Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Door-to-Balloon Time for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention　- Results From the Singapore Western STEMI Network.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effect of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the outbreak response measures on door-to-balloon time (D2B). This study examined both D2B and clinical outcomes of patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).Methods and Results:This was a retrospective study of 303 STEMI patients who presented directly or were transferred to a tertiary hospital in Singapore for PPCI from October 2019 to March 2020. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients admitted before (BOR) and during (DOR) the COVID-19 outbreak response. The study outcomes were in-hospital death, D2B, cardiogenic shock and 30-day readmission. For direct presentations, fewer patients in the DOR group achieved D2B time <90 min compared with the BOR group (71.4% vs. 80.9%, P=0.042). This was more apparent after exclusion of non-system delay cases (DOR 81.6% vs. BOR 95.9%, P=0.006). Prevalence of both out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (9.5% vs. 1.9%, P=0.003) and acute mitral regurgitation (31.6% vs. 17.5%, P=0.006) was higher in the DOR group. Mortality was similar between groups. Multivariable regression showed that longer D2B time was an independent predictor of death (odds ratio 1.005, 95% confidence interval 1.000-1.011, P=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic and the outbreak response have had an adverse effect on PPCI service efficiency. The study reinforces the need to focus efforts on shortening D2B time, while maintaining infection control measures.

Improvement in Door-to-Needle Time in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke via a Simple Stroke Activation Protocol.

BACKGROUND: In acute ischemic stroke (AIS), treatment with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) is time-sensitive. All stroke centers make continual efforts to reduce door-to-needle time (DNT) with varying success. We present the impact of modifications to our stroke activation protocol on DNT. METHODS: We included 404 consecutive patients with AIS receiving IV-tPA between January 2014 and December 2016. First changes in stroke activation protocol were made in March 2015 in the form of prenotification by paramedics, direct transfer from ambulance to computed tomography (CT) scanner, and rapid en route neurological assessment by an emergency physician and neurologist. In March 2016, a second amendment was made where a stroke nurse accompanied the patient to expedite various steps in the treatment pathway, including endovascular treatment in eligible cases. RESULTS: Both protocol amendments resulted in improvement in DNT and door-to-CT time from 84 ± 47 minutes before intervention to 69 ± 33 minutes after protocol amendment 1 to 59 ± 37 minutes after protocol amendment 2. In particular, the second amendment (144 patients) showed significant shortening of DNT compared with the 137 patients before (59 ± 37 minutes versus 69 ± 33 minutes, P = .020), with a higher percentage achieving the target of 60 minutes (68.1% versus 48.2%, P < .001). This finding was attributed to a reduction in both door-to-CT time and CT-to-needle time. This improvement remained consistent over subsequent months. CONCLUSIONS: The application of a simple systems-based, multidisciplinary stroke activation protocol may help in significant reduction in DNT. Encouraging increased patient ownership by stroke nurses appeared to be a promising approach for timely administration of definitive acute therapies.