Factors associated with successful weight loss after liraglutide treatment for obesity.

AIM: To identify patient factors, including gastrointestinal functions, that are predictive or associated with weight loss in response to once-daily 3 mg liraglutide administered subcutaneously (SQ) or placebo in obesity. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-six obese adults (87% female) were randomized in a placebo-controlled, 16-week trial of liraglutide, escalated to 3 mg administered SQ daily. Gastrointestinal functions were measured at baseline and 16 weeks: gastric emptying of solids (GET1/2 ); fasting and postprandial gastric volumes; kcal ingested during ad libitum buffet meal and the nutrient drink test. GET1/2 was also measured at 5 weeks. A multiple variable regression model examined variables associated with weight loss of more than 4 kg at 16 weeks. A parsimonious model using backward selection identified the final model. RESULTS: Weight loss of more than 4 kg at 16 weeks occurred in 71% of liraglutide- and 16% of placebo-treated patients. In all participants combined, parameters univariately associated with a weight loss of more than 4 kg were GET1/2 at 5 and 16 weeks, weight loss at 5 weeks and kcal intake during the buffet meal at 16 weeks. The final parsimonious model (area under the receiver operator characteristics [AUROC] curve = 0.832) identified that factors associated with more than 4-kg weight loss were GET1/2 at 5 weeks (OR = 2.505; 95% CI: 1.57-3.997) per 50 minutes and kcal intake during ad libitum meal at 16 weeks (OR = 0.721; 95% CI: 0.602-0.864) per 100 kcal. Among only the 60 liraglutide-treated subjects, kcal intake at 16 weeks was associated with 4-kg weight loss (AUROC = 0.757). CONCLUSIONS: Slower GET1/2 and weight loss at 5 weeks predicted a weight loss of more than 4 kg at 16 weeks in all participants. Among liraglutide-treated adults, weight loss of more than 4 kg was associated with ad libitum meal kcal intake at 16 weeks.

Impact of Bile Acid Diarrhea in Patients With Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome on Symptoms and Quality of Life.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Bile acid diarrhea (BAD) affects approximately a quarter of patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D). We aimed to compare the demographics, bowel and somatic symptoms, and quality of life of patients with IBS-D, with or without BAD. METHODS: On one occasion, patients with IBS-D (positive for Rome III criteria) completed the following questionnaires: bowel disease questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression inventory, general quality of life (Symptom Checklist-90), and IBS-specific quality of life. A fasting serum C4 level higher than 52.5 ng/mL was used as a biomarker for BAD. Statistical analysis included a multiple variable logistic model to identify strong predictors of BAD in IBS-D. RESULTS: Among 219 patients (79% female) with IBS-D, 44 had BAD; the BAD group was significantly older and had a higher body mass index than the patients without BAD. Patients with BAD had more severe bowel dysfunction and impact on IBS-specific quality of life (need of toilet proximity) compared with patients with IBS-D without BAD. Patients with BAD were more likely than other IBS-D groups to receive antidiarrheals, bile acid binders, and antacid secretory agents. The severity of diarrhea and need of toilet proximity were predictors of BAD in IBS-D (P < .01). Patients with BAD were more likely to have a depression score higher than 8 on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression inventory. CONCLUSIONS: There is a greater impact on bowel and somatic symptoms and quality of life in IBS-D with BAD compared with IBS-D without BAD. Screening for BAD in IBS-D is especially relevant, with more severe and frequent diarrhea along with urgency.

Differential mRNA Expression in Ileal Mucosal Biopsies of Patients With Diarrhea- or Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) showed immune activation, secretion, and barrier dysfunction in duodenal, jejunal, or colorectal mucosa. This study aimed to measure ileal mucosal expression of genes and proteins associated with mucosal functions. METHODS: We measured by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of 78 genes (reflecting tight junction proteins, chemokines, innate immunity, ion channels, and transmitters) and 5 proteins (barrier, bile acid receptor, and ion exchanger) in terminal ileal mucosa from 11 patients with IBS-diarrhea (IBS-D), 17 patients with IBS-constipation (IBS-C), and 14 healthy controls. Fold changes in mRNA were calculated using 2(-Δ, ΔCT) formula. Group differences were measured using analysis of variance. Protein ratios relative to healthy controls were based on Western blot analysis. Nominal P values (P < 0.05) are reported. RESULTS: In ileal mucosal biopsies, significant differences of mRNA expression in IBS-D relative to IBS-C were upregulation of barrier proteins (TJP1, FN1, CLDN1, and CLDN12), repair function (TFF1), and cellular functions. In ileal mucosal biopsies, mRNA expression in IBS-C relative to healthy controls was reduced GPBAR1 receptor, myosin light chain kinase (MYLK in barrier function), and innate immunity (TLR3), but increased mRNA expression of cadherin cell adhesion mechanisms (CTNNB1) and transport genes SLC9A1 (Na-H exchanger [NHE1]) and INADL (indirect effect on ion transport). DISCUSSION: These data support a role of ileal mucosal dysfunction in IBS, including barrier dysfunction in IBS-D and alterations in absorption/secretion mechanisms in IBS-C.