Intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes and risk of incident coronary artery disease for the common haptoglobin phenotypes: the Look AHEAD study.

BACKGROUND: Intensive glycemic control reduced coronary artery disease (CAD) events among the Action to Control Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) participants with the haptoglobin (Hp) 2-2 phenotype only. It remains unknown whether Hp phenotype modifies the effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) on CAD in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Haptoglobin phenotype was measured in 4542 samples from the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) study. Cox regression models assessed the effect of ILI (focused on weight loss from caloric restriction and physical activity) versus diabetes support and education (DSE) on CAD events in each phenotype group, and within pre-specified subgroups including race/ethnicity, sex, history of cardiovascular disease, diabetes medication use, and diabetes duration. RESULTS: 1590 (35%) participants had the Hp2-2 phenotype. The ILI did not lower glycated hemoglobin (%HbA1c) to < 6.5% in either phenotype, with a peak significant difference between treatment arms of 0.5% [non-Hp2-2] and 0.6% [Hp2-2]. The cumulative CAD incidence was 13.4% and 13.8% in the DSE arm and 12.2% and 13.6% in the ILI arm for non-Hp2-2 and Hp2-2 groups, respectively. Compared to DSE, the ILI was not associated with CAD among participants without (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.78-1.17) or with (0.89, 0.68-1.19) the Hp2-2 phenotype (p-interaction between Hp phenotype and ILI = 0.58). After Bonferroni correction, there were no significant results among any subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Hp phenotype did not modify the effect of the weight loss ILI on risk of CAD in Look AHEAD, potentially because it did not substantially impact glycemic control among participants with or without the Hp2-2 phenotype. Further research is needed to determine if these results are conclusive.

Incidence and Progression of Fibrotic Lung Disease in an At-Risk Cohort.

Rationale: Relatives of patients with familial interstitial pneumonia (FIP) are at increased risk for pulmonary fibrosis and develop preclinical pulmonary fibrosis (PrePF). Objectives: We defined the incidence and progression of new-onset PrePF and its relationship to survival among first-degree relatives of families with FIP. Methods: This is a cohort study of family members with FIP who were initially screened with a health questionnaire and chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan, and approximately 4 years later, the evaluation was repeated. A total of 493 asymptomatic first-degree relatives of patients with FIP were evaluated at baseline, and 296 (60%) of the original subjects participated in the subsequent evaluation. Measurements and Main Results: The median interval between HRCTs was 3.9 years (interquartile range, 3.5-4.4 yr). A total of 252 subjects who agreed to repeat evaluation were originally determined not to have PrePF at baseline; 16 developed PrePF. A conservative estimate of the annual incidence of PrePF is 1,023 per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 511-1,831 per 100,000 person-years). Of 44 subjects with PrePF at baseline, 38.4% subjects had worsening dyspnea compared with 15.4% of those without PrePF (P = 0.002). Usual interstitial pneumonia by HRCT (P < 0.0002) and baseline quantitative fibrosis score (P < 0.001) are also associated with worsening dyspnea. PrePF at the initial screen is associated with decreased survival (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The incidence of PrePF in this at-risk population is at least 100-fold higher than that reported for sporadic idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Although PrePF and IPF represent distinct entities, our study demonstrates that PrePF, like IPF, is progressive and associated with decreased survival.

Haptoglobin phenotype and intensive glycemic control for coronary artery disease risk reduction in people with type two diabetes: The Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial.

Background: Intensive glycemic control reduced the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) events among White ACCORD study participants with the haptoglobin (Hp)2-2 phenotype, and not among participants without the Hp2-2 phenotype. It is unknown whether these results persist in a population with more severe diabetes. Methods: Haptoglobin phenotype was measured in 1746 (97 %) samples from the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT) randomized controlled trial. Multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models assessed the effect of intensive therapy on CAD risk among participants with and without the Hp2-2 phenotype separately and when stratified within pre-specified race/ethnicity-based subgroups. Time-varying (achieved) HbA1c data (<7.0 % or ≥8.0 % compared to 7.0-7.9, updated every 3 months) were also analyzed in relation to CAD risk within each phenotype. Results: 567 (32.5 %) participants had the Hp2-2 phenotype. Compared to standard therapy, intensive glycemic control was not associated with risk of CAD among participants with the non-Hp2-2 or the Hp2-2 phenotype or for any race/ethnicity-based group. Compared to HbA1c of 7.0-7.9 %, having HbA1c <7.0 % was not associated with CAD risk for either phenotype or among any race/ethnicity-based group. Having HbA1c ≥8.0 % was associated with an increased risk of CAD among Hispanic participants without the Hp2-2 phenotype (HR= 3.61, 95 % CI: 1.54-8.41, p-interaction=0.53). Conclusion: The effect of intensive glycemic therapy on CAD events was not dependent on Hp phenotype in the VADT study of veterans with severe diabetes who may represent a population where Hp phenotype information would not be useful for personalizing diabetes management. However, further research is needed to determine if these results are conclusive.

Haptoglobin Phenotype and Intensive Glycemic Control for Coronary Artery Disease Risk Reduction in People With Type 2 Diabetes: The ADVANCE Study.

OBJECTIVE: Intensive glycemic control reduced coronary artery disease (CAD) events among the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) study participants with the haptoglobin (Hp)2-2 phenotype but not in participants without the Hp2-2 phenotype. It is unknown whether and how these results translate across different demographic/clinical characteristics and treatment strategies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Haptoglobin phenotype was measured in available samples from the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) biomarker case-cohort study. Weighted multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association between intensive glycemic control (HbA1c target of ≤6.5%) versus standard therapy (based on local guidelines) and major CAD events among participants with (n = 1,327) and without (n = 2,077) the Hp2-2 phenotype separately and within prespecified stratifications by sex, race, previous cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes duration, and HDL-cholesterol. RESULTS: While the hazard ratios (HRs) were in the hypothesized differing directions, compared with standard therapy, intensive glycemic control was not significantly associated with risk of CAD events among participants without (1.04, 95% CI 0.82-1.32) or with (0.84, 0.63-1.14, Pinteraction = 0.27) the Hp2-2 phenotype overall. Intensive therapy was associated with lower CAD risk among participants with the Hp2-2 phenotype who had no previous CVD (0.47, 0.29-0.76, Pinteraction = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that intensive glycemic control contributes to the prevention of major CAD events among ADVANCE participants with the Hp2-2 phenotype and no previous CVD and are in alignment with our hypothesis that intensive glycemic control may be beneficial in a subset of people with the Hp2-2 phenotype.

The Relationship Between Time-Varying Achieved HbA1c and Risk of Coronary Events Depends on Haptoglobin Phenotype Among White and Black ACCORD Participants.

OBJECTIVE: Intensive glycemic therapy reduced coronary artery disease (CAD) events among White participants in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) study with the haptoglobin (Hp)2-2 phenotype, while participants without the Hp2-2 phenotype had no CAD benefit. The association between achieved glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and CAD for each Hp phenotype remains unknown. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Achieved HbA1c was similar in each phenotype throughout the study. Prospectively collected HbA1c data (categorized as <6.0%, 6.0-6.5%, 6.6-6.9%, or ≥8.0% compared with 7.0-7.9%) from the ACCORD study, updated every 4 months over a median of 4.7 years, were analyzed in relation to CAD in the Hp2-2 (n = 3,322) and non-Hp2-2 (n = 5,949) phenotypes separately overall, and within White (63%, 37% Hp2-2) and Black (19%, 26% Hp2-2) participants using Cox proportional hazards regression with time-varying covariables. RESULTS: Compared with HbA1c of 7.0-7.9%, having HbA1c ≥8.0% was associated with CAD risk among White (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.43, 95% CI 1.03-1.98) and Black (2.86, 1.09-7.51) participants with the Hp2-2 phenotype, but not when all Hp2-2 participants were combined overall (1.30, 0.99-1.70), and not among participants without the Hp2-2 phenotype. HbA1c <7.0% was not associated with a lower risk of CAD for any Hp phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving HbA1c >8.0% compared with 7.0-7.9% was consistently associated with incident CAD risk among White and Black ACCORD participants with the Hp2-2 phenotype, while no association was observed among participants without the Hp2-2 phenotype. We found no evidence that HbA1c concentration <7.0% prevents CAD in either Hp phenotype group.

Relationship Between Time-Varying Achieved High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Risk of Coronary Events Depends on Haptoglobin Phenotype Within the ACCORD Lipid Study.

Background The Hp (haptoglobin)2-2 phenotype (~40% of people) is associated with dysfunctional high-density lipoprotein (HDL) that is heavily oxidized in hyperglycemia, which may explain why raising HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) does not reliably prevent coronary artery disease (CAD) in diabetes. Methods and Results In this observational study using longitudinal data from the ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes) lipid trial, time-varying (achieved) HDL-C updated at 4, 8, and 12 months, and annually thereafter over a mean of 4.7 years, was analyzed in relation to risk of CAD and secondary outcomes using Cox proportional hazards regression with time-varying covariables among participants with (n=1781) and without (n=3191) the Hp2-2 phenotype. HDL-C did not differ between the phenotypes throughout the study. Having low HDL-C (<40 mg/dL for male participants and <50 mg/dL for female participants) was associated with a greater risk of CAD compared with non-low HDL-C among participants with the non-Hp2-2 phenotype (hazard ratio [HR], 1.48 [95% CI, 1.18-1.87]) but not among the Hp2-2 phenotype (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.70-1.35]; P interaction=0.03). Similarly, an inverse relationship was observed between HDL-C quintiles and CAD risk among participants without the Hp2-2 phenotype, whereas no significant inverse relationship was observed among participants with the Hp2-2 phenotype (P interaction=0.38). Among the Hp2-2 phenotype group, having low HDL-C was associated with higher risk of CVD mortality (HR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.05-4.13]), and compared with the lowest HDL-C quintile, higher quintiles were associated with lower risk of CVD mortality and congestive heart failure. Conclusions Hp phenotype modified the association between HDL-C and risk of CAD in the ACCORD lipid study, suggesting that HDL dysfunction in the Hp2-2 phenotype may hinder CAD-protective properties of HDL-C.

Haptoglobin Phenotype Modifies the Effect of Fenofibrate on Risk of Coronary Event: ACCORD Lipid Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The haptoglobin (Hp)2-2 phenotype (∼35-40% of people) is associated with increased oxidation and dysfunctional HDL in hyperglycemia and may explain why drugs designed to pharmacologically raise HDL cholesterol and lower triglycerides have not reliably prevented cardiovascular disease in diabetes. We aimed to determine whether the effect of adding fenofibrate versus placebo to simvastatin on the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) events depends on Hp phenotype in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) lipid trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Cox proportional hazards regression models quantified the relationship between fenofibrate therapy and CAD events in the ACCORD lipid trial in participants with the Hp2-2 phenotype (n = 1,795) separately from those without (n = 3,201). RESULTS: Fenofibrate therapy successfully lowered the risk of CAD events in participants without the Hp2-2 phenotype (multivariable adjusted hazard ratio 0.74 [95% CI 0.60-0.90] compared with no fenofibrate therapy) but not in participants with the Hp2-2 phenotype (1.16 [0.87-1.56]; P interaction = 0.009). Subgroup analyses revealed that this protective effect of fenofibrate against CAD events among the non-Hp2-2 phenotype group was pronounced in participants with severe dyslipidemia (P interaction = 0.01) and in males (P interaction = 0.02) with an increased CAD risk from fenofibrate treatment observed in females with the Hp2-2 phenotype (P interaction = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of fenofibrate added to simvastatin on risk of CAD events depends on Hp phenotype in the ACCORD lipid trial.