Effectiveness of conventional versus virtual reality-based balance exercises in vestibular rehabilitation for unilateral peripheral vestibular loss: results of a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of virtual reality-based balance exercises to conventional balance exercises during vestibular rehabilitation in patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular loss (UVL). DESIGN: Assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Two acute care university teaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with UVL (N=71) who had dizziness/vertigo, and gait and balance impairment. INTERVENTIONS: Patients with UVL were randomly assigned to receive 6 weeks of either conventional (n=36) or virtual reality-based (n=35) balance exercises during vestibular rehabilitation. The virtual reality-based group received an off-the-shelf virtual reality gaming system for home exercise, and the conventional group received a foam balance mat. Treatment comprised weekly visits to a physiotherapist and a daily home exercise program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was self-preferred gait speed. Secondary outcomes included other gait parameters and tasks, Sensory Organization Test (SOT), dynamic visual acuity, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Vestibular Rehabilitation Benefits Questionnaire, and Activities Balance Confidence Questionnaire. The subjective experience of vestibular rehabilitation was measured with a questionnaire. RESULTS: Both groups improved, but there were no significant differences in gait speed between the groups postintervention (mean difference, -.03m/s; 95% confidence interval [CI], -.09 to .02m/s). There were also no significant differences between the groups in SOT scores (mean difference, .82%; 95% CI, -5.00% to 6.63%) or on any of the other secondary outcomes (P>.05). In both groups, adherence to exercise was high (∼77%), but the virtual reality-based group reported significantly more enjoyment (P=.001), less difficulty with (P=.009) and less tiredness after (P=.03) balance exercises. At 6 months, there were no significant between-group differences in physical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual reality-based balance exercises performed during vestibular rehabilitation were not superior to conventional balance exercises during vestibular rehabilitation but may provide a more enjoyable method of retraining balance after unilateral peripheral vestibular loss.

Attitudes and perceptions of Irish health care professionals regarding functional neurological disorder: A national survey.

BACKGROUND: Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a common and often disabling condition. Limited access to services for FND poses challenges both for patients and their health care providers. This survey explored the attitudes, experiences, support needs and training needs of health care professionals (HCPs) who provide care to individuals with FND in Ireland. METHODS: A broad range of HCPs working with patients with FND in Ireland partook in an anonymous online 12-item survey. Participants were recruited via professional bodies and snowball convenience sampling utilising social media and email invitation. Descriptive and inferential statistics were employed to analyze data. RESULTS: A total of 314 HCPs working in Ireland completed the survey. 80% were female and over half worked in their current role for more than 10 years.   75% of the sample encountered three or less individuals with FND per month. Identified service-related challenges to effective patient care included insufficient clinic time, lack of confidence explaining the diagnosis, and the need for greater access to specialist support.  Data revealed persisting negative attitudes toward FND patients among a proportion of respondents. The majority of respondents did not feel they received adequate education on FND, with the exception of neurologists, of whom 65% felt adequately trained.  The majority of respondents (85%) also felt that people with FND did not have access to appropriate FND services in Ireland. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that there is a significant need to improve FND education among HCPs in Ireland, in addition to developing appropriately resourced, integrated, multidisciplinary care pathways for the FND patient group.

Toward a Digital Health Intervention for Vestibular Rehabilitation: Usability and Subjective Outcomes of a Novel Platform.

Digital technologies are increasingly available and are reducing in cost. There is an opportunity to move to a digital health approach in vestibular rehabilitation (VR), but there is a paucity of suitable systems available and a consequent lack of evidence to support their use. This study aimed to investigate a novel digital platform developed specifically for VR (comprising clinician software, a wearable sensor, and a patient-facing app). Participants (n = 14, 9F:5M, mean age 59) with vestibular dysfunction and imbalance used the app for treatment, and therapists (n = 4) used the platform to deliver VR in the form of individualized exercise programmes over a mean of 17.4 ± 8.8 weeks. Outcomes included the system usability scale, the patient enablement instrument (PEI), change in subjective symptoms (numerical rating scales), percentage adherence to prescribed exercise, and a semi-structured interview on utility. A significant reduction was found in symptoms of vertigo/dizziness (p < 0.004), imbalance (p < 0.002), oscillopsia (p < 0.04), and anxiety (p < 0.02) after use. System usability scores were high for both clinicians (mean 85/100) and participants (mean 82.7/100) and high enablement was reported (mean PEI 6.5/12). Overall percentage adherence to the exercise prescription was highly variable and ranged from 4 to 78% when measured digitally. At semi-structured interviews, participants reported a high level of acceptance and satisfaction with digital delivery, and no adverse events were recorded. When COVID-19 restrictions eased, 2 participants trialed the head sensor with the application and found it highly usable. Further research is required to investigate the efficacy and how the wearable sensor impacts the delivery of care.

A Case of GCH-1 Mutation Dopa-Responsive Dystonia Requiring High Doses of Levodopa for Treatment.

Background: Mutations in the GCH-1 gene are associated with Autosomal Dominant Dopamine Responsive Dystonia (DYT 5). One of the hallmarks of this condition is dramatic and sustained response to low doses of levodopa. Case Report: We present the case of a 22 year old female patient with genetically confirmed GCH-1 Dopa-Responsive Dystonia who had no response to low dose Levodopa but who achieved symptom control on a total dose of 900 mg/day. Discussion: Autosomal Dominant Dopa-Responsive Dystonia is a phenotypical heterogenous condition that, in some cases, may require high doses of levodopa for treatment response. Highlights: Mutations in the GCH-1 gene are associated with Autosomal Dominant Dopamine Responsive Dystonia which is typically defined by dramatic responses to low doses of levodopa. We report a patient with genetically confirmed Dopa-Responsive Dystonia who had no response to low dose Levodopa but who achieved symptom control with 900 mg/day.

Balance, gait and dizziness in adult cochlear implant users: A cross sectional study.

Objective: Cochlear implantation is associated with vestibular impairment due to the close proximity of the structures. The aim of the study was to quantify dizziness/vertigo, gaze instability, balance and gait problems in a sample of adult cochlear implant (CI) users.Methods: An observational, cross sectional study evaluated subjective dizziness (Vestibular Rehabilitation Benefit Questionnaire (VRBQ)), balance confidence (Activities Specific Balance Questionnaire (ABC)), gait (Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) and 10m walk test), balance (Equitest Sensory Organisation Test (SOT)), and computerised dynamic visual acuity (DVA). The Dix Hallpike test was performed to test for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV).Results: Twenty participants (n=10F), 2.8(±2.7) years post implantation, with mean age 59.3(±15.8) years were assessed. Subjective dizziness (VRBQ) was low (15.0% (±15.5)) and balance confidence was high (ABC: 82.1%±14.9). FGA scores (25.1 ± 4.4) and gait speed (1.8 (±0.3) m/sec) were below normal. Dx Hallpike was positive in 3. Gaze instability was found in 50% (DVA loss, 0.29 (± 0.16) LogMAR), while 79% demonstrated balance impairment (mean SOT score, 57.8%±14.5), with 42% falling on SOT condition 5.Discussion: Evidence of vestibular dysfunction was identified in these adult CI users.Conclusion: Access to vestibular function assessment and rehabilitation is required in adult CI users.

Dual tasking with the timed "up & go" test improves detection of risk of falls in people with Parkinson disease.

BACKGROUND: Falls are a common and disabling feature of Parkinson disease (PD). Early identification of patients at greatest risk of falling is a key goal of physical therapy assessment. The Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG), a frequently used mobility assessment tool, has moderate sensitivity and specificity for identifying fall risk. OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to investigate whether adding a task (cognitive or manual) to the TUG (TUG-cognitive or TUG-manual, respectively) increases the utility of the test for identifying fall risk in people with PD. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of people with PD (N=36). METHODS: Participants were compared on the basis of self-reported fall exposure in the preceding 6 months (those who had experienced falls ["fallers"] versus those who had not ["nonfallers"]). The time taken to complete the TUG, TUG-cognitive, and TUG-manual was measured for both groups. Between-group differences were calculated with the Mann-Whitney U test. The discriminative performance of the test at various cutoff values was examined, and estimates of sensitivity and specificity were based on receiver operating characteristic curve plots. RESULTS: Fallers took significantly longer than nonfallers (n=19) to complete the TUG under all 3 conditions. The TUG-cognitive showed optimal discriminative performance (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve=0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.64, 0.92) at a cutoff of 14.7 seconds. The TUG-cognitive was more likely to correctly classify participants with a low risk of falling (positive likelihood ratio=2.9) (<14.7 seconds) and had higher estimates of sensitivity (0.76; 95% CI=0.52, 0.90) than of specificity (0.73; 95% CI=0.51, 0.88) at this threshold (negative likelihood ratio=0.32). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective classification of fallers and nonfallers was used. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a cognitive task to the TUG enhanced the identification of fall risk in people with PD. The TUG-cognitive should be considered a component of a multifaceted fall risk assessment in people with PD.