Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Chin J Traumatol ; 2024 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38811319

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We carried out the study aiming to explore and analyze the risk factors, the distribution of pathogenic bacteria, and their antibiotic-resistance characteristics influencing the occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI), to provide valuable assistance for reducing the incidence of SSI after traumatic fracture surgery. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study enrolling 3978 participants from January 2015 to December 2019 receiving surgical treatment for traumatic fractures was conducted at Tangdu Hospital of Air Force Medical University. Baseline data, demographic characteristics, lifestyles, variables related to surgical treatment, and pathogen culture were harvested and analyzed. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to reveal the independent risk factors of SSI. A bacterial distribution histogram and drug-sensitive heat map were drawn to describe the pathogenic characteristics. RESULTS: Included 3978 patients 138 of them developed SSI with an incidence rate of 3.47% postoperatively. By logistic regression analysis, we found that variables such as gender (males) (odds ratio (OR) = 2.012, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.235 - 3.278, p = 0.005), diabetes mellitus (OR = 5.848, 95% CI: 3.513 - 9.736, p < 0.001), hypoproteinemia (OR = 3.400, 95% CI: 1.280 - 9.031, p = 0.014), underlying disease (OR = 5.398, 95% CI: 2.343 - 12.438, p < 0.001), hormonotherapy (OR = 11.718, 95% CI: 6.269 - 21.903, p < 0.001), open fracture (OR = 29.377, 95% CI: 9.944 - 86.784, p < 0.001), and intraoperative transfusion (OR = 2.664, 95% CI: 1.572 - 4.515, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for SSI, while, aged over 59 years (OR = 0.132, 95% CI: 0.059 - 0.296, p < 0.001), prophylactic antibiotics use (OR = 0.082, 95% CI: 0.042 - 0.164, p < 0.001) and vacuum sealing drainage use (OR = 0.036, 95% CI: 0.010 - 0.129, p < 0.001) were protective factors. Pathogens results showed that 301 strains of 38 species of bacteria were harvested, among which 178 (59.1%) strains were Gram-positive bacteria, and 123 (40.9%) strains were Gram-negative bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus (108, 60.7%) and Enterobacter cloacae (38, 30.9%) accounted for the largest proportion. The susceptibility of Gram-positive bacteria to Vancomycin and Linezolid was almost 100%. The susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria to Imipenem, Amikacin, and Meropenem exceeded 73%. CONCLUSION: Orthopedic surgeons need to develop appropriate surgical plans based on the risk factors and protective factors associated with postoperative SSI to reduce its occurrence. Meanwhile, it is recommended to strengthen blood glucose control in the early stage of admission and for surgeons to be cautious and scientific when choosing antibiotic therapy in clinical practice.

2.
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue ; 32(4): 428-431, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38044740

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of metal materials for oral fixation and restoration on magnetic resonance imaging artifacts and the health of tissues around dental implants. METHODS: A total of 153 patients undergoing fixed oral restoration were selected from May 2018 to June 2020. They were divided according to the random number table method into group A (cobalt-chromium alloy, n=31), group B (nickel-chromium alloy, n=32), group C (titanium alloy, n=28), group D (pure titanium, n=29) and group E (gold alloy, n=33). The largest area of metal crown artifacts and the number of layers of the 5 groups were compared. The probing depth(PD), modified plaque index(mPLI), modified sulcus bleeding index(mSBI) and papilla index(PI) 6 months after restoration were evaluated.The data were statistically analyzed with SPSS 22.0 software package. RESULTS: One-way ANOVA showed that the largest area of metal crown artifacts and the number of layers involved in the 5 groups had significant differences(P<0.05). Pairwise comparison showed that the largest area of metal crown artifacts, and the number of involved layers in group E were significantly lower than those in groups A, B, C, and D(P<0.05). One-way ANOVA showed that there was no significant difference in PD, mPLI, mSBI and PI among 5 groups (P>0.05). Pairwise comparison showed that there was no significant difference in PD, mPLI, mSBI and PI between group A and group B,C,D and E (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The artifacts produced by metal materials for oral fixation and restoration are closely related to the types of metal materials. Among them, cobalt-chromium alloys produce the largest artifacts, and gold alloys produce the smallest artifacts. The use of metal materials for oral fixation and restoration will not affect the health of tissues around dental implants.


Asunto(s)
Implantes Dentales , Titanio , Humanos , Titanio/efectos adversos , Implantes Dentales/efectos adversos , Artefactos , Coronas , Aleaciones de Oro , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA