Vitamin B12 Supplementation in Psychiatric Practice.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Vitamin B12 (B12, cobalamin) deficiency has been associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms, suggesting a role for B12 supplementation both as a treatment for psychiatric symptoms due to B12 deficiency and as an augmentation strategy for pharmacological treatments of psychiatric disorders. This critical review discusses the major causes of B12 deficiency, the range of psychiatric and non-psychiatric manifestations of B12 deficiency, the indications for testing B12 levels, and the evidence for B12 supplementation for major psychiatric disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: We find that high-quality evidence shows no benefit to routine B12 supplementation for mild depressive symptoms or to prevent depression. There is very limited evidence on the role of B12 supplementation to augment antidepressants. No high-quality evidence to date suggests a role for routine B12 supplementation in any other major psychiatric disorder. No formal guidelines indicate when clinicians should test B12 levels for common psychiatric symptoms, in the absence of major risk factors for deficiency or cardinal symptoms of deficiency. No robust evidence currently supports routine B12 supplementation for major psychiatric disorders. However, psychiatrists should be aware of the important risk factors for B12 deficiency and should be able to identify symptoms of B12 deficiency, which requires prompt testing, medical workup, and treatment. Testing for B12 deficiency should be considered for atypical or severe psychiatric presentations.

Pharmacogenomic Testing in Psychiatry: Ready for Primetime?

Pharmacogenomic testing in clinical psychiatry has grown at an accelerated pace in the last few years and is poised to grow even further. Despite robust evidence lacking regarding efficacy in clinical use, there continues to be growing interest to use it to make treatment decisions. We intend this article to be a primer for a clinician wishing to understand the biological bases, evidence for benefits, and pitfalls in clinical decision-making. Using clinical vignettes, we elucidate these headings in addition to providing a perspective on current relevance, what can be communicated to patients, and future research directions. Overall, the evidence for pharmacogenomic testing in psychiatry demonstrates strong analytical validity, modest clinical validity, and virtually no evidence to support clinical use. There is definitely a need for more double-blinded randomized controlled trials to assess the use of pharmacogenomic testing in clinical decision-making and care, and until this is done, they could perhaps have an adjunct role in clinical decision-making but minimal use in leading the initial treatment plan.

Psychedelics, With a Focus on Psilocybin: Issues for the Clinician.

There has been a burgeoning interest in psychedelics among the public, state legislatures, psychiatrists and other clinical providers, and within the research community. Increasing numbers of studies evaluating psychedelics for depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder, and substance use disorders have been conducted or are underway. While discussing psychedelics in general, the focus of this paper is on psilocybin and its mechanism, how it exerts a psychedelic effect, dosing, and a review of the treatment studies of psilocybin, which were primarily for treatment-resistant depression and cancer-related anxiety. Future directions and potential limitations of studying and regulating psilocybin and other psychedelics are also discussed.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors: How Long Is Long Enough?

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are among the most commonly prescribed medications. They are among the first-line medications for several chronic or relapsing-remitting psychiatric conditions, including major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders. The advantages of SSRI use include ease of titration and their tolerability and safety profile. Guidelines for the short-term use of SSRIs are widely available, but there is no well-organized guidance on how and whether to maintain a patient on SSRIs for the long-term. In this article, we discuss the benefits and possible adverse consequences of long-term SSRI use, as well as clinical practice considerations when using SSRIs chronically. The major benefit of long-term SSRI use is relapse prevention. The current literature suggests that the general health risks of long-term SSRI use are low; however, further research, particularly in special populations including youth and the elderly, is needed. Long-term SSRI use increases the risk of tachyphylaxis and discontinuation syndrome. Recognizing that many patients may remain on SSRIs for many years, there are several factors that prescribers should consider if they choose to use an SSRI when initiating treatment and during long-term monitoring. The decision to continue or to discontinue an SSRI should be an active one, involving both the patient and prescriber, and should be revisited periodically. Patients who remain on SSRIs for the long-term should also have periodic monitoring to reassess the risk-benefit ratio of remaining on the SSRI, as well as to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the medication.

Efficacy and safety of atomoxetine in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and major depression.

This double-blind study examined efficacy and safety of atomoxetine (ATX; < or =1.8mg/kg per day) in adolescents aged 12-18 with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) diagnoses of both attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and co-morbid major depressive disorder (MDD). Diagnoses were confirmed by the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version and persistently elevated scores on the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV, Parent version, Investigator-administered and -scored (ADHDRS-IV-Parent:Inv, > or =1.5 standard deviations above age and gender norms) and Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R, > or = 40). Patients were treated for approximately 9 weeks with ATX (n = 72) or placebo (n = 70). Mean decrease in ADHDRS-IV-Parent:Inv total score was significantly greater in the ATX group (-13.3 +/- 10.0) compared with the placebo group (-5.1 +/- 9.9; p < 0.001). Mean CDRS-R score improvement was not significantly different between groups (ATX, -14.8 +/- 13.3; placebo, -12.8 +/- 10.4). Rates of treatment-emergent mania did not differ between groups (ATX, 0.0%; placebo, 1.5%). ATX treatment was associated with significantly more nausea and decreased appetite (p = 0.002; p = 0.003). No spontaneously reported adverse events involving suicidal ideation or suicidal behavior occurred in either group. ATX was an effective and safe treatment for ADHD in adolescents with ADHD and MDD. However, this trial showed no evidence for ATX of efficacy in treating MDD.

Placebo-controlled study of the effects of atomoxetine on bladder control in children with nocturnal enuresis.

INTRODUCTION: Nocturnal enuresis is a condition in which children at least 5 years of age are incontinent of urine at night. Atomoxetine, a potent inhibitor of the presynaptic norepinephrine transporter, is used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study tested the hypothesis that atomoxetine will provide significant therapeutic benefit for nocturnal enuresis in patients with the diagnosis of nocturnal enuresis. METHODS: Atomoxetine's efficacy for improving nocturnal enuresis was studied in 87 pediatric subjects using an outpatient, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study. Efficacy was determined by measuring the mean number of dry nights per week using an intent-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome measure, the Dry Night Log-Parent Report (DNL-PR), a daily parent diary. RESULTS: Baseline and end point DNL-PR data were available from 42 atomoxetine-treated and 41 placebo-treated subjects. Atomoxetine increased the average number of dry nights per week by 1.47 compared with .60 for placebo (F = 7.06; df = (1, 75); p = 0.01). Fifteen atomoxetine-treated subjects (35.7%) had an increase of at least 2 dry nights per week compared with only 6 (14.6%) placebo-treated subjects (Fisher's exact test; p = 0.042). There were no significant differences in adverse events between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, atomoxetine treatment was associated with a significant increase in dry nights in children with nocturnal enuresis.

Neuropsychiatric aspects of concussion.

Over the past decade, concussion has become the most widely discussed injury in contact sports. However, concussions also occur in several other settings, such as non-contact sports, elderly individuals, young children, military personnel, and victims of domestic violence. Concussion is frequently undiagnosed as a cause of psychiatric morbidity, especially when the patient has no history of loss of consciousness or direct head trauma. Almost all of the extant literature focuses on traumatic brain injury and assumes that concussion is merely a mild form of traumatic brain injury, which has resulted in a lack of understanding about what concussion is, and how to diagnose, monitor, and treat its varied neuropsychiatric symptoms. In this Review, we address key issues so that the psychiatric clinician can better understand and treat patients with a clinical phenotype that might be the direct result of, or be exacerbated by, concussion. Future research needs to focus on prospective clinical trials in all affected patient populations (ie, those affected by concussion and those affected by various degrees of traumatic brain injury), the identification of reliable biomarkers that can be used to assist with diagnosis and treatment response, and the development of effective treatment interventions. Clearly differentiating concussion from traumatic brain injury is essential to achieve reliable and clinically relevant outcomes.

Improvement in health-related quality of life in children with ADHD: an analysis of placebo controlled studies of atomoxetine.

Despite significant functional impairments associated with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the growing appreciation of the importance of health-related quality of life (HRQL) assessment in children with chronic disorders, relatively few studies have examined the impact of ADHD treatment on HRQL. This investigation examines the effect of atomoxetine, a nonstimulant treatment for ADHD, on HRQL and identifies factors that are predictive of HRQL improvements. The Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ), which is a multidimensional HRQL measure, was collected during three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Children who received atomoxetine had significantly greater improvement in psychosocial functioning compared to the placebo group. No significant differences between once-a-day and twice-a-day dosing were found. Treatment with atomoxetine, lower HRQL baseline score, no history of stimulant use, and absence of oppositional defiant disorder were all associated with improvements in psychosocial functioning. Findings demonstrate the positive impact of atomoxetine on HRQL in children with ADHD.

Does placebo response differ between objective and subjective measures in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder?

Placebo response complicates the interpretation of treatment response in both clinical practice and clinical trials in youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In a pilot study comparing subjective ADHD symptom rating scales with scores obtained using the Quotient™ ADHD System (an objective computerized technology for assessment of hyperactivity, inattention, and impulsivity in ADHD), it was found that agreement between these 2 measures was not as strong as anticipated. This observation prompted us to evaluate placebo responses associated with subjective and objective assessments. Eligible study participants aged 6 to 14 years with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition ADHD diagnosis based on clinician interviews were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment sequence groups (placebo, low dose, and medium dose; or low dose, medium dose, and placebo) using either atomoxetine HCl or osmotic controlled-release (OROS) methylphenidate HCl as the active treatment in a 3-week, triple-blind (subject, parent, rater) trial. Subjects were exposed to placebo and different medication doses to evaluate the comparative sensitivity of objective and subjective measures in assessing changes in clinical condition. Placebo response was defined using 3 thresholds: any improvement, > 25% improvement, or > 40% improvement from baseline on Quotient™ Global Scaled Score (QGSS) or the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) Total score from baseline to the visit when placebo was administered. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was used to measure agreement between baseline and placebo scores for the objective and subjective assessments. Of 30 subjects with placebo and baseline scores, 80%, 47%, and 27% met the 3 response thresholds (ie, any, > 25%, or > 40% improvement, respectively) on the ADHD-RS Total score compared with 27%, 7%, and 0% on the QGSS. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.81 and 0.39 for the QGSS and the ADHD-RS Total score, respectively. Although larger trials are warranted, we tentatively conclude that using objective measures and higher response thresholds may enhance assay sensitivity in clinical trials and hence limit necessary patient enrollments to rule out type II statistical error.

Clinical responses to atomoxetine in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the Integrated Data Exploratory Analysis (IDEA) study.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical experience suggests that some (but not all) patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are highly responsive to the nonstimulant atomoxetine. We conducted a retrospective analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to identify potential baseline (moderator) and on-treatment (mediator) predictors of responses. METHOD: Data from 6 U.S. RCTs among patients aged 6 to 18 years were pooled (N = 1,069; subjects treated with atomoxetine, n = 618). Subjects were categorized as much improved (> or = 40% decrease in ADHD Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator Administered and Scored total score), minimally improved (25%-< 40% decline), or nonresponders (< 25% decrease). Logistic regression, analyses of variance, and repeated-measures analyses were used to explore associations between baseline and on-treatment variables, achieving a much improved response at trial endpoint (6-9 weeks). RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of patients showed a much improved clinical response, and 40% did not respond. Only 13% of the patients had a minimal response. No baseline characteristics predicted achieving a much improved clinical response; the only predictor of achieving this response was being at least minimally improved by treatment week 4 (sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 72%, positive predictive value = 75%, and negative predictive value = 79%). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical response to atomoxetine was bimodal, with most subjects being either responders who were much improved or nonresponders. There were no demographic or clinical predictors of response. However, subjects who ultimately achieved a much improved response were likely to be at least minimal responders by week 4. The recommendation to consider either augmenting or switching treatment in patients who do not achieve at least this level of response to atomoxetine by 4 weeks offers a method for limiting the extended duration of titration to subjects who are most likely to benefit further, while minimizing the duration of exposure in those less likely to achieve an excellent response.

Atomoxetine for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children with ADHD and dyslexia.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the effects of atomoxetine on treating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), on reading performance, and on neurocognitive function in youth with ADHD and dyslexia (ADHD+D). METHODS: Patients with ADHD (n = 20) or ADHD+D (n = 36), aged 10-16 years, received open-label atomoxetine for 16 weeks. Data from the ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHDRS-IV), Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (K-TEA), Working Memory Test Battery for Children (WMTB-C), and Life Participation Scale for ADHD-Child Version (LPS-C) were assessed. RESULTS: Atomoxetine demonstrated significant improvement for both groups on the ADHDRS-IV, LPS-C, and K-TEA reading comprehension standard and composite scores. K-TEA spelling subtest improvement was significant for the ADHD group, whereas the ADHD+D group showed significant reading decoding improvements. Substantial K-TEA reading and spelling subtest age equivalence gains (in months) were achieved for both groups. The WMTB-C central executive score change was significantly greater for the ADHD group. Conversely, the ADHD+D group showed significant phonological loop score enhancement by visit over the ADHD group. Atomoxetine was well tolerated, and commonly reported adverse events were similar to those previously reported. CONCLUSIONS: Atomoxetine reduced ADHD symptoms and improved reading scores in both groups. Conversely, different patterns and magnitude of improvement in working memory component scores existed between ADHD and ADHD+D patients. Though limited by small sample size, group differences in relation to the comparable changes in improvement in ADHD symptoms could suggest that brain systems related to the therapeutic benefit of atomoxetine in reducing ADHD symptoms may be different in individuals with ADHD+D and ADHD without dyslexia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00191048.

Effects of atomoxetine on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in clinical pediatric treatment settings: a naturalistic study.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies involving atomoxetine hydrochloride in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) complement randomized controlled trials by assessing treatment effects in a usual-care setting and including a more heterogeneous patient population. OBJECTIVE: To provide data on the effectiveness of atomoxetine in a naturalistic treatment setting according to both physician and parent ratings. DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective, observational (non-interventional), longitudinal, open-label study of patients (N = 627; mean age = 11 years) with ADHD (from 60 physicians' offices in the United States and Puerto Rico) whose physicians had decided to prescribe atomoxetine either as initial treatment or after trying another ADHD treatment (e.g., stimulants, antidepressants). Patients with a baseline visit and one post-baseline visit for up to 1 year were eligible. Atomoxetine administration, dosing, and timing of follow-up visits were at each physician's discretion. Physicians evaluated the effectiveness of atomoxetine using a single-item rating scale: the Physician Global Impression: ADHD Severity (PGI-ADHD-S) scale. RESULTS: The average reported duration of treatment was 21.2 (range 0-89) weeks. Over this period, treatment significantly lowered ADHD severity compared with baseline, with a mean change of -0.91 (95% confidence interval: -1.00 to -0.82; p < 0.001) on the PGI-ADHD-S scale. Physician-rated improvement was more marked in patients with more severe ADHD at baseline (p < 0.001). Most patients (59-69%) experienced consistent symptom control at all times of the day. ADHD severity was improved similarly in patients across comorbid conditions (e.g., anxiety, depression, learning disorders), chief complaints (e.g., school problems, emotional problems), and prior treatment with stimulants or other medications. By parent reports, 49% of patients had improved grades following atomoxetine therapy while 35% stayed the same, and improvement in behavior (according to parents' ratings) occurred in 49% of patients following atomoxetine therapy, whereas 31% stayed the same. CONCLUSION: Data captured in this study support the conclusion that atomoxetine was effective in reducing symptom severity, and improving progress toward treatment goals, in children and adolescents with ADHD treated in a naturalistic treatment setting. However, given the open-label, observational (non-interventional) design of this study, certain biases cannot be excluded.

Decreased use of clonidine following treatment with atomoxetine in children with ADHD.

The objectives of the present study were to examine clonidine use before and after initiation of atomoxetine in a cohort of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). For this purpose, medical and pharmaceutical claims data for patients from 75 managed health care plans across the United States were extracted to identify a cohort of patients aged 18 years and younger at the time of a first atomoxetine prescription. Clonidine users were characterized on the basis of demographics, comorbid conditions, medication use and provider types, and prescribing patterns before and after the index atomoxetine prescription assessed. Subgroups of patients switching from clonidine to atomoxetine were examined and predictors of ongoing or new clonidine use were assessed. Of patients filling a first prescription for atomoxetine, 9.6% received a prescription for clonidine at some time and 4.3% within the previous 2 months. Children identified with a hyperactive component to their ADHD, those with more complex diagnostic histories, and those with tics and sleep disorders were particularly likely to receive clonidine. More than a third of patients (36.5%) with recent clonidine use subsequently discontinued use, with the pattern of clonidine use before and after atomoxetine use being highly dependent upon the pattern of stimulant prescription. Atomoxetine, in some cases, seems to have replaced clonidine in the treatment of patients with ADHD complicated with comorbid psychiatric disorders. In others, atomoxetine has replaced both stimulant and clonidine in patients previously requiring this combination for the control of symptoms or for the management of stimulant-related adverse effects.

Once-daily atomoxetine treatment for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, including an assessment of evening and morning behavior: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Atomoxetine seems to be as effective for treating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) when the daily dose is administered once in the morning as when the dose is divided and administered in the morning and evening. In the present study, the efficacy of atomoxetine administered once daily among children with ADHD was assessed throughout the day, including the evening and early morning. Another goal was to determine how early in treatment it was possible to discern a specific effect of the drug on ADHD symptoms. METHODS: This study was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 12 outpatient sites in the United States. A total of 197 children, 6 to 12 years of age, who had been diagnosed as having ADHD, on the basis of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.) criteria, were randomized to receive 8 weeks of treatment with atomoxetine or placebo, dosed once daily in the mornings. ADHD symptoms were assessed with parent and investigator rating scales. The primary outcome measure was the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored total score. Daily parent assessments of children's home behaviors in the evening and early morning were recorded with an electronic data entry system. This instrument measures 11 specific morning or evening activities, including getting up and out of bed, doing or completing homework, and sitting through dinner. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of the children enrolled were male, 69% met criteria for the combined subtype (both inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive symptoms), and the most common psychiatric comorbidity was oppositional defiant disorder (35%). Once-daily atomoxetine (final mean daily dose of 1.3 mg/kg) was significantly more effective than placebo in treating core symptoms of ADHD. Mean reductions in the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator-Administered and Scored total score were significantly greater for patients randomized to atomoxetine, beginning at the first visit after the initiation of treatment and continuing at all subsequent visits. Both inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive symptom clusters were significantly reduced with atomoxetine, compared with placebo. With continued treatment and dose titrations, core symptoms of ADHD continued to decrease throughout the 8-week study. Mean reductions in the daily parent assessment total scores for patients randomized to atomoxetine were superior during the first week, beginning with the first day of dosing, and were also superior at endpoint. Efficacy outcomes for the evening hours for atomoxetine-treated patients were superior to those for placebo-treated patients, as assessed with 2 different assessment scales. Decreases in the daily parent assessment morning subscores at endpoint showed a significant reduction in symptoms that lasted into the mornings. Rates of discontinuations attributable to adverse events were <5% for both groups. Adverse events reported significantly more frequently with atomoxetine were decreased appetite, somnolence, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Among children 6 to 12 of age who had been diagnosed as having ADHD, once-daily administration of atomoxetine in the morning provided safe, rapid, continuous, symptom relief that lasted not only into the evening hours but also into the morning hours. Atomoxetine treatment was safe and well tolerated.