Association between epicardial adipose tissue and incident heart failure mediating by alteration of natriuretic peptide and myocardial strain.

BACKGROUND: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) has been suggested to exert deleterious effects on myocardium and cardiovascular disease (CVD) consequence. We evaluated the associations of EAT thickness with adverse outcomes and its potential mediators in the community. METHODS: Participants without heart failure (HF) who had undergone cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to measure EAT thickness over the right ventricular free wall from the Framingham Heart Study were included. The correlation of EAT thickness with 85 circulating biomarkers and cardiometric parameters was assessed in linear regression models. The occurrence of HF, atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease (CHD), and other adverse events was tracked since CMR was implemented. Their associations with EAT thickness and the mediators were evaluated using Cox regression and causal mediation analysis. RESULTS: Of 1554 participants, 53.0% were females. Mean age, body mass index, and EAT thickness were 63.3 years, 28.1 kg/m2, and 9.8 mm, respectively. After fully adjusting, EAT thickness positively correlated with CRP, LEP, GDF15, MMP8, MMP9, ORM1, ANGPTL3, and SERPINE1 and negatively correlated with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), IGFBP1, IGFBP2, AGER, CNTN1, and MCAM. Increasing EAT thickness was associated with smaller left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, thicker left ventricular wall thickness, and worse global longitudinal strain (GLS). During a median follow-up of 12.7 years, 101 incident HF occurred. Per 1-standard deviation increment of EAT thickness was associated with a higher risk of HF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-1.72, P < 0.001) and the composite outcome consisting of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, HF, and death from CVD (adjusted HR [95% CI], 1.23 [1.07-1.40], P = 0.003). Mediation effect in the association between thicker EAT and higher risk of HF was observed with NT-proBNP (HR [95% CI], 0.95 [0.92-0.98], P = 0.011) and GLS (HR [95% CI], 1.04 [1.01-1.07], P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: EAT thickness was correlated with inflammation and fibrosis-related circulating biomarkers, cardiac concentric change, myocardial strain impairment, incident HF risk, and overall CVD risk. NT-proBNP and GLS might partially mediate the effect of thickened EAT on the risk of HF. EAT could refine the assessment of CVD risk and become a new therapeutic target of cardiometabolic diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Identifier: NCT00005121.

Association between triglyceride glucose index and arterial stiffness and coronary artery calcification: a systematic review and exposure-effect meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The triglyceride and glucose (TyG) index has been linked to various cardiovascular diseases. However, it's still unclear whether the TyG index is associated with arterial stiffness and coronary artery calcification (CAC). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies until September 2022 in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. We used a random-effects model to calculate the pooled effect estimate and the robust error meta-regression method to summarize the exposure-effect relationship. RESULTS: Twenty-six observational studies involving 87,307 participants were included. In the category analysis, the TyG index was associated with the risk of arterial stiffness (odds ratio [OR]: 1.83; 95% CI 1.55-2.17, I2 = 68%) and CAC (OR: 1.66; 95% CI 1.51-1.82, I2 = 0). The per 1-unit increment in the TyG index was also associated with an increased risk of arterial stiffness (OR: 1.51, 95% CI 1.35-1.69, I2 = 82%) and CAC (OR: 1.73, 95% CI 1.36-2.20, I2 = 51%). Moreover, a higher TyG index was shown to be a risk factor for the progression of CAC (OR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.21-2.27, I2 = 0, in category analysis, OR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.29-1.68, I2 = 41% in continuity analysis). There was a positive nonlinear association between the TyG index and the risk of arterial stiffness (Pnonlinearity < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An elevated TyG index is associated with an increased risk of arterial stiffness and CAC. Prospective studies are needed to assess causality.

U-shaped association between the triglyceride-glucose index and atrial fibrillation incidence in a general population without known cardiovascular disease.

OBJECTIVE: The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index has been shown to be a new alternative measure for insulin resistance. However, no study has attempted to investigate the association of the TyG index with incident atrial fibrillation (AF) in the general population without known cardiovascular diseases. METHODS: Individuals without known cardiovascular diseases (heart failure, coronary heart disease, or stroke) from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort were recruited. The baseline TyG index was calculated as the Ln [fasting triglycerides (mg/dL) × fasting glucose (mg/dL)/2]. The association between the baseline TyG index and incident AF was examined using Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 11,851 participants, the mean age was 54.0 years; 6586 (55.6%) were female. During a median follow-up of 24.26 years, 1925 incidents of AF cases (0.78/per 100 person-years) occurred. An increased AF incidence with a graded TyG index was found by Kaplan‒Meier curves (P < 0.001). In multivariable-adjusted analysis, both < 8.80 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02, 1.29) and > 9.20 levels (aHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03, 1.37) of the TyG index were associated with an increased risk of AF compared with the middle TyG index category (8.80-9.20). The exposure-effect analysis confirmed the U-shaped association between the TyG index and AF incidence (P = 0.041). Further sex-specific analysis showed that a U-shaped association between the TyG index and incident AF still existed in females but not in males. CONCLUSIONS: A U-shaped association between the TyG index and AF incidence is observed in Americans without known cardiovascular diseases. Female sex may be a modifier in the association between the TyG index and AF incidence.

A simple ATTR-CM score to identify transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy burden in HFpEF patients.

BACKGROUND: Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is often found in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the evidence regarding ATTR-CM and prognosis in HFpEF remains scarce. This study sought to determine whether the ATTR-CM burden was associated with clinical outcomes in HFpEF patients. METHODS: We evaluated the associations of baseline ATTR-CM score with adverse outcomes in HFpEF patients from the TOPCAT trial using the Cox proportional hazards model or the competing risk regression model. The discriminatory ability of the ATTR-CM score was assessed using the area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: We included 870 HFpEF patients, 18.9% of which had an ATTR-CM score ≥6. Per 1 increment in the ATTR-CM score was significantly associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.27) with an AUC of 0.652 (0.594-0.711), whereas patients with ATTR-CM score ≥6 presented higher risks of the primary outcome (adjusted HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.65-2.95). Similar results were observed toward the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The simple ATTR-CM score identified an 18.9% ATTR-CM burden in HFpEF patients, and a higher ATTR-CM burden might predict adverse outcomes with moderate discriminatory abilities in HFpEF.

Effectiveness of early rhythm control in improving clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend rhythm control for improving symptoms and quality of life in symptomatic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the long-term prognostic outcomes of rhythm control compared with rate control are still inconclusive. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the effects of early rhythm control compared with rate control on clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed AF patients. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases up to August 2022 for randomized and observational studies reporting the associations of early rhythm control (defined as within 12 months of AF diagnosis) with effectiveness outcomes. The primary outcome was a composite of death, stroke, admission to hospital for heart failure (HF), or acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from each study were pooled using a random-effects model, complemented with an inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model. RESULTS: A total of 8 studies involving 447,202 AF patients were included, and 23.5% of participants underwent an early rhythm-control therapy. In the pooled analysis using the random-effects model, compared with rate control, the early rhythm-control strategy was significantly associated with reductions in the primary composite outcome (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.86-0.89) and secondary outcomes, including stroke or systemic embolism (HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.71-0.85), ischemic stroke (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.69-0.94), cardiovascular death (HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-0.99), HF hospitalization (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88-0.92), and ACS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76-0.98). Reanalyses using the inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Our current meta-analysis suggested that early initiation of rhythm control treatment was associated with improved adverse effectiveness outcomes in patients who had been diagnosed with AF within 1 year. REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered to PROSPERO (CRD42021295405).

Relationship between the triglyceride-glucose index and risk of cardiovascular diseases and mortality in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is a new alternative measure for insulin resistance. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the associations of the TyG index with the risks of cardiovascular diseases and mortality in the general population. METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were searched for randomized controlled trials or observational cohort studies reporting associations of the TyG index with cardiovascular diseases and mortality from inception to April 16, 2022. Effect sizes were pooled using random-effects models. Robust error meta-regression methods were applied to fit nonlinear dose-response associations. Evidence quality levels and recommendations were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system (GRADE). RESULTS: Twelve cohort studies (6 prospective and 6 retrospective cohorts) involving 6,354,990 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the lowest TyG index category, the highest TyG index was related to a higher incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) (3 studies; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68-2.40; I2 = 0%), myocardial infarction (MI) (2 studies; HR = 1.36; 95% CI 1.18-1.56; I2 = 35%), and composite cardiovascular disease (CVD) (5 studies; HR = 1.46; 95% CI 1.23-1.74; I2 = 82%). However, there was no association between the TyG index and mortality (cardiovascular mortality [3 studies; HR = 1.10; 95% CI 0.82-1.47; I2 = 76%] or all-cause mortality [4 studies; HR = 1.08; 95% CI 0.92-1.27; I2 = 87%]). In the dose-response analysis, there was a linear association of the TyG index with the risk of CAD (Pnonlinear = 0.3807) or CVD (Pnonlinear = 0.0612). GRADE assessment indicated very low certainty for CVD, MI, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality, and moderate certainty for CAD. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our current evidence, a higher TyG index may be associated with an increased incidence of CAD (moderate certainty), MI (very low certainty) and CVD (very low certainty) in the general population. There is a potential linear association of the TyG index with CAD and the composite CVD incidence. Further prospective studies (especially in non-Asians) are needed to confirm our findings.

Off-label underdosing of four individual NOACs in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Although several meta-analyses have examined the effects of off-label underdosing of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with their recommended doses in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), they combined different kinds of NOACs in their primary analyses. Herein, we first conducted a meta-analysis to separately assess the effects of off-label underdosing versus on-label dosing of four individual NOACs on adverse outcomes in the AF population. METHODS: The PubMed and Embase database were systemically searched until November 2021 to identify the relevant studies. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled by utilizing a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of nine studies with 144,797 patients taking NOACs were included in the meta-analysis. In the pooled analysis, off-label underdosing of rivaroxaban was related to an increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism (HR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.05-1.63; p = .02), whereas off-label underdosing of apixaban was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (HR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.40; p = .01). When comparing off-label underdosing versus on-label dosing of dabigatran or edoxaban, no differences were found in the primary and secondary clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Off-label underdosing of rivaroxaban may increase the risk of stroke or systematic embolism, whereas off-label underdosing of apixaban may heighten the incidence of all-cause death.

Prevalence of NSAID use among people with COVID-19 and the association with COVID-19-related outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: Recent reports of potential harmful effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have raised great concern. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and MedRxiv databases to examine the prevalence of NSAID use and associated COVID-19 risk, outcomes and safety. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies with a total of 101 215 COVID-19 patients were included. Prevalence of NSAID use among COVID-19 patients was 19% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14-23%, no. of studies [n] = 22) and NSAID use prior to admission or diagnosis of COVID-19 was not associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.93, 95% CI 0.82-1.06, I2  = 34%, n = 3), hospitalization (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.76-1.48, I2  = 81%, n = 5), mechanical ventilation (aOR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.47-1.06, I2  = 38%, n = 4) or length of hospital stay. Moreover, prior use of NSAIDs was associated with a decreased risk of severe COVID-19 (aOR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.89, I2  = 0%, n = 7) and death (aOR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.89, I2 = 85%, n = 10). Prior NSAID administration might also be associated with an increased risk of stroke (aOR = 2.32, 95% CI 1.04-5.2, I2  = 0%, n = 2), but not myocardial infarction (aOR = 1.49, 95% CI 0.25-8.92, I2  = 0, n = 2) and composite thrombotic events (aOR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.66-3.69, I2  = 52%, n = 2). CONCLUSION: Based on current evidence, NSAID use prior to admission or diagnosis of COVID-19 was not linked with increased odds or exacerbation of COVID-19. NSAIDs might provide a survival benefit, although they might potentially increase the risk of stroke. Controlled trials are still required to further assess the clinical benefit and safety (e.g., stroke and acute renal failure) of NSAIDs in treating patients with COVID-19.

Hydrogen sulfide restores sevoflurane postconditioning mediated cardioprotection in diabetic rats: Role of SIRT1/Nrf2 signaling-modulated mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress.

Diabetic hearts are vulnerable to myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI), but are insensitive to sevoflurane postconditioning (SPC), activating peroxiredoxins that confer cardioprotection. Previous studies have demonstrated that hydrogen sulfide (H2 S) can suppress oxidative stress of diabetic rats through increasing the expression of silent information regulator factor 2-related enzyme 1 (SIRT1), but whether cardioprotection by SPC can be restored afterward remains unclear. Diabetic rat was subjected to IRI (30 min of ischemia followed by 120 min reperfusion). Postconditioning treatment with sevoflurane was administered for 15 min upon the onset of reperfusion. The diabetic rats were treated with GYY4137 (H2 S donor) 5 days before the experiment. Myocardial infarct size, mitochondrial structure and function, ATP content, activities of complex I-IV, marker of oxidative stress, SIRT1, nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), and NADPH Oxidase-2 (Nox-2) protein expression were detected after reperfusion, and cardiac function was evaluated by echocardiography at 24 h after reperfusion. After H2 S activated SIRT1 in the impaired myocardium of diabetic rats, SPC significantly upregulated the expression of Nrf2 and its downstream mediator HO-1, thus reduced the expression of Nox-2. In addition, H2 S remarkably increased cytoplasmic and nuclear SIRT1 which was further enhanced by SPC. Furthermore, H2 S combined with SPC reduced the production of reactive oxygen species, increased the content of ATP, and maintained mitochondrial enzyme activity. Finally, myocardial infarct size and myocardium damage were decreased, and cardiac function was improved. Taken together, our study proved that H2 S could restore SPC-induced cardioprotection in diabetic rats by enhancing and promoting SIRT1/Nrf2 signaling pathway mediated mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several observational studies have compared the effect of the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants to each other in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, confounding by indication is a major problem when comparing non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatments in some of these studies. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant by only including the propensity score matching studies. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed and Ovid databases until May 2020 to identify relevant observational studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of the reported outcomes were collected and then pooled by a random-effects model complemented with an inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model. RESULTS: A total of 17 retrospective cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with dabigatran use, the use of rivaroxaban was significantly associated with increased risks of stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.05-1.29]) and major bleeding (HR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.24-1.41]), whereas the use of apixaban was associated with a reduced risk of major bleeding (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67-0.90]) but not stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.56-1.28]). Compared with rivaroxaban use, the use of apixaban was associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.54-0.73]) but not stroke or systemic embolism (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.67-1.04]). Reanalyses with the inverse variance heterogeneity or quality effects model produced similar results as the random-effects model. CONCLUSIONS: Current observational comparisons with propensity score matching methods suggest that apixaban might be a better choice compared with dabigatran or rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients.

C2HEST score predicts clinical outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a secondary analysis of the TOPCAT trial.

BACKGROUND: The C2HEST score has been validated for predicting AF in the general population or post-stroke patients. We aimed to assess whether this risk score could predict incident AF and other clinical outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients. METHODS: A total of 2202 HFpEF patients without baseline AF in the TOPCAT trial were stratified by baseline C2HEST score. Cox proportional hazard model and competing risk regression model was used to explore the relationship between C2HEST score and outcomes, including incident AF, stroke, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, any hospitalization, and HF hospitalization. The discriminative ability of the C2HEST score for various outcomes was assessed by calculating the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: The incidence rates of incident AF, stroke, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, any hospitalization, and HF hospitalization were 1.79, 0.70, 3.81, 2.42, 15.50, and 3.32 per 100 person-years, respectively. When the C2HEST score was analyzed as a continuous variable, increased C2HEST score was associated with increased risk of incident AF (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.29-1.75), as well as increased risks of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, any hospitalization, and HF hospitalization. The AUC for the C2HEST score in predicting incident AF (0.694, 95% CI 0.640-0.748) was higher than all-cause death, cardiovascular death, any hospitalization, or HF hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The C2HEST score could predict the risk of incident AF as well as death and hospitalization with moderately good predictive abilities in patients with HFpEF. Its simplicity may allow the possibility of quick risk assessments in busy clinical settings.

Living Alone and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), whether living alone could contribute to a poor prognosis remains unknown. We sought to investigate the association of living alone with clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF. METHODS: Symptomatic patients with HFpEF with a follow-up of 3.3 years (data collected from August 2006 to June 2013) in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist trial were classified as patients living alone and those living with others. The primary outcome was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, aborted cardiac arrest, or HF hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 3103 patients with HFpEF were included; 25.2% of them were living alone and were older, predominantly female, and less likely to be White and have more comorbidities compared with the other patients. After multivariate adjustment for confounders, living alone was associated with increased risks of HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.61) and any hospitalization (HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.12-1.42). A significantly increased risk of any hospitalization (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.01-1.34) was also observed in the Americas-based sample. In addition, each year increase in age, female sex, non-White race, New York Heart Association functional classes III and IV, dyslipidemia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were independently associated with living alone. CONCLUSIONS: We assessed the effect of living arrangement status on clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF and suggested that living alone was associated with an independent increase in any hospitalization.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00094302.

Major depression and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVE: Limited data have been published concerning about depression in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Besides, among HFpEF patients with depression, the efficacy of antidepressants is poorly defined. Therefore, our current study was aimed to examine the relationship between major depression and clinical outcomes in HFpEF patients and further address the effects of antidepressants on prognosis in patients with major depression and HFpEF. METHODS: A total of 1431 patients enrolled in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial (TOPCAT) were divided into 2 groups according to the baseline depression status. Major depression was diagnosed if the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score (PHQ-9) ≥ 10. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models tested the association of major depression with outcomes and the effects of antidepressants among HFpEF patients with major depression during a follow-up of 6 years. RESULTS: 26.7% (382/1431) of patients were diagnosed with major depression. After multivariable adjustment, major depression at baseline was not significantly associated with cardiovascular outcomes (fully adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.95 [0.76-1.18] for primary outcomes; aHR: 0.86 [0.67-1.10] for HF hospitalization; aHR: 1.06 [0.91-1.23] for any hospitalization; aHR: 1.00 [0.70-1.43] for cardiovascular death; aHR: 1.24 [0.96-1.61] for all-cause death). Additionally, among HFpEF patients with major depression, the use of antidepressants was not associated with adverse events (P > .05 for all analyses). CONCLUSIONS: In HFpEF patients, major depression at baseline did not increase mortality or rehospitalization. Additionally, treatment with antidepressants might not improve prognosis among HFpEF patients with major depression. Future studies are warranted to explore the effects of antidepressants on HFpEF patients with depression.

Effect of Rivaroxaban or Apixaban in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Stage 4-5 Chronic Kidney Disease or on Dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant treatment in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) or on dialysis remains a matter of debate. The object of this study was to quantify the benefit-risk profiles of rivaroxaban or apixaban versus warfarin in AF patients with stage 4-5 CKD or on dialysis. METHOD: A comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid, and Google Scholar databases was performed for eligible studies that comparing the effect and safety of rivaroxaban or apixaban versus warfarin in AF patients with stage 4-5 CKD or on dialysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were abstracted, and then pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of seven studies, one post hoc analysis of RCT and six observational cohorts, were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with warfarin use, the use of rivaroxaban or apixaban was significantly associated with reduced risks of all-cause death (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.93) and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.95). There were no significant differences in the risks of stroke or systemic embolism (rivaroxaban, HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.43-1.19; apixaban, HR = 0.86, 95%CI 0.68-1.09) and major bleeding (rivaroxaban, HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.64-1.45; apixaban, HR = 0.56, 95%CI 0.28-1.12). CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that rivaroxaban or apixaban are safe and at least as effective as warfarin in patients with AF and stage 4-5 CKD or on dialysis.

Association of physical activity and risk of atrial fibrillation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Physical activity (PA) could modify the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the general population and mortality in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). HFpEF patients are frequently concomitant with AF, but whether PA could modify the risk of AF in HFpEF patients remains undiscovered. METHOD AND RESULTS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the TOPCAT trial. Patients without AF at baseline and with data on PA (n = 652) were included. The association between PA and risk of AF occurrence was explored using the Cox proportional hazard model. During a median follow-up of 2.84 years, 9.4% of the studied patients (n = 60) had an occurrence of AF. When PA was analyzed as a continuous variable, every ten-fold increase of PA was associated with a 42.8% risk reduction of AF occurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 0.572, 95% CI 0.357-0.916, p = 0.020). When HFpEF patients were divided into three tertile groups according to PA levels, patients in the second tertile (HR 0.507, 95% CI 0.272-0.946, p = 0.033) and the third tertile (HR 0.487, 95% CI 0.261-0.908, p = 0.024) had significantly lower risks of AF occurrence when compared to those in the first tertile. CONCLUSIONS: Our current results suggest that a higher PA level associates with a lower risk of AF in HFpEF patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00094302.

Low vitamin D levels do not aggravate COVID-19 risk or death, and vitamin D supplementation does not improve outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis and GRADE assessment of cohort studies and RCTs.

BACKGROUND: The associations between vitamin D and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and clinical outcomes are controversial. The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in COVID-19 is also not clear. METHODS: We identified relevant cohort studies that assessed the relationship between vitamin D, COVID-19 infection and associated death and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported vitamin D supplementation on the outcomes in patients with COVID-19 by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, and medRxiv databases up to June 5th, 2021. Evidence quality levels and recommendations were assessed using the GRADE system. RESULTS: Eleven cohort studies with 536,105 patients and two RCTs were identified. Vitamin D deficiency (< 20 ng/ml) or insufficiency (< 30 ng/ml) was not associated with an significant increased risk of COVID-19 infection (OR for < 20 ng/ml: 1.61, 95% CI: 0.92-2.80, I2 = 92%) or in-hospital death (OR for < 20 ng/ml: 2.18, 95% CI: 0.91-5.26, I2 = 72%; OR for < 30 ng/ml: 3.07, 95% CI: 0.64-14.78, I2 = 66%). Each 10 ng/ml increase in serum vitamin D was not associated with a significant decreased risk of COVID-19 infection (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.79-1.08, I2 = 98%) or death (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.40-1.06, I2 = 79%). The overall quality of evidence (GRADE) for COVID-19 infection and associated death was very low. Vitamin D supplements did not significantly decrease death (OR: 0.57, I2 = 64%) or ICU admission (OR: 0.14, I2 = 90%) in patients with COVID-19. The level of evidence as qualified using GRADE was low. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggested that vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency was not significantly linked to susceptibility to COVID-19 infection or its associated death. Vitamin D supplements did not significantly improve clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. The overall GRADE evidence quality was low, we suggest that vitamin D supplementation was not recommended for patients with COVID-19.

Brugada syndrome with SCN5A mutations exhibits more pronounced electrophysiological defects and more severe prognosis: A meta-analysis.

Whether the presence of SCN5A mutation is a predictor of BrS risk remains controversial, and patient selection bias may have weakened previous findings. Therefore, we performed this study to clarify the clinical characteristics and outcomes of BrS probands with SCN5A mutations. We systematically retrieved eligible studies published through October 2018. A total of 17 studies enrolling 1780 BrS patients were included. Overall, our results found that compared with BrS patients without SCN5A mutations, patients with SCN5A mutations exhibited a younger age at the onset of symptoms and higher rate of the spontaneous type-1 electrocardiogram pattern, more pronounced conduction or repolarization abnormalities, and increased atrial vulnerability. In addition, the presence of SCN5A mutations was associated with an elevated risk of major arrhythmic events in both Asian (odds ratio [OR] = 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-3.11; P = .03) and Caucasian (OR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.02-4.90; P = .04) populations. In conclusions, patients with SCN5A mutations exhibit more pronounced electrophysiological defects and more severe prognosis. Clinicians should be cautious when utilizing genetic testing for risk stratification or treatment guidance before determining whether the causal relationship regarding SCN5A mutation status is an independent predictor of risk.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: evidences from the real-world data.

The role of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in stroke prevention remains unclear in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of NOACs in Asian patients with AF from the real-world settings. The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched to identify eligible observational studies until June 2019. The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and then pooled by a random-effects model. A total of 18 observational studies were included. Compared with warfarin, dabigatran (OR, 0.56, 95% CI 0.43-0.73), rivaroxaban (OR, 0.54, 95% CI 0.44-0.67), apixaban (OR, 0.41, 95% CI 0.35-0.48), and edoxaban (OR, 0.19, 95% CI 0.14- 0.25) reduced the risk of major bleeding, while dabigatran (OR, 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.85), rivaroxaban (OR, 0.74, 95% CI 0.68-0.82), and edoxaban (OR, 0.29, 95% CI 0.22-0.39) were associated with reduced risks of stroke or systemic embolism. In addition, dabigatran versus apixaban was associated with increased risks of ischemic stroke and gastrointestinal bleeding, while rivaroxaban versus apixaban was associated with elevated risks of stroke or systemic embolism, ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleeding. In Asian patients with AF, NOACs are non-inferior to warfarin for stroke prevention, and apixaban may be a better choice compared with dabigatran or rivaroxaban.

Dose-response relationship of cardiorespiratory fitness with incident atrial fibrillation.

The dose-response association between cardiorespiratory fitness and risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) is still not well known. Therefore, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to investigate the dose-response association between cardiorespiratory fitness and incident AF. We performed a comprehensive search in the databases of PubMed, Cochrane library, and Ovid from inception through August 2019. A one-stage robust error meta-regression method was used to summarize the dose-response association between cardiorespiratory fitness and AF. A total of 9 studies were included in this meta-analysis. In the categorical analysis, compared with the lowest level of cardiorespiratory fitness, both the intermediate (RR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.57-0.82) and highest (RR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.51-0.72) levels of cardiorespiratory fitness were associated with a decreased risk of AF. In the dose-response analysis, per 1 metabolic equivalent increase in cardiorespiratory fitness was associated with a decreased risk of AF (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.95). There was an inverse relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and risk of AF with evidence of linearity (Pnon-linearity = 0.43). Current evidence suggests that there is an inverse relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and risk of AF, manifesting as a higher level of cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with a decreased risk of AF.

Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Secondary Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: An Updated Analysis by Adding Observational Studies.

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in secondary stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. METHODS: PubMed and Embase electronic databases were systematically searched from January 2009 to July 2019 for relevant randomized clinical trials and observational studies. A random-effects model was applied in the pooled analysis. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies (4 randomized clinical trials and 10 observational studies) were included. Based on the randomized clinical trials, compared with VKA use, the use of NOACs was associated with decreased risk of stroke and systemic embolism, major bleeding, and intracranial bleeding. Based on the observational studies, compared with VKAs, the subgroup analysis showed that dabigatran and rivaroxaban were associated with a reduced risk of stroke or systemic embolism, whereas dabigatran and apixaban were associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding. CONCLUSION: Based on current data, the use of NOACs is at least non-inferior to the use of VKAs in AF patients for secondary stroke prevention irrespective of NOAC type.