Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1152: 105-129, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31456182

RESUMEN

Bone is the most common site of metastasis for breast cancer. Bone metastasis significantly affects both quality of life and survival of the breast cancer patient. Clinically, complications secondary to bone metastasis include pain, pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia of malignancy. Because bone metastasis is extremely common in patients with metastatic breast cancer, clinical management of bone metastases is an important and challenging aspect of treatment in the metastatic setting.The skeleton is a metabolically active organ system that undergoes continuous remodeling throughout life. A delicate balance of the bone-forming osteoblasts and bone-resorbing osteoclasts in the dynamic microenvironment of the skeleton maintains normal bone remodeling and integrity. The presence of metastatic lesions in bone disrupts the normal bone microenvironment and upsets the fine balance between the key components. The changes in the bone microenvironment then create a vicious cycle that further promotes bone destruction and tumor progression.Various therapeutic options are available for bone metastases of breast cancer. Treatment can be tailored for each patient and, often requires multiple therapeutic interventions. Commonly used modalities include local therapies such as surgery, radiation therapy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) together with systemic therapies such as endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody-based therapy, bone-enhancing therapy and radioisotope therapy. Despite the use of various therapeutic modalities, bone metastases eventually become resistant to therapy, and disease progresses.In this chapter, we describe the clinical picture and biological mechanism of bone metastases in breast cancer. We also discuss known risk factors as well as detection and assessment of bone metastases. We present therapeutic options for bone metastasis using a multidisciplinary approach. Further, we describe future directions for bone metastasis management, focusing on novel bone-specific targeted therapies.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Huesos , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Microambiente Tumoral
2.
Clin Cancer Res ; 27(4): 983-991, 2021 02 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33257427

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We report results from a phase II study assessing the efficacy of the WEE1 inhibitor adavosertib with cisplatin in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mTNBC treated with 0-1 prior lines of chemotherapy received cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. followed 21 days later by cisplatin plus adavosertib 200 mg oral twice daily for five doses every 21 days. The study had 90% power to detect the difference between null (20%) and alternative (40%) objective response rates (ORR) with a one-sided type I error of 0.1: an ORR >30% was predefined as making the regimen worthy of further study. RNA sequencing and multiplex cyclic immunofluorescence on pre- and post-adavosertib tumor biopsies, as well as targeted next-generation sequencing on archival tissue, were correlated with clinical benefit, defined as stable disease ≥6 months or complete or partial response. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients initiated protocol therapy; median age was 56 years, 2 patients (6%) had BRCA2 mutations, and 14 (41%) had one prior chemotherapy. ORR was 26% [95% confidence interval (CI), 13-44], and median progression-free survival was 4.9 months (95% CI, 2.3-5.7). Treatment-related grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 53% of patients, most commonly diarrhea in 21%. One death occurred because of sepsis, possibly related to study therapy. Tumors from patients with clinical benefit demonstrated enriched immune gene expression and T-cell infiltration. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with mTNBC treated with 0-1 prior lines, adavosertib combined with cisplatin missed the prespecified ORR cutoff of >30%. The finding of immune-infiltrated tumors in patients with clinical benefit warrants validation.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinonas/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Proteínas de Ciclo Celular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirimidinonas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/patología , Adulto Joven
3.
Cancer Med ; 9(3): 1025-1032, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31849202

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Radium-223 dichloride (Ra-223) is a targeted alpha therapy that induces localized cytotoxicity in bone metastases. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Ra-223 plus hormonal therapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), bone-dominant metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: In this single-center phase II study, 36 patients received Ra-223 (55 kBq/kg intravenously every 4 weeks) up to 6 cycles with endocrine therapy. The primary objective was to determine the clinical disease control rate at 9 months. Secondary objectives were to determine (a) tumor response rate at 6 months, (b) progression-free survival (PFS) durations, and (c) safety. RESULTS: The median number of prior systemic treatments for metastatic disease was 1 (range, 0-4). The disease control rate at 9 months was 49%. The tumor response rate at 6 months was 54% (complete response, 21%; partial, 32%). The median PFS was 7.4 months (95% CI, 4.8-not reached [NR]). The median bone-PFS was 16 months (95% CI, 7.3-NR). There were no grade 3/4 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Ra-223 with hormonal therapy showed possible efficacy in HR+ bone-dominant breast cancer metastasis, and adverse events were tolerable. We plan to further investigate the clinical application of Ra-223 in these patients. (NCT02366130).


Asunto(s)
Partículas alfa/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Radio (Elemento)/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Huesos/diagnóstico por imagen , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Denosumab/administración & dosificación , Denosumab/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fulvestrant/administración & dosificación , Fulvestrant/efectos adversos , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Radioisótopos/administración & dosificación , Radioisótopos/efectos adversos , Radio (Elemento)/efectos adversos , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Tamoxifeno/administración & dosificación , Tamoxifeno/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA