Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices at the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) can be used as a bridging therapy for myocardial recovery or cardiac transplant, as well as a destination therapy for long-term support in patients with advanced heart failure. Patients with LVADs can present to the emergency department (ED) for acute deterioration and emergency physicians (EPs) must be equipped with the necessary knowledge and skill to treat this unique population. OBJECTIVE: This review describes the role of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the evaluation of patients with LVADs and illustrates how EPs can incorporate POCUS into the evaluation of these patients in the ED. DISCUSSION: The clinical applications for which POCUS may be useful in patients with LVADs include hypotension or shock, dyspnea, cardiac failure, dysrhythmia, syncope, and cardiac arrest. The normal features of POCUS in patients with LVADs and the features of POCUS associated with diseased states are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LVADs have altered anatomy and physiology. Therefore, an understanding of key modifications to standard POCUS views is necessary so that EPs can use POCUS effectively in their evaluation of these patients.

Safety and Tolerability of Sacubitril/Valsartan Initiation in Inpatient Versus Outpatient Setting: A Retrospective Real World Study.

BACKGROUND: The Comparison of Pre- and Post-discharge Initiation of LCZ696 Therapy in HFrEF Patients After an Acute Decompensation Event (TRANSITION) and PIONEER-HF trialsa have shown that sacubitril/valsartan can be initiated early and safely in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) shortly after an acute heart failure episode during hospitalisation. However, it is unclear whether the results can be translated to Asian populations. Hence, this real-world study was designed with the aim of comparing the safety and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan initiation in an inpatient versus outpatient setting. METHODS: A retrospective review for all patients initiated with sacubitril/valsartan from 1 November 2015 to 30 September 2018 was conducted in a tertiary health care institution in Singapore. Patients with HFrEF and aged ≥21 years were included. Incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and discontinuation rate of sacubitril/valsartan were compared between initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in inpatient and outpatient settings. Reasons for discontinuation were investigated. Subgroup analysis was performed. Cox regression was used to analyse the primary outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 1,022 patients who were screened, 840 (289 inpatient group; 551 outpatient group) were included. The inpatient group experienced significantly higher ADRs (34.6% vs 22.7%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68-3.10; p<0.01) and discontinuation rate (18.0% vs 10.3%; adjusted HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.37-3.26; p<0.01) than the outpatient group. The safety outcomes were consistent across all the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in an inpatient group was associated with higher ADRs and discontinuation rate as compared with an outpatient group in an Asian population. However, given that the majority of patients in the inpatient cohort could tolerate sacubitril/valsartan, it would still be feasible to initiate this drug with close monitoring. Further randomised clinical trials in Asian populations are required to confirm this finding.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in hypertension.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hypertension is the most prevalent risk factor in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and plays a key role in the disease. The continued lack of effective therapies to improve outcomes in HFpEF underscores the knowledge gaps regarding the pathophysiology of HFpEF. This review builds on fundamental concepts in pressure overload-induced left ventricular modeling, and summarizes recent knowledge gained regarding the mechanisms underlying the transition from hypertensive heart disease to HFpEF. RECENT FINDINGS: The pathophysiology of hypertensive HFpEF extends beyond the development of left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction to myocardial contractile dysfunction, beyond left atrial structural dilatation to left atrial functional decline, beyond macrovascular stiffening to microvascular dysfunction, beyond central cardiac triggers to systemic endothelial inflammation, beyond fibrosis to titin changes, and beyond collagen deposition to qualitative changes in collagen. The central paradigm involves a systemic proinflammatory state triggering a downstream cascade of cardiac microvascular endothelial activation, oxidative stress, and abnormal myocardial cyclic guanosine monophosphate signaling, leading to microvascular rarefaction, chronic ischemia, fibrosis and progression to HFpEF. SUMMARY: Recent advances have provided insights into the pathophysiology of HFpEF in hypertension. Such knowledge provides novel opportunities for therapeutic strategies in the treatment of hypertensive HFpEF.

Evolving Approaches to Genetic Evaluation of Specific Cardiomyopathies.

The understanding of the genetic basis of cardiomyopathy has expanded significantly over the past 2 decades. The increasing availability, shortening diagnostic time, and lowering costs of genetic testing have provided researchers and physicians with the opportunity to identify the underlying genetic determinants for thousands of genetic disorders, including inherited cardiomyopathies, in effort to improve patient morbidities and mortality. As such, genetic testing has advanced from basic scientific research to clinical application and has been incorporated as part of patient evaluations for suspected inherited cardiomyopathies. Genetic evaluation framework of inherited cardiomyopathies typically encompasses careful evaluation of family history, genetic counseling, clinical screening of family members, and if appropriate, molecular genetic testing. This review summarizes the genetics, current guideline recommendations, and evidence supporting the genetic evaluation framework of five hereditary forms of cardiomyopathy: dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM), and left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC).

Ultrafiltration in patients with decompensated heart failure and diuretic resistance: an Asian centre's experience.

INTRODUCTION: Diuretics are the mainstay of therapy for restoring the euvolaemic state in patients with decompensated heart failure. However, diuretic resistance remains a challenge. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to examine the efficacy and safety of ultrafiltration (UF) in 44 hospitalised patients who had decompensated heart failure and diuretic resistance between October 2011 and July 2013. RESULTS: Among the 44 patients, 18 received UF (i.e. UF group), while 26 received diuretics (i.e. standard care group). After 48 hours, the UF group achieved lower urine output (1,355 mL vs. 3,815 mL, p = 0.0003), greater fluid loss (5,058 mL vs. 1,915 mL, p < 0.0001) and greater weight loss (5.0 kg vs. 1.0 kg, p < 0.0001) than the standard care group. The UF group also had a shorter duration of hospitalisation (5.0 days vs. 9.5 days, p = 0.0010). There were no differences in the incidence of 30-day emergency department visits and rehospitalisations for heart failure between the two groups. At 90 days, the UF group had fewer emergency department visits (0.2 vs. 0.8, p = 0.0500) and fewer rehospitalisations for heart failure (0.3 vs. 1.0, p = 0.0442). Reduction in EQ-5D™ scores was greater in the UF group, both at discharge (2.7 vs. 1.4, p = 0.0283) and 30 days (2.5 vs. 0.3, p = 0.0033). No adverse events were reported with UF. CONCLUSION: UF is an effective and safe treatment that can improve the health outcomes of Asian patients with decompensated heart failure and diuretic resistance.