How do young people with a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome understand and experience cancer survivorship? "With Li-Fraumeni syndrome, it's just an intermission".

OBJECTIVES: Adolescents and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors face unique medical and psychosocial sequalae, including chronic health conditions, late effects of treatment and fear of recurrence. The meaning of cancer survivorship may be further complicated for AYAs with hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes. This study used a patient-centered framework to investigate how AYAs with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) consider cancer survivorship. METHODS: An interprofessional team conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with AYAs (aged 18-41, mean 31 years) enrolled in the National Cancer Institute's LFS Study (NCT01443468). Twenty had experienced at least one cancer diagnosis. Interview data were thematically analyzed by an inter-professional team using interpretive description and grounded theory methods. FINDINGS: Participants viewed "survivorship" as a period marked by no evidence of formerly diagnosed disease. By contrast, participants felt the label "survivor" was tenuous since LFS is characterized by multiple primary malignancies and uncertainty about intervals between one diagnosis and the next. Many AYAs viewed survivorship as requiring a high degree of suffering. Though many personally rejected "survivor" identities, almost all articulated its various functions including positive, negative, and more complicated connotations. Instead, they chose language to represent a range of beliefs about survival, longevity, prognosis, and activism. CONCLUSIONS: AYAs with LFS struggle with the term "survivor" due to their multi-organ cancer risk, short intervals between malignancies, and evolving identities. Loved ones' cancer-related suffering informed perspectives on survivorship. Survivorship care for AYAs with cancer risk syndromes requires interprofessional interventions that address their unique biomedical and psychosocial needs.

Shwachman Diamond syndrome: narrow genotypic spectrum and variable clinical features.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Shwachman Diamond syndrome (SDS) is an inherited bone marrow failure syndrome (IBMFS) associated with pancreatic insufficiency, neutropenia, and skeletal dysplasia. Biallelic pathogenic variants (PV) in SBDS account for >90% of SDS. We hypothesized that the SDS phenotype varies based on genotype and conducted a genotype-phenotype correlation study to better understand these complexities. METHODS: We reviewed records of all patients with SDS or SDS-like syndromes in the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) IBMFS study. Additional published SDS cohorts were reviewed and compared with the NCI cohort. RESULTS: PVs in SBDS were present in 32/47 (68.1%) participants. Biallelic inheritance of SBDS c.258 + 2T > C and c.183_184TA > CT was the most common genotype in our study (25/32, 78.1%) and published cohorts. Most patients had the SDS hallmark features of neutropenia (45/45, 100%), pancreatic insufficiency (41/43, 95.3%), and/or bony abnormalities (29/36, 80.6%). Developmental delay was common (20/34, 58.8%). Increased risk of hematologic malignancies at young ages and the rarity of solid malignancies was observed in both the NCI cohort and published studies. CONCLUSIONS: SDS is a complex childhood illness with a narrow genotypic spectrum. Patients may first present to primary care, gastroenterology, orthopedic, and/or hematology clinics. Coordinated multidisciplinary care is important for diagnosis and patient management. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00027274. IMPACT: The clinical and genetic spectrum of Shwachman Diamond Syndrome was comprehensively evaluated, and the findings illustrate the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for these complex patients. Our work reveals: 1. a narrow genotypic spectrum in SDS; 2. a low risk of solid tumors in patients with SDS; 3. patients with SDS have clinical manifestations in multiple organ systems.

Population Frequency of Fanconi Pathway Gene Variants and Their Association with Survival After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Severe Aplastic Anemia.

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is most frequently immune-mediated; however, rare inherited bone marrow failure syndromes, such as Fanconi anemia (FA), may be causal and can present as aplastic anemia (AA). FA is primarily an autosomal recessive disorder caused by the presence of 2 pathogenic variants in a single FA/BRCA DNA repair pathway gene. Patients with SAA often undergo genetic testing during clinical evaluation that may identify single deleterious alleles in FA pathway genes. We quantified the rate of germline single deleterious alleles in 22 FA genes using both a general population database (3234 variants, 125,748 exomes) and in a cohort of patients with SAA undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) (21 variants in 730 patients). The variants were classified as deleterious using in silico tools (REVEL, MetaSVM, VEP) and database resources (ClinVar, LOVD-FA). We found similar rates of single deleterious alleles in FA genes in both groups (2.6% and 2.9%). The presence of a single deleterious variant in a gene for FA in SAA HCT recipients did not affect the overall survival after HCT (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.95; P  = 0.71), or post-HCT cancer risk (P = 0.52). Our results demonstrate that the identification of a germline monoallelic deleterious variant in an FA gene in patients with idiopathic SAA does not influence the outcome of HCT. Our findings suggest that there is no need for special treatment considerations for patients with SAA and a single deleterious FA allele identified on genetic testing.

The causes of Fanconi anemia in South Asia and the Middle East: A case series and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Fanconi anemia (FA) is an inherited bone marrow failure syndrome associated with characteristic dysmorphology primarily caused by biallelic pathogenic germline variants in any of 22 different DNA repair genes. There are limited data on the specific molecular causes of FA in different ethnic groups. METHODS: We performed exome sequencing and copy number variant analyses on 19 patients with FA from 17 families undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation evaluation in Pakistan. The scientific literature was reviewed, and we curated germline variants reported in patients with FA from South Asia and the Middle East. RESULTS: The genetic causes of FA were identified in 14 of the 17 families: seven FANCA, two FANCC, one FANCF, two FANCG, and two FANCL. Homozygous and compound heterozygous variants were present in 12 and two families, respectively. Nine families carried variants previously reported as pathogenic, including two families with the South Asian FANCL founder variant. We also identified five novel likely deleterious variants in FANCA, FANCF, and FANCG in affected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the importance of determining the genomic landscape of FA in diverse populations, in order to improve understanding of FA etiology and assist in the counseling of families.