RESUMEN
Before the Covid-19 pandemic, human-centered design work in San Francisco found video visits promising for Medicaid-insured pregnant individuals. They were deemed likely better than phone at addressing concerns about remoteness. We describe our experience with introducing video visits within a safety net clinic that had rapidly adopted phone visits as the standard telemedicine option early in the pandemic. By utilizing Kotter's change framework, providing an equity-focused vision, and supporting the implementation with a skilled, on-the-ground project manager, temporary uptake of offering video visits was achieved. However, competing priorities, staffing structure, and institutional culture were barriers to creating sustained change once grant funding ended, even after improvement of digital infrastructure. Efforts to increase video visit uptake in systems where telephone visits are the norm-as is in many safety net systems-may have limited success without leadership-driven prioritization and culture change at all levels.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic triggered unprecedented expansion of outpatient telemedicine in the United States in all types of health systems, including safety-net health systems. These systems generally serve low-income, racially/ethnically/linguistically diverse patients, many of whom face barriers to digital health access. These patients' perspectives are vital to inform ongoing, equitable implementation efforts. METHODS: Twenty-five semi-structured interviews exploring a theoretical framework of technology acceptability were conducted from March through July 2020. Participants had preferred languages of English, Spanish, or Cantonese and were recruited from three clinics (general medicine, obstetrics, and pulmonary) within the San Francisco Health Network. Both deductive and inductive coding were performed. In a secondary analysis, qualitative data were merged with survey data to relate perspectives to demographic factors and technology access/use. RESULTS: Participants were diverse with respect to language (52% non-English-speaking), age (range 23-71), race/ethnicity (24% Asian, 20% Black, 44% Hispanic/Latinx, 12% White), & smartphone use (80% daily, 20% weekly or less). All but 2 had a recent telemedicine visit (83% telephone). Qualitative results revealed that most participants felt telemedicine visits fulfilled their medical needs, were convenient, and were satisfied with their telemedicine care. However, most still preferred in-person visits, expressing concern that tele-visits relied on patients' abilities to access telemedicine, as well as monitor and manage their own health without in-person physical evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: High satisfaction with telemedicine can co-exist with patient-expressed hesitations surrounding the perceived effectiveness, self-efficacy, and digital access barriers associated with a new model of care. More research is needed to guide how healthcare systems and clinicians make decisions and communicate about visit modalities to support high-quality care that responds to patients' needs and circumstances.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Femenino , Humanos , Pandemias , Satisfacción del Paciente , Satisfacción Personal , Embarazo , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Poor adherence to medications is more prevalent for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) than for other chronic conditions and is associated with unfavorable health outcomes. Few interventions have successfully improved adherence for COPD medications; none of these use unlicensed health care personnel. We explored the efficacy of lay health coaches to improve inhaler adherence and technique. METHODS: Within a randomized controlled trial, we recruited English- and Spanish-speaking patients with moderate to severe COPD from urban, public primary care clinics serving a low-income, predominantly African American population. Participants were randomized to receive 9 months of health coaching or usual care. Outcome measures included self-reported adherence to inhaled controller medications in the past 7 days and observed technique for all inhalers. We used generalized linear models, controlling for baseline values and clustering by site. RESULTS: Baseline adherence and inhaler technique were uniformly poor and did not differ by study arm. At 9 months, health-coached patients reported a greater number of days of adherence compared with usual care patients (6.4 vs 5.5 days; adjusted P = .02) and were more likely to have used their controller inhalers as prescribed for 5 of the last 7 days (90% vs 69%; adjusted P = .008). They were more than 3 times as likely to demonstrate perfect technique for all inhaler devices (24% vs 7%; adjusted P = .01) and mastery of essential steps (40% vs 11%; adjusted P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Health coaching may provide a scalable model that can improve care for people living with COPD.
Asunto(s)
Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tutoría , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración por Inhalación , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recruitment and retention are two significant barriers in research, particularly for historically underrepresented groups, including racial and ethnic minorities, patients who are low-income, or people with substance use or mental health issues. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death and disproportionately affects many underrepresented groups. The lack of representation of these groups in research limits the generalizability and applicability of clinical research and results. In this paper we describe our experience and rates of recruitment and retention of underrepresented groups for the Aides in Respiration (AIR) COPD Health Coaching Study. METHODS: A priori design strategies included minimizing exclusion criteria, including patients in the study process, establishing partnerships with the community clinics, and ensuring that the health coaching intervention was flexible enough to accommodate patient needs. RESULTS: Challenges to recruitment included lack of spirometric data in patient records, space constraints at the clinic sites, barriers to patient access to clinic sites, lack of current patient contact information and poor patient health. Of 282 patients identified as eligible, 192 (68%) were enrolled in the study and 158 (82%) completed the study. Race, gender, educational attainment, severity of disease, health literacy, and clinic site were not associated with recruitment or retention. However, older patients were less likely to enroll in the study and patients who used home oxygen or had more than one hospitalization during the study period were less likely to complete the study. Three key strategies to maximize recruitment and retention were identified during the study: incorporating the patient perspective, partnering with the community clinics, and building patient rapport. CONCLUSIONS: While the AIR study included design features to maximize the recruitment and retention of patients from underrepresented groups, additional challenges were encountered and responded to during the study. We also identified three key strategies recommended for future studies of COPD and similar conditions. Incorporating the approaches described into future studies may increase participation rates from underrepresented groups, providing results that can be more accurately applied to patients who carry a disparate burden of disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrial.gov at identifier NCT02234284 on August 12, 2014. Descriptor number: 2.9 Racial, ethnic, or social disparities in lung disease and treatment.
Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Minoritarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Selección de Paciente , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/prevención & control , Proyectos de Investigación , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pobreza , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Teledermatology enables dermatologists to remotely triage and evaluate dermatology patients, but previous studies have questioned whether teledermatology is clinically efficient. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether implementation of a teledermatology system at the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center has improved the accessibility and efficiency of dermatology care delivery. METHODS: Retrospective, pre-post analysis of a pre-teledermatology cohort (June 2014-December 2014) compared with a post-teledermatology cohort (June 2017-December 2017). RESULTS: Our analysis captured 11,586 patients. After implementation of teledermatology, waiting times for new patients decreased significantly (84.6 days vs 6.7 days; P < .001), total cases evaluated per month increased significantly (754 vs 901; P = .008), and number of cases evaluated per dermatologist-hour increased significantly (2.27 vs 2.63; P = .010). In the post-teledermatology period, 61.8% of teledermatology consults were managed without a clinic visit. LIMITATIONS: We were unable to control for changes in demand for dermatology evaluations between the 2 periods and did not have a control group with which to compare our results. CONCLUSION: The dermatology service was more accessible and more efficient after implementation of teledermatology, suggesting that capitated health care settings can benefit from implementation of a teledermatology system.
Asunto(s)
Dermatología/métodos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades de la Piel , Telemedicina , Servicios Urbanos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Eficiencia , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnósticoRESUMEN
In the original article [1], the authors reference their intention to use the 'Morisky Medication Adherence Scale'.
RESUMEN
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a devastating disorder characterized by increased alveolar permeability with no effective treatment beyond supportive care. Current mechanisms underlying ARDS focus on alveolar endothelial and epithelial injury caused by products of innate immune cells and platelets. However, the role of adaptive immune cells in ARDS remains largely unknown. In this study, we report that expansion of Ag-specific αßTh17 cells contributes to ARDS by local secretion of IL-17A, which in turn directly increases alveolar epithelial permeability. Mice with a highly restrictive defect in Ag-specific αßTh17 cells were protected from experimental ARDS induced by a single dose of endotracheal LPS. Loss of IL-17 receptor C or Ab blockade of IL-17A was similarly protective, further suggesting that IL-17A released by these cells was responsible for this effect. LPS induced a rapid and specific clonal expansion of αßTh17 cells in the lung, as determined by deep sequencing of the hypervariable CD3RßVJ region of the TCR. Our findings could be relevant to ARDS in humans, because we found significant elevation of IL-17A in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with ARDS, and rIL-17A directly increased permeability across cultured human alveolar epithelial monolayers. These results reveal a previously unexpected role for adaptive immune responses that increase alveolar permeability in ARDS and suggest that αßTh17 cells and IL-17A could be novel therapeutic targets for this currently untreatable disease.
Asunto(s)
Interleucina-17/inmunología , Alveolos Pulmonares/inmunología , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T alfa-beta/inmunología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/inmunología , Células Th17/inmunología , Inmunidad Adaptativa , Animales , Anticuerpos/farmacología , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/citología , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/inmunología , Células Epiteliales/efectos de los fármacos , Células Epiteliales/inmunología , Células Epiteliales/patología , Humanos , Interleucina-17/antagonistas & inhibidores , Interleucina-17/genética , Lipopolisacáridos/farmacología , Ratones , Ratones Transgénicos , Permeabilidad , Cultivo Primario de Células , Alveolos Pulmonares/efectos de los fármacos , Alveolos Pulmonares/patología , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T alfa-beta/genética , Receptores de Interleucina-17/genética , Receptores de Interleucina-17/inmunología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/genética , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/patología , Células Th17/efectos de los fármacos , Células Th17/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severely hinders quality of life for those affected and is costly to the health care system. Care gaps in areas such as pharmacotherapy, inhaler technique, and knowledge of disease are prevalent, particularly for vulnerable populations served by community clinics. Non-professionally licensed health coaches have been shown to be an effective and cost-efficient solution in bridging care gaps and facilitating self-management for patients with other chronic diseases, but no research to date has explored their efficacy in improving care for people living with COPD. METHOD: This is multi-site, single blinded, randomized controlled trial evaluates the efficacy of health coaches to facilitate patient self-management of disease and improve quality of life for patients with moderate to severe COPD. Spirometry, survey, and an exercise capacity test are conducted at baseline and at 9 months. A short survey is administered by phone at 3 and 6 months post-enrollment. The nine month health coaching intervention focuses on enhancing disease understanding and symptom awareness, improving use of inhalers; making personalized plans to increase physical activity, smoking cessation, or otherwise improve disease management; and facilitating care coordination. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide evidence regarding the efficacy and feasibility of health coaching to improve self-management and quality of life for urban underserved patients with moderate to severe COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02234284 . Registered 12 August 2014.
Asunto(s)
Tutoría , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Automanejo , Tolerancia al Ejercicio , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Renta , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Proyectos de Investigación , Método Simple Ciego , Espirometría , Prueba de PasoRESUMEN
This case study examines how a public delivery system hospital implemented a heart monitoring patch in place of existing electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring by pursuing a holistic value proposition. For example, leaders identified opportunity costs embedded in the existing ECG monitoring staffing. Stakeholders also rallied around values such as patient safety, patient experience, and quality of care. Implementation also benefited from external philanthropic and industry partnerships, which facilitated a pilot period to implement new workflows, demonstrate proof-of-concept, and evaluate process improvements. Despite implementation success, ongoing procurement and reimbursement challenges demonstrate the messiness of innovation, even after reaching a "maintenance" phase. Availability of patient-facing material in multiple languages is one example of an implementation gap in safety net settings. New policies by health systems, payers, and others are needed to establish pathways for future high-value innovations.
Asunto(s)
Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad , Tecnología , Humanos , Flujo de TrabajoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of telehealth video use across the United States is uneven, with low uptake in safety-net health care delivery systems, which care for patient populations who face barriers to using digital technologies. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to increase video visit use in an urban safety-net delivery system. We piloted a telehealth ambassador program, in which volunteers offered technical support to patients with access to digital technologies to convert primary care visits already scheduled as telehealth audio-only visits to telehealth video visits. METHODS: We used a descriptive approach to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and acceptability of the pilot telehealth ambassador program. Feasibility was quantified by the percentage of eligible patients who answered calls from telehealth ambassadors. Program efficacy was measured in two ways: (1) the percentage of patients with access to digital technology who interacted with the navigators and were successfully prepared for a telehealth video visit, and (2) the percentage of prepared patients who completed their scheduled video visits. Program acceptability was ascertained by a structured telephone survey. RESULTS: Telehealth ambassadors attempted to contact 776 eligible patients; 43.6% (338/776) were reached by phone, among whom 44.4% (150/338) were provided digital support between March and May 2021. The mean call duration was 8.8 (range 0-35) minutes. Overall, 67.3% (101/150) of patients who received support successfully completed a telehealth video visit with their provider. Among the 188 patients who were contacted but declined video visit digital support, 61% (114/188) provided a reason for their decline; 42% (48/114) did not see added value beyond a telehealth audio-only visit, 20% (23/114) had insufficient internet access, and 27% (31/114) declined learning about a new technology. The acceptability of the telehealth ambassador program was generally favorable, although some patients preferred having in-real-time technology support on the day of their telehealth video visit. CONCLUSIONS: This high-touch program reached approximately one-half of eligible patients and helped two-thirds of interested patients with basic video visit capability successfully complete a video visit. Increasing the program's reach will require outreach solutions that do not rely solely on phone calls. Routinely highlighting the benefits of video visits, partnering with community-based organizations to overcome structural barriers to telehealth use, and offering in-real-time technology support will help increase the program's efficacy.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Challenges in implementing telemedicine disproportionately affect patients served in safety-net settings. Few studies have elucidated pragmatic, team-based strategies for successful telemedicine implementation in primary care, especially with a safety-net population. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted in-depth, semistructured qualitative interviews with primary care clinicians and staff in a large urban safety-net health care system on the facilitators, challenges, and impact of implementing team workflows for synchronous telemedicine video and audio-only visits. METHODS: Interviews were analyzed using modified grounded theory with multistage coding. Common themes were identified and reviewed to describe within-group and between-group variations. We used the Practical, Robust Implementation Sustainability Model framework to organize the final themes with an implementation science lens. RESULTS: Four themes emerged from 11 interviews: (1) having a dedicated individual preparing patients for video visits is a prerequisite for the successful introduction of video visits to patients with limited digital literacy; (2) health care maintenance during video and audio-only visits benefits from standardized workflows and communication; (3) the increased flexibility and accessibility of telemedicine visits were perceived benefits to patient care, despite barriers for subsets of patients; and (4) telemedicine visits generally have a positive impact on work experience for clinicians and staff due to increased efficiency, despite audio-only visits feeling less engaging. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding how to strategically use team-based workflows to expand video visit access while ensuring care quality of all telemedicine visits will allow primary care practices to maximize telemedicine's benefits to patients in the safety-net setting.
Asunto(s)
Atención Primaria de Salud , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad , Telemedicina , Flujo de Trabajo , Humanos , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Investigación Cualitativa , Femenino , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , AdultoRESUMEN
Background This study aimed to investigate the rationale, barriers, and facilitators of teleretinal camera implementation in primary care and endocrinology clinics for diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening across University of California (UC) health systems utilizing the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Methodology Institutional representatives from UC Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, and Davis participated in a series of focus group meetings to elicit implementation facilitators and barriers for teleophthalmology programs within their campuses. Site representatives also completed a survey regarding their program's performance over the calendar year 2022 in the following areas: DR screening camera sites, payment sources and coding, screening workflows including clinical, information technology (IT), reading, results, pathologic findings, and follow-up, including patient outreach for abnormal results. Focus group and survey results were mapped to the EPIS framework to gain insights into the implementation process of these programs and identify areas for optimization. Results Four UC campuses with 20 active camera sites screened 7,450 patients in the calendar year 2022. The average DR screening rate across the four campuses was 55%. Variations between sources of payment, turn-around time, image-grading structure, image-report characteristics, IT infrastructure, and patient outreach strategies were identified between sites. Closing gaps in IT integration between data systems, ensuring the financial sustainability of the program, and optimizing patient outreach remain primary challenges across sites and serve as good opportunities for cross-institutional learning. Conclusions Despite the potential for long-term cost savings and improving access to care, numerous obstacles continue to hinder the widespread implementation of teleretinal DR screening. Implementation science approaches can identify strategies for addressing these challenges and optimizing implementation.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Integrin αvß5 has been identified as a regulator of vascular leak and endothelial permeability. We hypothesized that targeting αvß5 could represent a viable treatment strategy for sepsis. DESIGN: Integrin ß5 subunit knockout and wild-type 129/svJae mice and wild-type mice treated with αvß5 blocking or control antibodies were tested in models of intraperitoneal lipopolysaccharide and cecal ligation and puncture. Human umbilical vein endothelial cell and human lung microvascular endothelial cell monolayers were treated with αvß5 antibodies to assess for effects on lipopolysaccharide-induced changes in transendothelial resistance and on patterns of cytoskeletal reorganization. SETTING: Laboratory-based research. SUBJECTS: Mice and endothelial cell monolayers. INTERVENTIONS, MEASUREMENTS, AND MAIN RESULTS: Measurements taken after intraperitoneal lipopolysaccharide and/or cecal ligation and puncture included mortality, vascular leak, hematocrit, quantification of a panel of serum cytokines/chemokines, and assessment of thioglyccolate-induced leukocyte migration. ß5 knockout mice had decreased mortality after intraperitoneal lipopolysaccharide and cecal ligation and puncture and decreased vascular leak, as measured by extravasation of an I-labeled intravascular tracer. Treating clinically ill mice with αvß5 antibodies, up to 20 hrs after intraperitoneal lipopolysaccharide and cecal ligation and puncture, also resulted in decreased mortality. αvß5 antibodies attenuated lipopolysaccharide-induced transendothelial resistance changes and cytoskeletal stress fiber formation in both human umbilical vein endothelial cell and human lung microvascular endothelial cell monolayers. αvß5 antibodies had no effect on cytokine/chemokine serum levels after cecal ligation and puncture. ß5 knockout mice and wild-type controls did not exhibit differences in thioglyccolate-induced leukocyte migration. CONCLUSIONS: Our studies suggest that αvß5 is an important regulator of the vascular endothelial leak response in sepsis and that αvß5 blockade may provide a novel approach to treating this devastating disease syndrome.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos/farmacología , Receptores de Vitronectina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Sepsis/terapia , Animales , Ciego/cirugía , Movimiento Celular , Quimiocinas/sangre , Citocinas/sangre , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Células Endoteliales/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraperitoneales , Leucocitos/fisiología , Ligadura , Lipopolisacáridos/administración & dosificación , Ratones , Ratones de la Cepa 129 , Ratones Noqueados , Punciones , Receptores de Vitronectina/genéticaRESUMEN
RATIONALE: Sepsis and acute lung injury (ALI) have devastatingly high mortality rates. Both are associated with increased vascular leak, a process regulated by complex molecular mechanisms. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that integrin αvß3 could be an important determinant of vascular leak and endothelial permeability in sepsis and ALI. METHODS: ß3 subunit knockout mice were tested for lung vascular leak after endotracheal LPS, and systemic vascular leak and mortality after intraperitoneal LPS and cecal ligation and puncture. Possible contributory effects of ß3 deficiency in platelets and other hematopoietic cells were excluded by bone marrow reconstitution experiments. Endothelial cells treated with αvß3 antibodies were evaluated for sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P)mediated alterations in barrier function, cytoskeletal arrangement, and integrin localization. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: ß3 knockout mice had increased vascular leak and pulmonary edema formation after endotracheal LPS, and increased vascular leak and mortality after intraperitoneal LPS and cecal ligation and puncture. In endothelial cells, αvß3 antibodies inhibited barrier-enhancing and cortical actin responses to S1P. Furthermore, S1P induced translocation of αvß3 from discrete focal adhesions to cortically distributed sites through Gi- and Rac1-mediated pathways. Cortical αvß3 localization after S1P was decreased by αvß3 antibodies, suggesting that ligation of the αvß3 with its extracellular matrix ligands is required to stabilize cortical αvß3 focal adhesions. CONCLUSIONS: Our studies identify a novel mechanism by which αvß3 mitigates increased vascular leak, a pathophysiologic function central to sepsis and ALI. These studies suggest that drugs designed to block αvß3 may have the unexpected side effect of intensifying sepsis- and ALI-associated vascular endothelial leak.
Asunto(s)
Actinas/metabolismo , Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/metabolismo , Endotelio Vascular/metabolismo , Integrina alfaVbeta3/antagonistas & inhibidores , Sepsis/metabolismo , Enfermedades Vasculares/metabolismo , Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/complicaciones , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Femenino , Lisofosfolípidos/metabolismo , Ratones , Ratones Noqueados , Edema Pulmonar/complicaciones , Edema Pulmonar/metabolismo , Sepsis/complicaciones , Transducción de Señal , Esfingosina/análogos & derivados , Esfingosina/metabolismoRESUMEN
Purpose: Half of people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) do not receive high-quality, evidenced-based care as described in international guidelines. We conducted secondary data analysis of a previously published study to assess the ability of a model of lay health coaching to improve provision of guideline-based care in a primary care setting. Methods: As part of a randomized controlled trial, we recruited English- and Spanish-speaking patients with moderate to severe COPD from primary care clinics serving a low-income, predominantly African American population. Participants were randomized to receive usual care or 9 months of health coaching from primary care personnel informed by a pulmonary specialist practitioner. Outcome measures included prescription of appropriate inhaler therapy, participation in COPD-related education, engagement with specialty care, prescription of smoking cessation medications, and patient ratings of the quality of care. Results: Baseline quality measures did not differ between study arms. At 9 months, coached patients were more likely (increase of 9.3% over usual care; P=0.014) to have received guideline-based inhalers compared to those in usual care. Coached patients were more likely to engage with pulmonary specialty care (increase of 8.3% over usual care with at least 1 visit; P=0.04) and educational classes (increase of 5.3% over usual care; P=0.03). Receipt of smoking cessation medications among patients smoking at baseline in the health coaching group increased 21.1 percentage points more than in usual care, a difference near statistical significance (P=0.06). Conclusions: Health coaching may improve the provision of quality chronic illness care for conditions such as COPD.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted safety-net health care systems to rapidly implement telemedicine services with little prior experience, causing disparities in access to virtual visits. While much attention has been given to patient barriers, less is known regarding system-level factors influencing telephone versus video-visit adoption. As telemedicine remains a preferred service for patients and providers, and reimbursement parity will not continue for audio visits, health systems must evaluate how to support higher-quality video visit access. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess health system-level factors and their impact on telephone and video visit adoption to inform sustainability of telemedicine for ambulatory safety-net sites. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among ambulatory care clinicians at a hospital-linked ambulatory clinic network serving a diverse, publicly insured patient population between May 28 and July 14, 2020. We conducted bivariate analyses assessing health care system-level factors associated with (1) high telephone adoption (4 or more visits on average per session); and (2) video visit adoption (at least 1 video visit on average per session). RESULTS: We collected 311 responses from 643 eligible clinicians, yielding a response rate of 48.4%. Clinician respondents (N=311) included 34.7% (n=108) primary or urgent care, 35.1% (n=109) medical, and 7.4% (n=23) surgical specialties. Our sample included 178 (57.2%) high telephone adopters and 81 (26.05%) video adopters. Among high telephone adopters, 72.2% utilized personal devices for telemedicine (vs 59.0% of low telephone adopters, P=.04). Video nonadopters requested more training in technical aspects than adopters (49.6% vs 27.2%, P<.001). Primary or urgent care had the highest proportion of high telephone adoption (84.3%, compared to 50.4% of medical and 37.5% of surgical specialties, P<.001). Medical specialties had the highest proportion of video adoption (39.1%, compared to 14.8% of primary care and 12.5% of surgical specialties, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Personal device access and department specialty were major factors associated with high telephone and video visit adoption among safety-net clinicians. Desire for training was associated with lower video visit use. Secure device access, clinician technical trainings, and department-wide assessments are priorities for safety-net systems implementing telemedicine.
RESUMEN
Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted unprecedented expansion of telemedicine services. We sought to describe clinician experiences providing telemedicine to publicly-insured, low-income patients during COVID-19. Methods: Online survey of ambulatory clinicians in an urban safety-net hospital system, conducted May 28 2020-July 14 2020. Results: Among 311 participants (response rate 48.3%), 34.7% (N=108/311) practiced in primary/urgent care, 37.0% (N=115/311) medical specialty and 7.7% (N=24/311) surgical clinics. 87.8% (273/311) had conducted telephone visits, 26% (81/311) video. Participants reported observing both technical and non-technical patient barriers. Clinicians reported concerns about the diagnostic safety of telephone (58.9%, 129/219) vs video (35.3%, 24/68). However, clinician comfort with telemedicine was high (89.3% (216/242) for telephone, 91.0% (61/67) for video), with many clinicians (220/239 or 92.1% telephone, 60/66 or 90.9% video) planning to continue telemedicine after COVID-19. Conclusions: Clinicians in a safety-net healthcare system report high comfort with and intention to continue telemedicine after the pandemic, despite patient challenges and safety concerns.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore attitudes and beliefs about the role of health coaching for vulnerable populations, including people experiencing substance use or homelessness. METHODS: From May-July 2016, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with patients, primary care clinicians, pulmonary specialists, and health coaches participating in a study of health coaching for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We developed a codebook and applied it in Atlas.ti, generating themes for frequently occurring codes. RESULTS: All stakeholder groups (n=20 patients, 11 primary care clinicians, three specialists, and two health coaches), reported improved COPD management and behavior change, even for patients experiencing substance use or homelessness. Clinicians observed greater symptom awareness and prioritization of COPD during the medical visit. The strength of the health coaching relationship and flexibility of the role were key to its effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Lay health coaching may provide a model to meet the needs of highly vulnerable populations with COPD.
Asunto(s)
Tutoría , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
In service of particularly vulnerable populations, safety net healthcare systems must nimbly leverage health information technology (IT), including electronic health records (EHRs), to coordinate the medical and public health response to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Six months after the San Francisco Department of Public Health implemented a new EHR across its hospitals and citywide clinics, California declared a state of emergency in response to COVID-19. This paper describes how the IT and informatics teams supported San Francisco Department of Public Health's goals of expanding the safety net healthcare system capacity, meeting the needs of specific vulnerable populations, increasing equity in COVID-19 testing access, and expanding public health analytics and research capacity. Key enabling factors included critical partnerships with operational leaders, early identification of priorities, a clear governance structure, agility in the face of rapidly changing circumstances, and a commitment to vulnerable populations.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Health coaching has emerged as an important tool for improving patient-centered care in primary care practice but has not specifically been evaluated for patients whose care is shared by a primary care provider (PCP) and specialist. METHODS: As part of a nine-month randomized controlled trial comparing health coaching to usual care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the authors developed the Pulmonary Specialist Health Coach Consultation (PuSHCon). In this novel model, health coaches facilitated pulmonary specialist consultations for patients with COPD without the need for an in-person visit. Observational data from the randomized controlled trial were analyzed to study the implementation, adoption, and impact of the PuSHCon model for 70 of 92 patients randomized to the health coaching arm and for 17 of 100 patients in the control arm (who received PuSHCon after the end of the study). Quality of care was measured using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). RESULTS: Of 87 patients who participated in PuSHCon, 74 (85.1%) received one or more specialist recommendations, of which 86.8% were implemented. Only 12 patients (13.8%) subsequently required an in-person visit with the PuSHCon specialist. The proportion of PuSHCon participants receiving guideline-concordant care increased from 64.7% to 94.1% (p < 0.001). The mean PACIC item score increased from 3.48 to 3.74 (pâ¯=â¯0.03). CONCLUSION: The PuSHCon model facilitated consultations that resulted in changes in care, which were implemented for a majority of patients. Guideline-concordant care and patient-reported quality of care increased over nine months. This model could potentially be expanded to help patients with other chronic conditions when PCPs and specialists share patient care.