Targeting ubiquitination machinery in cystic fibrosis: Where do we stand?

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease caused by mutations in CFTR gene expressing the anion selective channel CFTR located at the plasma membrane of different epithelial cells. The most commonly investigated variant causing CF is F508del. This mutation leads to structural defects in the CFTR protein, which are recognized by the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) quality control system. As a result, the protein is retained in the ER and degraded via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Although blocking ubiquitination to stabilize the CFTR protein has long been considered a potential pharmacological approach in CF, progress in this area has been relatively slow. Currently, no compounds targeting this pathway have entered clinical trials for CF. On the other hand, the emergence of Orkambi initially, and notably the subsequent introduction of Trikafta/Kaftrio, have demonstrated the effectiveness of molecular chaperone-based therapies for patients carrying the F508del variant and even showed efficacy against other variants. These treatments directly target the CFTR variant protein without interfering with cell signaling pathways. This review discusses the limits and potential future of targeting protein ubiquitination in CF.

Outcome of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis and solid organ transplantation.

We report a case series of four patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and previous solid organ transplantation (SOT) receiving elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor therapy for 6 months or more. Data was collected retrospectively. The treatment was well tolerated and all patients reported subjective improvements.

Ivacaftor or lumacaftor/ivacaftor treatment does not alter the core CF airway epithelial gene response to rhinovirus.

BACKGROUND: Aberrant responses by the cystic fibrosis airway epithelium during viral infection may underly the clinical observations. Whether CFTR modulators affect antiviral responses by CF epithelia is presently unknown. We tested the hypothesis that treatment of CF epithelial cells with ivacaftor (Iva) or ivacaftor/lumacaftor (Iva/Lum) would improve control of rhinovirus infection. METHODS: Nineteen CF epithelial cultures (10 homozygous for p.Phe508del as CFTR Class 2, 9 p.Phe508del/p.Gly551Asp as Class 3) were infected with rhinovirus 1B at multiplicity of infection 12 for 24 h. Culture RNA and supernatants were harvested to assess gene and protein expression respectively. RESULTS: RNA-seq analysis comparing rhinovirus infected cultures to control identified 796 and 629 differentially expressed genes for Class 2 and Class 3, respectively. This gene response was highly conserved when cells were treated with CFTR modulators and were predicted to be driven by the same interferon-pathway transcriptional regulators (IFNA, IFNL1, IFNG, IRF7, STAT1). Direct comparisons between treated and untreated infected cultures did not yield any differentially expressed genes for Class 3 and only 68 genes for Class 2. Changes were predominantly related to regulators of lipid metabolism and inflammation, aspects of epithelial biology known to be dysregulated in CF. In addition, CFTR modulators did not affect viral copy number, or levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines produced post-infection. CONCLUSIONS: Though long-term clinical data is not yet available, results presented here suggest that first generation CFTR modulators do not interfere with core airway epithelial responses to rhinovirus infection. Future work should investigate the latest triple modulation therapies.