Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 40(1): 184, 2024 Jul 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38995440

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the outcome of pediatric patients with primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and compared of the treatments between continued antibiotic prophylaxis (CAP) and endoscopic injection. METHODS: The clinical data of children diagnosed with primary vesicoureteral reflux from March 2015 to June 2020 who were treated with antibiotics or endoscopic injection were reviewed. Antibiotic was the first-chosen treatment after the diagnosis of VUR in children. Endoscopic treatment consisted of injection of dextran hyaluronic acid copolymer (DX/HA) into the ureteral opening under direct cystoscopy guidance. RESULTS: Fifty-two children (35 males, 17 females) were included in this study, and for a total 90 ureters (14 unilateral, 38 bilateral) were diagnosed with vesicoureteral reflux by Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG). Twenty-two children were treated with antibiotics (8 unilateral, 14 bilateral), for a total of 36 ureters; thirty children were treated by endoscopic injection (6 unilateral, 24 bilateral), for a total of 54 ureters. The injection surgery took 36 ± 17 min including duration of general anesthesia and circumcision and the hospital stay was 2.3 ± 1.3 days. All male patients underwent circumcision simultaneously. There were no drug and allergic reactions in the antibiotic group, and no postoperative complications occurred in the injection group. With 23 months (13-63 months) of mean follow-up, the resolution rate, defined as radiological disappearance of VUR, was 36.1% (13/36) in the antibiotic group and 57.4% (31/54) in the injection group (P = 0.048).Two cases of bilateral reflux in the injection group required a second injection before resolution could be achieved. Thus, the overall success rate of injection was 64.8% (35/54). 9 cases (9/18, 50%) in the antibiotic group had renal scars on DMSA scans, while this was seen in 20 cases (20/23, 86.9%) in the injection group. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.010).The positive rates of ultrasound between the antibiotic group and the injection group were 45.5% (10/22) and 80.0% (24/30), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in positive rates of ultrasound (P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic injection is easy to operate with short surgical time and hospital stay, so it is a safe and feasible treatment. For the treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children, the radiological resolution rate of endoscopic injection is better than antibiotic therapy. In this study, the presence of kidney scars on DMSA and the dilated of the collecting system on ultrasound are the indications for endoscopic injection.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Cistoscopía , Dextranos , Ácido Hialurónico , Reflujo Vesicoureteral , Humanos , Reflujo Vesicoureteral/terapia , Reflujo Vesicoureteral/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ácido Hialurónico/administración & dosificación , Dextranos/administración & dosificación , Preescolar , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cistoscopía/métodos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Lactante , Niño , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inyecciones/métodos
2.
Mol Cell Biochem ; 400(1-2): 245-52, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25416447

RESUMEN

Recent data strongly suggest the important role of miRNAs in various cancer-related processes. Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary cancer of the bone and usually leads to deaths due to its rapid proliferation and metastasis. Here, we demonstrated that compared with noncancerous bone tissues, miR-135b expression is frequently upregulated in OS specimens, inversely correlated with potential target-FOXO1 expression pattern. Bioinformatics analysis combined with experimental confirmation revealed FOXO1 is a direct target of miR-135b in OS. Functionally, miR-135b inhibitor significantly inhibited OS cells proliferation and invasion. Forced expression of FOXO1 showed the opposite effect, and FOXO1 knockdown abolished the effect of miR-135b inhibitor. Taken together, our data provide compelling evidence that miR-135b functions as an onco-miRNA in OS to promote OS cells proliferation and invasion, and its oncogenic effects are mediated chiefly through targeting FOXO1.


Asunto(s)
Factores de Transcripción Forkhead/genética , MicroARNs/biosíntesis , Osteosarcoma/genética , Línea Celular Tumoral , Proliferación Celular/genética , Proteína Forkhead Box O1 , Factores de Transcripción Forkhead/biosíntesis , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , MicroARNs/genética , Invasividad Neoplásica/genética , Osteosarcoma/patología
3.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 45(5): 474-82, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25921099

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Recent reports strongly suggest the profound role of miRNAs in cancer therapeutic response and progression, including invasion and metastasis. The sensitivity to therapy and invasion is the major obstacle for successful treatment in prostate cancer. We aimed to investigate the regulative effect of miR-128/zinc-finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 axis on prostate cancer cell chemosensitivity and invasion. METHODS: The miR-128 expression pattern of prostate cancer cell lines and tissues was detected by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, while the mRNA and protein expression levels of zinc-finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 were measured by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and western blot assay, respectively. Dual-luciferase reporter gene assay was used to find the direct target of miR-128. Furthermore, prostate cancer cells were treated with miR-128 mimic or zinc-finger E-box-binding homeobox 1-siRNA, and then the cells' chemosensitivity and invasion were detected by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay and transwell assay, respectively. RESULTS: We found miR-128 expression obviously decreased in prostate cancer tissues compared with paired normal tissues. Restored miR-128 expression sensitized prostate cancer cells to cisplatin and inhibited the invasion. Furthermore, there was an inverse expression pattern between miR-128 and zinc-finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 in prostate cancer cells and tissues, and zinc-finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 was identified as a direct target of miR-128 in prostate cancer. Knockdown of zinc-finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 expression efficiently sensitized prostate cancer cells to cisplatin and inhibited the invasion. However, ectopic zinc-finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 expression impaired the effects of miR-128 on chemosensitivity and invasion in prostate cancer cells. CONCLUSIONS: miR-128 functions as a potential cancer suppressor in prostate cancer progression and rational therapeutic strategies for prostate cancer would be developed based on miR-128/zinc-finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 axis.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Proteínas de Homeodominio/metabolismo , MicroARNs/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismo , Dedos de Zinc , Western Blotting , Colorantes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Regulación hacia Abajo , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Inmunoprecipitación , Masculino , Invasividad Neoplásica , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Sales de Tetrazolio , Tiazoles , Técnicas de Cultivo de Tejidos , Homeobox 1 de Unión a la E-Box con Dedos de Zinc , Dedos de Zinc/efectos de los fármacos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA