Binding and functional profiling of antibody mutants guides selection of optimal candidates as antibody drug conjugates.

An increasingly appreciated conundrum in the discovery of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) is that an antibody that was selected primarily for strong binding to its cancer target may not serve as an optimal ADC. In this study, we performed mechanistic cell-based experiments to determine the correlation between antibody affinity, avidity, internalization and ADC efficacy. We used structure-guided design to assemble a panel of antibody mutants with predicted Her2 affinities ranging from higher to lower relative to the parent antibody, Herceptin. These antibodies were ranked for binding via SPR and via flow-cytometry on high-Her2 SKOV3 cells and low-Her2 MCF7 cells, the latter acting as a surrogate for low-Her2 normal cells. A subpanel of variants, representative of different Her2-binding affinities (2 strong, 2 moderate and 3 weak), were further screened via high-content imaging for internalization efficacies in high versus low-Her2 cells. Finally, these antibodies were evaluated in ADC cytotoxicity screening assays (using DM1 and MMAE secondary antibodies) and as antibody-drug conjugates (DM1 and PNU159682). Our results identified specific but weak Her2-binding variants as optimal candidates for developing DM1 and PNU ADCs since they exhibited high potencies (low to sub-nM) in high-Her2 SKOV3 cells and low toxicities in low-Her2 cells. The 2 strong-affinity variants were highly potent in SKOV3 cells but also showed significant toxicities in low-Her2 cells and therefore are predicted to be toxic in normal tissues. Our findings show that pharmacological profiling of an antibody library in multiple binding and functional assays allows for selection of optimal ADCs.

Bivalent binding by intermediate affinity of nimotuzumab: a contribution to explain antibody clinical profile.

Nimotuzumab is an EGFR-targeting antibody that has demonstrated encouraging clinical results in the absence of severe side-effects observed with other approved anti-EGFR antibodies. We investigated whether different clinical behavior of nimotuzumab is related to its bivalent/monovalent binding profile. Binding properties of nimotuzumab and cetuximab, the most development of anti-EGFR antibodies, were studied in vitro using chip surfaces and cells with varying EGFR expression levels. Experimental observations demonstrated that in contrast to cetuximab, the intrinsic properties of nimotuzumab required bivalent binding for stable attachment to the cellular surface, leading to nimotuzumab selectively binding to cells that express moderate to high EGFR expression levels. At these conditions, both antibodies bound bivalently, and accumulated to similar degrees. When EGFR density is low, nimotuzumab monovalent interaction was transient, whereas cetuximab continued to interact strongly with the receptors. We compared the in vitro anti-tumor efficacy of nimotuzumab and cetuximab. Cetuximab decreased the cell viability and induced apoptosis for all the tested cell lines, effects which did not depend on EGFR expression level. In contrast, nimotuzumab also provoked significant anti-cellular effects, but its anti-tumor capacity decreased together with EGFR expression level. Cetuximab Fab fragment was able to impact tumor cell survival, whereas nimotuzumab fragment totally lost this effect. Tumor-xenograft experiments using cells with a high EGFR expression revealed similar tumor growth inhibiting effects for both antibodies. This study suggests an explanation for nimotuzumab clinical profile, whereby anti-tumor activity is obtained in absence of severe toxicities due to its properties of bivalent binding to EGFR.