Perioperative Doppler ultrasound assessment of portal vein flow pulsatility in high-risk cardiac surgery patients: a multicentre prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Portal vein Doppler ultrasound pulsatility measured by transoesophageal echocardiography is a marker of the haemodynamic impact of venous congestion in cardiac surgery. We investigated whether the presence of abnormal portal vein flow pulsatility is associated with a longer duration of invasive life support and postoperative complications in high-risk patients. METHODS: In this multicentre cohort study, pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound assessments of portal vein flow were performed during anaesthesia before initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass (before CPB) and after separation of cardiopulmonary bypass (after CPB). Abnormal pulsatility was defined as portal pulsatility fraction (PPF) ≥50% (PPF50). The primary outcome was the cumulative time in perioperative organ dysfunction (TPOD) requiring invasive life support during 28 days. Secondary outcomes included major postoperative complications. RESULTS: 373 patients, 71 (22.0%) had PPF50 before CPB and 77 (24.9%) after CPB. PPF50 was associated with longer duration of TPOD (median [inter-quartile range]; before CPB: 27 h [11-72] vs 19 h [8.5-42], P=0.02; after CPB: 27 h [11-61] vs 20 h [8-42], P=0.006). After adjusting for confounders, PPF50 before CPB showed significant association with TPOD. PPF50 after CPB was associated with a higher rate of major postoperative complications (36.4% vs 20.3%, P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal portal vein flow pulsatility before cardiopulmonary bypass was associated with longer duration of life support therapy after cardiac surgery in high-risk patients. Abnormal portal vein flow pulsatility after cardiopulmonary bypass separation was associated with a higher risk of major postoperative complications although this association was not independent of other factors. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03656263.

Six-Month Outcomes after Restrictive or Liberal Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: We reported previously that, in patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were at moderate-to-high risk for death, a restrictive transfusion strategy was noninferior to a liberal strategy with respect to the composite outcome of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis by hospital discharge or 28 days after surgery, whichever came first. We now report the clinical outcomes at 6 months after surgery. METHODS: We randomly assigned 5243 adults undergoing cardiac surgery to a restrictive red-cell transfusion strategy (transfusion if the hemoglobin concentration was <7.5 g per deciliter intraoperatively or postoperatively) or a liberal red-cell transfusion strategy (transfusion if the hemoglobin concentration was <9.5 g per deciliter intraoperatively or postoperatively when the patient was in the intensive care unit [ICU] or was <8.5 g per deciliter when the patient was in the non-ICU ward). The primary composite outcome was death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis occurring within 6 months after the initial surgery. An expanded secondary composite outcome included all the components of the primary outcome as well as emergency department visit, hospital readmission, or coronary revascularization occurring within 6 months after the index surgery. The secondary outcomes included the individual components of the two composite outcomes. RESULTS: At 6 months after surgery, the primary composite outcome had occurred in 402 of 2317 patients (17.4%) in the restrictive-threshold group and in 402 of 2347 patients (17.1%) in the liberal-threshold group (absolute risk difference before rounding, 0.22 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.95 to 2.39; odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.18; P=0.006 for noninferiority). Mortality was 6.2% in the restrictive-threshold group and 6.4% in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.21). There were no significant between-group differences in the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were at moderate-to-high risk for death, a restrictive strategy for red-cell transfusion was noninferior to a liberal strategy with respect to the composite outcome of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis at 6 months after surgery. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; TRICS III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02042898 .).

Restrictive or Liberal Red-Cell Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The effect of a restrictive versus liberal red-cell transfusion strategy on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery remains unclear. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned 5243 adults undergoing cardiac surgery who had a European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) I of 6 or more (on a scale from 0 to 47, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of death after cardiac surgery) to a restrictive red-cell transfusion threshold (transfuse if hemoglobin level was <7.5 g per deciliter, starting from induction of anesthesia) or a liberal red-cell transfusion threshold (transfuse if hemoglobin level was <9.5 g per deciliter in the operating room or intensive care unit [ICU] or was <8.5 g per deciliter in the non-ICU ward). The primary composite outcome was death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis by hospital discharge or by day 28, whichever came first. Secondary outcomes included red-cell transfusion and other clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 11.4% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group, as compared with 12.5% of those in the liberal-threshold group (absolute risk difference, -1.11 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.93 to 0.72; odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.07; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Mortality was 3.0% in the restrictive-threshold group and 3.6% in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.16). Red-cell transfusion occurred in 52.3% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group, as compared with 72.6% of those in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.47). There were no significant between-group differences with regard to the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were at moderate-to-high risk for death, a restrictive strategy regarding red-cell transfusion was noninferior to a liberal strategy with respect to the composite outcome of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis, with less blood transfused. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; TRICS III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02042898 .).

Comparison of Two Major Perioperative Bleeding Scores for Cardiac Surgery Trials: Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding in Cardiac Surgery and European Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Bleeding Severity Grade.

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC: WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: BACKGROUND:: Research into major bleeding during cardiac surgery is challenging due to variability in how it is scored. Two consensus-based clinical scores for major bleeding: the Universal definition of perioperative bleeding and the European Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (E-CABG) bleeding severity grade, were compared in this substudy of the Transfusion Avoidance in Cardiac Surgery (TACS) trial. METHODS: As part of TACS, 7,402 patients underwent cardiac surgery at 12 hospitals from 2014 to 2015. We examined content validity by comparing scored items, construct validity by examining associations with redo and complex procedures, and criterion validity by examining 28-day in-hospital mortality risk across bleeding severity categories. Hierarchical logistic regression models were constructed that incorporated important predictors and categories of bleeding. RESULTS: E-CABG and Universal scores were correlated (Spearman ρ = 0.78, P < 0.0001), but E-CABG classified 910 (12.4%) patients as having more severe bleeding, whereas the Universal score classified 1,729 (23.8%) as more severe. Higher E-CABG and Universal scores were observed in redo and complex procedures. Increasing E-CABG and Universal scores were associated with increased mortality in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Regression model discrimination based on predictors of perioperative mortality increased with additional inclusion of the Universal score (c-statistic increase from 0.83 to 0.91) or E-CABG (c-statistic increase from 0.83 to 0.92). When other major postoperative complications were added to these models, the association between Universal or E-CABG bleeding with mortality remained. CONCLUSIONS: Although each offers different advantages, both the Universal score and E-CABG performed well in the validity assessments, supporting their use as outcome measures in clinical trials.

Cerebral Oximetry Monitoring to Maintain Normal Cerebral Oxygen Saturation during High-risk Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral oxygen desaturation during cardiac surgery has been associated with adverse perioperative outcomes. Before a large multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) on the impact of preventing desaturations on perioperative outcomes, the authors undertook a randomized prospective, parallel-arm, multicenter feasibility RCT to determine whether an intervention algorithm could prevent desaturations. METHODS: Eight Canadian sites randomized 201 patients between April 2012 and October 2013. The primary outcome was the success rate of reversing cerebral desaturations below 10% relative to baseline in the intervention group. Anesthesiologists were blinded to the cerebral saturation values in the control group. Intensive care unit personnel were blinded to cerebral saturation values for both groups. Secondary outcomes included the area under the curve of cerebral desaturation load, enrolment rates, and a 30-day follow-up for adverse events. RESULTS: Cerebral desaturations occurred in 71 (70%) of the 102 intervention group patients and 56 (57%) of the 99 control group patients (P = 0.04). Reversal was successful in 69 (97%) of the intervention group patients. The mean cerebral desaturation load (SD) in the operating room was smaller for intervention group patients compared with control group patients (104 [217] %.min vs. 398 [869] %.min, mean difference, -294; 95% CI, -562 to -26; P = 0.03). This was also true in the intensive care unit (P = 0.02). There were no differences in adverse events between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Study sites were successful in reversal of desaturation, patient recruitment, randomization, and follow-up in cardiac surgery, supporting the feasibility of conducting a large multicenter RCT.

The RECITE Study: A Canadian Prospective, Multicenter Study of the Incidence and Severity of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (NMB), defined as a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of <0.9, is an established risk factor for critical postoperative respiratory events and increased morbidity. At present, little is known about the occurrence of residual NMB in Canada. The RECITE (Residual Curarization and its Incidence at Tracheal Extubation) study was a prospective observational study at 8 hospitals in Canada investigating the incidence and severity of residual NMB. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery expected to last <4 hours, ASA physical status I-III, and scheduled for general anesthesia with at least 1 dose of a nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent for endotracheal intubation or maintenance of neuromuscular relaxation were enrolled in the study. Neuromuscular function was assessed using acceleromyography with the TOF-Watch SX. All reported TOF ratios were normalized to the baseline values. The attending anesthesiologist and all other observers were blinded to the TOF ratio (T4/T1) results. The primary and secondary objectives were to determine the incidence and severity of residual NMB (TOF ratio <0.9) just before tracheal extubation and at arrival at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). RESULTS: Three hundred and two participants were enrolled. Data were available for 241 patients at tracheal extubation and for 207 patients at PACU arrival. Rocuronium was the NMB agent used in 99% of cases. Neostigmine was used for reversal of NMB in 73.9% and 72.0% of patients with TE and PACU data, respectively. The incidence of residual NMB was 63.5% (95% confidence interval, 57.4%-69.6%) at tracheal extubation and 56.5% (95% confidence interval, 49.8%-63.3%) at arrival at the PACU. In an exploratory analysis, no statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of residual NMB according to gender, age, body mass index, ASA physical status, type of surgery, or comorbidities (all P > 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Residual paralysis is common at tracheal extubation and PACU arrival, despite qualitative neuromuscular monitoring and the use of neostigmine. More effective detection and management of NMB is needed to reduce the risks associated with residual NMB.

Interrelationship of preoperative anemia, intraoperative anemia, and red blood cell transfusion as potentially modifiable risk factors for acute kidney injury in cardiac surgery: a historical multicentre cohort study.

PURPOSE: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a potentially serious complication of cardiac surgery. Anemia and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion have individually been identified as potentially modifiable risk factors, but their interrelationship with AKI has not been clearly defined. The purpose of this study was to explore the interrelationship of preoperative anemia, intraoperative anemia, and RBC transfusion on the day of surgery with AKI in cardiac surgery. METHODS: This historical cohort study included 16 hospitals, each contributing data on approximately 100 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Acute kidney injury was defined as a > 50% increase in creatinine levels during the first postoperative week. Multivariable regression was used to identify the interrelationship between preoperative anemia (hemoglobin < 130 g·L(-1) in males and < 120 g·L(-1) in females), intraoperative anemia (hemoglobin < 80 g·L(-1) during cardiopulmonary bypass), RBC transfusion on the day of surgery, and their interaction terms, after adjusting for site and baseline AKI risk. RESULTS: Of the 1,444 patients included in the study, 541 (37%) had preoperative anemia, 501 (35%) developed intraoperative anemia, 619 (43%) received RBC transfusions, and 238 (16%) developed AKI. After risk-adjustment, an individual with the combination of these three risk factors had a 2.6-fold (95% confidence interval 2.0 to 3.3) increase in the relative risk of AKI over an individual with none of these risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anemia, intraoperative anemia, and RBC transfusion on the day of surgery are interrelated risk factors for AKI after cardiac surgery. Targeting these risk factors may reduce the burden of AKI.

Preoperative pregabalin does not reduce propofol ED(50): a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In many studies, gabapentinoids, such as pregabalin, have been shown to reduce preoperative anxiety. This anxiolysis is often accompanied by sedation, one of the most frequent side effects of pregabalin. We hypothesized that pregabalin taken preoperatively could reduce propofol requirements for induction of general anesthesia. METHODS: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted after approval by the local ethics committee. Fifty women aged 18-40 yr, American Anesthesiologists Society physical status I and II, and scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic gynecologic procedures were enrolled after written consent. Treatment group patients were given pregabalin 150 mg po one hour before surgery while patients in the control group received a placebo. The primary outcome was the propofol dose required to achieve a targeted anesthetic depth in 50% of the population, i.e., effective dose (ED)50. The ED50 was estimated using Dixon's up-and-down methodology. The targeted anesthetic depth was defined based on predetermined entropy monitoring values (State Entropy [SE] < 50 and Response Entropy [RE]-SE < 10). As a secondary outcome, we tested if pregabalin reduced pre-induction anxiety levels which were measured on a 0-100 scale. RESULTS: The propofol ED50 was not statistically different between the pregabalin group (mean 1.33 mg·kg(-1); 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23 to 1.43) vs the placebo group (mean 1.37 mg·kg(-1); 95% CI 1.28 to 1.46); P = 0.19. Also, pre-induction anxiety level was not different between groups (median 31; interquartile range [IQR] [10-52] vs median 42; IQR [4-71], respectively; P = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative pregabalin does not reduce propofol requirements in a population of healthy young women undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. This study failed to show a pre-induction anxiolytic effect of pregabalin in such a population. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01158859).

Technical report: optimal quantity of saline for epidural pressure waveform analysis.

PURPOSE: Epidural waveform analysis (EPWA) is a simple test to confirm the optimal placement of an epidural catheter. It relies on the transmission of the thecal pressure waveform through the epidural catheter. Little is known about the optimal volume of catheter injectate needed to optimize the EPWA test. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial we compared three different catheters: stimulating, open-ended hole [S1]; stimulating, three-hole [S3]; non-stimulating three-hole [NS3]) in 60 patients in an unblinded pilot study. After catheter insertion using a loss of resistance to air technique, we recorded the dose response curve of EPWA and the presence of epidural pressure wave transmitted through the catheter to repeated injections of 2.5 mL saline boluses in the catheter to a total volume of 10 mL. All patients were followed by the acute pain service to confirm adequacy of postoperative epidural analgesia. RESULTS: The S3 catheters were significantly more responsive (able to transmit a pulsatile waveform) compared to the S1 [P = 0.003 (S3) and P = 0.012 (NS3)] at low injectate volume, while there was no differences between the S3 catheters in their ability to transmit a waveform for EPWA (P = 0.25). There was no increase in responsiveness after 2.5 mL injected for S3 catheters and 5 mL for the S1 catheter. Three patients had soft catheters that did not transmit an epidural pulsative waveform. CONCLUSIONS: For EPWAs, S3 epidural catheters are superior to S1 catheters for determining pulsative waveform transmission at low injectate volume. The optimal initial quantity of saline for EPWA is 5 mL regardless of the catheter type used.

A prospective comparative study of two indirect methods for confirming the localization of an epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia.

We prospectively evaluated, in randomized order, 2 indirect methods of confirming the localization of an epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia in 218 surgical patients: epidural stimulation test (EST) and epidural pressure waveform analysis (EPWA). The epidural space was localized by using a loss of resistance technique. All catheters were inserted 5 cm into the epidural space and primed with 5 mL of 0.9% normal saline. There were no differences between the methods: the positive predictive value and specificity were high (100% in both groups), but the sensitivity was moderate (80% for EST and 81% for EPWA) and the negative predictive value was low (16% for EST and 17% for EPWA). Combining both methods yielded better sensitivity (97%) and negative predictive value (57%) (P < 0.001). The sensitivity of EST was increased to 87% (P < 0.05) if sensory response was included as well as motor response for stimulation less than 10 mA. We suggest the inclusion of sensory response in the appropriate dermatome at a current <10 mA as a criterion for adequate epidural catheter localization for EST testing. EPWA sensitivity was significantly better with older patients: 94% for patients older than 80 yr compared with 63% for patients younger than 40, 73% for patients 40 to 60, and 85% for patients aged 60 to 80 yr (P = 0.03). We conclude that the two tests are comparable for confirming catheter placement.