Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 63
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Immun Ageing ; 21(1): 6, 2024 Jan 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38212801

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The striking increase in COVID-19 severity in older adults provides a clear example of immunesenescence, the age-related remodelling of the immune system. To better characterise the association between convalescent immunesenescence and acute disease severity, we determined the immune phenotype of COVID-19 survivors and non-infected controls. RESULTS: We performed detailed immune phenotyping of peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from 103 COVID-19 survivors 3-5 months post recovery who were classified as having had severe (n = 56; age 53.12 ± 11.30 years), moderate (n = 32; age 52.28 ± 11.43 years) or mild (n = 15; age 49.67 ± 7.30 years) disease and compared with age and sex-matched healthy adults (n = 59; age 50.49 ± 10.68 years). We assessed a broad range of immune cell phenotypes to generate a composite score, IMM-AGE, to determine the degree of immune senescence. We found increased immunesenescence features in severe COVID-19 survivors compared to controls including: a reduced frequency and number of naïve CD4 and CD8 T cells (p < 0.0001); increased frequency of EMRA CD4 (p < 0.003) and CD8 T cells (p < 0.001); a higher frequency (p < 0.0001) and absolute numbers (p < 0.001) of CD28-ve CD57+ve senescent CD4 and CD8 T cells; higher frequency (p < 0.003) and absolute numbers (p < 0.02) of PD-1 expressing exhausted CD8 T cells; a two-fold increase in Th17 polarisation (p < 0.0001); higher frequency of memory B cells (p < 0.001) and increased frequency (p < 0.0001) and numbers (p < 0.001) of CD57+ve senescent NK cells. As a result, the IMM-AGE score was significantly higher in severe COVID-19 survivors than in controls (p < 0.001). Few differences were seen for those with moderate disease and none for mild disease. Regression analysis revealed the only pre-existing variable influencing the IMM-AGE score was South Asian ethnicity ([Formula: see text] = 0.174, p = 0.043), with a major influence being disease severity ([Formula: see text] = 0.188, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses reveal a state of enhanced immune ageing in survivors of severe COVID-19 and suggest this could be related to SARS-Cov-2 infection. Our data support the rationale for trials of anti-immune ageing interventions for improving clinical outcomes in these patients with severe disease.

2.
Clin Exp Immunol ; 213(2): 243-251, 2023 07 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37095599

RESUMEN

Post-acute cardiac sequelae, following SARS-CoV-2 infection, are well recognized as complications of COVID-19. We have previously shown the persistence of autoantibodies against antigens in skin, muscle, and heart in individuals following severe COVID-19; the most common staining on skin tissue displayed an inter-cellular cement pattern consistent with antibodies against desmosomal proteins. Desmosomes play a critical role in maintaining the structural integrity of tissues. For this reason, we analyzed desmosomal protein levels and the presence of anti-desmoglein (DSG) 1, 2, and 3 antibodies in acute and convalescent sera from patients with COVID-19 of differing clinical severity. We find increased levels of DSG2 protein in sera from acute COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, we find that DSG2 autoantibody levels are increased significantly in convalescent sera following severe COVID-19 but not in hospitalized patients recovering from influenza infection or healthy controls. Levels of autoantibody in sera from patients with severe COVID-19 were comparable to levels in patients with non-COVID-19-associated cardiac disease, potentially identifying DSG2 autoantibodies as a novel biomarker for cardiac damage. To determine if there was any association between severe COVID-19 and DSG2, we stained post-mortem cardiac tissue from patients who died from COVID-19 infection. This confirmed DSG2 protein within the intercalated discs and disruption of the intercalated disc between cardiomyocytes in patients who died from COVID-19. Our results reveal the potential for DSG2 protein and autoimmunity to DSG2 to contribute to unexpected pathologies associated with COVID-19 infection.


Asunto(s)
Autoanticuerpos , COVID-19 , Humanos , Autoanticuerpos/metabolismo , Sueroterapia para COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Miocardio
3.
JAMA ; 330(17): 1641-1652, 2023 11 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37877587

RESUMEN

Importance: Patients with septic shock undergo adrenergic stress, which affects cardiac, immune, inflammatory, and metabolic pathways. ß-Blockade may attenuate the adverse effects of catecholamine exposure and has been associated with reduced mortality. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of landiolol in patients with tachycardia and established septic shock requiring prolonged (>24 hours) vasopressor support. Design, Setting, and Participants: An open-label, multicenter, randomized trial involving 126 adults (≥18 years) with tachycardia (heart rate ≥95/min) and established septic shock treated for at least 24 hours with continuous norepinephrine (≥0.1 µg/kg/min) in 40 UK National Health Service intensive care units. The trial ran from April 2018 to December 2021, with early termination in December 2021 due to a signal of possible harm. Intervention: Sixty-three patients were randomized to receive standard care and 63 to receive landiolol infusion. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score from randomization through 14 days. Secondary outcomes included mortality at days 28 and 90 and the number of adverse events in each group. Results: The trial was stopped prematurely on the advice of the independent data monitoring committee because it was unlikely to demonstrate benefit and because of possible harm. Of a planned 340 participants, 126 (37%) were enrolled (mean age, 55.6 years [95% CI, 52.7 to 58.5 years]; 58.7% male). The mean (SD) SOFA score in the landiolol group was 8.8 (3.9) compared with 8.1 (3.2) in the standard care group (mean difference [MD], 0.75 [95% CI, -0.49 to 2.0]; P = .24). Mortality at day 28 after randomization in the landiolol group was 37.1% (23 of 62) and 25.4% (16 of 63) in the standard care group (absolute difference, 11.7% [95% CI, -4.4% to 27.8%]; P = .16). Mortality at day 90 after randomization was 43.5% (27 of 62) in the landiolol group and 28.6% (18 of 63) in the standard care group (absolute difference, 15% [95% CI, -1.7% to 31.6%]; P = .08). There were no differences in the number of patients having at least one adverse event. Conclusion and Relevance: Among patients with septic shock with tachycardia and treated with norepinephrine for more than 24 hours, an infusion of landiolol did not reduce organ failure measured by the SOFA score over 14 days from randomization. These results do not support the use of landiolol for managing tachycardia among patients treated with norepinephrine for established septic shock. Trial Registration: EU Clinical Trials Register Eudra CT: 2017-001785-14; isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN12600919.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Medicina Estatal , Sepsis/complicaciones , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Norepinefrina/uso terapéutico , Taquicardia
4.
Ann Neurol ; 89(4): 646-656, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33368496

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Patients with traumatic brain injury who fail to obey commands after sedation-washout pose one of the most significant challenges for neurological prognostication. Reducing prognostic uncertainty will lead to more appropriate care decisions and ensure provision of limited rehabilitation resources to those most likely to benefit. Bedside markers of covert residual cognition, including speech comprehension, may reduce this uncertainty. METHODS: We recruited 28 patients with acute traumatic brain injury who were 2 to 7 days sedation-free and failed to obey commands. Patients heard streams of isochronous monosyllabic words that built meaningful phrases and sentences while their brain activity via electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. In healthy individuals, EEG activity only synchronizes with the rhythm of phrases and sentences when listeners consciously comprehend the speech. This approach therefore provides a measure of residual speech comprehension in unresponsive patients. RESULTS: Seventeen and 16 patients were available for assessment with the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) at 3 months and 6 months, respectively. Outcome significantly correlated with the strength of patients' acute cortical tracking of phrases and sentences (r > 0.6, p < 0.007), quantified by inter-trial phase coherence. Linear regressions revealed that the strength of this comprehension response (beta = 0.603, p = 0.006) significantly improved the accuracy of prognoses relative to clinical characteristics alone (eg, Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS], computed tomography [CT] grade). INTERPRETATION: A simple, passive, auditory EEG protocol improves prognostic accuracy in a critical period of clinical decision making. Unlike other approaches to probing covert cognition for prognostication, this approach is entirely passive and therefore less susceptible to cognitive deficits, increasing the number of patients who may benefit. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:646-656.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Encefálica/diagnóstico , Comprensión , Habla , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Muerte Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/psicología , Corteza Cerebral/fisiopatología , Electroencefalografía , Femenino , Escala de Consecuencias de Glasgow , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
5.
Br J Anaesth ; 129(5): 693-702, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36163077

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of early vs late tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated patients suggest that early tracheostomy reduces the duration of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation, but does not reduce short-term mortality or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Meta-analysis of randomised trials is typically performed using a frequentist approach, and although reporting confidence intervals, interpretation is usually based on statistical significance. To provide a robust basis for clinical decision-making, we completed the search used from the previous review and analysed the data using Bayesian methods to estimate posterior probabilities of the effect of early tracheostomy on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The search was completed for RCTS comparing early vs late tracheostomy in the databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library in June 2022. Effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the outcomes short-term mortality, VAP, duration of ICU stay, and mechanical ventilation. A Bayesian meta-analysis was performed with uninformative priors. Risk ratios (RRs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% credible intervals were reported alongside posterior probabilities for any benefit (RR<1; SMD<0), a small benefit (number needed to treat, 200; SMD<-0.5), or modest benefit (number needed to treat, 100; SMD<-1). RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs with 3508 patients were included. Comparing patients with early vs late tracheostomy, the posterior probabilities for any benefit, small benefit, and modest benefit, respectively, were: 99%, 99%, and 99% for short-term mortality; 94%, 78%, and 51% for VAP; 97%, 43%, and 1% for duration of mechanical ventilation; and 97%, 75%, and 27% and for length of ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: Bayesian meta-analysis suggests a high probability that early tracheostomy compared with delayed tracheostomy has at least some benefit across all clinical outcomes considered.


Asunto(s)
Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Traqueostomía , Humanos , Traqueostomía/métodos , Teorema de Bayes , Enfermedad Crítica , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación
6.
Immunology ; 164(1): 135-147, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33932228

RESUMEN

Detecting antibody responses during and after SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential in determining the seroepidemiology of the virus and the potential role of antibody in disease. Scalable, sensitive and specific serological assays are essential to this process. The detection of antibody in hospitalized patients with severe disease has proven relatively straightforward; detecting responses in subjects with mild disease and asymptomatic infections has proven less reliable. We hypothesized that the suboptimal sensitivity of antibody assays and the compartmentalization of the antibody response may contribute to this effect. We systematically developed an ELISA, optimizing different antigens and amplification steps, in serum and saliva from non-hospitalized SARS-CoV-2-infected subjects. Using trimeric spike glycoprotein, rather than nucleocapsid, enabled detection of responses in individuals with low antibody responses. IgG1 and IgG3 predominate to both antigens, but more anti-spike IgG1 than IgG3 was detectable. All antigens were effective for detecting responses in hospitalized patients. Anti-spike IgG, IgA and IgM antibody responses were readily detectable in saliva from a minority of RT-PCR confirmed, non-hospitalized symptomatic individuals, and these were mostly subjects who had the highest levels of anti-spike serum antibodies. Therefore, detecting antibody responses in both saliva and serum can contribute to determining virus exposure and understanding immune responses after SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , COVID-19/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina A/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina M/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Antígenos Virales/inmunología , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Humanos , Saliva
7.
BMC Med ; 19(1): 316, 2021 12 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34856983

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have suggested a non-significant increased risk of stroke among proton pump inhibitor (PPI) users, the association has not been confirmed. We evaluated the association between regular use of PPIs and incident stroke and identified population groups at high net risk. METHODS: This is a prospective analysis of 492,479 participants free of stroke from the UK biobank. Incident stroke was identified through linkage to hospital admission and death registries using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes (I60, I61, I63, and I64). We evaluated hazard ratios (HRs) adjusting for demographic factors, lifestyle habits, prevalent comorbidities, concomitant use of medications, and indications of PPIs. We assessed the risk differences (RDs) according to the baseline Framingham Stroke Risk Score. In the meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from 1988 to 1 June 2020) for randomized trials comparing PPIs with other interventions, placebo, or no treatment on stroke risk. Results were combined using a fix-effect meta-analysis (Mantel-Haenszel method). RESULTS: We documented 5182 incident strokes over 3,935,030 person-years of follow-up. Regular PPI users had a 16% higher risk of stroke than non-users (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.27). The estimated effect was similar to our meta-analysis of nine RCTs (case/participants 371/26,642; RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.50; quality of evidence: moderate). The absolute effect of PPI use on stroke increased with the baseline Framingham Stroke Risk Score, with an RD of 1.34‰, 3.32‰, 4.83‰, and 6.28‰ over 5 years for the lowest, quartile 2, quartile 3, and the highest quartile, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Regular use of PPIs was associated with an increased risk of stroke, with a higher absolute risk observed in individuals with high baseline stroke risk. Physicians should therefore exercise caution when prescribing PPIs. An assessment of the underlying stoke risk is recommended for individualized use of PPIs.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/inducido químicamente , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología
8.
Clin Exp Immunol ; 205(2): 99-105, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34082475

RESUMEN

Coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) has been associated with both transient and persistent systemic symptoms that do not appear to be a direct consequence of viral infection. The generation of autoantibodies has been proposed as a mechanism to explain these symptoms. To understand the prevalence of autoantibodies associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, we investigated the frequency and specificity of clinically relevant autoantibodies in 84 individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, suffering from COVID-19 of varying severity in both the acute and convalescent setting. These were compared with results from 32 individuals who were on the intensive therapy unit (ITU) for non-COVID reasons. We demonstrate a higher frequency of autoantibodies in the COVID-19 ITU group compared with non-COVID-19 ITU disease control patients and that autoantibodies were also found in the serum 3-5 months post-COVID-19 infection. Non-COVID patients displayed a diverse pattern of autoantibodies; in contrast, the COVID-19 groups had a more restricted panel of autoantibodies including skin, skeletal muscle and cardiac antibodies. Our results demonstrate that respiratory viral infection with SARS-CoV-2 is associated with the detection of a limited profile of tissue-specific autoantibodies, detectable using routine clinical immunology assays. Further studies are required to determine whether these autoantibodies are specific to SARS-CoV-2 or a phenomenon arising from severe viral infections and to determine the clinical significance of these autoantibodies.


Asunto(s)
Especificidad de Anticuerpos , Autoanticuerpos , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Anciano , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Autoanticuerpos/inmunología , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Especificidad de Órganos , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/metabolismo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
9.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 24(3): 184-189, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32435097

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Good analgesia has been shown to reduce the risk of pneumonia, chronic pain, and mortality in patients with multiple rib fractures (MRFs). This survey explores the current analgesic practice in the UK, protocol use, barriers to provision, and physician preferences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed nationally to an enriched cohort of clinicians working in UK trauma units with an interest in MRF management. RESULTS: Seventy-nine healthcare professionals responded. A third (31.4%) reported that their department had a rib fracture pain protocol, 52.9% did not, and 15.7% were unsure. Significantly more respondents reported adequate pain control when a hospital protocol was present compared to when not (χ 2, p < 0.01). Inadequate analgesia, a poor cough, and inability to breathe deeply were the commonest complications reported by 81.4, 78.6, and 65.7%, respectively. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was the most commonly used form of analgesia (38.6%) followed by thoracic epidural (TEA) (30.0%) and continuous opioid infusion (18.6%). However, TEA was the preferred method of analgesia among respondents (37.1%) followed by serratus block (21.4%), paravertebral block (17.1%), and PCA (14.3%). DISCUSSION: There is considerable variation among physicians in their current use of analgesic modalities, with opiate-based methods predominating despite a physician preference for regional techniques. Thoracic epidurals are preferred by physicians but of limited use as a result of contraindications, time pressures, and staff skill mix. Pain control is reported to be better handled when protocols are present. Further research focusing on currently utilized regional techniques is required in order to produce a validated standardized national protocol that is informed by the current practice, the evidence base, and limitations to service provision. KEY MESSAGES: There is considerable variation among physicians in their current use of analgesic modalities. Opiate-based methods dominate for thoracic trauma despite a physician preference for regional techniques, which can be challenging in this cohort due to contraindications, staff skill mix, and time pressures. Inadequate analgesia is common but is better managed when pain management protocols are available. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Beard L, Holt B, Snelson C, Parcha C, Smith FG, Veenith T. Analgesia of Patients with Multiple Rib Fractures in Critical Care: A Survey of Healthcare Professionals in the UK. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(3):184-189.

10.
Crit Care Med ; 46(12): 1969-1976, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30134302

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In various medical and surgical conditions, research has found that centers with higher patient volumes have better outcomes. This relationship has not previously been explored for status epilepticus. This study sought to examine whether centers that see higher volumes of patients with status epilepticus have lower in-hospital mortality than low-volume centers. DESIGN: Cohort study, using 2010-2015 data from the nationwide Case Mix Programme database of the U.K.'s Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre. SETTING: Greater than 90% of ICUs in United Kingdom, Wales, and Northern Ireland. PATIENTS: Twenty-thousand nine-hundred twenty-two adult critical care admissions with a primary or secondary diagnosis of status epilepticus or prolonged seizure. INTERVENTIONS: Annual hospital status epilepticus admission volume. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used multiple logistic regression to evaluate the association between hospital annual status epilepticus admission volume and in-hospital mortality. Hospital volume was modeled as a nonlinear variable using restricted cubic splines, and generalized estimating equations with robust SEs were used to account for clustering by institution. There were 2,462 in-hospital deaths (11.8%). There was no significant association between treatment volume and in-hospital mortality for status epilepticus (p = 0.54). This conclusion was unchanged across a number of subgroup and sensitivity analyses, although we lacked data on seizure duration and medication use. Secondary analyses suggest that many high-risk patients were already transferred from low- to high-volume centers. CONCLUSIONS: We find no evidence that higher volume centers are associated with lower mortality in status epilepticus overall. It is likely that national guidelines and local pathways in the United Kingdom allow efficient patient transfer from smaller centers like district general hospitals to provide satisfactory patient care in status epilepticus. Future research using more granular data should explore this association for the subgroup of patients with refractory and superrefractory status epilepticus.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estado Epiléptico/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reino Unido
11.
Crit Care Med ; 45(6): 949-955, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28398923

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that intensivists unfamiliar with an ICU team and the context of that ICU would affect patient outcomes. We examined differences in mortality when ICU patients were admitted under intensivists routinely working in that ICU and compared with those admitted by intensivists familiar with an ICU elsewhere in the same hospital. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PATIENTS: A 5-year natural experimental crossover study involving patients admitted to four ICUs in a large U.K. teaching hospital. INTERVENTIONS: During a period of service reconfiguration, intensivists routinely rostered to work in one ICU worked in another of the hospital's four ICUs. "Home" intensivists were those who continued to work in their usual ICU; "visitor" intensivists were those who delivered care in an unfamiliar ICU. Patient data were obtained from electronic patient records to provide analysis on sex, age, admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, date and time of admission, and admission type (elective, transfer, or unplanned). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We analyzed 9,981 admissions to four separate ICUs over a 5-year period. In total, 34.5% of patients were admitted by intensivists working in nonfamiliar surroundings. Visitor intensivists admitted patients with similar age and gender distributions but with greater physiologic derangement (mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, 4.1 ± 2.8 vs 3.9 ± 2.8; p < 0.001) than home intensivists. Overall ICU mortality rates were higher in visitor intensivists, albeit not significantly so (11.5% vs 10.2%; p = 0.052). However, when the ICUs were analyzed separately, visitor mortality rates were found to be significantly higher than for home intensivists in two of the four ICUs (p = 0.017, 0.006). A multivariable analysis adjusting for confounding factors and the clustering of consultants revealed that the overall mortality rate was significantly higher for visitors (odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.02-1.37; p = 0.024). A significant interaction between the ICU and visitor status was also detected (p = 0.046), with the visitor effect remaining significant in the two ICUs identified previously (both p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Visitor intensivists in some ICUs were associated with higher mortality. The reasons are unknown but could relate to intensivists' practices, unfamiliarity with the patients, or the interaction with the interprofessional team.


Asunto(s)
Consultores/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/organización & administración , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , APACHE , Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Factores Sexuales , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
14.
Br J Neurosurg ; 30(2): 221-6, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26744221

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The UK population is ageing with increasing number of elderly patients suffering traumatic brain injury (TBI). The purpose of this study was to identify national TBI admission demographics, analyse the temporal evolution of TBI mortality in a single centre and conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify whether there is an age bias amongst researchers studying TBI. METHODS: National demographics for TBI were obtained from Health Episode Statistics. TBI patients admitted from 2000 to 2011 to Cambridge University Hospitals Neurocritical Care Unit (NCCU) were divided into age groups (<60, 60-74, ≥75 years). Temporal evolution of mortality was analysed using a logistic regression method. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify primary TBI research studies. Patient's ages were extracted and an average mean age was calculated and compared over time. RESULTS: From 1998, national TBI admissions have increased with the greatest rise in >60-year age group (p < 0.0001). In a tertiary referral critical care unit (n = 1145), the 60-74 year age group (compared to <60) had a significantly lower improvement in mortality over time (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.02-1.31). A literature review revealed a mean age of 32.73 years (SD ± 12.85) for patients recruited to primary TBI studies. CONCLUSION: Despite increased admissions of elderly patients following TBI and static mortality (single centre, 60-74 year age group) there is little or no evidence of a corresponding increase in the age of patients recruited for TBI studies. In addition to the difficulties this presents in forming evidence-based decisions for the patient with TBI, it may also represent a wider problem for ICU research in an ever-ageing critical care population. More research needs to be conducted to establish the treatment end points for an ageing population.


Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento/fisiología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Cuidados Críticos , Hospitalización , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido
15.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 20(5): 280-4, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27275076

RESUMEN

Tracheostomy is one of the most common procedures undertaken in critically ill patients. It offers many theoretical advantages over translaryngeal intubation. Recent evidence in a heterogeneous group of critically ill patients, however, has not demonstrated a benefit for tracheostomy, in terms of mortality, length of stay in Intensive Care Unit (ICU), or incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. It may be a beneficial intervention in articular subsets of ICU patients. In this article, we will focus on the evidence for the timing of tracheostomy and its effect on various subgroups of patients in critical care.

16.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 20(9): 534-41, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27688630

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Sepsis is a common cause of morbidity and mortality and is associated with significant costs to the healthcare organizations. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether high or low-dose statin therapy improved mortality in patients with sepsis. METHODS: The trials analyzed in this study were multicenter or single center randomized control studies using statins for sepsis in a hospital setting. The patients included were adults with suspected or confirmed infection. INTERVENTIONS: This study found eight randomized controlled trials where participants were given either a statin or placebo daily for 14-28 days, the duration of their illness, or until their death or discharge, which ever occurred first. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURED: This meta-analysis measured the effect of statin therapy on in hospital and 28 days mortality. RESULTS: In unselected patients, there was no demonstrable difference in the 28 days mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.88 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.12 and P = 0.16). There was also no significant difference between statin versus placebo for in-hospital mortality (RR 0.98 95% CI, 0.85-1.14 P = 0.36). When the studies where divided into low-dose and high-dose groups, there were no statistically significant differences for in-hospital mortality between low-dose statin versus placebo for (RR 0.81 CI 0.44-1.49 P = 0.27) or high-dose statin versus placebo (RR 0.99 95% CI 0.85-1.16, P = 0.28). There was no significant difference in adverse effects between the high- and low-dose groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, we found that the use of statins did not significantly improve either in-hospital mortality or 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. In the low-dose group, there were fewer quality multicenter studies; hence, conclusions based on the results of this subgroup are limited.

17.
Neurocrit Care ; 22(2): 325-34, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25182388

RESUMEN

Management of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) focuses on controlling intracranial pressure (ICP), while other treatments, such as the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), need scientific evidence. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the usefulness of NMBAs in the context of TBI and/or increased ICP. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases up to January 31st 2014, including both clinical and experimental findings. We found a total of 34 articles, of which 22 were prospective clinical trials. No systematic review/meta-analyses were found. Seven studies evaluated NMBA boluses in preventing stimulation-related ICP surges: paralysis was effective during tracheal suctioning and physiotherapy but not during bronchoscopy. Fourteen small studies (8 to 25 patients) assessed the effect of NMBA boluses on ICP. Two studies showed an ICP increase by succinylcholine and one found a decrease in ICP after atracurium. No ICP changes were observed in the other studies. One prospective study confirmed that discontinuing paralysis increases energy expenditure. Two retrospective studies investigated mortality/morbidity: one found that early paralysis (continued for >12 h) was not beneficial and potentially associated with extra-cranial complications, while the second demonstrated a correlation between continuous infusion of NMBA and time spent with ICP > 20 mmHg. Eight animal studies were also retrieved. In most studies, NMBA bolus was beneficial in controlling ICP, especially when performing stimulating procedures. However, retrospective evidence found potential harm by continuous NMBA infusion. In the context of TBI patients, we discuss the potentially positive effects of paralysis with its negative ones. Well-conducted randomized controlled trials and/or large pharmaco-epidemiologic studies are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Bloqueo Neuromuscular/efectos adversos , Bloqueo Neuromuscular/métodos , Animales , Humanos
18.
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 31(3): 166-71, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24270899

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the commonest nosocomial infection in intensive care. Implementation of a VAP prevention care bundle is a proven method to reduce its incidence. The UK care bundle recommends maintenance of the tracheal tube cuff pressure at 20 to 30  cmH2O with 4-hourly pressure checks and use of tracheal tubes with subglottic aspiration ports in patients admitted for more than 72  h. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of tracheal tube type and cuff pressure monitoring technique on leakage of subglottic secretions past the tracheal tube cuff. DESIGN: Bench-top study. SETTING: Laboratory. INTERVENTIONS: A model adult trachea with simulated subglottic secretions was intubated with a tracheal tube with the cuff inflated to 25  cmH2O. Experiments were conducted using a Portex Profile Soft Seal tracheal tube with three cuff pressure monitoring strategies and using a Portex SACETT tracheal tube with intermittent cuff pressure checks. OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of simulated secretion leakage past the tracheal tube cuff. RESULTS: Mean ±â€ŠSD leakage of fluid past the Profile Soft Seal tracheal tube cuff was 2.25 ±â€Š1.49  ml  min⁻¹ with no monitoring of cuff pressure, 2.98 ±â€Š1.63  ml  min⁻¹ with intermittent cuff pressure monitoring and 3.83 ±â€Š2.17  ml  min⁻¹ with continuous cuff pressure monitoring (P <0.001). Using a SACETT tracheal tube with a subglottic aspiration port and aspirating the simulated secretions prior to intermittent cuff pressure checks reduced the leakage rate to 0.50 ±â€Š0.48  ml  min⁻¹ (P <0.001). CONCLUSION: Subglottic secretions leaked past the tracheal tube cuff with all tube types and cuff pressure monitoring strategies in this model. Significantly higher rates were observed with continuous cuff pressure monitoring and significantly lower rates were observed when using a tracheal tube with a subglottic aspiration port. Further evaluation of medical device performance is needed in order to design more effective VAP prevention strategies.


Asunto(s)
Glotis/metabolismo , Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Adulto , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Masculino , Presión , Factores de Tiempo , Tráquea
19.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 1850, 2024 Feb 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38424037

RESUMEN

Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) presents a challenge to clinicians because of its multisystem effects. Advancements in computed tomography (CT), endovascular treatments, and neurocritical care have contributed to declining mortality rates. The critical care of aSAH prioritises cerebral perfusion, early aneurysm securement, and the prevention of secondary brain injury and systemic complications. Early interventions to mitigate cardiopulmonary complications, dyselectrolytemia and treatment of culprit aneurysm require a multidisciplinary approach. Standardised neurological assessments, transcranial doppler (TCD), and advanced imaging, along with hypertensive and invasive therapies, are vital in reducing delayed cerebral ischemia and poor outcomes. Health care disparities, particularly in the resource allocation for SAH treatment, affect outcomes significantly, with telemedicine and novel technologies proposed to address this health inequalities. This article underscores the necessity for comprehensive multidisciplinary care and the urgent need for large-scale studies to validate standardised treatment protocols for improved SAH outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma , Isquemia Encefálica , Hipertensión , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea , Humanos , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/terapia , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Infarto Cerebral/etiología , Hipertensión/complicaciones
20.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9643, 2024 04 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38670997

RESUMEN

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is widely used for non-invasive retinal vascular imaging, but the OCTA methods used to assess retinal perfusion vary. We evaluated the different methods used to assess retinal perfusion between OCTA studies. MEDLINE and Embase were searched from 2014 to August 2021. We included prospective studies including ≥ 50 participants using OCTA to assess retinal perfusion in either global retinal or systemic disorders. Risk of bias was assessed using the National Institute of Health quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. Heterogeneity of data was assessed by Q statistics, Chi-square test, and I2 index. Of the 5974 studies identified, 191 studies were included in this evaluation. The selected studies employed seven OCTA devices, six macula volume dimensions, four macula subregions, nine perfusion analyses, and five vessel layer definitions, totalling 197 distinct methods of assessing macula perfusion and over 7000 possible combinations. Meta-analysis was performed on 88 studies reporting vessel density and foveal avascular zone area, showing lower retinal perfusion in patients with diabetes mellitus than in healthy controls, but with high heterogeneity. Heterogeneity was lowest and reported vascular effects strongest in superficial capillary plexus assessments. Systematic review of OCTA studies revealed massive heterogeneity in the methods employed to assess retinal perfusion, supporting calls for standardisation of methodology.


Asunto(s)
Vasos Retinianos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Humanos , Vasos Retinianos/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía con Fluoresceína/métodos , Angiografía/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA