Best practice and reproducible science are required to advance artificial intelligence in real-world applications.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the most significant concerns in medical practice but yet it still cannot be fully recapitulated with existing in vivo, in vitro and in silico approaches. To address this challenge, Chen et al. [ 1] developed a deep learning-based DILI prediction model based on chemical structure information alone. The reported model yielded an outstanding prediction performance (i.e. 0.958, 0.976, 0.935, 0.947, 0.926 and 0.913 for AUC, accuracy, recall, precision, F1-score and specificity, respectively, on a test set), far outperforming all publicly available and similar in silico DILI models. This extraordinary model performance is counter-intuitive to what we know about the underlying biology of DILI and the principles and hypothesis behind this type of in silico approach. In this Letter to the Editor, we raise awareness of several issues concerning data curation, model validation and comparison practices, and data and model reproducibility.

PLM-ARG: antibiotic resistance gene identification using a pretrained protein language model.

MOTIVATION: Antibiotic resistance presents a formidable global challenge to public health and the environment. While considerable endeavors have been dedicated to identify antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) for assessing the threat of antibiotic resistance, recent extensive investigations using metagenomic and metatranscriptomic approaches have unveiled a noteworthy concern. A significant fraction of proteins defies annotation through conventional sequence similarity-based methods, an issue that extends to ARGs, potentially leading to their under-recognition due to dissimilarities at the sequence level. RESULTS: Herein, we proposed an Artificial Intelligence-powered ARG identification framework using a pretrained large protein language model, enabling ARG identification and resistance category classification simultaneously. The proposed PLM-ARG was developed based on the most comprehensive ARG and related resistance category information (>28K ARGs and associated 29 resistance categories), yielding Matthew's correlation coefficients (MCCs) of 0.983 ± 0.001 by using a 5-fold cross-validation strategy. Furthermore, the PLM-ARG model was verified using an independent validation set and achieved an MCC of 0.838, outperforming other publicly available ARG prediction tools with an improvement range of 51.8%-107.9%. Moreover, the utility of the proposed PLM-ARG model was demonstrated by annotating resistance in the UniProt database and evaluating the impact of ARGs on the Earth's environmental microbiota. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PLM-ARG is available for academic purposes at https://github.com/Junwu302/PLM-ARG, and a user-friendly webserver (http://www.unimd.org/PLM-ARG) is also provided.

A framework enabling LLMs into regulatory environment for transparency and trustworthiness and its application to drug labeling document.

Regulatory agencies consistently deal with extensive document reviews, ranging from product submissions to both internal and external communications. Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT can be invaluable tools for these tasks, however present several challenges, particularly the proprietary information, combining customized function with specific review needs, and transparency and explainability of the model's output. Hence, a localized and customized solution is imperative. To tackle these challenges, we formulated a framework named askFDALabel on FDA drug labeling documents that is a crucial resource in the FDA drug review process. AskFDALabel operates within a secure IT environment and comprises two key modules: a semantic search and a Q&A/text-generation module. The Module S built on word embeddings to enable comprehensive semantic queries within labeling documents. The Module T utilizes a tuned LLM to generate responses based on references from Module S. As the result, our framework enabled small LLMs to perform comparably to ChatGPT with as a computationally inexpensive solution for regulatory application. To conclude, through AskFDALabel, we have showcased a pathway that harnesses LLMs to support agency operations within a secure environment, offering tailored functions for the needs of regulatory research.

Classifying Free Texts Into Predefined Sections Using AI in Regulatory Documents: A Case Study with Drug Labeling Documents.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory process often involves several reviewers who focus on sets of information related to their respective areas of review. Accordingly, manufacturers that provide submission packages to regulatory agencies are instructed to organize the contents using a structure that enables the information to be easily allocated, retrieved, and reviewed. However, this practice is not always followed correctly; as such, some documents are not well structured, with similar information spreading across different sections, hindering the efficient access and review of all of the relevant data as a whole. To improve this common situation, we evaluated an artificial intelligence (AI)-based natural language processing (NLP) methodology, called Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT), to automatically classify free-text information into standardized sections, supporting a holistic review of drug safety and efficacy. Specifically, FDA labeling documents were used in this study as a proof of concept, where the labeling section structure defined by the Physician Label Rule (PLR) was used to classify labels in the development of the model. The model was subsequently evaluated on texts from both well-structured labeling documents (i.e., PLR-based labeling) and less- or differently structured documents (i.e., non-PLR and Summary of Product Characteristic [SmPC] labeling.) In the training process, the model yielded 96% and 88% accuracy for binary and multiclass tasks, respectively. The testing accuracies observed for the PLR, non-PLR, and SmPC testing data sets for the binary model were 95%, 88%, and 88%, and for the multiclass model were 82%, 73%, and 68%, respectively. Our study demonstrated that automatically classifying free texts into standardized sections with AI language models could be an advanced regulatory science approach for supporting the review process by effectively processing unformatted documents.

TransOrGAN: An Artificial Intelligence Mapping of Rat Transcriptomic Profiles between Organs, Ages, and Sexes.

Animal studies are required for the evaluation of candidate drugs to ensure patient and volunteer safety. Toxicogenomics is often applied in these studies to gain understanding of the underlying mechanisms of toxicity, which is usually focused on critical organs such as the liver or kidney in young male rats. There is a strong ethical reason to reduce, refine and replace animal use (the 3Rs), where the mapping of data between organs, sexes and ages could reduce the cost and time of drug development. Herein, we proposed a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based framework entitled TransOrGAN that allowed the molecular mapping of gene expression profiles in different rodent organ systems and across sex and age groups. We carried out a proof-of-concept study based on rat RNA-seq data from 288 samples in 9 different organs of both sexes and 4 developmental stages. First, we demonstrated that TransOrGAN could infer transcriptomic profiles between any 2 of the 9 organs studied, yielding an average cosine similarity of 0.984 between synthetic transcriptomic profiles and their corresponding real profiles. Second, we found that TransOrGAN could infer transcriptomic profiles observed in females from males, with an average cosine similarity of 0.984. Third, we found that TransOrGAN could infer transcriptomic profiles in juvenile, adult, and aged animals from adolescent animals with an average cosine similarity of 0.981, 0.983, and 0.989, respectively. Altogether, TransOrGAN is an innovative approach to infer transcriptomic profiles between ages, sexes, and organ systems, offering the opportunity to reduce animal usage and to provide an integrated assessment of toxicity in the whole organism irrespective of sex or age.

A Weakly Supervised Deep Learning Framework for Whole Slide Classification to Facilitate Digital Pathology in Animal Study.

The pathology of animal studies is crucial for toxicity evaluations and regulatory assessments, but the manual examination of slides by pathologists remains time-consuming and requires extensive training. One inherent challenge in this process is the interobserver variability, which can compromise the consistency and accuracy of a study. Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated its ability to automate similar examinations in clinical applications with enhanced efficiency, consistency, and accuracy. However, training AI models typically relies on costly pixel-level annotation of injured regions and is often not available for animal pathology. To address this, we developed the PathologAI system, a "weakly" supervised approach for WSI classification in rat images without explicit lesion annotation at the pixel level. Using rat liver imaging data from the Open TG-GATEs system, PathologAI was applied to predict necrosis of n = 816 WSIs (377 controls). TG-GATEs studied 170 compounds at three dose levels (low, middle, and high) for four time points (3, 7, 14, and 28 days). PathologAI first preprocessed WSIs at the tile level to generate a high-level representation with a Generative Adversarial Network architecture. The prediction of liver necrosis relied on an ensemble model of 5 CNN classifiers trained on 335 WSIs. The ensemble model achieved notable classification accuracy on the holdout test set: 87% among 87 control slides free of findings, 83% among 120 controls with spontaneous necrosis, 67% among 147 treated animals with spontaneous minimal or slight necrosis, and 59% among 127 treated animals with minimal or slight necrosis caused by the treatment. Importantly, PathologAI was able to discriminate WSIs with spontaneous necrosis from those with treatment related necrosis and discriminated mild lesion level findings (slight vs minimal) and between treatment dose levels. PathologAI could provide an inexpensive and rapid screening tool to assist the digital pathology analysis in preclinical applications and general toxicological studies.

DeepAmes: A deep learning-powered Ames test predictive model with potential for regulatory application.

The Ames assay is required by the regulatory agencies worldwide to assess the mutagenic potential risk of consumer products. As well as this in vitro assay, in silico approaches have been widely used to predict Ames test results as outlined in the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) guidelines. Building on this in silico approach, here we describe DeepAmes, a high performance and robust model developed with a novel deep learning (DL) approach for potential utility in regulatory science. DeepAmes was developed with a large and consistent Ames dataset (>10,000 compounds) and was compared with other five standard Machine Learning (ML) methods. Using a test set of 1,543 compounds, DeepAmes was the best performer in predicting the outcome of Ames assay. In addition, DeepAmes yielded the best and most stable performance up to when compounds were >30% outside of the applicability domain (AD). Regarding the potential for regulatory application, a revised version of DeepAmes with a much-improved sensitivity of 0.87 from 0.47. In conclusion, DeepAmes provides a DL-powered Ames test predictive model for predicting the results of Ames tests; with its defined AD and clear context of use, DeepAmes has potential for utility in regulatory application.

Development of benchmark datasets for text mining and sentiment analysis to accelerate regulatory literature review.

In the field of regulatory science, reviewing literature is an essential and important step, which most of the time is conducted by manually reading hundreds of articles. Although this process is highly time-consuming and labor-intensive, most output of this process is not well transformed into machine-readable format. The limited availability of data has largely constrained the artificial intelligence (AI) system development to facilitate this literature reviewing in the regulatory process. In the past decade, AI has revolutionized the area of text mining as many deep learning approaches have been developed to search, annotate, and classify relevant documents. After the great advancement of AI algorithms, a lack of high-quality data instead of the algorithms has recently become the bottleneck of AI system development. Herein, we constructed two large benchmark datasets, Chlorine Efficacy dataset (CHE) and Chlorine Safety dataset (CHS), under a regulatory scenario that sought to assess the antiseptic efficacy and toxicity of chlorine. For each dataset, ∼10,000 scientific articles were initially collected, manually reviewed, and their relevance to the review task were labeled. To ensure high data quality, each paper was labeled by a consensus among multiple experienced reviewers. The overall relevance rate was 27.21% (2,663 of 9,788) for CHE and 7.50% (761 of 10,153) for CHS, respectively. Furthermore, the relevant articles were categorized into five subgroups based on the focus of their content. Next, we developed an attention-based classification language model using these two datasets. The proposed classification model yielded 0.857 and 0.908 of Area Under the Curve (AUC) for CHE and CHS dataset, respectively. This performance was significantly better than permutation test (p < 10E-9), demonstrating that the labeling processes were valid. To conclude, our datasets can be used as benchmark to develop AI systems, which can further facilitate the literature review process in regulatory science.

Artificial intelligence and real-world data for drug and food safety - A regulatory science perspective.

In 2013, the Global Coalition for Regulatory Science Research (GCRSR) was established with members from over ten countries (www.gcrsr.net). One of the main objectives of GCRSR is to facilitate communication among global regulators on the rise of new technologies with regulatory applications through the annual conference Global Summit on Regulatory Science (GSRS). The 11th annual GSRS conference (GSRS21) focused on "Regulatory Sciences for Food/Drug Safety with Real-World Data (RWD) and Artificial Intelligence (AI)." The conference discussed current advancements in both AI and RWD approaches with a specific emphasis on how they impact regulatory sciences and how regulatory agencies across the globe are pursuing the adaptation and oversight of these technologies. There were presentations from Brazil, Canada, India, Italy, Japan, Germany, Switzerland, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States. These presentations highlighted how various agencies are moving forward with these technologies by either improving the agencies' operation and/or preparing regulatory mechanisms to approve the products containing these innovations. To increase the content and discussion, the GSRS21 hosted two debate sessions on the question of "Is Regulatory Science Ready for AI?" and a workshop to showcase the analytical data tools that global regulatory agencies have been using and/or plan to apply to regulatory science. Several key topics were highlighted and discussed during the conference, such as the capabilities of AI and RWD to assist regulatory science policies for drug and food safety, the readiness of AI and data science to provide solutions for regulatory science. Discussions highlighted the need for a constant effort to evaluate emerging technologies for fit-for-purpose regulatory applications. The annual GSRS conferences offer a unique platform to facilitate discussion and collaboration across regulatory agencies, modernizing regulatory approaches, and harmonizing efforts.

Toward Clinical Implementation of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Genetic Testing in Rare Diseases: Where Are We?

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have changed the landscape of genetic testing in rare diseases. However, the rapid evolution of NGS technologies has outpaced its clinical adoption. Here, we re-evaluate the critical steps in the clinical application of NGS-based genetic testing from an informatics perspective. We suggest a 'fit-for-purpose' triage of current NGS technologies. We also point out potential shortcomings in the clinical management of genetic variants and offer ideas for potential improvement. We specifically emphasize the importance of ensuring the accuracy and reproducibility of NGS-based genetic testing in the context of rare disease diagnosis. We highlight the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in enhancing understanding and prioritization of variance in the clinical setting and propose deep learning frameworks for further investigation.

A comprehensive rat transcriptome built from large scale RNA-seq-based annotation.

The rat is an important model organism in biomedical research for studying human disease mechanisms and treatments, but its annotated transcriptome is far from complete. We constructed a Rat Transcriptome Re-annotation named RTR using RNA-seq data from 320 samples in 11 different organs generated by the SEQC consortium. Totally, there are 52 807 genes and 114 152 transcripts in RTR. Transcribed regions and exons in RTR account for ∼42% and ∼6.5% of the genome, respectively. Of all 73 074 newly annotated transcripts in RTR, 34 213 were annotated as high confident coding transcripts and 24 728 as high confident long noncoding transcripts. Different tissues rather than different stages have a significant influence on the expression patterns of transcripts. We also found that 11 715 genes and 15 852 transcripts were expressed in all 11 tissues and that 849 house-keeping genes expressed different isoforms among tissues. This comprehensive transcriptome is freely available at http://www.unimd.org/rtr/. Our new rat transcriptome provides essential reference for genetics and gene expression studies in rat disease and toxicity models.

R-ODAF: Omics data analysis framework for regulatory application.

Despite the widespread use of transcriptomics technologies in toxicology research, acceptance of the data by regulatory agencies to support the hazard assessment is still limited. Fundamental issues contributing to this are the lack of reproducibility in transcriptomics data analysis arising from variance in the methods used to generate data and differences in the data processing. While research applications are flexible in the way the data are generated and interpreted, this is not the case for regulatory applications where an unambiguous answer, possibly later subject to legal scrutiny, is required. A reference analysis framework would give greater credibility to the data and allow the practitioners to justify their use of an alternative bioinformatic process by referring to a standard. In this publication, we propose a method called omics data analysis framework for regulatory application (R-ODAF), which has been built as a user-friendly pipeline to analyze raw transcriptomics data from microarray and next-generation sequencing. In the R-ODAF, we also propose additional statistical steps to remove the number of false positives obtained from standard data analysis pipelines for RNA-sequencing. We illustrate the added value of R-ODAF, compared to a standard workflow, using a typical toxicogenomics dataset of hepatocytes exposed to paracetamol.

Landscape of circRNAs Across 11 Organs and 4 Ages in Fischer 344 Rats.

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a class of endogenous noncoding RNAs with a covalently closed loop. Aside from their recognized regulatory functions (e.g., sponging microRNAs to reduce their activity, and altering parental gene transcription by competing with the canonical splicing of pre-mRNA), expression of circRNAs is abundant, diverse, and conservative across species, rendering them as potential biomarker candidates. Consequently, the landscape of circRNAs has been studied for several species. Although the rat is one of the most important animal models for drug safety and toxicological research, few attempts have been made to understand the landscape of rat circRNAs. One noticeable challenge in analyzing circRNAs with next-generation sequencing (NGS) data is to find ways to use rapidly advancing bioinformatics approaches to improve accuracy while also reducing the number of resulting false positives that occur in circRNA identification with these new methods. Here, we applied two of the most advanced circRNA bioinformatics pipelines to provide a landscape of circRNAs in rats by analyzing an RNA-seq data set for 11 organs (adrenal gland, brain, heart, kidney, liver, lung, muscle, spleen, thymus, and testis or uterus) from Fischer 344 rats of both sexes in four age groups (juvenile, adolescence, adult, and aged). The circRNAs displayed organ-specific patterns and sex differences in most organs. Lowest numbers of circRNAs were seen in the liver and muscle, while highest numbers of circRNAs occurred in the brain, which correlated to gene expression patterns seen across those organs. Concordance of circRNAs between males and females was approximately 50% in nonsex organs, implying that some caution needs to be exercised when selecting specific circRNAs as biomarkers for both sexes. The number of common circRNAs between sexes increased with age for most organs except heart, spleen, and thymus. A dramatic drop in the number of circRNAs in kidney, thymus, and testis was observed in aged rats, suggesting that the regulatory function of circRNAs is age dependent. From the 1595 circRNAs identified with high confidence, only 6 appeared in all 9 of the nonsex organs in both sexes and four age groups. Forty-one and 48 circRNAs were identified in more than 5 nonsex organs in males and females, respectively, while close to 280 circRNAs were found in an organ for more than 2 age groups in both sexes. This study offers an overview of rat circRNAs, which contributes to the effort of identifying circRNAs as potential biomarkers for safety and risk assessment.

Impact of Sequencing Depth and Library Preparation on Toxicological Interpretation of RNA-Seq Data in a "Three-Sample" Scenario.

While RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) has emerged as a standard approach in toxicogenomics, its full potential in gaining underlying toxicological mechanisms is still not clear when only three biological replicates are used. This "three-sample" study design is common in toxicological research, particularly in animal studies during preclinical drug development. Sequencing depth (the total number of reads in an experiment) and library preparation are critical to the resolution and integrity of RNA-seq data and biological interpretation. We used aflatoxin b1 (AFB1), a model toxicant, to investigate the effect of sequencing depth and library preparation in RNA-seq on toxicological interpretation in the "three-sample" scenario. We also compared different gene profiling platforms (RNA-seq, TempO-seq, microarray, and qPCR) using identical liver samples. Well-established mechanisms of AFB1 toxicity served as ground truth for our comparative analyses. We found that a minimum of 20 million reads was sufficient to elicit key toxicity functions and pathways underlying AFB1-induced liver toxicity using three replicates and that identification of differentially expressed genes was positively associated with sequencing depth to a certain extent. Further, our results showed that RNA-seq revealed toxicological insights from pathway enrichment with overall higher statistical power and overlap ratio, compared with TempO-seq and microarray. Moreover, library preparation using the same methods was important to reproducing the toxicological interpretation.

DeepDILI: Deep Learning-Powered Drug-Induced Liver Injury Prediction Using Model-Level Representation.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the most frequently reported single cause of safety-related withdrawal of marketed drugs. It is essential to identify drugs with DILI potential at the early stages of drug development. In this study, we describe a deep learning-powered DILI (DeepDILI) prediction model created by combining model-level representation generated by conventional machine learning (ML) algorithms with a deep learning framework based on Mold2 descriptors. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the proposed DeepDILI model performance by posing several critical questions: (1) Could the DILI potential of newly approved drugs be predicted by accumulated knowledge of early approved ones? (2) is model-level representation more informative than molecule-based representation for DILI prediction? and (3) could improved model explainability be established? For question 1, we developed the DeepDILI model using drugs approved before 1997 to predict the DILI potential of those approved thereafter. As a result, the DeepDILI model outperformed the five conventional ML algorithms and two state-of-the-art ensemble methods with a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) value of 0.331. For question 2, we demonstrated that the DeepDILI model's performance was significantly improved (i.e., a MCC improvement of 25.86% in test set) compared with deep neural networks based on molecule-based representation. For question 3, we found 21 chemical descriptors that were enriched, suggesting a strong association with DILI outcome. Furthermore, we found that the DeepDILI model has more discrimination power to identify the DILI potential of drugs belonging to the World Health Organization therapeutic category of 'alimentary tract and metabolism'. Moreover, the DeepDILI model based on Mold2 descriptors outperformed the ones with Mol2vec and MACCS descriptors. Finally, the DeepDILI model was applied to the recent real-world problem of predicting any DILI concern for potential COVID-19 treatments from repositioning drug candidates. Altogether, this developed DeepDILI model could serve as a promising tool for screening for DILI risk of compounds in the preclinical setting, and the DeepDILI model is publicly available through https://github.com/TingLi2016/DeepDILI.

Trade-off Predictivity and Explainability for Machine-Learning Powered Predictive Toxicology: An in-Depth Investigation with Tox21 Data Sets.

Selecting a model in predictive toxicology often involves a trade-off between prediction performance and explainability: should we sacrifice the model performance to gain explainability or vice versa. Here we present a comprehensive study to assess algorithm and feature influences on model performance in chemical toxicity research. We conducted over 5000 models for a Tox21 bioassay data set of 65 assays and ∼7600 compounds. Seven molecular representations as features and 12 modeling approaches varying in complexity and explainability were employed to systematically investigate the impact of various factors on model performance and explainability. We demonstrated that end points dictated a model's performance, regardless of the chosen modeling approach including deep learning and chemical features. Overall, more complex models such as (LS-)SVM and Random Forest performed marginally better than simpler models such as linear regression and KNN in the presented Tox21 data analysis. Since a simpler model with acceptable performance often also is easy to interpret for the Tox21 data set, it clearly was the preferred choice due to its better explainability. Given that each data set had its own error structure both for dependent and independent variables, we strongly recommend that it is important to conduct a systematic study with a broad range of model complexity and feature explainability to identify model balancing its predictivity and explainability.

Development of a Battery of In Silico Prediction Tools for Drug-Induced Liver Injury from the Vantage Point of Translational Safety Assessment.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains a challenge when translating knowledge from the preclinical stage to human use cases. Attempts to model human DILI directly based on the information from drug labels have had some success; however, the approach falls short of providing insights or addressing uncertainty due to the difficulty of decoupling the idiosyncratic nature of human DILI outcomes. Our approach in this comparative analysis is to leverage existing preclinical and clinical data as well as information on metabolism to better translate mammalian to human DILI. The human DILI knowledge base from the United States Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) National Center for Toxicology Research contains 1036 pharmaceuticals from diverse therapeutic categories. A human DILI training set of 305 oral marketed drugs was prepared and a binary classification scheme applied. The second knowledge base consists of mammalian repeated dose toxicity with liver toxicity data from various regulatory sources. Within this knowledge base, we identified 278 pharmaceuticals containing 198 marketed or withdrawn oral drugs with data from the U.S. FDA new drug application and 98 active pharmaceutical ingredients from ToxCast. From this collection, a set of 225 oral drugs was prepared as the mammalian hepatotoxicity training set with particular end points of pathology findings in the liver and bile duct. Both human and mammalian data sets were processed using various learning algorithms, including artificial intelligence approaches. The external validations for both models were comparable to the training statistics. These data sets were also used to extract species-differentiating chemotypes that differentiate DILI effects on humans from mammals. A systematic workflow was devised to predict human DILI and provide mechanistic insights. For a given query molecule, both human and mammalian models are run. If the predictions are discordant, both metabolites and parents are investigated for quantitative structure-activity relationship and species-differentiating chemotypes. Their results are combined using the Dempster-Shafer decision theory to yield a final outcome prediction for human DILI with estimated uncertainty. Finally, these tools are implementable within an in silico platform for systematic evaluation.

Regulatory landscape of nanotechnology and nanoplastics from a global perspective.

Nanotechnology and more particularly nanotechnology-based products and materials have provided a huge potential for novel solutions to many of the current challenges society is facing. However, nanotechnology is also an area of product innovation that is sometimes developing faster than regulatory frameworks. This is due to the high complexity of some nanomaterials, the lack of a globally harmonised regulatory definition and the different scopes of regulation at a global level. Research organisations and regulatory bodies have spent many efforts in the last two decades to cope with these challenges. Although there has been a significant advancement related to analytical approaches for labelling purposes as well as to the development of suitable test guidelines for nanomaterials and their safety assessment, there is a still a need for greater global collaboration and consensus in the regulatory field. Furthermore, with growing societal concerns on plastic litter and tiny debris produced by degradation of littered plastic objects, the impact of micro- and nanoplastics on humans and the environment is an emerging issue. Despite increasing research and initial regulatory discussions on micro- and nanoplastics, there are still knowledge gaps and thus an urgent need for action. As nanoplastics can be classified as a specific type of incidental nanomaterials, current and future scientific investigations should take into account the existing profound knowledge on nanotechnology/nanomaterials when discussing issues around nanoplastics. This review was conceived at the 2019 Global Summit on Regulatory Sciences that took place in Stresa, Italy, on 24-26 September 2019 (GSRS 2019) and which was co-organised by the Global Coalition for Regulatory Science Research (GCRSR) and the European Commission's (EC) Joint Research Centre (JRC). The GCRSR consists of regulatory bodies from various countries around the globe including EU bodies. The 2019 Global Summit provided an excellent platform to exchange the latest information on activities carried out by regulatory bodies with a focus on the application of nanotechnology in the agriculture/food sector, on nanoplastics and on nanomedicines, including taking stock and promoting further collaboration. Recently, the topic of micro- and nanoplastics has become a new focus of the GCRSR. Besides discussing the challenges and needs, some future directions on how new tools and methodologies can improve the regulatory science were elaborated by summarising a significant portion of discussions during the summit. It has been revealed that there are still some uncertainties and knowledge gaps with regard to physicochemical properties, environmental behaviour and toxicological effects, especially as testing described in the dossiers is often done early in the product development process, and the material in the final product may behave differently. The harmonisation of methodologies for quantification and risk assessment of nanomaterials and micro/nanoplastics, the documentation of regulatory science studies and the need for sharing databases were highlighted as important aspects to look at.

Coordinated Regulation of UGT2B15 Expression by Long Noncoding RNA LINC00574 and hsa-miR-129-5p in HepaRG Cells.

Recent studies have shown that microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) regulate the expression of drug metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) in human hepatic cells and that a set of DMEs, including UDP glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B15, is down-regulated dramatically in liver cells by toxic acetaminophen (APAP) concentrations. In this study we analyzed mRNA, microRNA, and lncRNA expression profiles in APAP-treated HepaRG cells to explore noncoding RNA-dependent regulation of DME expression. The expression of UGT2B15 and lncRNA LINC00574 was decreased in APAP-treated HepaRG cells. UGT2B15 levels were diminished by LINC00574 suppression using antisense oligonucleotides or small interfering RNA. Furthermore, we found that hsa-miR-129-5p suppressed LINC00574 and decreased UGT2B15 expression via LINC00574 in HepaRG cells. In conclusion, our results indicate that LINC00574 acts as an important regulator of UGT2B15 expression in human hepatic cells, providing experimental evidence and new clues to understand the role of cross-talk between noncoding RNAs. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We showed a molecular network that displays the cross-talk and consequences among mRNA, micro RNA, long noncoding RNA, and proteins in acetaminophen (APAP)-treated HepaRG cells. APAP treatment increased the level of hsa-miR-129-5p and decreased that of LINC00574, ultimately decreasing the production of UDP glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B15. The proposed regulatory network suppresses UGT2B15 expression through interaction of hsa-miR-129-5p and LINC00574, which may be achieved potentially by recruiting RNA binding proteins.

Can Transcriptomic Profiles from Cancer Cell Lines Be Used for Toxicity Assessment?

In vitro toxicogenomics (TGx) has the potential to replace or supplement animal studies. However, TGx studies often suffer from a limited sample size and cell types. Meanwhile, transcriptomic data have been generated for tens of thousands of compounds using cancer cell lines mainly for drug efficacy screening. Here, we asked the question of whether these types of transcriptomic data can be used to support toxicity assessment. We compared transcriptomic profiles from three cancer lines (HL60, MCF7, and PC3) from the CMap data set with those using primary hepatocytes or in vivo repeated dose studies from the Open TG-GATEs database by using our previously reported pair ranking (PRank) method. We observed an encouraging similarity between HL60 and human primary hepatocytes (PRank score = 0.70), suggesting the two cellular assays could be potentially interchangeable. When the analysis was limited to drug-induced liver injury (DILI)-related compounds or genes, the cancer cell lines exhibited promise in DILI assessment in comparison with conventional TGx systems (i.e., human primary hepatocytes or rat in vivo repeated dose). Also, some toxicity-related pathways, such as PPAR signaling pathways and fatty acid-related pathways, were preserved across various assay systems, indicating the assay transferability is biological process-specific. Furthermore, we established a potential application of transcriptomic profiles of cancer cell lines for studying immune-related biological processes involving some specific cell types. Moreover, if PRank analysis was focused on only landmark genes from L1000 or S1500+, the advantage of cancer cell lines over the TGx studies was limited. In conclusion, repurposing of existing cancer-related transcript profiling data has great potential for toxicity assessment, particularly in predicting DILI.