Clinical and laboratory correlates of platelet alloimmunization and refractoriness in the PLADO trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Platelet alloimmunization and refractoriness to platelet transfusion are complications of platelet transfusion therapy. The platelet dose (PLADO) trial, as the largest prospective randomized trial of prophylactic platelet therapy to date, afforded an opportunity to analyse these two issues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PLADO patient records were examined for evidence of platelet alloimmunization, defined as an increase in HLA Class I panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) to ≥20%, and clinical refractoriness, defined as two consecutive ≤4 h posttransfusion corrected platelet count increments (CCI) of <5000. Multivariate logistic regression, restricted to platelet-transfused subjects who received exclusively either in-process leucoreduction apheresis or whole blood-derived (WBD) leucocyte-reduced platelets, compared the frequency of these outcomes by platelet unit and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Forty of 816 evaluable platelet-transfused patients (5%) became alloimmunized during the trial. Prior pregnancy, chemotherapy only compared to progenitor cell transplant, and low platelet dose - all were associated with significantly higher rates of alloimmunization. Among 35 alloimmunized patients evaluated for refractoriness, 8 (23%) had two consecutive CCI < 5000/µl. Regardless of alloimmunization status, CCIs < 5000/µl were observed following 17% of platelet transfusions. Among 734 patients receiving at least two platelet transfusions, two consecutive CCIs of ≤5000 occurred in 102 (14%). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of new platelet alloimmunization was low in the PLADO study, but follow-up was at most 30 days. Alloimmunization was present in only 8 of 102 (8%) of observed cases of refractoriness, suggesting that other causes of poor posttransfusion increments are frequent.

Dental composite materials and renal function in children.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether greater exposure to resin-based composite materials, which may intra-orally release bisphenol A (BPA), is associated with worse renal function outcomes in children. DESIGN: Prospective multi-centre study. SETTING: Community health dental clinics in Boston and Maine from 1997-2005.Subjects and methods Five hundred and thirty-four New England Children's Amalgam Trial participants aged six to ten years were randomised to treatment with amalgam or resin-based composite restorations over five years of follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Restorations were placed according to treatment arm, and sealants placed per standard of care. Cumulative composite exposure was calculated using surface-years (each treated surface weighted by number years present). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Urinary excretion of albumin, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (gamma-GT), and N-acetyl-ß-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) were available for 417 children. RESULTS: Analysis of covariance showed no association between exposure to dental composites, polyacid-modified compomer, or flowable composite dental sealants and preventative resin restorations with levels of renal function. There was no association between composite materials and thresholds indicating renal damage in logistic regression models. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no harmful associations between dental composite materials and renal function in children. Therefore, concerns about renal function need not be a consideration in the choice of dental restoration material or placement of preventative dental sealants.

Dental composites and amalgam and physical development in children.

Resin-based composite dental restoration materials may release bisphenol-A, an endocrine-disrupting chemical. Using secondary analysis of a randomized clinical safety trial of amalgam vs. composites, we tested the hypothesis that dental restoration materials affect children's growth. Children (N = 218 boys, N = 256 girls) aged 6 to 10 yrs at baseline with ≥ 2 decayed posterior teeth were randomized to amalgam or composites (bisphenol-A-diglycidyl-dimethacrylate composite for permanent teeth, urethane-dimethacrylate compomer for primary teeth) for treatment of posterior caries throughout follow-up. Primary outcomes for this analysis were 5-year changes in BMI-for-age z-scores, body fat percentage (BF%), and height velocity; exploratory analyses (n = 113) examined age at menarche. Results showed no significant differences between treatment assignment and changes in physical development in boys [(composites vs. amalgam) BF%, 4.9 vs. 5.7, p = 0.49; (BMI-z-score) 0.13 vs. 0.25, p = 0.36] or girls (8.8 vs. 7.7, p = 0.95; 0.36 vs. 0.21, p = 0.49). Children with more treatment on primary teeth had greater increases in BF% regardless of material type. Girls assigned to composites had lower risk of menarche during follow-up (hazard ratio = 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.95). Overall, there were no significant differences in physical development over 5 years in children treated with composites or amalgam. Additional studies examining these restoration materials in relation to age at menarche are warranted (clinicaltrials.gov number NCT00065988).