SMARCA4 as a support for the differential diagnosis of poorly differentiated lung carcinomas.

Among non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), sarcomatoid carcinomas account for 3%. They are rare tumours with a poor prognosis, classified into three subgroups, namely pleomorphic carcinoma, pulmonary blastoma and carcinosarcoma. In the 5th edition of WHO Classification of Thoracic Tumours more space is given to SMARC4-deficient lung cancers. Although studies on SMARCA4-deficient lung tumours are limited, a small percentage of SMARCA4 loss is present within NSCLCs. This finding is clinically relevant, as the loss of the SMARCA4 gene is associated with a worse prognosis. In our study, we analysed the presence of the main catalytic subunit of the SMARCA4 gene, the BRG1 protein, in 60 sarcomatoid lung tumours. The results of our study show that 5.3% of sarcomatoid carcinomas have BRG1-loss in tumour cells, proving that a non-negligible amount of lung sarcomatoid carcinomas are SMARCA4-deficient. These data open the debate on the necessity of including the detection of SMARCA4 within a standardised immunohistochemical panel.

Correction to: Lung metastasectomy after colorectal cancer: prognostic impact of resection margin on long term survival, a retrospective cohort study.

The original version of this article, unfortunately, contained an error. In Fig. 2 - panel d, incorrect image was published and this is now presented correctly in this article.

Lung metastasectomy after colorectal cancer: prognostic impact of resection margin on long term survival, a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary metastasectomy is considered a potentially curative treatment for selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Several prognostic factors have been analysed, but to date, it is still not well defined which is the optimal resection margin during lung metastasectomy (LM). This study analyses the long-term results and prognostic factors after LM in CRC patients with particular attention to the resection margins. Primary endpoint of this study is to assess the correlation between resection margins and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Observational cohort study on all proven cases of CRC lung metastases (2000-2016) resected with curative intent in a single centre. RESULTS: The series included 210 consecutive patients (M/F 133/77) with a mean age of 65.4 (± 9.96) years, 75% (159/210) of them with a solitary metastasis. Mean size of metastasis was 2.57 cm (± 1.45). One hundred sixty-eight patients underwent wedge resections (80%) and lymphadenectomy was carried out in 90 cases (42.9%). With a mean follow-up of 56 months (range 5-192), we observed a 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) of 95%, 74% and 54%, respectively. The patients were divided into three groups according to the resection margin distance from the tumour: (a) ≥ 2 cm (145 cases); (b) < 2, ≥ 1 cm (37 cases); and (c) < 1 cm (12 cases). The OS was significantly different between the three groups (p = 0,020); univariate and multivariate analyses showed that a narrow resection margin was an independent prognostic factor of worse survival (p = 0.006 and HR 3.4 p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival of patients after LM is strongly associated with a greater distance between the lesion and the resection margin.

Robotic versus Open Surgery in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Evaluation of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes.

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consists of a heterogeneous group, with different pulmonary extension and lymph nodal involvement. Robotic surgery can play a key role in these tumours thanks to its technological features, although open surgery is still considered the gold-standard approach. Our study aims to evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of locally advanced NSCLC patients who underwent robotic surgery in a high-volume centre. Data from consecutive patients with locally advanced NSCLC who underwent robotic lobectomy were retrospectively analysed and compared with patients treated with open surgery. Clinical characteristics and surgical and oncological information were evaluated. From 2010 to 2020, 131 patients underwent anatomical lung resection for locally advanced NSCLC. A total of 61 patients were treated with robotic surgery (46.6%); the median hospitalization time was 5.9 days (range 2-27) and the postoperative complication rate was 18%. Open surgery was performed in 70 patients (53.4%); the median length of stay was 9 days (range 4-48) and the postoperative complication rate was 22.9%. The median follow-up time was 70 months. The 5-year overall survival was 34% in the robotic group and 31% in the thoracotomy group. Robotic surgery can be considered safe and feasible not only for early stages but also for the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC.

The evolution of robotic thoracic surgery.

Robotic surgery has the features to represent the future of surgery, considering the rapid evolution of its technology and the resulting in the surgical field. In the last years, the robotic technique in thoracic surgery has progressively become widespread in the word, particularly for the treatment of the mediastinal and pulmonary lesions. The development of technology in the robotic system has been associated with the improvement of intraoperative and postoperative results. Due to the satisfying results and increasing experience and confidence with the robotic technique, surgeons are consequently enlarging the surgical indication, moving to increasingly challenging cases. Thoracic robotic surgery is being affirmed as a safe technique also for those complex cases, which in the past were considered a matter solely for open surgery. In fact, robotic surgery is increasingly associated with positive surgical results and guarantees less traumatism and a fast recovery to the patients. These positive results have resulted from the evolution of the technique, which has developed in parallel with the evolution of the technology, exploiting to its best the latest features of the robotic system. These features, such as the fluorescence-detection tool or the robotic stapler, have been aiding the surgeon to maximise the safety and feasibility of the application of the robotic technique to thoracic surgery.

Long-term oncologic results for robotic major lung resection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

OBJECTIVE(S): Robotic lobectomy is becoming a widespread surgical procedure in NSCLC treatment, but data on oncologic outcomes is still lacking. The aim of this study was to analyze long term oncologic results of robotic lobectomy for non small lung cancer. METHODS: Clinical records of consecutive NSCLC patients underwent robotic major surgery, between January 2010 and December 2015, were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: We analyzed data of 212 patients (127 male and 85 female), with a median age of 66.3 years. The median follow-up time was 40.3 months (range 4-83). The median disease free survival was 66.3 months. Free disease survival stage-correlated was 75.6 months for stage I, 42.3 months for stage II, 51.2 months for stage III and 10.3 months for stage IV. The median overall survival was 78.6 months. Overall survival stage-correlated was 82 months for stage I, 73.5 months for stage II, 61.4 months for stage III and 41.3 months for stage IV. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests high safety level, positive post-operative and oncologic outcomes for patients NSCLC underwent robotic major surgery, also in advanced stages.