Description of Two Families with New Mutations in Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformations Genes.

Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are dilated aberrant leaky capillaries located in the Central Nervous System. Familial CCM is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder related to mutations in KRIT1, Malcavernin or PDCD10. We show two unrelated families presenting familial CCM due to two new mutations in KRIT1 and PDCD10, producing truncated proteins. Clinical phenotype was highly variable among patients from asymptomatic individuals to diplopia, seizures or severe intracranial hemorrhage. PDCD10 patients usually show a more aggressive course and they frequently showed multiple meningiomas. This work provides evidence for the pathogenicity of two new mutations in CCM genes and supports previous findings regarding familial CCM and multiple meningiomas.

Impact on functional outcome of an adaptive Stroke Unit based system of care for patients undergoing endovascular treatment during pandemic times.

Introduction: The COVID19 pandemic collapsed intensive care units (ICUs) all around the world, conditioning systems of care (SOC) for other critical conditions such as severe ischemic stroke requiring endovascular treatment (EVT). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of an adaptive Stroke Unit (SU) based SOC on functional outcomes, with the goal of avoiding both general anesthesia (GA) and ICU admission in stroke patients treated with EVT. Material and methods: We performed an observational study comparing data from our traditional ICU-GA based SOC and the adaptive SU-Conscious Sedation (CS) based SOC (consecutive patients undergoing EVT 1 year prior and after onset of the pandemic). Primary outcome was 90-days modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and secondary outcomes included, among others, in-hospital complications, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Results: A total of 210 EVT were performed during the study period (107 under the traditional-SOC and 103 under the adaptive-SOC). A significantly greater proportion of patient was treated under CS (15.9% vs 57.3%; p < 0.001) and admitted for post-procedural care at SU (15% vs 66%; p < 0.001) in the adaptive SOC. Rates of in-hospital complications were similar in both periods, with reduced hospital LOS in the adaptive SOC (10 (7-15) vs 8 (6-12); p = 0.005). The adaptive SOC was associated with higher odds for 90 days favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) (aOR 3.15 (1.34-7.39); p = 0.008). Conclusion: In our case, an adaptive SOC that combined both preference for CS and postprocedural care in SU was associated with better functional outcomes and reduced healthcare resource use for patients undergoing EVT.