[Register and cohort studies : Overview of the most important data sources at the German Rheumatism Research Center]. / Register- und Kohortenstudien : Eine Übersicht über die wichtigsten Datenquellen am Deutschen Rheuma-Forschungszentrum.

Over the past 28 years the German Rheumatism Research Center in Berlin has initiated various epidemiological studies in which data on patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases are collected nationwide and multicentric. The spectrum ranges from rheumatoid arthritis and spondylarthritis to connective tissue diseases and rheumatic diseases in childhood. Based on the respective scientific question, studies of different types were established. The German National Databases for adults and children annually collect cross-sectional data to map the care of patients. In two inception cohorts, adults with early arthritis and patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis are investigated from disease onset. The long-term observational cohorts/registries RABBIT, RABBIT-SpA and JuMBO focus on the long-term efficacy and safety of biologic drugs and other targeted treatments. Rhekiss investigates women with inflammatory rheumatic diseases when trying to become pregnant, during pregnancy and postpartum. This article highlights each of these observational studies with its characteristics as well as national and international collaborations.

[Perspectives for rheumatological health services research at the German Rheumatism Research Center]. / Perspektiven für die rheumatologische Versorgungsforschung am Deutschen Rheuma-Forschungszentrum.

This review article summarizes the current projects and perspectives of rheumatological healthcare research in the program area epidemiology of the German Rheumatism Research Center. Health services research is conducted with the help of various data sources. In addition to the classical rheumatological disease registers, health insurance data and population-related cohorts are increasingly being used for analyses. From data collection and monitoring to analysis algorithms, digital applications will change the healthcare research over the coming years. Collaborative analyses with national and international cooperation partners, including biomarkers, complete the research fields in the program area epidemiology. The digitalization of research projects is a central component that will further change health services research in the coming decade.

[RABBIT-SpA: a new disease register for axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis]. / RABBIT-SpA: ein neues Krankheitsregister für axiale Spondyloarthritis und Psoriasisarthritis.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has changed enormously in recent years due to market authorization of a number of new biologicals with different modes of action and the increasing use of biosimilars. Real-world data on long-term safety and efficacy under routine daily conditions is not yet sufficient. Therefore, the German Rheumatism Research Center has initiated a new cohort study covering axSpA and PsA. OBJECTIVE: Presentation of initial results from the new register RABBIT-SpA, which was started in May 2017. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective longitudinal cohort study with a similar study design to the German biologics register RABBIT. Patients can be included at the start of a new treatment either in the so-called index drug group or in the comparison group (conventional systemic treatment, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, NSAID). Follow-up per patient should be at least 5 years and preferably 10 years. The RABBIT-SpA uses a web-based documentation system. RESULTS: Up to mid-December 2018 a total of 514 axSpA patients had been documented in RABBIT-SpA, 410 with an index drug and 104 with conventional treatment. There are differences between these treatment groups, e. g. in the duration of the disease and in parameters of disease activity. It is also noticeable that in axSpA patients, approximately 5 years lie between the onset of the symptoms and confirmation of the diagnosis. Of the 355 PsA patients, 265 were included with an index drug and 90 with conventional treatment. Of the PsA patients 86% have a dominant peripheral manifestation. The average number of pressure tender joints is 8 and the average number of swollen joints is 4. CONCLUSION: The online register RABBIT-SpA is well-received by the participating rheumatological institutions. The electronic recording of patient data can be carried out in a reasonable time. Participation in the RABBIT-SpA is open to new rheumatological institutions at any time.

[Revised version of the statement by the DGRh on biosimilars-update 2017]. / Neufassung der Stellungnahme der DGRh zu Biosimilars ­ Update 2017.

The treatment of rheumatic diseases with bioloics has significantly improved the prognosis of patients. Currently, there are 13 preparations available in Germany for the treatment of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. These original preparations generally have-depending on the individual country-15 years of patent protection. As soon as the patent has expired, approved biosimilars can be brought into use. For the approval of a biosimilar, authorities such as the European Medical Agency or the American Food and Drug Administration require proof of the best possible comparability with respect to efficacy and safety in comparison to the original or reference product. Since 2015, biosimilars of inifliximab, adalimumab, etanercept and rituximab have been granted approval in the European Union, the USA, Japan and in other countries. Further biosimilar products for these reference products are in development for treatment in rheumatology. From a societal and medical point of view, this opens up the possibility to increase the availability of biopharmaceutical products for patients through lower prices. In Germany, this possibility has already occurred-statutory health insurance physicians have introduced quotas for biosimilars, which will ultimately decrease spending and healthcare costs. This can lead to price reductions of the original products, which has already happened in Germany. Biosimilars can be prescribed for new patients or as a change from the original to the generic drug. When switching, a distinction is made between individual switching (interchangeability), which is made in individual consultation between the physician and the patient, and nonmedical switching (substitution) made at the societal or governmental level, which is made in the context of health care cost containment, and then, for example, implemented at the pharmacy level. Preliminary data from Norway and Denmark are available for substitution on the basis of results from large studies or registries in which systematic changes were made. The previous conclusion was that this does not lead to new problems for the patients. The German Society for Rheumatology recognizes the advantages of introducing biosimilars in Germany, but recommends that their use be based primarily on a joint decision by the treating physician and patient.

Serious adverse events and the risk of stroke in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the German RABBIT cohort.

OBJECTIVE: In the general population, the incidence of stroke is increased following other serious events and hospitalisation. We investigated the impact of serious adverse events on the risk of stroke in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), taking risk factors and treatment into account. METHODS: Using data of the German biologics register RABBIT (Rheumatoid Arthritis: Observation of Biologic Therapy) with 12354 patients with RA, incidence rates (IRs) and risk factors for stroke were investigated using multi-state and Cox proportional hazard models. In addition, in a nested case-control study, all patients with stroke were matched 1:2 to patients with identical baseline risk profile and analysed using a shared frailty model. RESULTS: During follow-up, 166 strokes were reported. The overall IR was 3.2/1000 patient-years (PY) (95% CI 2.7 to 3.7). It was higher after a serious adverse event (IR: 9.0 (7.3 to 11.0)), particularly within 30 days after the event (IR: 94.9 (72.6 to 121.9)). The adjusted Cox model showed increased risks of age per 5 years (HR: 1.4 (1.3 to 1.5)), hyperlipoproteinaemia (HR: 1.6 (1.0 to 2.5)) and smoking (HR: 1.9 (1.3 to 2.6)). The risk decreased with better physical function (HR: 0.9 (0.8 to 0.96)). In the case-control study, 163 patients were matched to 326 controls. Major risk factors for stroke were untreated cardiovascular disease (HR: 3.3 (1.5 to 7.2)) and serious infections (HR:4.4 (1.6 to 12.5)) or other serious adverse events (HR: 2.6 (1.4 to 4.8)). CONCLUSIONS: Incident adverse events, in particular serious infections, and insufficient treatment of cardiovascular diseases are independent drivers of the risk of stroke. Physicians should be aware that patients who experience a serious event are at increased risk of subsequent stroke.

Risk for lower intestinal perforations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab in comparison to treatment with other biologic or conventional synthetic DMARDs.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk of developing lower intestinal perforations (LIPs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tocilizumab (TCZ). METHODS: In 13 310 patients with RA observed in the German biologics register Rheumatoid Arthritis: Observation of Biologic Therapy, 141 serious gastrointestinal events possibly associated with perforations were reported until 31 October 2015. All events were validated independently by two physicians, blinded for treatment exposure. RESULTS: 37 LIPs (32 in the colon/sigma) were observed in 53 972 patient years (PYs). Only two patients had a history of diverticulitis (one in TCZ). Age, current/cumulative glucocorticoids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were significantly associated with the risk of LIP. The crude incidence rate of LIP was significantly increased in TCZ (2.7/1000 PYs) as compared with all other treatments (0.2-0.6/1000 PYs). The adjusted HR (ref: conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)) in TCZ was 4.48 (95% CI 2.0 to 10.0), in tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNFi) 1.04 (0.5 to 2.3) and in other biologic DMARDs 0.33 (0.1 to 1.4). 4/11 patients treated with TCZ presented without typical symptoms of LIP (acute abdomen, severe pain). Only one patient had highly elevated C reactive protein (CRP). One quarter of patients died within 30 days after LIP (9/37), 5/11 under TCZ, 2/13 under TNFi and 2/11 under csDMARD treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence rates of LIP under TCZ found in this real world study are in line with those seen in randomised controlled trials of TCZ and higher than in all other DMARD treatments. To ensure safe use of TCZ in daily practice, physicians and patients should be aware that, under TCZ, LIP may occur with mild symptoms only and without CRP elevation.

[The first biologic for rheumatoid arthritis: factors influencing the therapeutic decision]. / Das erste Biologikum bei rheumatoider Arthritis: Einflussfaktoren auf die Therapieentscheidung.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Biologics (disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, bDMARD) have been in use in Germany for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) since 2001, usually after failure of at least one conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD. We analyzed temporal changes in factors that influence the decision for either a first bDMARD or a further csDMARD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed data from 9513 bDMARD-naive RA patients in the German biologics register RABBIT who switched to a new therapy. For three recruitment periods (2001-2003, 2004-2006 and 2009-2015) factors influencing the therapeutic decision were analyzed by means of machine learning methods and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In all recruitment periods the number of previous csDMARDs, high dosages of glucocorticoids (>7.5 mg/day) and a higher DAS28 (>5.1) were significantly associated with the decision for a first bDMARD. Over time, the chance of receiving a bDMARD increased in patients with moderate disease activity, moderate glucocorticoid dosages (5-7.5 mg/day) and those with comorbidities, such as congestive heart failure or prior malignancy. Men had a higher chance of receiving a bDMARD than women only in the first recruitment period. Private health insurance, high education and gainful employment were significantly associated with more frequent prescription of bDMARDs in all recruitment periods. DISCUSSION: The time-dependent changes in the impact of disease activity, concomitant drugs, gender and comorbidity on the prescription of bDMARDs mirror the increasing therapeutic options and the growing experience in the application of the new substances in patients at higher risk. The influence of demographic and social factors may reflect safety concerns in patients at increased risk of adverse events but also the need to economize drug costs..

[How frequent are poor prognostic markers in rheumatoid arthritis? : An estimate based on three epidemiologic cohorts]. / Wie häufig sind prognostisch ungünstige Faktoren bei Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis? : Eine Abschätzung anhand von 3 epidemiologischen Kohorten.

BACKGROUND: Unfavorable prognostic factors-high disease activity, early erosions, and autoantibodies-should be considered when making treatment decisions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There are little data on the frequency of individual poor prognostic factors among RA patients in daily care. METHODS: Disease activity (Disease Activity Score, DAS28), erosions, antibodies against citrullinated peptides or rheumatoid factor (ACPA/RF+), previous treatment failure, inflammation markers, and functional disability (FFbH < 70) were defined as prognostic factors. Different treatment decision making situations were evaluated in disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naïve patients from the early RA CAPEA cohort (n = 1059), and in patients from the biologics register RABBIT after failure of one (n = 2217) or more (n = 3280) conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs or one (n = 1134) or more (n = 795) biologic (b)DMARDs. With the national database of German arthritis centers (NDB), the frequency of these factors was analyzed according to treatment strata (no/1st/2nd/3rd DMARD; n = 5707). RESULTS: In DMARD-naïve patients (CAPEA), 50% presented with DAS28 > 5.1, 64% were ACPA/RF+, 13% had erosions, and 37% functional disability (FFbH < 70). In RABBIT, 63 (1st csDMARD failure) to 81% (≥2 bDMARD failures) were ACPA/RF+, 29 to 70% had erosions, 33 to 52% DAS28 > 5.1, and 41 to 66% had FFbH < 70, respectively. In the NDB, between 47 (DMARD-naïve) and 82% (≥2 previous DMARDs) were ACPA/RF+, 5 to 11%, had high disease activity under treatment (DAS28 > 5.1), and 26 to 50% had functional disability (FFbH < 70), respectively. CONCLUSION: With growing numbers of previous DMARD therapies, increasing proportions of patients have poor prognostic factors. This underlines the importance of these factors for a difficult-to-treat disease course.

Impact of treatment with biologic DMARDs on the risk of sepsis or mortality after serious infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: This observational cohort study investigated the impact of biological (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on the outcomes of serious infections (SIs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: We investigated outcomes of SIs observed in 947 patients enrolled in the German biologics register RABBIT(Rheumatoid arthritis: observation of biologic therapy). Outcomes were (1) recovery without complication, (2) sepsis following SI (≤30 days), and (3) death after SI without known sepsis (≤90 days). We applied a multinomial generalised estimating equation model for longitudinal data to evaluate the risks of sepsis and death simultaneously. RESULTS: Sepsis within 30 days after SI was reported in 135 out of 947 patients, 85 of these had a fatal outcome. Fifty-three patients died within 90 days after SI without known sepsis. The adjusted risk of developing sepsis increased with age and was higher in patients with chronic renal disease. Compared with conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs, the risk was significantly lower when patients were exposed to bDMARDs at the time of SI (OR: 0.56, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.81). Risk factors of fatal SI were higher age, use of glucocorticoids at higher doses and heart failure. Patients treated with bDMARDs and those with better physical function had a significantly lower mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a beneficial effect of bDMARDs on the risk of sepsis after SI and the risk of a fatal outcome. Successful immunosuppression may prevent an unregulated host response to SI, that is, the escalation to sepsis. Further investigation is needed to validate these results.

[Medication treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with a history of malignancy. Epidemiological data]. / Medikamentöse Therapie der rheumatoiden Arthritis bei Malignomanamnese. Epidemiologische Daten.

INTRODUCTION: Only insufficient data are available regarding the question whether treatment with immunosuppressants or biologicals is feasible and safe in patients with a history of malignancy. METHOD: Literature search via PubMed, EULAR abstracts and ACR abstracts from 2013 to 2015. RESULTS: The Société Francaise de Rhumatologie, the Canadian Rheumatology Association and the American College of Rheumatology have tried to make recommendations on this topic. Direct evidence mainly originates from data in three national registries which suggest that treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors and rituximab appears to be safe for carefully selected patients, at least if there is a longer interval between treatment with biologicals and oncological treatment. Furthermore, despite partly conflicting data all routine drugs for treating rheumatoid arthritis do not seem to show a consistently increased risk of de novo malignancies. The currently available data are presented for each drug of interest. CONCLUSION: Taking the current literature into account an attempt is made to formulate an algorithm for the medicinal treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a history of malignancy.

[Influence of therapy on risk of cancer in rheumatoid arthritis. Pathophysiological principles]. / Einfluss der Therapie auf das Krebsrisiko bei rheumatoider Arthritis. Pathophysiologische Grundlagen.

The increased incidence of certain tumor entities in chronic inflammation and infections as well as the increased tumor risk under immunosuppression, illustrate the multiple and complex influences of the immune system on tumor pathogenesis. It is therefore conceivable that immunomodulatory therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) could also influence the risk of malignancies, apart from treating the underlying disease. Basic scientific research studies have identified various signal transduction pathways that are relevant for tumorigenesis and tumor defense mechanisms. This review presents the current knowledge on the effects of the immune system on the occurrence of cancer and tries, where possible, to relate it to specific treatment options.

[How do register data support clinical decision-making?]. / Wie unterstützen Registerdaten die klinische Entscheidungsfindung?

BACKGROUND: Patients in daily rheumatological care differ in their individual risk profiles from participants in randomized controlled trials (RCT), e.g. due to comorbidities and age. Transferring results from RCTs into routine daily practice is therefore limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution of observational studies for decision-making in routine rheumatology practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used data from the German biologics register RABBIT which includes patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when starting synthetic (s) or biologic (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). They are observed for at least 5 years. Comorbidities and clinically relevant aspects (e.g. history of malignancies) are reported at baseline and adverse events at regular follow-up. RESULTS: Only one out of three patients treated with bDMARDs in RABBIT would have fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the respective pivotal study. Register data enabled developing a risk scoring model which evaluates the individual risk of a patient for serious infections depending on different risk factors and the respective DMARD treatment. Open online access to the score provides the possibility of risk estimation for all rheumatologists. Further results identified long-standing high disease activity as a dominant risk factor for a worsening of prevalent comorbidities. In patients with heart failure it was shown that effective treatment and control of disease activity with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors was more likely to be protective than harmful. CONCLUSION: Observational studies contribute essentially to the assessment of individual risks of patients. The results provide valuable information to support clinical decision-making and therefore strengthen the evidence when treating patients of higher age or with existing comorbidities.

Evaluation of the RABBIT Risk Score for serious infections.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Rheumatoid Arthritis Observation of Biologic Therapy (RABBIT) Risk Score for serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The RABBIT Risk Score for serious infections was developed in 2011 on a cohort of RA patients enrolled in the German biologics register RABBIT between 2001 and 2007. To evaluate this score, we used data from patients enrolled in RABBIT after 1 January 2009. Expected numbers of serious infections and expected numbers of patients with at least one serious infection per year were calculated by means of the RABBIT Risk Score and compared with observed numbers in the evaluation sample. RESULTS: The evaluation of the score in an independent cohort of 1522 RA patients treated with tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitors and 1468 patients treated with non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) showed excellent agreement between observed and expected rates of serious infections. For patients exposed to TNF inhibitors, expected as well as observed numbers of serious infections were 3.0 per 100 patient-years (PY). For patients on non-biological DMARDs the expected and observed numbers were 1.5/100 PY and 1.8/100 PY, respectively. The score was highly predictive in groups of patients with low as well as with high infection risk. CONCLUSIONS: The RABBIT Risk Score is a reliable instrument which determines the risk of serious infection in individual patients based on clinical and treatment information. It helps the rheumatologist to balance benefits and risks of treatment, to avoid high-risk treatment combinations and thus to make informed clinical decisions.

[Safety of antirheumatic drug treatment in the elderly]. / Sicherheit der Rheumatherapie im Alter.

Mainly due to the general demographic changes and decreasing mortality in rheumatic diseases based on therapeutic progress, the proportion of older patients treated by rheumatologists is growing. Drug treatment in the elderly, however, harbors certain risks including age-specific pharmacokinetic features and high rates of multimorbidity and polypharmacy resulting in a risk of drug interactions and adherence problems. Nevertheless, older patients suffering from rheumatic diseases ought to be treated with the same intensity and same targets as the younger counterparts. Bearing all these facts in mind it is a balancing act for rheumatologists to find an optimal treatment for the individual elderly patient. Fear of risks should not lead to hesitant use of drugs leaving these patients alone with treatment deficits, as some studies have suggested.

[Prophylaxis and treatment of infections in elderly patients with rheumatism]. / Prophylaxe und Behandlung von Infektionen beim älteren Rheumapatienten.

In general, the risk of serious infections increases with age, mainly explained by immunosenescence and accumulation of comorbidities. Those patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are of advanced age and require treatment with immunosuppressive agents are at particular risk to develop an infectious disease. Actual requirement and kind of treatment on the one hand, and risk of infection on the other hand, have to be considered carefully for each patient. For example, in high-risk patients, it is important to use glucocorticoids in a minimal way, i.e. in low doses and as short as possible. Vaccination, especially against influenza and pneumococci, plays an essential role in preventing infectious diseases, particularly in the elderly. Nevertheless, in cases of suspected bacterial infection, empiric antibiotic therapy should be started promptly. Due to the burden of drugs taken by patients of advanced age, the benefits and possible side effects as well as potential drug interactions have to be carefully considered. In summary, drug treatment of the elderly requires bearing in mind the complete health status of the individual patient.

Current state of evidence on 'off-label' therapeutic options for systemic lupus erythematosus, including biological immunosuppressive agents, in Germany, Austria and Switzerland--a consensus report.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can be a severe and potentially life-threatening disease that often represents a therapeutic challenge because of its heterogeneous organ manifestations. Only glucocorticoids, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide and very recently belimumab have been approved for SLE therapy in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Dependence on glucocorticoids and resistance to the approved therapeutic agents, as well as substantial toxicity, are frequent. Therefore, treatment considerations will include 'off-label' use of medication approved for other indications. In this consensus approach, an effort has been undertaken to delineate the limits of the current evidence on therapeutic options for SLE organ disease, and to agree on common practice. This has been based on the best available evidence obtained by a rigorous literature review and the authors' own experience with available drugs derived under very similar health care conditions. Preparation of this consensus document included an initial meeting to agree upon the core agenda, a systematic literature review with subsequent formulation of a consensus and determination of the evidence level followed by collecting the level of agreement from the panel members. In addition to overarching principles, the panel have focused on the treatment of major SLE organ manifestations (lupus nephritis, arthritis, lung disease, neuropsychiatric and haematological manifestations, antiphospholipid syndrome and serositis). This consensus report is intended to support clinicians involved in the care of patients with difficult courses of SLE not responding to standard therapies by providing up-to-date information on the best available evidence.

Treatment benefit or survival of the fittest: what drives the time-dependent decrease in serious infection rates under TNF inhibition and what does this imply for the individual patient?

OBJECTIVE: To examine the risk of serious infection conveyed by tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitors in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Data from patients with RA enrolled in the German biologics register RABBIT were used for analysis. Baseline patient characteristics, time-varying risk factors (treatment changes, functional capacity) and selection processes caused by dropout, death or switching to non-anti-TNF treatment were taken into account to estimate the adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR(adj)) of serious infection during treatment with TNF inhibitors compared with non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment. RESULTS: Data were available on 5044 patients, in whom 392 serious infections occurred. The crude rates of serious infections in patients treated with TNF inhibitors declined over the first 3 years of observation (from 4.8 to 2.2/100 patient-years). This decline was driven by (1) treatment termination or loss to follow-up in patients at increased risk and (2) a risk reduction through decreasing glucocorticoid doses and improvement in function. Adjusted for selection processes and time-varying risk factors, the following parameters assessed at baseline (age, chronic diseases) or at follow-up prior to the infection were significantly associated with an increased risk: age >60 years, chronic lung or renal disease, low functional capacity, history of serious infections, treatment with glucocorticoids (7.5-14 mg/day, IRR(adj) 2.1 (95% CI 1.4 to 3.2); ≥ 15 mg/day, IRR(adj) 4.7 (95% CI 2.4 to 9.4)) and treatment with TNFα inhibitors (IRR(adj) 1.8 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.7)). CONCLUSION: Reasons for the decline in infection rates observed at the group level were identified. The results enable expected infection rates to be calculated in individual patients based on their risk profiles.

[The importance of patient perspective in drug surveillance systems]. / Die bedeutung der patientensicht bei der erfassung der sicherheit neuer medikamente.

AIMS: using data from the German biologics register RABBIT we investigated which gain in information can be achieved by integrating patient-reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) into drug surveillance systems. METHODS: patients with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the longitudinal cohort of the German biologics register between May 2001 and September 2006 who had undergone at least one follow-up were included in the study. All ADRs reported to the register either by the treating rheumatologists or the patients were coded with the same coding system (MedDRA®). The agreement between patients and physicians was analysed for the most frequently reported ADRs using the patient as gold standard. RESULTS: data from 4246 patients with a mean observation time of 2 years were analysed. Patients reported on average 1.2 ADRs per patient year (PY), while physicians indicated 1 ADR per PY (p<0,001). The ADR most frequently reported by patients was nausea (93.8 per 1000 PY), followed by fatigue (72.5 per 1000 PYs) and alopecia (60.6 per 1000 PYs). These ADRs were significantly less often reported by physicians. Agreement between patients and physicians was higher in more objective symptoms, such as injection site reaction (in 60.0% of cases where the patient reported this symptom, the physician did so too) or rash (53.0%), than in more subjective symptoms such as fatigue (17.4%). Agreement was highest in life-threatening events. CONCLUSIONS: patients report a higher number of ADRs than their treating physicians. Patients report subjective symptoms impacting on quality of life more frequently than physicians. Patient-physician agreement on known or clinically relevant ARDs is high. Integration of patient reports on ADRs into clinical routine could enhance the patient-physician partnership and improve compliance as well as awareness of signs and symptoms of possible ADRs.

Different risk profiles of biologic agents for new-onset psoriasis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate rates and risk factors for incident and recurrent psoriasis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with different biologic (b) and conventional synthetic (cs) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: RA patients enrolled in the German biologics register RABBIT without (n = 14,525) or with a history of psoriasis (n = 375) were analyzed separately. All first events of psoriasis reported until October 2017 were assigned to the treatments prescribed in the previous 3 months. Crude incidence rates (IR) of psoriasis were calculated per 1000 patient-years. To investigate risk factors for psoriasis, cox regressions with and without inverse probability weights were applied to adjust for confounding by indication. RESULTS: 117 incident and 37 recurrent psoriatic events were reported. Patients exposed to TNFi had a significantly higher incidence rate (IR = 3.04/1,000 PY) than those exposed to csDMARDs only (IR = 0.65), whereas IRs for abatacept, rituximab and tocilizumab did not differ significantly from csDMARDs. Adjusted Cox regression confirmed a higher risk for TNFi. Female sex (HR: 1.7) and smoking (HR: 2.1) were significantly associated with incident psoriasis while methotrexate decreased the risk (HR: 0.5). For recurrent psoriasis, IRs for TNFi, abatacept and rituximab were significantly higher than for csDMARDs. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm a previously observed increased risk of incident psoriasis in patients exposed to TNFi compared to csDMARDs. However, the overall risk is low and the event is usually non-serious. Comedication of TNFi with methotrexate seems to lower the risk of incident psoriasis. In patients with a history of psoriasis, recurrence as adverse event is rare.