RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Quality assurance (QA) for ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) irradiation is a crucial aspect in the emerging field of FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT). This innovative treatment approach delivers radiation at UHDR, demanding careful adoption of QA protocols and procedures. A comprehensive understanding of beam properties and dosimetry consistency is vital to ensure the safe and effective delivery of FLASH-RT. PURPOSE: To develop a comprehensive pre-treatment QA program for cyclotron-based proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) FLASH-RT. Establish appropriate tolerances for QA items based on this study's outcomes and TG-224 recommendations. METHODS: A 250 MeV proton spot pattern was designed and implemented using UHDR with a 215nA nozzle beam current. The QA pattern that covers a central uniform field area, various spot spacings, spot delivery modes and scanning directions, and enabling the assessment of absolute, relative and temporal dosimetry QA parameters. A strip ionization chamber array (SICA) and an Advanced Markus chamber were utilized in conjunction with a 2 cm polyethylene slab and a range (R80) verification wedge. The data have been monitored for over 3 months. RESULTS: The relative dosimetries were compliant with TG-224. The variations of temporal dosimetry for scanning speed, spot dwell time, and spot transition time were within ± 1 mm/ms, ± 0.2 ms, and ± 0.2 ms, respectively. While the beam-to-beam absolute output on the same day reached up to 2.14%, the day-to-day variation was as high as 9.69%. High correlation between the absolute dose and dose rate fluctuations were identified. The dose rate of the central 5 × 5 cm2 field exhibited variations within 5% of the baseline value (155 Gy/s) during an experimental session. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive QA program for FLASH-RT was developed and effectively assesses the performance of a UHDR delivery system. Establishing tolerances to unify standards and offering direction for future advancements in the evolving FLASH-RT field.
Asunto(s)
Terapia de Protones , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/normas , Terapia de Protones/métodos , Terapia de Protones/normas , Humanos , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/normas , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/normas , Radiometría/métodos , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Fantasmas de ImagenRESUMEN
This retrospective review evaluated our institutions' practice of administering low fixed-dose FEIBA (high (1000 units) or low dose (500 units) for an INR ≥ 5 or <5, respectively) for the management of warfarin-associated coagulopathies. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who had a post-FEIBA INR ≤ 1.5. In the total population, 55.6% (10/18) of patients achieved a post-FEIBA INR ≤ 1.5. In the subgroup analysis, significantly more patients in the low dose FEIBA group achieved a post-FEIBA INR ≤ 1.5 compared to the high dose FEIBA group (71.4% vs. 45.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). In the post hoc analysis, there was a significant difference in the number of patients who achieved a post-FEIBA INR ≤ 1.5 when comparing those who received high dose FEIBA with a baseline INR 5−9.9 to those who received high dose FEIBA with a baseline INR ≥ 10 (60% vs. 33.3%, respectively, p < 0.001). The existing literature and our findings suggest that patients who present with lower baseline INR values and receive additional reversal agents are more likely to meet post-reversal INR goals. Current low fixed-dose protocols may be oversimplified and may need to be revised to provide larger fixed-doses.
RESUMEN
Cellular processes such as cell cycle progression, mitosis, apoptosis, and cell migration are characterized by well-defined events that are modulated as a function of time. Measuring these events in the context of time and its perturbation by small molecule compounds and RNAi can provide mechanistic information about cellular pathways being affected. We have used impedance-based time-dependent cell response profiling (TCRP) to measure and characterize cellular responses to antimitotic compounds or siRNAs. Our findings indicate that small molecule perturbation of mitosis leads to unique TCRP. We have further used this unique TCRP signature to screen 119 595 compound library and identified novel antimitotic compounds based on clustering analysis of the TCRPs. Importantly, 113 of the 117 hit compounds in the TCRP antimitotic cluster were confirmed as antimitotic based on independent assays, thus establishing the robust predictive nature of this profiling approach. In addition, potent and novel agents that induce mitotic arrest either by directly interfering with tubulin polymerization or by other mechanisms were identified. The TCRP approach allows for a practical and unbiased phenotypic profiling and screening tool for small molecule and RNAi perturbation of specific cellular pathways and time resolution of the TCRP approach can serve as a complement for other existing multidimensional profiling approaches.
Asunto(s)
Mitosis/efectos de los fármacos , ARN Interferente Pequeño/metabolismo , Bibliotecas de Moléculas Pequeñas/química , Línea Celular Tumoral , Análisis por Conglomerados , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Interferencia de ARN , Bibliotecas de Moléculas Pequeñas/farmacología , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Strict quality control of cells is required for the standardization and interpretation of results in all areas of cell-based research, especially in drug discovery. Real-time cellular analysis using electrical impedance as a readout offers a rapid and highly reproducible method for quality control as it provides a quantitative measure of overall cell morphology and growth. In a case study, the authors demonstrate that samples of a single cell line obtained from several different labs show clear differences in their impedance profiles when compared with the corresponding standard cell line. A number of kinetic parameters were derived from the impedance profiles and used to quantify the differences among these cell lines. Our findings indicate that this methodology can detect cell line differences including mix-ups or contaminations, genetic alterations, and potential epigenetic changes occurring during passaging, all of which can occur in the time scale of a screening campaign. Finally, we provide evidence that these impedance profile differences can be predictive of different outcomes in cell-based functional assays for the effects of small molecules on otherwise seemingly identical cell lines.