Clinicopathologic correlation of dermatologic diseases in patients with darker pigmentation.

OBJECTIVES: Cutaneous diseases that disproportionately affect patients with darker pigmentation and their histologic features are historically understudied and undertreated. This review article aims to highlight the key clinical features, histopathology, and diagnostic pearls of several cutaneous diseases that commonly present in patients with darker pigmentation. METHODS: A literature search was conducted, and a list of cutaneous diseases that frequently affect patients with darker pigmentation was compiled. A group of experts expounded upon those that were most common or misdiagnosed according to scientific evidence and clinical practice. RESULTS: The diseases were divided into hypopigmented disorders, hyperpigmented disorders, scarring disorders, and alopecic disorders. Within each category, the etiology, clinical features, histopathology, and key histologic differential diagnoses are described and discussed. CONCLUSIONS: As many clinicians are taught that there are no effective treatment options or that these diseases are considered "cosmetic" in nature, patients often do not get a thorough medical workup or skin biopsy. This article aims to decrease the knowledge gap and serve as a resource for anyone involved in the care of patients with these cutaneous conditions.

Implementation of the vitiligo area scoring index in clinical studies of patients with vitiligo: a scoping review.

The vitiligo area scoring index (VASI) is a validated, reliable clinician-reported outcome measure widely used to assess the extent of skin depigmentation seen in patients with vitiligo and to measure patient responses to therapies for vitiligo in clinical trials. However, its implementation in studies is inconsistent and makes comparing results across different studies difficult. The aim of this scoping review is to summarize interventional clinical studies that applied the VASI to measure vitiligo and identify variability in VASI implementation. A systematic search of Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed. Interventional studies published between January 1946 and October 2020 that used the VASI as an outcome measure for assessing vitiligo response were reviewed for methodological approach. Great heterogeneity was found within the 55 included interventional studies that used VASI as an outcome measure. A total of 9 VASI subtypes were described by the authors within 10 intervention categories. VASI determined study eligibility in one study. Body surface area was most frequently established using inconsistent methods. We found unclear or ambiguously scaled assessments of depigmentation. Most VASI outcomes were reported as mean absolute difference, percentage VASI improvement, and percentage of patients who achieved the VASI endpoint. The VASI score was over 100 in one study. Our scoping review revealed many VASI methodology variations in interventional clinical studies of vitiligo. While VASI is a standard method to measure vitiligo changes, substantial heterogeneity in methodology limits reliable comparison and interpretation of findings from different clinical trials. Our findings may be used as a foundation to standardize the VASI outcome measure methodology, allowing for improved clinician training and rigorous data analysis across vitiligo research groups worldwide.

PRAME immunohistochemistry compared to traditional FISH testing in spitzoid neoplasms and other difficult to diagnose melanocytic neoplasms.

PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma) is a gene first identified in melanoma. It has been proposed as a useful marker to differentiate melanoma from benign melanocytic neoplasms. Recently genomic testing using fluorescence in situ hybridization has been used to aid in the diagnosis of difficult melanocytic neoplasms. We have compared PRAME staining to FISH testing results in 83 difficult to classify melanocytic neoplasms which showed spitzoid histologic features. A relatively low sensitivity of 29.6% and high specificity of 76.8% is seen with PRAME staining as compared to genomic testing with fluorescence in situ hybridization. This study highlights the limitations of PRAME staining in spitzoid neoplasms.

Remdesivir for the Treatment of COVID-19: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the spread of SARS-CoV-2 a global pandemic. To date, coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has spread to over 200 countries, leading to over 1.6 million cases and over 99,000 deaths. Given that there is neither a vaccine nor proven treatment for COVID-19, there is currently an urgent need for effective pharmacotherapy. To address the need for an effective treatment of SARS-CoV-2 during the worldwide pandemic, this systematic review of intravenous (IV) remdesivir was performed. Remdesivir, an anti-viral prodrug originally developed to treat Ebola virus disease, has shown broad spectrum activity against the Coronavirus family. A recent case report reported improvement of clinical symptoms with remdesivir in a patient with COVID-19. After conducting a systematic search of 18 clinical trial registries and three large scientific databases, we identified 86 potentially eligible items. Following removal of duplicates (n = 21), eligible studies were reviewed independently by two authors. After the first round of screening, inter-rater agreement was 98.5% (κ = 0.925). After the second round of full-text screening, inter-rater agreement was 100%. A total of seven ongoing and recruiting clinical trials of remdesivir (100-200 milligrams, intravenous [IV]) were included. We identified the following primary outcomes: patients discharged (n = 2); time to clinical status improvement (n = 2); improved O2 saturation (n = 2); body temperature normalization (n = 2); and clinical status (n = 1). Secondary outcomes in all identified studies included documentation of adverse events. Phase 3 trials are expected to be completed between April 2020-2023. Therefore, despite supportive data from in vitro and in vivo studies, the clinical effectiveness of IV remdesivir for treatment of COVID-19 and potential side effects remain incompletely defined in the human population.