more effective attack on cancer cells. ICIs have changed the treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and numerous ICIs have now been approved as first-line treatments for NSCLC by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. ICIs can cause atypical response patterns such as pseudoprogression, whereby the tumor burden initially increases but then decreases. Therefore, response criteria have been developed specifically for patients receiving immunotherapy. Because ICIs activate the immune system, they can lead to inflammatory side effects, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Usually occurring within weeks to months after the start of therapy, irAEs range from asymptomatic abnormal laboratory results to life-threatening conditions such as encephalitis, pneumonitis, myocarditis, hepatitis, and colitis. It is important to be aware of the imaging appearances of the various irAEs to avoid misinterpreting them as metastatic disease, progressive disease, or infection. The basic principles of ICI therapy; indications for ICI therapy in the setting of NSCLC; response assessment and atypical response patterns of ICI therapy, as compared with conventional chemotherapy; and the spectrum of irAEs seen at imaging are reviewed. An invited commentary by Nishino is available online. ©RSNA, 2022.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a recently approved breakthrough treatment that has become a new paradigm in treatment of recurrent or refractory B-cell lymphomas and pediatric or adult acute lymphoid leukemia. CAR T cells are a type of cellular immunotherapy that artificially enhances T cells to boost eradication of malignancy through activation of the native immune system. The CAR construct is a synthetically created functional cell receptor grafted onto previously harvested patient T cells, which bind to preselected tumor-associated antigens and thereby activate host immune signaling cascades to attack tumor cells. Advantages include a single treatment episode of 2-3 weeks and durable disease elimination, with remission rates of over 80%. Responses to therapy are more rapid than with conventional chemotherapy or immunotherapy, with intervening short-interval edema. CAR T-cell administration is associated with therapy-related toxic effects in a large percentage of patients, notably cytokine release syndrome, immune effect cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and infections related to immunosuppression. Knowledge of the expected evolution of therapy response and potential adverse events in CAR T-cell therapy and correlation with the timeline of treatment are important to optimize patient care. Some toxic effects are radiologically evident, and familiarity with their imaging spectrum is key to avoiding misinterpretation. Other clinical toxic effects may be occult at imaging and are diagnosed on the basis of clinical assessment. Future directions for CAR T-cell therapy include new indications and expanded tumor targets, along with novel ways to capture T-cell activation with imaging. An invited commentary by Ramaiya and Smith is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Tratamiento Basado en Trasplante de Células y Tejidos , Niño , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Radiólogos , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
In the imaging of the mediastinum, benign lesions mimicking malignancy constitute potential pitfalls in interpretation. Localization and characteristic imaging features are key to narrow the differential diagnosis and avoid potential pitfalls in interpretation. Based on certain anatomic landmarks, the mediastinal compartment model enables accurate localization. Depending on the anatomic origin, mediastinal lesions can have various etiologies. The anatomic location and structures contained within each mediastinal compartment are helpful in generating the differential diagnoses. These structures include thyroid, thymus, parathyroid, lymph nodes, pericardium, embryogenic remnants, and parts of the enteric tracts, vessels, and nerves. Imaging characteristics on computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT), including attenuation (fluid, fat, calcification), contrast enhancement, and metabolic activity, aid in narrowing the differential diagnoses. Understanding the roles and limitations of various imaging modalities is helpful in the evaluation of mediastinal masses. In this review, we present potential pitfalls in the imaging of mediastinal lesions with emphasis on the mimics of malignancy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Mediastino , Mediastino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neoplasias del Mediastino/diagnóstico por imagen , Mediastino/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Chest radiography is one of the most commonly performed imaging tests, and benefits include accessibility, speed, cost, and relatively low radiation exposure. Lung cancer is the third most common cancer in the United States and is responsible for the most cancer deaths. Knowledge of the role of chest radiography in assessing patients with lung cancer is important. This article discusses radiographic manifestations of lung cancer, the utility of chest radiography in lung cancer management, as well as the limitations of chest radiography and when computed tomography (CT) is indicated.
RESUMEN
Imaging plays a key role in clinical staging of lung cancer and guiding therapy. A thorough understanding of the staging system including the nomenclature and updates is necessary to tailor treatment plans and optimize patient care. The 9th edition of the Tumor, Node, Metastasis staging system for lung cancer has no changes for T classification and subdivides N2 and M1c categories. In nodal staging, N2 splits into N2a, ipsilateral mediastinal single station involvement and N2b, ipsilateral mediastinal multiple stations involvement. In the staging of multiple extrathoracic metastases, M1c splits into M1c1, multiple extrathoracic metastases in one organ system and M1c2, multiple extrathoracic metastases in multiple organ systems. Awareness of the proposed changes in TNM-9 staging classification is essential to provide methodical and accurate imaging interpretation.
RESUMEN
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) has become the mainstay imaging modality for evaluating oncology patients with certain cancers. The most common FDG PET/CT applications include staging/restaging, assessing response to therapy and detecting tumor recurrence. It is important to be aware of potential pitfalls and technical artifacts on PET/CT in the chest and abdomen to ensure accurate interpretation, avoid unnecessary intervention and optimize patient care.
RESUMEN
Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, as well as in the United States. Clinical staging, primarily with imaging, is integral to stratify patients into groups that determine treatment options and predict survival. The eighth edition of the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM-8) staging system proposed in 2016 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer remains the current standard for lung cancer staging. The system is used for all subtypes of lung cancer, including non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, and bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Tomografía de Emisión de PositronesRESUMEN
An integral part of managing patients with thymoma and thymic carcinoma is imaging. At diagnosis and staging, imaging helps demonstrate the extent of local invasion and distant metastases which allows the proper stratification of patients for therapy. For decades, the predominant staging system for thymic tumors was the Masaoka-Koga staging system. More recently, however, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, the International Thymic Malignancies Interest Group (ITMIG), the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Chinese Alliance for Research on Thymomas, and the Japanese Association of Research on Thymus partnered together to develop a tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system specifically for thymic tumors based on a retrospective database of nearly 10,000 patients. The TNM 8th edition defines specific criteria for thymic tumors. Imaging also serves to assess treatment response and detect recurrent disease after various treatment modalities. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 is currently used to assess response to treatment. ITMIG recommends certain modifications to RECIST version 1.1, however, in thymic tumors due to unique patterns of spread. While there is often overlap, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) characteristics can help differentiate thymoma and thymic carcinoma, with newer CT and MRI techniques under evaluation showing encouraging potential.
RESUMEN
Mediastinal masses present a diagnostic challenge due to their diverse etiologies. Accurate localization and internal characteristics of the mass are the two most important factors to narrow the differential diagnosis or provide a specific diagnosis. The International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) classification is the standard classification system used to localize mediastinal masses. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the two most commonly used imaging modalities for characterization of the mediastinal masses.
RESUMEN
A wide variety of neoplastic and nonneoplastic conditions occur in the mediastinum. Imaging plays a central role in the evaluation of mediastinal pathologies and their mimics. Localization of a mediastinal lesion to a compartment and characterization of morphology, density/signal intensity, enhancement, and mass effect on neighboring structures can help narrow the differentials. The International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) established a cross-sectional imaging-derived and anatomy-based classification system for mediastinal compartments, comprising the prevascular (anterior), visceral (middle), and paravertebral (posterior) compartments. Cross-sectional imaging is integral in the evaluation of mediastinal lesions. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are useful to characterize mediastinal lesions detected on radiography. Advantages of CT include its widespread availability, fast acquisition time, relatively low cost, and ability to detect calcium. Advantages of MRI include the lack of radiation exposure, superior soft tissue contrast resolution to detect invasion of the mass across tissue planes, including the chest wall and diaphragm, involvement of neurovascular structures, and the potential for dynamic sequences during free-breathing or cinematic cardiac gating to assess motion of the mass relative to adjacent structures. MRI is superior to CT in the differentiation of cystic from solid lesions and in the detection of fat to differentiate thymic hyperplasia from thymic malignancy.
RESUMEN
Radiation therapy using conventional or newer high-precision dose techniques, including three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, four-dimensional conformational radiotherapy, and proton therapy, is an important component of treating patients with lung cancer. Knowledge of the radiation technique used and the expected temporal evolution of radiation-induced lung injury, as well as patient-specific parameters such as previous radiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, or immunotherapy, is important in image interpretation. This review discusses factors that affect the development and severity of radiation-induced lung injury and its radiological manifestations, as well as the differences between conventional and high-precision dose radiotherapy techniques.
RESUMEN
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in men and women in the United States. Accurate staging is needed to determine prognosis and devise effective treatment plans. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) has made multiple revisions to the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system used by the Union for International Cancer Control and the American Joint Committee on Cancer to stage lung cancer. The eighth edition of this staging system includes modifications to the T classification with cut points of 1 cm increments in tumor size, grouping of lung cancers associated with partial or complete lung atelectasis or pneumonitis, grouping of tumors with involvement of a main bronchus regardless of distance from the carina, and upstaging of diaphragmatic invasion to T4. The N classification describes the spread to regional lymph nodes and no changes were proposed for TNM-8. In the M classification, metastatic disease is divided into intra- versus extrathoracic metastasis, and single versus multiple metastases. In order to optimize patient outcomes, it is important to understand the nuances of the TNM staging system, the strengths and weaknesses of various imaging modalities used in lung cancer staging, and potential pitfalls in image interpretation.
RESUMEN
In the oncologic setting, misinterpretation of fluid in pericardial recesses as mediastinal adenopathy or benign pericardial findings as malignant can lead to inaccurate staging and inappropriate management. Knowledge of normal pericardial anatomy, imaging features to differentiate fluid in pericardial sinuses and recesses from mediastinal adenopathy and potential pitfalls in imaging of the pericardium on CT and PET/CT is important to avoid misinterpretation.
Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías , Linfadenopatía , Enfermedades del Mediastino , Humanos , Pericardio/diagnóstico por imagen , Pericardio/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodosRESUMEN
Pulmonary embolism (PE) can present with a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms that can overlap considerably with other cardiovascular diseases. To avoid PE related morbidity and mortality, it is vital to identify this disease accurately and in a timely fashion. Several clinical criteria have been developed to standardize the diagnostic approach for patients with suspected PE. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiogram has significantly improved the detection of pulmonary embolism and is considered the imaging modality of choice to diagnose this disease. However, there are several potential pitfalls associated with this modality which can make diagnosis of PE challenging. In this review, we will discuss various pitfalls routinely encountered in the diagnostic work up of patients with suspected PE, approaches to mitigate these pitfalls and incidental pulmonary embolism.
Asunto(s)
Embolia Pulmonar , Angiografía , Humanos , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Annual LDCT lung cancer screening is recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) for high-risk population based on the results from the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NLST) that showed a significant (20%) reduction in lung cancer-specific mortality rate with the use of annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening. More recently, the benefits of lung cancer screening were confirmed by the Dutch- Belgian NELSON trial in Europe. With the implementation of lung screening in large scale, knowledge of the limitations related to false positive, false negative and other potential pitfalls is essential to avoid misdiagnosis. This review outlines the most common potential pitfalls in the characterization of screen-detected lung nodules that include artifacts in LDCT, benign nodules that mimic lung cancer, and causes of false negative evaluations of lung cancer with LDCT and PET/CT studies. Awareness of the spectrum of potential pitfalls in pulmonary nodule detection and characterization, including equivocal or atypical presentations, is important for avoiding misinterpretation that can alter patient management.
Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
In imaging of the mediastinum, advances in computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology enable improved characterization of mediastinal masses. Knowledge of the boundaries of the mediastinal compartments is key to accurate localization. Awareness of distinguishing imaging characteristics allows radiologists to suggest a specific diagnosis or narrow the differential. In certain situations, MRI adds value to further characterize mediastinal lesions.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Mediastino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias del Mediastino/diagnóstico por imagen , Mediastino/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Objectives: Neoadjuvant therapy has been theorized to increase complexity of non-small cell lung cancer resections; however, specific factors that contribute to intraoperative challenges after induction therapy have not been well described. We aimed to characterize the effect of nodal involvement and nodal treatment response on surgical complexity after neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: We identified patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by anatomic lung resection for cN + non-small cell lung cancer between 2010 and 2020. Patients were categorized according to clinical N1 versus N2 disease. To evaluate the effect of nodal response to therapy, thoracic radiologists measured clinically suspected and pathologically involved lymph nodes before and after induction therapy. Operative reports were reviewed to identify technical challenges specifically related to nodal disease. Categorical outcomes were compared using Fisher exact test. Results: One hundred twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria, among whom 107 (86.3%) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whereas chemoradiation (n = 8) and targeted therapy (n = 9) were less common. In cases with N1 disease, 8/38 (21.0%) required proximal pulmonary arterial control, whereas this was necessary in only 2/88 (2.3%) of N2 cases (P = .001). Likewise, sleeve resection and arterioplasty were needed more frequently during resection of N1 disease (7/38, 18.4%) versus N2 disease (0/88, P < .001). Increased nodal response to therapy was associated with greater likelihood of requiring change in vascular approach (P = .011). Conclusions: After induction therapy, N1 disease was associated with greater need for complex surgical maneuvers than N2 disease. Likewise, substantial treatment response was associated with increased intraoperative technical challenges. Recognizing such factors enables surgical teams to engage in appropriate operative planning to ensure patient safety.