Definitive chemoradiotherapy plus cetuximab for cancer in the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction.

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy is standard treatment for localized oesophageal cancer unsuitable for surgery. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab in combination with chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: This non-randomised multicentre phase II trial recruited patients aged 18-75 with WHO performance status 0-2 having squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma in the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction, T2-4, N0-3, M0 not suitable for surgery. Chemotherapy was three 21-day cycles of fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 D1-5 and oxaliplatin D1 (cycle 1:130mg/m 2, cycle 2-3:85 mg/m 2). Radiotherapy was 50Gy in 2Gy/fraction, 5 days a week, concurrent with cycle 2 and 3 and weekly cetuximab. The primary objective was loco-regional control at one year. RESULTS: 52 patients were included. 51 were eligible for toxicity and survival analysis and 46 for recurrence analysis. Full radiotherapy dose was delivered to 80%, 75% received all three cycles of chemotherapy and 75% received four or more doses of cetuximab. The most common related grade III-IV adverse events were gastro-intestinal(16), hypersensitivity(6) and infection(5). There were two drug-related deaths. Within six months from the end of treatment, six patients died from complications from fistulas. The loco-regional control rate at one year was 47.3%(95%CI 30.9%-62.1%). Overall survival at three years was 29.1%(95% CI 17.4-41.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin and fluorouracil given concurrent with radiotherapy and cetuximab had an acceptable safety profile and showed a clinical response in patients with locoregionally advanced oesophageal cancer unsuitable for surgery. However, the primary end-point was not met, and the addition of cetuximab to definitive chemoradiotherapy cannot be recommended.

Pulmonary function and cardiac stress test after multimodality treatment of esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: Curative treatment of esophageal cancer is accompanied by frequent and sometimes severe side effects. However, prospectively collected data on side effects are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate if pulmonary function and exercise capacity were affected in the acute setting after neoadjuvant treatment and if there were long-lasting effects after neoadjuvant treatment and surgery. We also aimed to investigate whether the addition of radiation therapy to chemotherapy would aggravate side effects. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A cohort of 97 patients enrolled in the randomized NeoRes trial was used for the present analysis. The patients had been randomized to receive 3 cycles of cisplatin and fluorouracil with or without concurrent radiation therapy to 40 Gy. A cardiac stress test on a stationary bicycle and a spirometry were performed before and after neoadjuvant treatment and 1 to 2 years later after surgery provided that the cancer had not recurred. RESULTS: We found impairment in pulmonary function measured as vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second and a decrease in exercise capacity after neoadjuvant treatment and 1 to 2 years later after surgery. We did not detect any differences between patients treated with chemoradiation therapy and those treated with chemotherapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodality treatment of esophageal cancer caused short-term and lasting impairments in pulmonary function and exercise capacity. The reductions were not aggravated by the addition of radiation therapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.