Interventional cardiologist perceptions about PCI without surgical backup-Results of an international survey.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without surgical backup is becoming increasingly common in the United States. Additionally, a recent SCAI expert consensus document has liberalized recommendations for performing PCI without cardiac surgery on site (SOS). AIMS: The current study sought to understand practice patterns and operator preferences with regard to performing PCI without SOS. METHODS: Two internet-based surveys were distributed to interventional cardiologists worldwide. Survey items asked about operator demographics, procedural preferences when performing PCI without SOS, self-judged personality traits, and history of malpractice. RESULTS: Between March 2021 and May 2021, 517 interventional cardiologists completed the survey; 341 of whom perform elective PCI without SOS (no-SOS operators), and 176 who perform elective PCI with surgical backup (SOS operators). Most operators were male 473 (91.5%). There was a greater proportion of SOS operators in academic practice (86 vs. 75, p < 0.001) and greater proportion of no-SOS operators in hospital-owned practices (158 vs. 56, p < 0.001). Lesion characteristics (left main, chronic total occlusions, and need for atherectomy) were the most important procedural attributes for no-SOS operators, and international operators reported higher comfort levels with PCI on high-risk lesions. Cumulative personality profile scores were similar between SOS and no-SOS operators. SOS operators expressed more concern with legal ramifications of performing PCI without SOS (2.57 vs. 2.34, p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of surgical backup, lesion characteristics were the most important consideration for PCI patient selection for operators worldwide. Compared to the United States, international operators were more confident in performing high-risk PCI without surgical backup.

Radial versus femoral access for left main percutaneous coronary intervention: An analysis from the Veterans Affairs Clinical, Reporting, and Tracking Program.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare clinical characteristics and procedural outcomes of left main percutaneous interventions (LM-PCI) by transradial (TRA) versus transfemoral (TFA) approach in the VA healthcare system. BACKGROUND: TRA for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is steadily increasing. However, the frequency and efficacy of TRA for LM-PCI remain less studied. METHODS: All LM-PCIs performed in the VA healthcare system were identified for fiscal year 2008 through 2018. Patients' baseline characteristics and procedure-related variables were compared by access site. Both short- and long-term clinical outcomes were analyzed using propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 4004 LM-PCI were performed in the VA via either radial or femoral access from 2008 to 2018. Among these, 596 (14.9%) LM PCIs were performed via TRA. Use of TRA for LM-PCI increased from 2.2% to 31.5% over the study period. Propensity matched outcome analysis, comparing TRA versus TFA, showed a similar procedural success (98.4% for TRA vs. 97.8% for TFA; RR: 1.01 [0.98, 1.03]) and 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (25.9% for TRA vs. 26.8% TFA; RR: 0.96 [0.74, 1.25]). There were no statistically significant differences among secondary outcomes analyses including major bleeding. CONCLUSION: Use of TRA for LM-PCI has been steadily increasing in the VA healthcare system. These findings demonstrate similar procedural success and 1-year MACE across access strategies, suggesting an opportunity to continue increasing TRA use for LM-PCI.

Coronary Artery Radial Deformation and Velocity in Native and Stented Arteries.

Introduction: Coronary arteries are exposed to a variety of complex biomechanical forces during a normal cardiac cycle. These forces have the potential to contribute to coronary stent failure. Recent advances in stent design allow for the transmission of native pulsatile biomechanical forces in the stented vessel. However, there is a significant lack of evidence in a human model to measure vessel motion in native coronary arteries and stent conformability. Thus, we aimed to characterize and define coronary artery radial deformation and the effect of stent implantation on arterial deformation. Materials and Methods: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) pullback DICOM images were obtained from human coronary arteries using a coronary ultrasound catheter. Using two-dimensional speckle tracking, coronary artery radial deformation was defined as the inward and outward displacement (mm) and velocity (cm/s) of the arterial wall during the cardiac cycle. These deformation values were obtained in native and third-generation drug-eluting stented artery segments. Results: A total of 20 coronary artery segments were independently analyzed pre and poststent implantation for a total of 40 IVUS runs. Stent implantation impacted the degree of radial deformation and velocity. Mean radial deformation in native coronary arteries was 0.1230 mm ± 0.0522 mm compared to 0.0775 mm ± 0.0376 mm in stented vessels (p=0.0031). Mean radial velocity in native coronary arteries was 0.1194 cm/s ± 0.0535 cm/s compared to 0.0840 cm/s ± 0.0399 cm/s in stented vessels (p=0.0228). Conclusion: In this in vivo analysis of third-generation stents, stent implantation attenuates normal human coronary deformation during the cardiac cycle. The implications of these findings on stent failure and improved clinical outcomes require further investigation.

SCAI expert consensus statement update on best practices for transradial angiography and intervention.

Transradial angiography and intervention continues to become increasingly common as an access site for coronary procedures. Since the first "Best Practices" paper in 2013, ongoing trials have shed further light onto the safest and most efficient methods to perform these procedures. Specifically, this document comments on the use of ultrasound to facilitate radial access, the role of ulnar artery access, the utility of non-invasive testing of collateral flow, strategies to prevent radial artery occlusion, radial access for primary PCI and topics that require further study.

Relative importance of attribute preferences for radial vs. femoral arterial access: A crowdsourcing study of healthy online-recruited volunteers.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is typically performed with vascular access provided by the radial or femoral artery. However, little is known about how patients value aspects of these different vascular access approaches. METHODS: Conjoint analysis is a survey-based statistical technique used in market research that helps determine how individuals value different attributes that make up a particular product or services. We utilized conjoint analysis to assess the relative importance of four attributes associated with PCI: access site, risk of bleeding, hospital stay, and radiation exposure. Participants were healthy individuals recruited by Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTURK). After completing a conjoint analysis survey, the software Conjoint.ly was used to calculate the relative importance for these four different attributes of PCI. RESULTS: The relative importance of hospital stay, radiation exposure, bleeding risk, and procedure site was 32.7% (95% CI 29.5-35.8), 27.3% (95% CI 24.8-29.8), 24.4% (95% CI 22.3-26.5), and 15.7% (95% CI 13.6-17.8), respectively. The difference between these groups was statistically significant (P-value < 0.00001). The difference between duration of hospital stay and radiation exposure was statistically significant (P-value < 0.00433). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing PCI place largest relative value on duration of hospital stay. Access site appears the least valued attribute. These findings carry implications to guide further research on access site choices and the consent process in the context of shared decision-making.

Contemporary transradial access practices: Results of the second international survey.

OBJECTIVES: To gain insight into current practice of transradial angiography and intervention in the United States and around the world. BACKGROUND: Transradial access (TRA) has grown worldwide. In a prior survey, there was significant practice variation and there was minimal US participation which limited the generalizability to US operators. METHODS: We used an internet-based survey software program to solicit input from practicing interventional cardiologists from the United States and around the world. US operators were compared with outside the United States (OUS) operators and respondent-level comparisons were made with the prior survey to assess for temporal changes in practice. RESULTS: Between August 2016 and January 1, 2017, 125 interventional cardiologists completed the survey representing 91 countries with the United States having 449 (39.9%) respondents. Preprocedure, noninvasive testing for collateral circulation is used more commonly in the United States (54.1%) than around the world (26.6%) but its use has decreased since 2010. In the US, 48.8% of operators never use ultrasound and 92.6% of OUS operators never use it; only 4.4% overall use ultrasound in >50% of cases. Use of bivalirudin has decreased in the US and OUS. Nearly, 30% of operators do not assess for radial artery patency following hemostasis. US respondents used TRA less commonly for primary PCI for STEMI than their global counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in how TRA procedures are performed including relatively low rates of adherence to practices that are known to improve outcomes. Further education aimed at increasing use of best practices will impact patient outcomes.

Global geographical variation in patient characteristics in percutaneous coronary intervention clinical trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether there are differences in enrolled patients' risk factors in published percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) trials between various continents. METHODS: We systematically identified clinical trials evaluating PCI interventions through PubMed. We reviewed 701 studies between 1990 and 2014 from North America (N=135), Europe (N=403), and Asia (N=163), examining the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors-hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), hyperlipidemia (HL), smoking, sex, and body mass index. We performed meta-regression with random- and mixed-effects models to compare patient baseline characteristics between continents and linear meta-regression analysis to test trends over time. RESULTS: In meta-regression with random-effects model, North American trials recruited the lowest proportion of male participants (71.32%), followed by Asian (74.41%) and European trials (76.47%; P<.0001). North American trials enrolled the highest proportion of patients with HTN (63.17%, P=.0035) and HL (63.72%, P<.0001), whereas Asia enrolled the highest proportion of DM patients (29.64%, P<.0001) and smoking (38.41%, P=.0144). When adjusting for other moderators such as publication date, body mass index, and sex in meta-regression with mixed-effects model, age was significantly positively correlated with HTN, HL, DM, and smoking (P<.001). Body mass index was significantly higher in Europe and North America than in Asia. All enrollment risk factors demonstrated (ß<0.02) statistically significant temporal trends over time, except for sex. CONCLUSIONS: There are major continental differences in risk factors among patients enrolled in PCI trials from various continents. Clinical trial results may not be applicable to patient populations from another region.

Coronary artery rotation in native and stented porcine coronary arteries.

INTRODUCTION: Coronary arteries are exposed to several complex biomechanical forces during the cardiac cycle. These biomechanical forces potentially contribute to both native coronary artery disease, development of atherosclerosis and eventual stent failure. The aim of the present study was to characterize and define coronary artery axial rotation and the effect of stent implantation on this biomechanical factor. METHODS: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images were obtained from porcine coronary arteries and analyzed in ultrasound analysis software used to evaluate myocardial strain and torsion in echocardiography. In this study the software was utilized for a novel application to evaluate coronary artery rotation and time-to-peak (TTP) rotation in porcine coronary arteries. Clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) rotation of coronary arteries during the cardiac cycle and (TTP) rotation were measured. RESULTS: A total of 11 (4 LAD, 4 LCX, 3 RCA) coronary artery segments were independently analyzed pre- and post-stent implantation for a total of 22 IVUS runs. CW and CCW rotation and TTP varied widely within coronary artery segments and between different coronary arteries. Stent implantation impacted degree, direction and TTP of coronary rotation. Measurement reliability was assessed and the intraclass correlation coefficient for maximum average CCW was 0.990 (95% confidence interval 0.980-0.996, P < 0.0001), indicating excellent agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary arteries display wide spectrum of CW and CCW rotation during the cardiac cycle. Coronary stents impact the degree and direction of coronary artery rotation. The implications of these findings on development of atherosclerosis and stent failure require further investigation.

Ulnar Artery Catheterization: Is This Our Second Access Site or Is It Still Femoral?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize and discuss the safety and efficacy of ulnar arterial approach for cardiac catheterization. RECENT FINDINGS: Ulnar access has been found to be as safe and efficacious as radial access. However, the number of access attempts and cross-over rates is higher than with radial access. Ulnar access is an excellent alternative after failed radial access as femoral access is associated with more bleeding and worse clinical outcomes. Future research should focus on ultrasound-guided ulnar access to reduce the number of puncture attempts.

Compared to femoral venous access, upper extremity right heart catheterization reduces time to ambulation: A single center experience.

OBJECTIVES: To determine ambulation times after right heart catheterization (RHC) via upper extremity access compared to femoral venous access. BACKGROUND: Transradial coronary angiography has been associated with shorter times to ambulation. We hypothesized that RHC from the upper extremity would be similarly associated with shorter ambulation times when compared to traditional femoral access. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of 379 consecutive patients who underwent a variety of diagnostic and interventional left- and right-heart procedures through upper extremity and femoral access sites. RESULTS: The time to ambulation for RHC through the arm veins versus the femoral vein was lower (42.6 min ± 14.2 vs. 175.0 min ± 65.0, P < 0.001). Fluoroscopy times (8.5 min ± 6.8 vs. 12.8 min ± 8.4, P < 0.001) and radiation doses (64.1 Gy cm-2 ± 60.0 vs. 108.5 Gy cm-2 ± 71.6, P < 0.001) were reduced in the radial compared to femoral group, respectively. In multivariate analyses, upper arm access (P < 0.0001), lower heparin dose (P = 0.032), inpatient status (P = 0.01), and concurrent PCI (P = 0.03) were associated with shorter times to ambulation. CONCLUSIONS: Right heart catheterization from the upper extremity is strongly associated with shorter times to ambulation. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Temporal trends in the use of intraaortic balloon pump associated with percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States, 1998-2008.

BACKGROUND: With conflicting evidence regarding the usefulness of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP), reports of IABP use in the United States have been inconsistent. Our objective was to examine trends in IABP usage in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the United States and to evaluate the association of IABP use with mortality. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study using patient data obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 1998 to 2008. Patients undergoing any PCI (1,552,602 procedures) for a primary diagnosis of symptomatic coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome, including non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and ST-elevation myocardial infarction, were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall use of IABP significantly decreased during the study period from 0.99% in 1998 to 0.36% in 2008 (univariate and multivariate P for trend < .0001). Patients who received IABP had substantially higher rates of shock compared with those who did not receive IABP (38.09% vs 0.70%; P < .0001), which was associated with markedly higher inhospital mortality rates (20.31% vs 0.72%; P < .0001). However, IABP use significantly decreased in patients with shock (36.5%-13.4%) and acute myocardial infarction (2.23%-0.84%) (univariate and multivariate P for trend for both < .0001). A temporal reduction in all-cause PCI-associated mortality from 1.1% in 1998 to 0.86% in 2008 (univariate and multivariate P for trend < .0001) was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of IABP associated with PCI significantly decreased between 1998 and 2008 in the United States, even among patients with acute myocardial infarction and shock.

Myocardial infarction due to intracoronary embolization of percutaneous coronary intervention packaging.

Intracoronary device loss is occasionally encountered and removal is commonly performed at the time of the procedure. We report a case of removal of a retained coronary balloon protective plastic tubing inadvertently left in the coronary artery for a month and associated with myocardial infarction. Optical coherence tomography was used to visualize the foreign body prior to removal with a snare. To our knowledge this is the first report of a removal of disposable packaging equipment after prolonged intracoronary dwell time.

Intra-arterial nicardipine versus verapamil during transradial access coronary catheterization.

INTRODUCTION: Intra-arterial (IA) vasodilators are recommended during transradial access (TRA) to prevent radial artery spasm (RAS). The American Heart Association (AHA) recommends either IA verapamil, diltiazem, nicardipine, or nitroglycerin to prevent RAS. To our knowledge, the efficacy of RAS prevention and patient tolerability of verapamil and nicardipine has not been directly compared in a randomized fashion. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, single-blinded randomized clinical trial comparing the discomfort experienced by patients receiving either 400 µg of IA nicardipine (n = 26) or 5 mg of IA verapamil (n = 29). Patient discomfort and/or pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) both before and after IA administration of nicardipine or verapamil. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in mean change in VAS scores between the 2 groups, with an average increase in VAS score of 0.88 in the nicardipine group and 4.81 in the verapamil group (p < 0.0001). The overall rate of RAS was low in our study (5.5 %) with no significant difference in RAS incidence between the 2 groups (p = 0.465). The nicardipine group had 2 RAS cases (7.7 %), with 1 requiring a change in strategy (3.8 %). The verapamil group had 1 RAS case (3.4 %) that did not require a change in strategy. CONCLUSION: In this trial, we showed that nicardipine causes significantly less discomfort and pain compared to verapamil during IA administration for TRA cardiac catheterization.

Perception of Ridesharing Among Veterans With Cardiovascular Diseases in the Era of the MISSION Act.

The Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act of 2018 expanded veteran's access to community care leading to increased utilization of non-Veterans Affairs (VA) care and prompting concerns about the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of this care model for the VA. This study seeks to explore veterans' attitudes toward ridesharing services as a means of accessing VA-based cardiovascular care. This cross-sectional, quality improvement study utilized a 7-question survey administered to patients in an urban VA Heart Center to assess transportation preferences and opinions on ridesharing. Participants were more likely to support ridesharing if they held a positive opinion of rideshare ( P = 0.024), felt safe utilizing rideshare ( P = 0.025), or were undergoing invasive procedures ( P = 0.007). Distance traveled did not influence support of ridesharing ( P = 0.617). In conclusion, investing in ridesharing for veterans may provide a cost-effective means to improve VA access and continuity of care regardless of distance.

Team-Based Coaching Intervention to Improve Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: A Cluster-Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Up to 14% of patients in the United States undergoing cardiac catheterization each year experience AKI. Consistent use of risk minimization preventive strategies may improve outcomes. We hypothesized that team-based coaching in a Virtual Learning Collaborative (Collaborative) would reduce postprocedural AKI compared with Technical Assistance (Assistance), both with and without Automated Surveillance Reporting (Surveillance). METHODS: The IMPROVE AKI trial was a 2×2 factorial cluster-randomized trial across 20 Veterans Affairs medical centers (VAMCs). Participating VAMCs received Assistance, Assistance with Surveillance, Collaborative, or Collaborative with Surveillance for 18 months to implement AKI prevention strategies. The Assistance and Collaborative approaches promoted hydration and limited NPO and contrast dye dosing. We fit logistic regression models for AKI with site-level random effects accounting for the clustering of patients within medical centers with a prespecified interest in exploring differences across the four intervention arms. RESULTS: Among VAMCs' 4517 patients, 510 experienced AKI (235 AKI events among 1314 patients with preexisting CKD). AKI events in each intervention cluster were 110 (13%) in Assistance, 122 (11%) in Assistance with Surveillance, 190 (13%) in Collaborative, and 88 (8%) in Collaborative with Surveillance. Compared with sites receiving Assistance alone, case-mix-adjusted differences in AKI event proportions were -3% (95% confidence interval [CI], -4 to -3) for Assistance with Surveillance, -3% (95% CI, -3 to -2) for Collaborative, and -5% (95% CI, -6 to -5) for Collaborative with Surveillance. The Collaborative with Surveillance intervention cluster had a substantial 46% reduction in AKI compared with Assistance alone (adjusted odds ratio=0.54; 0.40-0.74). CONCLUSIONS: This implementation trial estimates that the combination of Collaborative with Surveillance reduced the odds of AKI by 46% at VAMCs and is suggestive of a reduction among patients with CKD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: IMPROVE AKI Cluster-Randomized Trial (IMPROVE-AKI), NCT03556293.

Reporting of radiation exposure in contemporary interventional cardiology trials.

OBJECTIVES: To determine reporting of radiation exposure in contemporary interventional cardiology randomized trials published in leading journals. BACKGROUND: Interventional cardiology procedures are a significant source of ionizing radiation, which can have detrimental effects on both patients and medical personnel. METHODS: The EuroIntervention 2010 supplement served as a source of randomized trials in interventional cardiology published in scientific literature from 2000 to 2010. RESULTS: Of all the trials in the supplement, 204 represented original research and were examined for reporting of radiation dose and fluoroscopy times. Only eight trials (3.92%) reported either radiation exposure or fluoroscopy time, covering 16,563 patients (4.55% of the total patient population of 363,727). All of these trials were published after 2006. The average fluoroscopy time reported in seven trials was 13.6 min and the mean radiation dose reported in three trials was 58.67 Gy cm(2) . CONCLUSIONS: Radiation exposure is not consistently reported in contemporary interventional cardiology trials. Even when reporting occurs, trials may not report detailed data such as radiation dose, radiation exposure time, or fluoroscopy time. Although reporting of radiation exposure has not been a requirement in research studies, efforts by professional societies and regulatory authorities toward standardized reporting should aid clinicians in making a more informed decision on specific interventional procedures and devices.

Transradial Interventions at the Forefront of Innovation.

Interventional cardiology has witnessed tremendous changes over the years from a mainly diagnostic approach in an elective population to therapeutic strategies in critically ill patients. Currently, we can treat a broad spectrum of coronary artery, peripheral artery, and structural heart diseases with less invasive, percutaneous approaches that we did not anticipate to be possible just a decade ago. It is certain that the interventional techniques will see further development and we will be able to treat by percutaneous methods more conditions previously thought beyond our reach. Regardless of the advances in catheter-based diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, one thing remains constant. They all require vascular access. And, vascular access is the first technical part of any percutaneous cardiovascular procedure that can determine its overall success. High-quality data together with the availability of training courses for interventional cardiologists and fellows-in-training ensure systematic use of the transradial approach (TRA) which has demonstrated a considerable benefit compared to transfemoral approach both in chronic and acute coronary syndromes. Constant improvement of TRA techniques will further facilitate transradial endovascular and structural interventions, and the growing use for high-risk and complex percutaneous coronary interventions. A continuously growing body of evidence is focused on surpassing current TRA limitations (specifically radial artery occlusion) and expanding alternative vascular accesses such as transulnar approach or distal TRA ("snuff-box" technique). Should this downsizing trend continue, we could see a further paradigm shift toward using the snuff-box technique.

Adaptive Coronary Artery Rotational Motion Through Uncaging of a Drug-Eluting Bioadaptor Aiming to Reduce Stress on the Coronary Artery.

BACKGROUND: Caged drug-eluting stents impede natural coronary rotational motion and increase vessel stress, which can contribute towards adverse events. The DynamX™ Drug-Eluting Bioadaptor is a cobalt­chromium platform with a novel mechanism that uncages the vessel after the bioresorbable coating resorbs over six months. This study aimed to analyze the effects of the rotational uncaging in a finite element analysis (FEA) model, validating its effect on coronary artery rotational motion through in-vivo stationary intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). METHODS: Maximum Von Mises stresses were measured in an FEA model and compared for caged and uncaged bioadaptors. Stationary IVUS images from 20 patients enrolled in a single center were acquired post implantation and at 9-12-month follow-up to evaluate coronary artery rotational motion. RESULTS: The FEA model showed that rotational uncaging of the bioadaptor reduces peak stress by 70%. In-vivo, the in-bioadaptor segment was significantly distorted post-implant compared to the native distal and proximal vessel, measured by IVUS: The sum of clockwise and counterclockwise rotational motion (net-effect rotational motion) was -2.7 ± 4.3° versus 0.5 ± 5.0° (proximal vessel), p = 0.036, and versus 0.2 ± 3.8° (distal vessel), p = 0.042. At follow up, when the bioadaptor had uncaged, the vessel returned towards its equilibrium (net-effect rotational motion -0.2 ± 5.6°), with no significant difference between the vessel segments. CONCLUSIONS: In concurrence with the FEA observation, the in-vivo IVUS-analysis demonstrates that uncaging of the bioadaptor affects coronary artery rotational motion. The effect of these findings on reducing clinical events warrants further investigation.

A Heart Team Approach to Assessing Frailty in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.

INTRODUCTION: Frailty is a well-documented risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There remains a lack of knowledge regarding the impact of patient frailty in cardiac patient management and outcomes. Thus, this study examined whether the Heart Team, without using frailty assessments, made decisions regarding coronary interventions [medical management (MM) vs. PCI vs. coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)] that aligned with formally quantified frailty status. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional quality-improvement (QI) study was performed at a single, large, urban Veterans Affairs Hospital. From September 2019 to November 2020, heart team nurses approached patients prior to coronary angiograms and assessed for frailty using the Risk Analysis Index Questionnaire (RAIC). Interventional cardiologists were blinded to the results. This study's independent variable was RAI-C score. The outcome variables were "intervention performed" (MM, PCI, or CABG) and presence of a "reduced invasiveness intervention" (RI). RESULTS: Ninety-five of the 182 participants had obstructive coronary artery disease. Among them, there were 69 PCIs, 10 CABGs, and 16 MMs. 26 received RIs. The primary outcomes demonstrated that frailty score was positively associated with receiving RI [adjusted OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.02-1.24, p = 0.02] and MM [adjusted OR = 1.13, CI = 1.02-1.25, p = 0.02], and negatively associated with receiving PCI [adjusted OR = 0.94, CI = 0.88-0.998, p = 0.04]. There was no significant association between frailty and the likelihood of undergoing CABG [AOR = 0.95, CI = 0.81-1.10, p = 0.47]. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the Heart Team and patients at baseline reduced high-risk interventions in frailer patients. A Heart Team, shared-decision-making model utilizing the RAI-C was found to be efficient and effective at measuring frailty in coronary angiogram patients and should be considered for use in the clinical setting.