RESUMEN
This study aimed to identify which preseason factors had strong evidence of risks for physical injury during the season of collision sports including rugby, American football, and Australian rules football using qualitative synthesis. Pubmed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were reviewed. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies were: studies involving the collision sports; prospective cohort studies; and studies with outcomes of relative risks, odds ratios, and correlations between players' preseason conditions and injury during the season. The risk of bias based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network quality checklists for cohort studies was assessed in 57 studies. The current study identified strong evidence that 1) anthropometric characteristics (body mass index and estimated mass moment of inertia of the body around a horizontal axis through the ankle), which are calculated with weight and height; 2) physical function, in particular for the trunk and lower limb (trunk-flexion hold and wall-sit hold); and 3) Oswestry Disability Index disability, which is a patient-reported outcome measure for disability due to low back pain, were positive prognostic factors for injury during the collision sports season, regardless of playing experience.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Fútbol Americano , Fútbol , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Pronóstico , Australia , Fútbol Americano/lesiones , Fútbol/lesiones , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Presenteeism is defined as the loss of work productivity due to health issues in workers, which can be measured subjectively. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of supervised exercise therapy and unsupervised self-care in reducing presenteeism in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for various keywords from their inception to January 2023. Two examiners independently assessed the eligibility of studies: (1) studies involving workers suffering from musculoskeletal pain, (2) those involving supervised exercise therapy intervention with interactive communication, and (3) those in which the comparison group was subjected to interventions other than supervised exercise therapy, and (4) those including patient-reported outcome measures of presenteeism or work productivity or ability. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated using a random effects model, with higher scores indicating reduced presenteeism in the intervention group compared with that in the comparison group. The GRADE assesses the overall certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: Only the short-term effects of interventions on presenteeism could be obtained using four studies. The intervention group showed statistically significant short-term effects on presenteeism compared with the comparison group (p < 0.001; SMD, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.77). The GRADE score was downgraded by two levels from high to low due to concerns for indirectness. CONCLUSIONS: Although the certainty of the evidence was low, it was assumed that supervised exercise therapy was more effective than unsupervised self-care in reducing presenteeism in workers with musculoskeletal disorders.
RESUMEN
[Purpose] We aimed to identify possible solutions to enhance evidence-based practice (EBP) in rehabilitation professionals in Japan. [Participants and Methods] A three-round Delphi method was undertaken among a cohort of clinical therapists (328 physical therapists, 55 occupational therapists, and 6 speech therapists). In the first round, the participants listed possible solutions for promoting EBP, other than 12 solutions presented in a previous study; subsequently, a new list was created. In the second round, a newly-created list of solutions was presented, and the participants responded on a 5-point Likert scale on how much they agreed with the solutions promoting EBP in Japanese rehabilitation professionals. In the third round, the distribution of responses obtained in the second round was presented, and participant's agreement was again assessed on a 5-point Likert scale. [Results] Across the three rounds, data were collected from 33.7% to 47.0% of all eligible participants. After the first round, 17 possible solutions were developed, and a list of 29 solutions was used in the second round. After the third round, 10 solutions reached the predetermined criteria for consensus. [Conclusion] In this study, ten possible solutions to promote EBP were proposed by the Japanese rehabilitation professionals.
RESUMEN
[Purpose] This study aimed to determine whether certain research activities improve the attitude of rehabilitation professionals towards evidence-based practice and its implementation in Japan. [Participants and Methods] We included physical, occupational, and speech therapists currently working in clinical settings. We employed hierarchical multiple regression analyses to assess the attitude of rehabilitation professionals towards evidence-based practice and research activities. Scores of the five dimensions of the Health Sciences-Evidence Based Practice questionnaire were considered the dependent variables. The five dimensions were as follows: Dimension 1, attitude towards evidence-based practice; Dimensions 2-4, evidence-based practice implementation; and Dimension 5, work environment related to evidence-based practice barriers-facilitators. The four sociodemographic variables (gender, academic degree, clinical experience, and the number of therapists at work) were initially included, following which self-reported research achievements were supplemented as independent variables (the number of case studies, literature reviews, cross-sectional studies, and longitudinal studies). [Results] We analyzed data from 167 participants. In addition to sociodemographic variables, the research achievements that statistically increased F-values of the modeling were case study achievements in Dimensions 2-3, cross-sectional study achievements in Dimensions 2 and 4, and longitudinal study achievements in Dimension 5. [Conclusion] Case studies and cross-sectional studies could improve evidence-based practice implementation among rehabilitation professionals in Japan.
RESUMEN
[Purpose] To determine whether the 25-item Japanese Health Locus of Control (25-JHLC) scale satisfies a 5-factor structure among Japanese with musculoskeletal disorders. [Participants and Methods] The primary inclusion criterion was people undergoing physical therapy for musculoskeletal disorders in two medical facilities. The 25-JHLC scale and demographic data were obtained by conducting an anonymous survey. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to analyze data from the 25-JHLC scale in 200 patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Fits for the 5-factor structure (1-internal; 2-family; 3-professional; 4-chance; and 5-supernatural) and the 2-factor structure (1-internal; and 2-external, including family, professional, chance, and supernatural) were studied. The goodness-of-fit criteria included chi-squared/degree of freedom, goodness-of-fit index, adjusted goodness-of-fit index, and root mean square error of approximation. [Results] The mean (standard deviation) age of the participants was 46.3 (18.3) years of age. The 2-factor structure satisfied no criteria; however, the 5-factor structure satisfied two criteria for acceptable fit (chi-squared/degree of freedom, and root mean square error of approximation). [Conclusion] This study found that the 5-factor structure of the 25-JHLC scale can be accepted to some extent among Japanese with musculoskeletal disorders without comorbidities.
RESUMEN
[Purpose] This study aimed to develop a culturally adapted Japanese version of the Pain Understanding and Confidence Questionnaire (PUnCQ). The first-factor structure describes management from 12 perspectives for a case vignette of chronic pain and determines whether the management is based on a biomedical or biopsychosocial perspective. The second-factor structure evaluates the confidence level in management skills for the same case from 21 perspectives. [Participants and Methods] We conducted a cross-cultural adaptation based on five stages according to Beaton's guidelines (two forward translations, creation of an integrated forward translation version, two backward translations, creation of a provisional Japanese version, and a pilot test). In the pilot test, we asked 40 Japanese physical therapists to rate their understanding of the PUnCQ descriptions on a five-point Likert scale (1, not at all understandable; 5, completely understandable) and provide comments when they rated 1 to 3. We repeated revisions and pilot tests until less than 10% of the respondents rated 1 for all descriptions. [Results] By conducting two rounds of the pilot test, all items of descriptions satisfied the preestablished criteria. [Conclusion] A Japanese version of the PUnCQ was developed.
RESUMEN
[Purpose] The primary aim was to cross-culturally adapt the Satisfaction and Recovery Index (SRI) among Japanese people. The secondary aim was to preliminarily investigate the convergent validity of the SRI with the SF-12v2® Health Survey among ambulatory patients with musculoskeletal disorders. [Participants and Methods] A provisional Japanese SRI was developed after forward and backward translations and confirmation from its original developer. This study included 30 outpatients diagnosed with musculoskeletal disorders at an orthopedic clinic in Japan. All participants underwent the SF-12v2® Health Survey and the provisional Japanese SRI. They were then asked to provide comments about the provisional Japanese SRI. Pearson's r was calculated to examine the convergent validity between the SF-12v2® Health Survey scores and the provisional Japanese SRI scores. [Results] The provisional Japanese SRI was accepted as the final version due to no serious concerns raised by the participants. Only the mental component scores of the SF-12v2® Health Survey had a statistically significant correlation (r=0.45), indicating partial evidence of the convergent validity of the provisional Japanese SRI. [Conclusion] This study developed the Japanese SRI with preliminary validity evidence among ambulatory patients with musculoskeletal disorders.
RESUMEN
[Purpose] "Katakori" refers to a nonspecific symptom, including discomfort or dull pain, that is experienced around the occiput and that extends through the cervical spine to the acromion and scapular area. This study aimed to develop a patient-reported outcome measure of disability due to Katakori, namely the Katakori Disability Index, via evaluating patient comprehensibility and comprehensiveness. [Participants and Methods] We conducted a semi-structured interview among participants who had experienced Katakori consistently during the past month to examine patient comprehensibility and comprehensiveness; we particularly used the thinking-aloud method and cognitive debriefing to evaluate comprehensibility. [Results] We initially tested a provisional version of the Katakori Disability Index with 24 items using two 11-point numeric rating scales in a subset of 10 participants. Considering the issues identified concerning comprehensibility and comprehensiveness, we created a second draft of the Katakori Disability Index with two 6-point Likert scales, modified items, and four additional items. The second draft was tested in another subset of 10 participants. We eventually developed a 31-item Katakori Disability Index with modified instructions and items, two additional items, and a post-survey checklist; all these features addressed the concerns identified and suggestions obtained in the second round of interviews. [Conclusion] We developed a 31-item Katakori Disability Index with content validity.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Exercise adherence is important for achieving a long-term effect from musculoskeletal management. The Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS), which was developed in 2017 as a patient reported outcome measure to assess exercise adherence in those with chronic low back pain in the UK, has demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability and is a robust measure of exercise adherence. This study aimed to undertake cross-cultural adaptation of the EARS into Japanese and investigate its structural validity in participants with musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS: The current study was composed of two phases, where a provisional Japanese version of the EARS was developed employing an international guideline for cross-cultural adaptation (Phase A), and structural validity was then evaluated using the Rasch analysis (Phase B). Participants with musculoskeletal disorders who have individualized home exercises prescribed by a physical therapist were recruited. RESULTS: In Phase A, the pilot testing was conducted twice because the initial testing detected some uncertainty revealed in comments from 17 participants (5 males and 12 females, 18-79 years of age) about which activities and exercises were supposed to be included. We therefore modified the draft by identifying a person who prescribed/recommended activities and exercises as per the Working Alliance Inventory. The second pilot testing using this draft recruited 30 participants (6 males and 24 females, 18-79 years of age), who provided no further comments, demonstrating the Japanese version of the EARS (EARS-J) had been successfully developed. In Phase B, data from 200 participants who completed the EARS-J (63 males and 127 females, mean ± SD of age = 53.6 ± 17.0) were analyzed using the Andrich's Rating Scale Model. Rasch statics indicated unidimensionality of the six items of the EARS-J. The Cronbach α was 0.77. Substantial ceiling effect (21.0%) was observed, with no floor effect (0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: A Japanese version of the EARS has been developed, which demonstrated acceptable structural validity with the evidence of unidimensionality in the Rasch analysis in Japanese people with musculoskeletal disorders who were prescribed individualized home exercises. However, there was a substantial ceiling effect and further studies are required to comprehensively establish validity and reliability of the EARS-J.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/rehabilitación , Cooperación del Paciente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Psicometría/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , TraduccionesRESUMEN
This study aimed to compare the manufacturability and granule and tablet properties of green fluidized bed granulation (GFBG) and of direct compression (DC). Acetaminophen was used as a low compactability model drug. The process time of GFBG to produce final mixtures was comparable to that of DC, and thus GFBG could be considered a simple process. DC could not produce 30% drug load tablets owing to poor granule flowability, whereas no problems were observed in the GFBG tableting process up to 80% of drug load. Tablets prepared with GFBG showed higher tensile strength than those prepared using DC. Compactability evaluation results show that the yield pressure of the granules prepared with GFBG was significantly lower than that of DC, suggesting that the granules prepared with GFBG were easily plastically deformed. Moreover, tablets prepared with GFBG showed fast disintegration, which was faster than that of DC. We conclude that GFBG produces granules with higher drug content and desired physicochemical properties at low cost.
Asunto(s)
Composición de Medicamentos , Tecnología Química Verde , Tamaño de la Partícula , ComprimidosRESUMEN
[Purpose] To investigate the disturbed activities of daily living due to Katakori, a nonspecific symptom that includes discomfort or dull pain around the occiput through the cervical spine to the acromion and scapular area, by assessment of patients' values or perceptions. [Participants and Methods] Fifty participants with consistent Katakori during the last month were included. We used the patient-elicitation technique, in which the participants were asked to rate the 1) magnitude of disturbance to the elicited activities on an 8-point scale (0-7), and 2) the importance of each activity on an 11-point scale (0-10) in a semistructured interview. A score for each activity was calculated by multiplying the magnitude of the disturbance by its importance, and the score ranged from 0 to 70. [Results] Among the 186 disturbed activities evaluated in the patient-elicitation technique, 24 coding categories of disturbed activities were identified. The two most prevalent disturbed activities were using a personal computer (62%), and using a mobile phone or a tablet (52%). Taking care of children had the highest mean patient-elicitation technique score (66.5). [Conclusion] This study identified 24 conceptual structures of disturbed activities of daily living due to Katakori, which will serve as the foundation for future development of a patient-reported outcome measure for the disability caused by Katakori.
RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Accurate joint position sense (JPS) is necessary for effective motor learning and high performance in activities that require fine motor control. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) can be a promising intervention. OBJECTIVE: To examine existing peer-reviewed original studies that have investigated the effect of PNF techniques on the JPS in terms of the methodological quality, PNF techniques, outcomes, and participant characteristics. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, SocINDEX, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from inception to January 2018. The following inclusion criteria were used: (1) assessment of the JPS; (2) peer-reviewed original studies with a randomized controlled trial or quasi-randomized controlled trial design; (3) participants with musculoskeletal disorders or healthy individuals (ie, neither animal studies nor those involving neurological problems); and (4) no cointervention with PNF, except for warm-up procedures. The methodological quality was assessed using PEDro scale and 5 additional criteria. Effect size (η2) was calculated where a positive value indicated an increased JPS after PNF as compared with other approaches including the wait-and-see method. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Nine studies were examined for their methodological quality, and only one study scored >6 on the PEDro scale. Positive and large effect size (η2 > .14) was detected in 2 studies where JPS of the knee with contract-relax and replication techniques was assessed in healthy individuals. However, the methodological quality of these studies was poor (PEDro scores of 3 and ≤5 in the total quality score out of 16, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The current study did not find multiple studies with high methodological quality and similar PNF techniques, outcomes, and characteristics of participants. More high-quality studies are required to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the effect of PNF on the JPS.
Asunto(s)
Articulaciones/fisiología , Destreza Motora/fisiología , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Musculoesqueléticos , Propiocepción , Humanos , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
[Purpose] This study aimed to investigate a cross-cultural adaptation of the 40-item Healthcare Provider-Patient Activation Scale (HP-PAS). [Participants and Methods] We followed a guideline for cross-cultural adaptation that recommended using two forward and backward translations. In pilot testing, participants were Japanese physical therapists who provided comments about expression readability. Two authors independently categorized each comment as either "unable to understand" or "suggestion to enhance clarity", after which Cohen κ and % agreement were used to assess agreement. We then assessed the flooring and ceiling effects, internal consistency, and Spearman ρ between the factor scores of the patient-activation-approach and non-patient-activation-approach. [Results] A total of 58 Japanese physical therapists participated in the pilot test. The agreement on comments was κ=0.44 and 86.5%. We identified the flooring and ceiling effects for most items. In addition, the internal consistency was acceptable for each factor; however, the Spearman ρ between the patient-activation-approach and non-patient-activation-approach factor scores was positive when it should have been negative. [Conclusion] We developed a Japanese version of the HP-PAS which will serve as a foundation for future studies to establish a measurement method for the magnitude of patient activation in the physical therapist population.
RESUMEN
[Purpose] Active unilateral knee extension in sitting (AUKEiSit) is a clinical test for lumbopelvic control during limb movements. We aimed to identify the normal upper limit for the angle of lumbopelvic sagittal alignment (θ) during AUKEiSit in young females. [Participants and Methods] The primary inclusion criteria of the participant included asymptomatic females 18-44 years of age. Lumbopelvic curvature from T12 to S2 was traced on paper using a flexible ruler during right AUKEiSit. The θ value was calculated using 2 methods: 1) 2-point-method, calculating the angle between 2 tangential lines at T12 and S2 on a trace line using Image J software; and 2) max-method, calculating θ by measuring the distance between T12 and S2 and the maximum depth of the curvature. A negative value of θ indicated lumbar lordosis. The mean and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed with bootstrapping. [Results] The data of 121 participants (mean age: 20.6â years) were analyzed. The mean and 95% confidence intervals of θ were -12.06° (-14.03° to -9.40°) with the 2-point-method and -5.40° (-7.62° to -2.73°) with the max-method. [Conclusion] In asymptomatic young females, the 95% confidence intervals of θ during AUKEiSit are negative regardless of the 2 different methods.
RESUMEN
[Purpose] To investigate whether habitual pelvic posture and time spent sitting are primary contributing factors to performance in the active unilateral knee extension in sitting test in young people. [Participants and Methods] The participants' ages ranged from 20 to 40â years. LUMOback, a wearable electronic device, was used to measure the proportion of the days spent in a neutral pelvic posture (posture score) and time spent sitting over a week. The lumbopelvic sagittal curvature from T12 to S2 (θ) during the active unilateral knee extension in sitting test was also assessed using a flexible ruler. A multiple regression analysis was performed with the primary independent variables of the posture score and time spent sitting, undertaking priori considerations of potential confounders of sex, and pain condition on the θ value. [Results] Eighty participants (21.7 ± 3.8â years) were enrolled in the study (24 males and 56 females). Neither the posture score nor time spent sitting statistically significantly contributed to the θ value. [Conclusion] Neither the proportion of the day spent with neutral pelvic posture nor time spent sitting detected by LUMOback was the primary contributing factor to the active unilateral knee extension in sitting test performance.
RESUMEN
Objectives: To preliminarily investigate in patients with a primary complaint of non-acute knee pain for ≥ 1 month: 1) the proportion of patients with non-acute knee pain classified by Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) as Spinal Derangements, 2) the number of sessions taken to identify the concluding classification, and 3) the ability of MDT classifications, demographics, and symptomatic baselines to predict pain reduction at 1-month follow-up.Methods: This study reviewed data from outpatients managed with MDT. For modeling knee pain reduction at the 1-month follow-up, 3 MDT provisional or concluding classifications (Spinal Derangement, Knee Derangement, and Non-Derangement) and the following variables were included: 1) gender, 2) symptom duration, 3) presence of low back pain (LBP), 4) the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure, 5) average pain intensity at the initial session using a 0-10 numerical rating scale, and 6) the Kellgren-Lawrence grade.Results: Data from 101 patients were extracted. The percentage of patients with the concluding classification of Spinal Derangement was 44.6%. This was greater in those patient's reporting concomitant LBP (p = .002) and without radiographic findings of knee osteoarthritis (p < .001). A concluding classification was determined by the fourth session in 80% of patients. Multiple regression modeling demonstrated that only the concluding classification significantly predicted the knee pain reduction at the 1-month follow-up.Discussion: These findings suggest the importance of careful screening assessments of the lumbar spine and the importance of detecting Derangements throughout the follow-up sessions for patients with a primary complaint of knee pain.
Asunto(s)
Artralgia/diagnóstico , Articulación de la Rodilla/patología , Rodilla/patología , Vértebras Lumbares , Examen Físico/métodos , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Artralgia/etiología , Artralgia/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/complicaciones , Manejo del Dolor , Dimensión del Dolor , Examen Físico/clasificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/complicacionesRESUMEN
[Purpose] To translate and culturally adapt the Örebro Musculoskeletal Screening Questionnaire (ÖMSQ-12) into Japanese (ÖMSQ-12-J), and to preliminarily investigate practicality from the clinicians' perspectives, and determine inter-session reliability. [Subjects and Methods] This study included four phases: cross-cultural adaptation (Phases 1-2); survey among 14 clinicians (two medical doctors and 12 physiotherapists) about the practicality of using the questionnaire in six perspectives (speed of evaluation/treatment; capacity to detect patients with yellow flags; attitude towards management with bio-psycho-social perspectives; quality of evaluation/treatment; considerations of communications with patients at history-taking, physical assessments and interventions; and general clinical usefulness) based on their experiences with patients (Phase 3); and investigation of inter-session reliability among 50 patients with musculoskeletal disorders (Phase 4). [Results] The ÖMSQ-12-J was developed in Phases 1-2 using the recommended international guidelines for cultural adaptation and translation. In Phase 3, most responses were in the 3-positive options (35.7-78.6%). In Phase 4, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient for each item ranged from 0.71-0.99 and 0.92 for the total score. [Conclusion] This study developed the ÖMSQ-12-J, which has preliminary evidence of good practicality and moderate-strong inter-session reliability. Further investigation is required to determine the predictive and prognostic capacity within a problematic musculoskeletal Japanese population.
RESUMEN
The patient in this case study presented with constant idiopathic neck pain and left lower scapular pain (greater than 3 months) and was treated based on the principles of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT). Retraction exercises produced centralization of the lower scapular pain to the upper part of the scapula at the initial visit. At the first visit, the performance level on the Cranio-Cervical Flexion Test (CCFT) was ≤20 mmHg before the treatment. At the conclusion of the treatment during which centralization occurred, the CCFT level improved to 24 mmHg. At the second visit, all symptoms were abolished and cervical range of motion (ROM) was fully restored by performing repeated extension in lying from a retracted position with clinician's traction. The CCFT levels before and immediately after the treatment were 24 and 26 mmHg, respectively. At the third visit (1 week after the initial visit), he noted that all daily activities could be performed without pain. The CCFT level was maintained at 26mmHg. The patient in this study showed immediate improvement in the CCFT through the treatments based on MDT. This suggests a possible link between MDT interventions and motor control of the cervical spine and a need to further investigate this relationship.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the direction and magnitude of mechanical influence to the lumbar disc in side bending and side gliding positions by considering shift of disc hydration. METHODS: Twenty asymptomatic subjects completed this study. Direction of the hydration shift (θ), magnitude of the shift, and segmental lateral flexion and rotation angles from L1/L2 to L5/S1 during left side bend and side glide in lying were measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compared using paired t-tests. RESULTS: A significant difference (P<0.001) was detected in the segmental lateral flexion angle at L1/L2 between the side bending position (mean [SD], 5.1° [2.2°] left lateral flexion) and the side gliding position (mean [SD], 2.1° [2.7°] left lateral flexion). However, there was neither significant difference (P>0.05) in the lateral flexion angle at other segments nor rotation angles at each segment between the two lumbar positions. There was also no significant difference (P>0.05) in the θ value and magnitude of the hydration shift between the two lumbar positions. The disc hydration generally shifted to the right in the left side bending and side gliding positions at all disc levels. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to investigate mechanical influence to each lumbar disc in the side gliding position using the shift of disc hydration on axial MRI. The comparability in the direction and magnitude of the hydration shift in the side bending and side gliding positions indicates that the maneuver of side gliding can produce comparable ipsilateral mechanical influence to each lumbar disc in comparison to side bending.
RESUMEN
Presenteeism, among desk workers with pain can be affected by musculoskeletal disabilities (MSDs), working styles, and gender. In this study, teleworkers were defined as those who teleworked >70% of the time at home, while others were defined as non-full teleworkers. This study aimed to (1) compare the magnitude of presenteeism among four groups: male and female teleworkers with pain and male and female non-full teleworkers with pain, and (2) create a regression model of presenteeism with 66 independent biopsychosocial variables for each group. Data were collected through an anonymous online survey. Presenteeism was evaluated using the work functioning impairment scale. The 66 independent biopsychosocial variables included four disability measures, namely, stiff neck/shoulders, low back pain, and upper or lower limb problems, along with other factors relevant to presenteeism in previous studies, such as age, body mass index, comorbidities, work-related variables, pain catastrophizing, and various psychological distress measures. Data from 1068 male non-full teleworkers, 1,043 female non-full teleworkers, 282 male teleworkers, and 307 female teleworkers were analyzed. Presenteeism was the highest among female teleworkers with pain. Furthermore, in all models, overall psychological distress, rather than the four MSD measures, was the primary contributing factor for presenteeism.