[Impact of the diagnostic method for borderline personality disorder on the acute response and the risk of early relapse in major depressed individuals treated with ECT: A systematic literature review]. / Impact de la méthode diagnostique du trouble de personnalité borderline sur la réponse aiguë et le risque de rechute précoce chez les individus déprimés majeurs traités par ECT : une revue systématique de la littérature.

INTRODUCTION: Given the contradictory data available in the literature, the aim of this systematic review was to investigate the impact of the diagnostic method for borderline personality disorder (BPD) on the acute response and the risk of early relapse in major depressed individuals treated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). METHOD: After a systematic literature review performed during March 2023 in the PubMed-Medline database according to the PRISMA criteria, 47 articles were identified using the keyword algorithm ("Electroconvulsive Therapy" [Mesh] or electroconvulsive therapy) and ("Borderline Personality Disorder" [Mesh] or borderline personality disorder). The inclusion criteria applied for the selection of articles in this systematic review were: (1) articles investigating the impact of BPD on the acute response and/or the risk of early relapse in major depressed individuals (> 18 years old) treated with ECT, (2) diagnosis of BPD and major depressive disorder by validated screening tests and/or systematic psychiatric interviews based on diagnostic criteria of international classification, (3) any type of study (cross-sectional, longitudinal, prospective, retrospective, interventional and experimental), (4) articles written in English or French, and (5) articles published after January 2000. After assessment of the 47 articles based on these inclusion criteria by two authors, seven studies investigating the impact of BPD diagnosed by systematic psychiatric interview or screening tests on the acute response and the risk of early relapse in major depressed individuals treated with ECT were included in this systematic review. RESULTS: Unlike the three studies diagnosing BPD by screening tests, the four studies diagnosing BPD by systematic psychiatric interview demonstrated a negative impact of this personality disorder on the acute response or the risk of early relapse in major depressed individuals treated with ECT. However, all studies included in this systematic review presented a low level of scientific evidence (cross-sectional epidemiological studies and retrospective cohort studies). CONCLUSION: Despite the need for studies of better scientific quality, the results of this systematic review seem to indicate that screening for BPD by systematic psychiatric interview during the pre-ECT assessment and the establishment of adequate therapeutic strategies in case of comorbid BPD could be promising options to allow better acute response and better prevention of early relapses in major depressed individuals treated with ECT.

Etomidate versus propofol for electroconvulsive therapy: An intraindividual comparative study during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic markedly influenced mental health care practices, notably regarding electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). This was due to the redistribution of anesthetic agents used during ECT such as propofol, for intensive care units. Because in our center propofol was switched to etomidate to avoid ECT activity discontinuation, we undertook this study in order to compare Propofol and Etomidate regarding electroencephalographic seizure duration and stimulus intensity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective and comparative study, each patient being its own control. We included patients with at least two courses of ECT on propofol and two others with etomidate over the period from September 2019 to April 2021, regardless of the psychiatric diagnosis. Our data collection process notably targeted stimulus intensity, seizure duration recorded using electroencephalography, and medication used for anesthetic induction. RESULTS: Overall, we included 18 patients with a male: female ratio of 1:2.6 and a mean (and standard deviation) age of 62.7±13.4 years. We found that the mean intensity of stimulation was significantly lower with etomidate when compared to propofol (425.3±250.0 vs. 658.9±280.2 mC, P=0.001). The mean duration of electroencephalographic seizure was significantly higher with etomidate in comparison to propofol (53.5±16.6 vs. 35.0±12.2seconds, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: By using each patient as its own control, our study found that etomidate, while compared to propofol, was related to a lower level of stimulatory intensity and a longer electroencephalographic seizure duration.

ECT: An essential therapy in psychiatry.

At a time when innovations in psychiatry are booming, particularly in the field of medical devices, we thought it necessary, as members of French Society for Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology (AFPBN), to reconsider one of the oldest medical devices in psychiatry: the ECT apparatus. First, we recall the regulatory aspects of ECT. National guidelines define means of implementation and conditions of administration of ECT. Second, we remind of the indications and levels of evidence of ECT in the main psychiatric disorders, including catatonia. Then, we synthetize the place of ECT alongside other brain stimulation therapies, especially repetitive Trancranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS). Furthermore, we explain the general effects of ECT: increased neuronal plasticity and neurogenesis, enhancement of the stress axis, resistance to oxidative stress, improved vascular endothelial function, activation of microglia and astrocytes, decrease in inflammatory events by upregulation of neuroinflammatory cytokines, and production of mitochondrial ATP. These effects appear from the first sessions and continue during the course of ECT treatment, suggesting activation of endogenous neuroprotection. Finally, we remember that most patients perform as well or better on neuropsychological assessments after ECT, relative to pre-ECT results, and this improvement continues over the following months. Memory disorders reported post-ECT are not all attributable to ECT. They may be subjective in nature or linked to residual depressive (and possibly comorbid neurogenerative) symptoms later attributed to ECT, on the basis of preexisting negative representations. We urgently need to reemphasize the crucial role of ECT in psychiatric treatment strategies as well as the need to update ECT recommendations.

[Impact of an educational video on the representations of electroconvulsive therapy among psychiatrists in Hauts-de-France and Occitanie]. / Impact d'une vidéo pédagogique sur les croyances et représentations relatives à l'électro-convulsivothérapie chez les psychiatres des Hauts-de-France et d'Occitanie.

INTRODUCTION: Despite its effectiveness and good tolerance, electro-convulsive therapy (ECT) is under-used in current clinical practice probably because of stigma and the negative image of this treatment. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of an educational video on the representations of ECT among psychiatrists and psychiatric residents in the North and in Occitanie districts of France. METHOD: We evaluated the representations of ECT through the Questionnaire on Attitudes and Knowledge of ECT (QuAKE) before (T0) and after (T1) viewing a short educational video. Scores at T0 and T1 were compared with a paired t-test. Factors associated with the improvement of the representations were investigated using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: In all, 195 responses were obtained. The QuAKE score at T1 was significantly better than at T0 (29.4 at T1 vs. 31.5 at T0, P<0.001). The more negative the representations were at T0, the higher the probability of a decrease in the score at T1 (OR=1.07 [1.02-1.13], P=0.003). DISCUSSION: Our study showed a beneficial effect of a short educational video on psychiatrists' representations of ECT. The wide use of this type of media, allowing information and destigmatization, could considerably optimize access to ECT for patients.

[Electroconvulsive therapy during the perinatal period: Representations of mental health professionals]. / L'électroconvulsivothérapie en période périnatale : représentations des professionnels de santé mentale.

INTRODUCTION: Psychiatric disorders are common in peripartum and are associated with adverse outcomes for mother and fetus. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is one of the most effective and safe options to treat severe mental illness, including during the perinatal period. Nevertheless, it remains underutilized during this period, possibly due to negative representations. Research has been carried out on the representations and attitudes of caregivers towards ECT, but the specificities of these attitudes during peripartum have not been explored. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the attitudes towards ECT during the peripartum among psychiatrists, nurses, social workers and psychologists. The primary objective was to compare the score of favorability for ECT during peripartum according to the profession. The secondary objective was to highlight other factors involved in the favorability for ECT in peripartum. METHODS: We investigated mental health professionals' attitudes sending by e-mail an anonymous questionnaire in five hospitals in France. The questionnaire was composed of demographic details, one scale about the attitudes towards ECT (the Questionnaire on Attitudes and Knowledge of ECT (QuAKE)) used in several studies; in this questionnaire, a specific part for perinatal period has been added for our study, both using a Likert scale. The completion time for this online questionnaire was approximately 5 to 7minutes. A score of favorability for ECT in general and in peripartum was established for each participant. These scores represented the percentage of positive responses to favorable items and of negative responses to unfavorable items towards ECT. Comparison of the QuAKE answers with a sample of English caregivers in 2001 has been determined with χ2 tests. A Bonferroni correction was applied due to the large number of tests performed. Factors involved in the favorability for ECT have been studied with Pearson correlation, Kruskall-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty one professionals (80 psychiatrists, 78 nurses, 19 social workers and 44 psychologists) were included in the study. Their answers to the QuAKE questionnaire were comparable or more favorable to ECT than the English sample answered in 2001. The perinatal part of questionnaire had a good internal consistency (Cronbach coefficient: 0,91). Participants were less favorable to ECT in perinatal period (favorability score: 44.2) than in general (63.6). They more often responded « uncertain ¼ to the perinatal questionnaire (44,9 % against 18.4 % for the ECT in general; W=19931,5; P<0,001). The favorability for ECT in general and during peripartum were statistically associated with profession (psychiatrists were more favorable), specific training and experience in ECT. Gender, perinatal specialization, age, and the number of years in professional service were not associated with favorability for ECT in general and during peripartum in this study. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we have found that profession, training and experience in ECT are linked to the attitudes towards ECT, including in the perinatal period. It is necessary to inform professionals about the possibility of prescribing ECT in the perinatal period by training them in the specificities of pregnancy.

[Recommendations for a gradual and controlled resumption of electroconvulsive therapy in France during the period of lifting of the containment and of the COVID-19 pandemic linked to SARS-CoV-2]. / Recommandations pour une reprise progressive et contrôlée de l'électroconvulsivothérapie en France en période de levée du confinement et de pandémie COVID-19 liée au SARS-CoV-2.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had major consequences for the organization of care. In France and around the world, centers practicing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) have seen their activity decrease, or even stop for many reasons. In this context, maintaining or resuming this essential therapeutic activity for many patients suffering from psychiatric disorders requires material, human and logistical adaptations that should be supervised. The objective of this collective and national work is to offer simple recommendations that can be applied immediately by any healthcare establishment, public or private, practicing ECT. They are the result of feedback from multiprofessional and inter-establishment experiences. Declined in three stages, these recommendations are accompanied by a practical sheet which describes in detail the necessary conditions and prerequisites for any resumption of ECT activity.

[Evolution of electro-convulsive therapy activity in France since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic]. / Évolution de l'activité d'électro-convulsivo-thérapie en France depuis le début de la pandémie COVID-19.

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has led to major organisational changes in health care settings, especially in psychiatric hospitals. We conducted a national online survey to assess the evolution of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the different centres practicing this treatment. 65 responses from all over France were analysed. More than 90 % of the centres practising ECT experienced a decrease in their activity. Half of the centres experienced a total cessation of activity and 25 % of the centres experienced a decrease of more than half of their usual activity. Post-pandemic COVID-19 psychiatric care is expected to be difficult. It is essential not to add to this difficulty the complications, often serious, that will be associated with delaying or stopping the practice of ECT. It will also be necessary to remain vigilant with regard to the specific neuropsychiatric consequences that will follow the pandemic.

[Electroconvulsive therapy in combination with psychotropic and non-psychotropic pharmacological treatments: Review of the literature and practical recommendations]. / Électroconvulsivothérapie en association avec des traitements pharmacologiques psychotropes et non psychotropes : revue de la littérature et recommandations pratiques.

CONTEXT: Electro-convulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective treatment for treatment resistant mood disorders and catatonia. ECT also appears to be an effective treatment in combination with clozapine in the context of treatment resistant schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Although increasingly codified (guidelines on indications, contraindications, methods of implementation), the practice of ECT still lacks consensual protocols. The concomitant use of psychotropic and/or non-psychotropic medication is a common situation when ECT treatment is considered. To our knowledge, there is to date no summary of studies or case reports in France, nor any proposal for guidelines concerning the management of medication of the patient to whom ECT sessions are offered. Indeed, several particularities must be considered. This article proposes to specify for each pharmacological class the possible interaction between ECT and medication. A first section of this article will be devoted to non-psychotropic treatments, and a second section to psychotropic treatments. A practical summary table is also provided. METHOD: A review of the literature was conducted including all articles published prior to January 2019 referenced in Pub Med database, combining research with Medical Subject Headings "Electroconvulsive Therapy" and each following pharmacological class: "Cardiovascular Agents" "Bronchodilator Agents" "Bronchoconstrictor Agents" "Theophylline" "Anticoagulants" "Hypoglycemic Agents" "Insulin" "Potassium" "Benzodiazepines" "Valproic Acid" "Carbamazepine" "Lamotrigine" "Lithium" "Antidepressive Agents" "Antipsychotic Agents". RESULTS: After reading the titles, abstracts and whole articles, then searching for additional articles in the references, 50 articles were selected. A summary table summarizing the main risks and proposing a course of action has been produced. DISCUSSION: It is essential to take into account the specificity and the different physiological mechanisms involved in the ECT treatment in order to adjust the associated pharmacological treatments. The prescription for each molecule should be reviewed when ECT treatment is initiated.

[Malignant catatonia in dementia with Lewy Body successfully treated with sismotherapy: A case report]. / Catatonie maligne compliquant une démence à corps de Lewy traitée par électro-convulsivo-thérapie : à propos d'un cas.

Malignant catatonia is a life-threatening syndrome, associated mostly with psychiatric diseases but also with neurological and neurodegenerative syndromes. We report the case of a 72-year-old patient, hospitalized for a major depressive episode with delusional symptoms, who presented a malignant catatonia. The patient had been transferred to an intensive care unit and treated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) leading to a rapid disappearance of the catatonic syndrome associated with a remission of the depressive symptoms. Complementary investigations helped us to secondarily diagnose a Lewy Body Dementia, which probably caused, associated with a treatment by haloperidol, the onset of catatonia. This case illustrates the need of an early diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases in psychiatric outpatients and the importance of a quick management of catatonia, including ECT.

[Electroconvulsive therapy and nursing support]. / Électroconvulsivothérapie et accompagnement infirmier.

Electroconvulsive therapy is a therapeutic option offered as part of the global treatment of certain severe forms of psychiatric disorders. Carried out under general anaesthesia, this treatment is subject to specific clinical monitoring and support in which the nurse plays an active role.

[Perstimulus asystole during electroconvulsive therapy: Clinical case and critical literature review]. / Asystolie perstimulus résultant d'une hypertonie parasympathique au cours des électroconvulsivothérapies : cas clinique, brève revue de la littérature et discussion.

INTRODUCTION: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is most frequently indicated for episodes of melancholic depression, but is also useful in the treatment of maniac syndrome and some schizophrenia subtypes. ECT is part of the treatment of movement disorders, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and even in the treatment of severe conversions. Although the therapeutic results are excellent when used appropriately, the mortality rate is estimated between 2 and 4 for 100,000 shocks. Despite this mortality rate, the benefit-risk ratio remains very positive and serious complications are extremely rare. ECT results in a biphasic cardiological effect: firstly a perstimulus parasympathetic hypertonia contemporary to the seizure's tonic phase, then a phase of contemporary sympathetic hypertonia during the epileptic clonic movement. We will focus on the perstimulus asystole as it is by far the most frequent. Very few cases and even less studies have been referenced in the literature; here, we present a clinical case followed by a discussion. CLINICAL CASE: The patient is in his fifties and has been treated for many years for a unipolar mood disorder with recurrent melancholic depressive episodes. With each new depressive episode, the clinical evolution is rapidly positive after a few sessions of ECT. Maintenance ECT was not retained due to the supra-annual periodicity of the melancholic depressive episodes and rapid recovery after electric treatment. Then, this patient developed another depressive decline in mood comparable to the previous one, despite adapted blood lithium levels associated with a new generation antidepressant treatment. According to his history, a hospitalisation was programmed to carry out a new course of ECT. Considering the short duration of the first seizures, the intensity of the stimulus was progressively increased. At 180 joules, the patient presented an immediate per-stimulus asystole of 20seconds which ceased spontaneously. The specialized cardiologic consultation following the rhythmic episode was reassuring: the patient's cardiac condition remained stable. However, after discussion with the patient and his family, we decided to stop the ECT. Was this a reasonable decision? DISCUSSION: According to the literature, the patient's medical history, sex, psychiatric diagnosis, the shock parameters (level of energy applied, duration of the stimulus, number of shocks) and clinical results, are not predictive factors in the occurrence of an asystole. Concerning the ECT protocol, the vagus nerve seems less stimulated during bifrontal stimulations in opposition to unilateral stimulations. Perasystolic patients are younger and have less prior history of cardiovascular disease or ECG abnormalities. Although the patients receiving ECT are often taking several medications (antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, anticholinergic correctors, calcium channel blockers, loop diuretics, converting enzyme inhibitors), these drugs are not considered as facilitating asystoles. No increase in the frequency of asystole had been observed when taking an average dose psychotropic treatment allowing the continuation of an antidepressant treatment at the recommended dose. Differently, lithium is regularly stopped during the shock phase as it could - even a few days after being stopped - potentiate the effects of succinylcholine and increase the vagal tone. Succinylcholine seems to promote asystole, whilst caffeine, methohexital and trimethaphan do not. The hypersympathetic phase can be controlled by a betablocker (propranolol, esmolol, labetalol) that does not increase the prior risk of asystole. Anticholinergic premedication using atropine does not appear to be systematic and could even potentially induce tachy-dysarrhythmia. However, in the case of perstimulus asystole, most authors recommend continuing the shocks with doses of atropine around 0.4 to 1mg. PHYSIOPATHOLOGY: Vagal stimulation is preferentially central and directly linked to the electric excitation of the lateral dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve. Younger patients with no cardiac history are more at risk. This could be explained by the fact that juvenile tissue conducts electricity more rapidly than senescent (the difference being probably due to the fibrosis and adipose tissue which reduce its conductive capacity). Finally, it is appropriate to question the direct therapeutic aspect of vagal stimulation which constitutes an experimental treatment of resistant depression. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of perstimulus asystole is not considered as a serious complication of ECT and therefore as a contra-indication to any future sessions. On the contrary, most authors are campaigning for the continuation of shocks with the possibility of adding prophylactic intravenous atropine. Cardiac arrest reminds us that ECT requires a special attention to its cardiovascular effect, which emphasizes the role of interdisciplinarity between anaesthesiologists and psychiatrists.

[Electroconvulsive therapy and level of evidence: From causality to dose-effect relationship]. / Électroconvulsivothérapie et niveau de preuve : de la causalité à la relation dose-effet.

OBJECTIVES: The first objective of this article is to summarize the history of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in psychiatry in order to highlight the transition from clinical level of evidence based on phenomenological descriptions to controlled trial establishing causal relationship. The second objective is to apply the criteria of causation for ECT, to focus on the dose-effect relationship criteria, and thus to analyze the conditions of application of these criteria for ECT. METHODS: A literature review exploring the use of electricity, ECT and electroencephalography (EEG) in psychiatry was conducted. The publications were identified from the Pubmed and GoogleScholar electronic databases. The scientific literature search of international articles was performed in July 2016. RESULTS: In 1784, a Royal commission established in France by King Louis XVI tested Mesmer's claims concerning animal magnetism. By doing that, the commission, including such prominent scientists as the chemist Anton Lavoisier and the scientist and researcher on electricity and therapeutics Benjamin Franklin, played a central role in establishing the criteria needed to assess the level of evidence of electrical therapeutics in psychiatry. Surprisingly, it is possible to identify the classical Bradford Hill criteria of causation in the report of the commission, except the dose-effect relationship criteria. Since then, it has been conducted blinded randomized controlled trials that confirmed the effectiveness of ECT against ECT placebos for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. At present, the dose-effect relationship criteria can be analyzed through an EEG quality assessment of ECT-induced seizures. CONCLUSIONS: EEG quality assessment includes several indices: TSLOW (time to onset of seizure activity ≤5Hz, seconds), peak mid-ictal amplitude (mm), regularity (intensity or morphology of the seizure (0-6)), stereotypy (global seizure patterning, 0-3) and post-ictal suppression (0-3). A manual rating sheet is needed to score theses indices. Such manual rating with example of EEG segments recording is proposed in this article. Additional studies are needed to validate this manual, to better establish the dose-response relationship for the ECT, and thus strengthen the position of the EEG as a central element for clinical good practice for ECT.

Catatonic syndrome: From detection to therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Catatonia is a psychomotor syndrome which can include motor, mental, behavioral and vegetative symptoms. Exclusively associated with schizophrenia until the 1970s, catatonia still remains an under-diagnosed syndrome with significant morbidity and mortality. LITERATURE FINDINGS: As a result of its different forms and developments, catatonic syndrome can be associated with many organic and psychiatric etiologies and confused with a variety of diagnoses. In addition to its organic complications, malignant catatonia can also be extremely severe. Several diagnostic scales are described, those of Bush and Peralta being the most widely used. Despite the recent development of the DSM-5, we can regret the lack of progress in the international classifications concerning both the recognition of the etiological diversity of this syndrome and in the clinical and therapeutic approaches to it. The diagnosis is based solely on clinical data, and needs to be completed by information from paraclinical settings, particularly with respect to detecting organic etiology. The first-line treatment is still based on the use of certain benzodiazepines or benzodiazepine-like agents such as lorazepam, diazepam and zolpidem. If the first or second line fails, or in case of malignant catatonia, electroconvulsive therapy is recommended. For the periodic form, no large-sample study has been performed on long-term treatment. A few case reports suggest the use of lithium in periodic catatonia, specifically to prevent recurrent episodes or at least to extend the inter-episode intervals. Other studies are in favor of the use of benzodiazepines, with disagreement between gradual discontinuation and long-term treatment. Concerning the management of catatonia in patients with schizophrenia, for whom first-line benzodiazepines are often insufficient, certain atypical antipsychotics such as clozapine or quetiapine appear efficient. These data are also applicable to children and adolescents. CONCLUSION: Often neglected by practitioners, catatonic syndrome remains a common entity of which it is important to be aware, especially in case of rapid installation of the symptoms. Diagnostic scales should be used and a lorazepam test should be performed to avoid delaying the diagnosis. Second-line therapy requires further study. This concerns in particular diazepam, anti-NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) and rTMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation). Some specificities of catatonia, such as the periodic form and cases in patients with schizophrenia, also require further evaluations.

[Catatonia]. / La catatonie.

In the new classification of the DSM-V, catatonia is individualized as a disease of its own. It is defined by presence of at least two out of five criteria: motor immobility, negativism, echolalia or echopraxia, sterile motor activity, atypical movements. The priority is to look first for organic causes: the main ones are neurologic disorders. Intoxication may also be found (illegal drugs or medication), and the role of neuroleptic malignant syndrome in catatonia remains unclear. Among the psychiatric causes, first come bipolar disorders, especially mania; then schizophrenia. Idiopathic forms can also be observed. Epidemiological work on catatonia show highly variable results, highlighting a possible underestimation of the diagnosis. Among the differential diagnoses, which are rare motor syndromes, neuroleptic malignant syndrome and serotonin syndrome are also discussed. The diagnosis of catatonia is clinical and can be obtained using standardized diagnostic scales. The use of zolpidem provides both a diagnostic and therapeutic guidance for the degree of response to drug treatment. The physiopathological hypotheses describe an intracerebral GABAergic, dopaminergic and glutamatergic dysfunction in catatonic patients. The complete mechanisms are still partly unknown. Benzodiazepines are the first treatment of choice. Electroconvulsive therapy is used secondarily or in severe cases. First-generation antipsychotics are prohibited, at the risk of worsening the catatonia in becoming malignant and lethal. The renewed interest in the catatonic syndrome during the past recent years has expanded research on the mechanisms of this syndrome and opened the way to new therapeutic options. The latest works tend to modulate the strict prohibition of antipsychotic in a catatonic patient.

[Antimanic treatments in bipolar mixed states]. / Traitements anti- maniaques dans les états mixtes.

INTRODUCTION: Mixed states present nosologic and diagnostic challenges with a relative paucity of evidence to guide treatment. Mixed bipolar states are difficult to treat and are associated with a high neuropsychiatric morbidity, a high risk of suicide and a poor outcome. In DSM- 5, the definition of mixed episode has been removed (in DSM- IV TR: "juxtaposed full manic and depressive episodes"). Mixed symptoms are captured under a broader concept called "mixed features" that is applied to mania and depression. The classification of mixed states as defined in DSM- 5 is less restrictive than in DSM- IV TR and challenges us at methodological and therapeutic levels. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper was to conduct an overview of the literature to ascertain the efficacy of pharmacotherapy of mixed states. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed. RESULTS: Manic symptoms of mixed episodes seem to show a good response to second generation antipsychotics and to divalproate. There is no evidence of differential efficacy for second generation of antipsychotics (SGAs). Lithium and carbamazepine may be effective in mixed states in monotherapy and perhaps benefit in combination with SGAs as second line. Combination pharmacological treatment of SGAs and moodstabilizers are common in mixed states. This pattern has the best literature evidence. CONCLUSIONS: There is a few evidence to help us to choose the right treatment for patients with mixed state. In light with the DSM 5, more drugs specifically designed to treat mixed state are needed.

[The interest of maintenance electroconvulsive therapy in mood disorders]. / Intérêt de l'électroconvulsivothérapie de maintenance dans les troubles de l'humeur.

Maintenance electroconvulsive therapy (M-ECT) is a treatment indicated for the treatment and prevention of recurrent depression in patients who either do not respond or do not tolerate psychotropic medication. We evaluated, retrospectively, clinical response to a 6-month minimum course of M-ECT in 25 patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder according to DSM IV-TR criterion. Our study demonstrated a significant improvement of Global Assessment of functioning (GAF) scores after a six month minimum course of M-ECT (34.8 ± 12.6 vs 65.6 ± 10.8; P<0.05) as well as Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores (BPRS): 79.3 ± 12.4 vs 43.4 ± 10.2; P<0.05). We observed a slight increase of Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores after M-ECT; nonetheless, it was not statistically significant (24.2 ± 2.4 vs 26.2 ± 2.4; P=0.2). Regarding the mean duration of hospitalizations, we showed a statistically significant decrease in the median number of days of hospitalization (72 [59-93.50] days before M-ECT vs 43 [25-76] days since the first M-ECT; P=0.017). Maintenance ECT allowed a significant improvement in psychiatric symptoms and global functioning of the patients included in this study, as well as a decrease in the number of days of hospitalization. However, our pattern is limited because of its small size; so, further prospective studies in this field, including larger population is highly recommended.