Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 2022 Oct 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36239828

RESUMEN

Negative-pressure pulmonary edema (NPPE) is a rare respiratory complication due to acute upper airway obstruction occurring shortly after extubation. We report a case of NPPE in young adult patient who underwent an eventful general anesthesia. The patient presented laryngospasm followed by acute respiratory distress with pink frothy sputum. The NPPE was initially misdiagnosed, and a preventable tracheostomy was performed. NPPE was managed with mechanical ventilation and diuretics, and the patient had full recovery. Every anesthesiologist should be aware of the diagnosis of NPPE. Early recognition and management are essential to prevent the morbidity associated with NPPE in young healthy patients.

2.
Tunis Med ; 100(7): 520-524, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36571740

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several clinical practice guidelines strongly support the use of ultrasound guidance (USG) for internal jugular vein catheterization. The level of evidence concerning the use of USG for subclavian vein (SCV) cannulation remains low. AIM: To compare the effectiveness and safety of USG and anatomical landmarks approaches for cannulation of SCV. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized study. Patients aged over 18 years old who requiring elective central venous catheterization were included. Non-inclusion criteria were thrombosis of the vein or major coagulopathy. All catheterizations were performed by two anaesthesiology residents. Patients were randomized into two groups: ultrasound guidance group (US group) and anatomical landmarks (LM group). The main outcome was the success rate. The secondary outcomes were the first attempt success rate and the incidence of complications. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included (35 in each group). The success rate was higher in US group compared to LM group without statistical significance (100% vs 85.7%; p=0.054). The first attempt success rate was significantly higher in the US group (82.9% vs. 40%; p <10-3). The incidence of mechanical complications was significantly lower in the US group compared to LM group (5.7% vs. 37.1%; p=0,001). CONCLUSION: according to our study, US guidance for SCV catheterization seems to be an interesting alternative to anatomical landmarks approaches.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Vena Subclavia , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Vena Subclavia/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Ultrasonografía , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Venas Yugulares/diagnóstico por imagen
3.
Ann Intensive Care ; 12(1): 91, 2022 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36183049

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided out-of-plane internal jugular vein (OOP-IJV) and in-plane supraclavicular subclavian vein (IP-SSCV) catheterization in adult intensive care unit. METHODS: A total of 250 consecutive patients requiring central venous catheterization, were randomly assigned to undergo either ultrasound-guided OOP-IJV or IP-SSCV cannulation. All catheterizations were carried out by three physicians. The primary outcome was the first attempt success rate. Ultrasound scanning time, venous puncture time, insertion time, overall access time, number of puncture attempts, number of needle redirections, success rate, guidewire advancing difficulties, venous collapse and adverse events were also documented. RESULTS: The first attempt success rate was significantly higher in IP-SSCV group (83.2%) compared to OOP-IJV group (63.2%) (p = 0.001). The IP-SSCV group was associated with a longer ultrasound scanning time (16.54 ± 13.51 vs. 5.26 ± 4.05 s; p < 0.001) and a shorter insertion time (43.98 ± 26.77 vs. 53.12 ± 40.21 s; p = 0.038). In the IP-SCCV group, we recorded a fewer number of puncture attempts (1.16 ± 0.39 vs. 1.47 ± 0.71; p < 0.001), needle redirections (0.69 ± 0.58 vs. 1.17 ± 0.95; p < 0.001), difficulties in guidewire advancement (2.4% vs. 27.4%; p < 0.001), venous collapse (2.4%, vs. 18.4%; p < 0.001) and adverse events (8.8% vs. 13.6%; p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: The IP-SSCV approach is an effective and a safe alternative to the classic OOP-IJV catheterization in critical adult patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03879954. Registered March 19, 2019-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03879954 .

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA