Restoration of constitutional alignment optimizes outcomes of computer navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The value of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for arthritic knees continues to be debated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of navigated TKA associated with updated alignment philosophy. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 38 consecutive patients (76 knees) and were randomly assigned to both groups. The demographic data and perioperative data were recorded. The coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification was used to classify knee alignment phenotypes. Radiographic outcomes were measured and subgroup analysis was further performed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Surgery-related complications were recorded. RESULTS: The distribution of CPAK phenotypes following constitutional aligned TKA was equivalent to the native cohort, whereas the mechanical aligned TKA dramatically altered the phenotype distribution from type I and type II to type V and type IV. Final implant positioning was different between groups, with constitutional aligned TKA having larger cTCA (P = .004), joint line obliquity (P = .006), joint line distance (P = .033) and smaller sFCA (P = .013). Subgroup analysis showed higher actual accuracy of component positioning was achieved in navigated TKA, especially in knees with deformity of > 10° (P < .05). Patients reported higher HSS score at three months postoperatively in constitutional aligned group (P = .002). One patient in navigated group suffered femoral pin site fracture caused by a minor trauma. CONCLUSION: Computer navigated TKA allows for restoration of constitutional alignment and minimizes soft tissue release, which when compared to mechanical alignment may be associated with superior early outcomes.

Functional alignment in total knee arthroplasty best achieves balanced gaps and minimal bone resections: an analysis comparing mechanical, kinematic and functional alignment strategies.

PURPOSE: Key concepts in total knee arthroplasty include restoration of limb alignment and soft-tissue balance. Although differences in balance have been reported amongst mechanical alignment (MA), kinematic alignment (KA) and functional alignment (FA) techniques, it remains unclear whether there are differences in gap imbalance or resection thicknesses when comparing different constitutional alignment subgroups. METHODS: MA (measured resection technique), KA (matched resections technique) and FA (technique based on the restricted KA boundaries) were compared in 116 consecutive patients undergoing 137 robotic-assisted cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties. The primary outcome was the proportion of balanced gaps (differential laxities ≤ 2 mm) for extension, flexion, medial and lateral gap measurements. Manual pre-resection laxity measurements were obtained for MA and KA and manual post-resection measurements were obtained for FA in 10° and in 90° of knee flexion. Secondary outcomes were resection depths and implant alignment. All outcomes were analysed per constitutional coronal alignment and joint line obliquity subgroups. RESULTS: The proportions of balance in all four gap measurements were 54.7%, 66.4% and 96.5%, with MA, KA and FA, respectively. Across all constitutional alignment types, FA achieved the highest proportion of balance. MA resected the least amount of bone from the medial tibial plateau. KA had femoral components in most valgus and most internally rotated, tibial components in most varus and was the most bone-preserving for the posteromedial femoral condyle. FA had the most externally rotated femoral components and was most bone-preserving for the distal femoral resections. CONCLUSION: The study shows that implant alignment to the mechanical axis or joint line anatomy (equal resections) alone does not guarantee a balanced total knee arthroplasty. FA resulted in the highest proportion of balanced knees across all analysed subgroups. Future research will consider whether one alignment philosophy leads to superior outcomes for different constitutional alignment subgroups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Constitutional and postoperative joint line obliquity can predict serial alignment change after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: analysis using coronal plane alignment of the knee classification.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were (1) to clarify the distribution of the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) phenotype in patients who underwent medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and (2) to identify the predictive factors for postoperative serial alignment changes after OWHTO by analyzing constitutional phenotypes. METHODS: Patients who underwent OWHTO between March 2014 and December 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Those who completed a minimum follow-up of 3 years were divided into three groups based on the direction of alignment changes from postoperative 3 months to the final follow-up: Group 1 (varus direction) when the weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR) change was less than - 4%, Group 2 (maintained) when the WBLR change was between - 4% and 4%, and Group 3 (valgus direction) when the WBLR change was greater than 4%. The following parameters were assessed serially and compared between the groups: (1) radiologic parameters of coronal limb alignment such as joint line obliquity (JLO), (2) CPAK phenotypes, and (3) clinical outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 163 knees were included, and the average duration of follow-up was 4.8 ± 1.6 years. More apex distal JLO was observed in the order of Group 1, 2, and 3 at all times (all p < 0.05). The most common CPAK type was type (I + II) (constitutional: apex distal JLO) + type (V + VI) (postoperative 3 months: neutral JLO) in Group 1 (29.4%; p = 0.000); otherwise, the most common CPAK type was type (IV + V) (constitutional: neutral JLO) + type (VIII + IX) (postoperative 3 months: apex proximal JLO) in Group 3 (11.7%; p = 0.000). Clinical outcomes did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: Constitutional and postoperative JLO were predictive factors of postoperative alignment changes after OWHTO. Constitutional apex distal and postoperative neutral JLO had a tendency for varus alignment progression, whereas constitutional neutral and postoperative apex proximal JLO had a tendency for valgus alignment progression. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study; Level III.

Long leg radiographs underestimate the degree of constitutional varus limb alignment and joint line obliquity in comparison with computed tomography: a radiographic study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to understand if differences exist between computed tomography (CT) and long leg radiographs (LLR) when defining coronal plane alignment of the lower limb in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It aimed to identify any such differences between the two imaging modalities by quantifying constitutional limb alignment (arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), joint line obliquity (JLO) and Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) type within the same population. METHODS: A retrospective radiographic study compared pre-operative LLR and CT measurements in patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA. The aHKA, JLO and CPAK types were calculated after measuring the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA). The primary outcomes were the mean differences in aHKA (MPTA-LDFA), JLO (MPTA + LDFA) and proportions of CPAK types between LLR and CT groups. The secondary outcomes were the differences in CT-derived MPTA values based on four different tibial sagittal landmarks. RESULTS: After exclusions, 465 imaging sets were analysed in 394 patients. There was a statistically significant mean difference between LLR and CT, respectively, for both MPTA (87.5° vs. 86.2°; p < 0.01) and LDFA (88.7° vs. 87.3°; p < 0.01). There were also statistically significant differences for aHKA (- 0.2° vs. - 1.1°) and JLO (175.1° vs. 173.4°) for LLR and CT, respectively (both p < 0.01). CT increased the proportion of patients with CPAK Type I (constitutional varus aHKA, apex distal JLO) and CPAK Type II (neutral aHKA, apex distal JLO), and decreased numbers of CPAK Types III-VI. There were significant mean differences in the MPTA using varying sagittal landmarks. CONCLUSION: Alignment determined by LLRs underestimates the magnitude of both constitutional varus alignment and joint line obliquity compared to CT, differences that notably increase the proportions of patients included in CPAK Types I and II. These distinctions are primarily due to underestimation of proximal tibial varus when measured on LLRs compared to CT, which more specifically defines articular weight-bearing points. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Constitutional alignment predicts medial ligament balancing in mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty for varus knees.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify if constitutional alignment and preoperative radiologic parameters determined whether medial gap balancing was required in mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Two hundred and sixty three patients with 394 consecutive knees who underwent primary TKAs were retrospectively analysed in this study. Selective sequential multiple needle puncturing (MNP) was performed for medial ligament balancing when required. Constitutional alignment, which was determined using the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification, as well as preoperative and postoperative radiologic parameters was evaluated to identify factors which predicted the need for MNP. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty eight (40.1%) knees required medial ligament balancing with MNP. Patients who required MNP during surgery had significantly more constitutional varus, more varus preoperative mechanical Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (mHKA), smaller preoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and a larger change in mHKA and MPTA after surgery than those who did not. Patients with constitutional varus also had a higher incidence of having had MNP to both anterior and posterior superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) fibres. There was no significant difference in preoperative lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), posterior tibial slope (PTS) and varus-valgus difference (VVD) between groups. CONCLUSION: Ligament balancing using MNP was determined by constitutional alignment rather than medial soft tissue contracture. Patients with constitutional varus who had a larger medio-lateral gap difference in extension also had a higher incidence of having had MNP to both anterior and posterior sMCL fibres. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, level IV.

Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle and stressed hip-knee-ankle angle: equivalent methods for estimating constitutional lower limb alignment in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA) relies on precise determination of constitutional alignment to set resection targets. The arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) is a radiographic method to estimate constitutional alignment following onset of arthritis. Intraoperatively, constitutional alignment may also be approximated using navigation-based angular measurements of deformity correction, termed the stressed HKA (sHKA). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between these methods of estimating constitutional alignment to better understand their utility in KA TKA. METHODS: A radiological and intraoperative computer-assisted navigation study was undertaken comparing measurements of the aHKA using radiographs and computed tomography (CT-aHKA) to the sHKA in 88 TKAs meeting the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the difference in the paired means between the three methods to determine constitutional alignment (aHKA, CT-aHKA, sHKA). Secondary outcomes included testing agreement across measurements using Bland-Altman plots and analysis of subgroup differences based on different patterns of compartmental arthritis. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between any paired comparison or across groups (aHKA vs. sHKA: 0.1°, p = 0.817; aHKA vs. CT-aHKA: 0.3°, p = 0.643; CT-aHKA vs. sHKA: 0.2°, p = 0.722; ANOVA, p = 0.845). Bland-Altman plots were consistent with good agreement for all comparisons, with approximately 95% of values within limits of agreement. There was no difference in the three paired comparisons (aHKA, CT-aHKA, and sHKA) for knees with medial compartment arthritis. However, these findings were not replicated in knees with lateral compartment arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between the arithmetic HKA (whether obtained using CT or radiographs) and the stressed HKA in this analysis. These findings further validate the preoperative arithmetic method and support use of the intraoperative stressed HKA as techniques to restore constitutional lower limb alignment in KA TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The importance of joint line obliquity: a radiological analysis of restricted boundaries in normal knee phenotypes to inform surgical decision making in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore native soft tissue laxities while limiting alignment extremes that risk prosthetic failure. However, there is no consensus where restricted boundaries (RB) should be set. This study aims to determine the proportion of limbs in which constitutional alignment and joint line obliquity (JLO) would be restored with various RB scenarios, to inform decision making in rKA TKA. METHODS: The mechanical hip-knee-ankle (mHKA) angle, arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) angle, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured on radiographs of 500 normal knees. Incrementally wider RBs were then applied. The proportion of limbs within each increment was determined when RBs were applied only to HKA, or to HKA, LDFA and MPTA together. In addition, the proportion of limbs within published adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA) and rKA protocols were determined, as well as those within one, two and three standard deviations of the means for HKA, LDFA and MPTA. RESULTS: When restrictions to mHKA alone were applied, 74.0% and 97.8% of knees were captured with boundaries of ± 3° and ± 6° respectively. However, when the same boundaries to HKA were also applied to MPTA and LDFA, 36.2% and 91.0% of knees were captured respectively, highlighting the limiting effect that JLO has on restoration of normal knee phenotypes. When comparing previously published boundaries, aMA of 0° ± 3° captured 36.2%; rKA of 0° ± 3 for HKA and 85° to 95° for LDFA/MPTA captured 67.8%; rKA of - 5° to 4° HKA and 86°-93° for LDFA/MPTA captured 63%; and rKA of - 6° to + 3° for HKA and 84°-93° for LDFA/MPTA captured 85.4%. CONCLUSION: The greatest proportions of normal knee phenotypes were captured with boundaries that were centred around population means for HKA and JLO. Further, these findings demonstrate that restricting the JLO has a significant limiting influence on restoration of normal knee phenotypes beyond that of restricting HKA alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Kinematic alignment matches functional alignment for the extension gap: a consecutive analysis of 749 primary varus osteoarthritic knees with stress radiographs.

PURPOSE: The alignment goal in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains debated. Two major strategies have emerged based on recreating the native knee: kinematic and functional alignment (KA and FA). Recently a new Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification for KA, based on bony landmarks, was described considering joint line obliquity and the arithmetic HipKneeAnkle angle (aHKA). Valgus corrected HKA medial angle (vcHKA) was measured on distractive valgus preoperative radiographs compensating for cartilage wear and ligament balance in varus osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to determine if aHKA accounts for differences in medial laxity for the extension gap by comparing vcHKA to aHKA. The hypothesis was that no significant difference would be observed between the two measurements. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 749 knees in consecutive patients presenting to a single-centre with primary medial osteoarthritis. Patients underwent standardized weight bearing long-leg and valgus stress radiographs. Tibial mechanical angle (TMA), femoral mechanical angle (FMA) and vcHKA were measured using digital software. aHKA and vcHKA were compared to determine differences due to soft tissue balancing. RESULTS: The mean FMA was 91.3 ± 2.2° (range 82°-97°), the mean TMA was 85.7 ± 2.5° (range 75°-98°), the mean aHKA was 177.0 ± 3.0° (range 164°-185°) and the mean vcHKA was 176.6 ± 3.1° (range 165°-192°). No significant difference was observed between aHKA and vcHKA (p = 0.06). A significant correlation was found between vcHKA and TMA (ρ = 0.3; p < 0.001) and between vcHKA and FMA (ρ = 0.41; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that vcHKA was similar to aHKA confirming that aHKA accounts for ligamentous medial laxity. Therefore, kinematic alignment based on the CPAK classification matches the pre-arthritic coronal alignment of the knee for the extension gap. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Residual varus alignment can reduce joint awareness, restore joint parallelism, and preserve the soft tissue envelope during total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: The objectives were to compare the coronal joint configuration of the knee joints, coronal gap imbalances requiring substantial medial release, and patient-reported outcomes, including the forgotten joint score, between knees in which residual varus alignment was intentionally allowed according to an individualised lower limb analysis and those with mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis. METHODS: Consecutive primary navigated total knee arthroplasty procedures for varus osteoarthritis were retrospectively reviewed. The study cohort was stratified based on whether residual varus alignment was intentionally allowed. Propensity-score matching was performed based on the baseline characteristics, including demographic characteristics, preoperative radiological measurements, and the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (mechanical alignment group vs residual varus group). The patient-reported outcomes and coronal joint line orientation of the knee (relative to the ground) and ankle were evaluated. Coronal gap differences and coronal gap imbalances were analysed using intraoperative gap measurements. RESULTS: Relative to the ground and ankle, the postoperative knee joint line orientation slanted down laterally in the mechanical alignment group (- 3.05˚ ± 1.62, relative to the ground; - 2.65˚ ± 1.56, relative to the ankle joint), but was parallel in the residual varus group (- 0.75˚ ± 1.59, relative to the ground; - 0.95˚ ± 1.71, relative to the ankle joint). Coronal gap differences at extension and the proportion of coronal gap imbalances requiring substantial medial release were 1.27 ± 1.53 and 6% in the residual varus group and 2.32 ± 1.24 and 15% in the mechanical alignment group. Postoperatively, the residual varus group showed higher Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index scores and total forgotten joint scores than the mechanical alignment group (6.97 ± 4.75 vs. 10.31 ± 5.74 and 56.42 ± 12.85 vs. 45.69 ± 14.49, respectively). CONCLUSION: Intentionally allowed residual varus alignment with individualised analysis of lower limb alignment restored the parallel joint line of the knees, preserved the soft tissue envelope, and reduced joint awareness after total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III retrospective case-control study.

Increased prevalence of valgus constitutional alignment subtypes in a South African arthritic population group using the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification.

BACKGROUND: Knee alignment philosophies and patient specific models to improve patient reported outcomes are gaining increasing attention. The coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification describes nine knee phenotypes and then proposes surgical alignment strategies to achieve constitutional alignment. The CPAK classification has been validated in Australian, European, Asian and North American population groups. To date no African data has been analyzed using CPAK. METHODS: A total of 344 arthritic patients (608 knees) with appropriate long leg radiographs were classified based on the CPAK type. Measurements included mechanical hip-knee-angle(mHKA), medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and the derived calculations of joint line obliquity (JLO) and arithmetic hip-knee-angle (aHKA). RESULTS: The sample population was 77.9% (n = 268) female with a mean age of 68.4 ± 9.2 years. The most common CPAK types in order were type 3 (n = 174; 28.6%), type 2 (n = 155; 25.5%), type 1 (n = 94; 15.5%) and type 6 (n = 80; 13.2%). The most common limb alignment types were valgus (CPAK types 3,6,9; 41.8%). CONCLUSION: This study, which investigated arthritic patients from a single institution in South Africa, shows a divergence of CPAK phenotypic knee patterns relative to other international studies, with much higher proportions of valgus phenotypes (3 and 6). This regional difference should be further investigated in other South African and African population samples and used to adapt the surgical strategies employed by local surgeons.

The language of knee alignment : updated definitions and considerations for reporting outcomes in total knee arthroplasty.

Orthopaedic surgeons are currently faced with an overwhelming number of choices surrounding total knee arthroplasty (TKA), not only with the latest technologies and prostheses, but also fundamental decisions on alignment philosophies. From 'mechanical' to 'adjusted mechanical' to 'restricted kinematic' to 'unrestricted kinematic' - and how constitutional alignment relates to these - there is potential for ambiguity when thinking about and discussing such concepts. This annotation summarizes the various alignment strategies currently employed in TKA. It provides a clear framework and consistent language that will assist surgeons to compare confidently and contrast the concepts, while also discussing the latest opinions about alignment in TKA. Finally, it provides suggestions for applying consistent nomenclature to future research, especially as we explore the implications of 3D alignment patterns on patient outcomes.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):102-108.

Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA): An algorithm for estimating constitutional lower limb alignment in the arthritic patient population.

AIMS: Once knee arthritis and deformity have occurred, it is currently not known how to determine a patient's constitutional (pre-arthritic) limb alignment. The purpose of this study was to describe and validate the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) algorithm as a straightforward method for preoperative planning and intraoperative restoration of the constitutional limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A comparative cross-sectional, radiological study was undertaken of 500 normal knees and 500 arthritic knees undergoing TKA. By definition, the aHKA algorithm subtracts the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) from the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). The mechanical HKA (mHKA) of the normal group was compared to the mHKA of the arthritic group to examine the difference, specifically related to deformity in the latter. The mHKA and aHKA were then compared in the normal group to assess for differences related to joint line convergence. Lastly, the aHKA of both the normal and arthritic groups were compared to test the hypothesis that the aHKA can estimate the constitutional alignment of the limb by sharing a similar centrality and distribution with the normal population. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in means and distributions of the mHKA of the normal group compared to the arthritic group (mean -1.33° (SD 2.34°) vs mean -2.88° (SD 7.39°) respectively; p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between normal and arthritic groups using the aHKA (mean -0.87° (SD 2.54°) vs mean -0.77° (SD 2.84°) respectively; p = 0.550). There was no significant difference in the MPTA and LDFA between the normal and arthritic groups. CONCLUSION: The arithmetic HKA effectively estimated the constitutional alignment of the lower limb after the onset of arthritis in this cross-sectional population-based analysis. This finding is of significant importance to surgeons aiming to restore the constitutional alignment of the lower limb during TKA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(5):351-358.

Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification.

AIMS: A comprehensive classification for coronal lower limb alignment with predictive capabilities for knee balance would be beneficial in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This paper describes the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification and examines its utility in preoperative soft tissue balance prediction, comparing kinematic alignment (KA) to mechanical alignment (MA). METHODS: A radiological analysis of 500 healthy and 500 osteoarthritic (OA) knees was used to assess the applicability of the CPAK classification. CPAK comprises nine phenotypes based on the arithmetic HKA (aHKA) that estimates constitutional limb alignment and joint line obliquity (JLO). Intraoperative balance was compared within each phenotype in a cohort of 138 computer-assisted TKAs randomized to KA or MA. Primary outcomes included descriptive analyses of healthy and OA groups per CPAK type, and comparison of balance at 10° of flexion within each type. Secondary outcomes assessed balance at 45° and 90° and bone recuts required to achieve final knee balance within each CPAK type. RESULTS: There was similar frequency distribution between healthy and arthritic groups across all CPAK types. The most common categories were Type II (39.2% healthy vs 32.2% OA), Type I (26.4% healthy vs 19.4% OA) and Type V (15.4% healthy vs 14.6% OA). CPAK Types VII, VIII, and IX were rare in both populations. Across all CPAK types, a greater proportion of KA TKAs achieved optimal balance compared to MA. This effect was largest, and statistically significant, in CPAK Types I (100% KA vs 15% MA; p < 0.001), Type II (78% KA vs 46% MA; p = 0.018). and Type IV (89% KA vs 0% MA; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CPAK is a pragmatic, comprehensive classification for coronal knee alignment, based on constitutional alignment and JLO, that can be used in healthy and arthritic knees. CPAK identifies which knee phenotypes may benefit most from KA when optimization of soft tissue balance is prioritized. Further, it will allow for consistency of reporting in future studies. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):329-337.

The arithmetic HKA (aHKA) predicts the constitutional alignment of the arthritic knee compared to the normal contralateral knee: a matched-pairs radiographic study.

AIMS: An algorithm to determine the constitutional alignment of the lower limb once arthritic deformity has occurred would be of value when undertaking kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to determine if the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) algorithm could estimate the constitutional alignment of the lower limb following development of significant arthritis. METHODS: A matched-pairs radiological study was undertaken comparing the aHKA of an osteoarthritic knee (aHKA-OA) with the mechanical HKA of the contralateral normal knee (mHKA-N). Patients with Grade 3 or 4 Kellgren-Lawrence tibiofemoral osteoarthritis in an arthritic knee undergoing TKA and Grade 0 or 1 osteoarthritis in the contralateral normal knee were included. The aHKA algorithm subtracts the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) from the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) measured on standing long leg radiographs. The primary outcome was the mean of the paired differences in the aHKA-OA and mHKA-N. Secondary outcomes included comparison of sex-based differences and capacity of the aHKA to determine the constitutional alignment based on degree of deformity. RESULTS: A total of 51 radiographs met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference between aHKA-OA and mHKA-N, with a mean angular difference of -0.4° (95% SE -0.8° to 0.1°; p = 0.16). There was no significant sex-based difference when comparing aHKA-OA and mHKA-N (mean difference 0.8°; p = 0.11). Knees with deformities of more than 8° had a greater mean difference between aHKA-OA and mHKA-N (1.3°) than those with lesser deformities (-0.1°; p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: This study supports the arithmetic HKA algorithm for prediction of the constitutional alignment once arthritis has developed. The algorithm has similar accuracy between sexes and greater accuracy with lesser degrees of deformity.Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-7:339-345.

Restoring the constitutional alignment with a restrictive kinematic protocol improves quantitative soft-tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: It is unknown whether kinematic alignment (KA) objectively improves knee balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), despite this being the biomechanical rationale for its use. This study aimed to determine whether restoring the constitutional alignment using a restrictive KA protocol resulted in better quantitative knee balance than mechanical alignment (MA). METHODS: We conducted a randomized superiority trial comparing patients undergoing TKA assigned to KA within a restrictive safe zone or MA. Optimal knee balance was defined as an intercompartmental pressure difference (ICPD) of 15 psi or less using a pressure sensor. The primary endpoint was the mean intraoperative ICPD at 10° of flexion prior to knee balancing. Secondary outcomes included balance at 45° and 90°, requirements for balancing procedures, and presence of tibiofemoral lift-off. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients (70 knees) were randomized to KA and 62 patients (68 knees) to MA. Mean ICPD at 10° flexion in the KA group was 11.7 psi (SD 13.1) compared with 32.0 psi in the MA group (SD 28.9), with a mean difference in ICPD between KA and MA of 20.3 psi (p < 0.001). Mean ICPD in the KA group was significantly lower than in the MA group at 45° and 90°, respectively (25.2 psi MA vs 14.8 psi KA, p = 0.004; 19.1 psi MA vs 11.7 psi KA, p < 0.002, respectively). Overall, participants in the KA group were more likely to achieve optimal knee balance (80% vs 35%; p < 0.001). Bone recuts to achieve knee balance were more likely to be required in the MA group (49% vs 9%; p < 0.001). More participants in the MA group had tibiofemoral lift-off (43% vs 13%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study provides persuasive evidence that restoring the constitutional alignment with KA in TKA results in a statistically significant improvement in quantitative knee balance, and further supports this technique as a viable alternative to MA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(1):117-124.