RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To explore whether it is necessary to put drain tubes after posterior pedicle screw fixation of thoracolumbar fractures. METHODS: From April 2020 to January 2023, a total of 291 patients with recent thoracolumbar fractures (AO type-A or type-B) who received the pedicle screw fixation operation were enrolled retrospectively. In 77 patients, drain tubes were used in the pedicle screw fixation surgery, while no drain tubes were placed in the other group. After gleaning demographic information and results of lab examination and imageology examination, all data were put into a database. Independent-sample t-tests, Pearson Chi-Square tests, Linear regression analysis, and correlation analysis were then performed. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, the drainage group had significantly lower postoperative CRP levels (P = 0.047), less use of antipyretics (P = 0.035), higher ADL scores (P = 0.001), and lower NRS scores (P < 0.001) on the 6th day after surgery. Other investigation items, such as demographic information, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, body temperature, and other preoperative and postoperative lab results, showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a drain tube in the pedicle screw fixation of thoracolumbar fractures is correlated with the improvement of patients' living and activity ability and the reduction of inflammation, postoperative fever and pain.
Asunto(s)
Drenaje , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Vértebras Lumbares , Tornillos Pediculares , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Vértebras Torácicas , Humanos , Masculino , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Drenaje/instrumentación , Drenaje/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , AncianoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the accuracy of robotic spine surgery and conventional pedicle screw fixation in lumbar degenerative disease. We evaluated clinical and radiological outcomes to demonstrate the noninferiority of robotic surgery. METHODS: This study employed propensity score matching and included 3 groups: robot-assisted mini-open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) (robotic surgery, RS), c-arm guided minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (C-arm guidance, CG), and freehand open PLIF (free of guidance, FG) (54 patients each). The mean follow-up period was 2.2 years. The preoperative spine condition was considered. Accuracy was evaluated using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale (GRS score) and Babu classification (Babu score). Radiological outcomes included adjacent segmental disease (ASD) and mechanical failure. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on the visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index, 36-item Short Form health survey, and clinical ASD rate. RESULTS: Accuracy was higher in the RS group (p < 0.01) than in other groups. The GRS score was lower in the CG group, whereas the Babu score was lower in the FG group compared with the RS group. No significant differences were observed in radiological and clinical outcomes among the 3 groups. Regression analysis identified preoperative facet degeneration, GRS and Babu scores as significant variables for radiological and clinical ASD. Mechanical failure was influenced by the GRS score and patients' age. CONCLUSION: This study showed the superior accuracy of robotic spine surgery compared with conventional techniques. When combined with minimally invasive surgery, robotic surgery is advantageous with reduced ligament and muscle damage associated with traditional open procedures.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Ankylosing spinal disorders present significant challenges in cases of trauma, and the treatment of ankylosed spine infections may also be challenging. However, to the best of our knowledge, only one study to date has addressed this topic, reporting a mortality rate of 62%. Case Report: Our patients were four men and one woman with a mean age of 72 years. Treatments consisted of intravenous antibiotics, a hard brace, and surgical interventions including percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in two patients, laminectomy and evacuation of the epidural abscess in one, and percutaneous lavage of the affected disc in two. The time from referral to intervention averaged 16 days. The mortality rate was 0% with healing of the infection with segmental bony fusion in four patients. Conclusion: This is the second reported case series of ankylosed spine infections. Early surgical intervention aimed at drainage or stabilization of the infectious lesions is crucial to disease control.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw instrument surgeries can result in the development of aortic pseudoaneurysm, which is a rare yet potentially severe complication; therefore, the purpose of this work is to describe the case of pseudoaneurysm of the thoracic aorta caused by the severe migration of a pedicle screw after surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: We herein report a patient who underwent endovascular repair for the pseudoaneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta following thoracic vertebral fixation surgery. A 28-80 mm covered stent was initially inserted through the right femoral artery, and intraoperative aortography revealed a minor extravasation of contrast material. Subsequently, an additional 28-140 mm covered stent was implanted. The patient recovered well during the 8-year follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular complications resulting from spinal surgery are severe and rare, necessitating early diagnosis and intervention.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Falso , Aorta Torácica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Tornillos Pediculares , Humanos , Aneurisma Falso/cirugía , Aneurisma Falso/etiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Tornillos Pediculares/efectos adversos , Masculino , Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Stents/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Thoracolumbar fractures are one of the most common fractures in clinical practice. Surgical intervention is recommended to restore spinal alignment or decompress the nerves when there are unstable fractures or neurological injuries. However, after excessive forward thrust force restoration, facet joint dislocation often occurs between the upper vertebra and the fractured vertebra, which usually leads to unsatisfactory reduction outcomes. Herein, we propose a novel spinal facet joint toothed plate to assist in fracture reduction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the new spinal facet joint toothed plate in preventing facet joint dislocation, and its advantages compared to traditional pedicle screw-rod decompression. METHODS: A total of 26 patients in the toothed plate group and 93 patients in the traditional group who experienced thoracolumbar fracture with reduction were retrospectively included. Relevant patients' information and clinical parameters were collected. Furthermore, visual analogue scores (VAS) scores and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were also collected. Moreover, imaging parameters were calculated based on radiographs. Correlated data were analyzed by χ2 test and t test. RESULTS: All patients in this study had no postoperative complications. Postoperative VAS scores and ODI scores (p < 0.001) were statistically significant (p < 0.001) in both groups compared with preoperative scores and further decreased (p < 0.001) at final follow-up. In addition, the postoperative vertebral margin ratio (VMR) (p < 0.001) and vertebral angle of the injured vertebrae (p < 0.001) were significantly improved compared with the preoperative period. There were no significant differences in postoperative VAS scores and ODI scores between the two groups. However, toothed plate reduction significantly improved the VMR (p < 0.05) and vertebral angle (p < 0.05) compared with conventional reduction. Ultimately, the total screw accuracy was 98.72% (sum of levels 0 and I), with 100% screw accuracy in the segment related to the tooth plate in the tooth plate group. The dislocation rate was higher in the conventional group (6.45%) than in the new serrated plate repositioning group (0.00%). CONCLUSION: The facet toothed plate assisted reduction method prevents facet joint dislocation and improves fracture reduction compared to traditional reduction technique, hence it could be considered as a novel surgical strategy for thoracolumbar fracture reduction.
Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Vértebras Lumbares , Tornillos Pediculares , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Vértebras Torácicas , Articulación Cigapofisaria , Humanos , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Articulación Cigapofisaria/lesiones , Articulación Cigapofisaria/cirugía , Anciano , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Dimensión del DolorRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: One method for treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), which is characterized by abnormal spinal alignment in the coronal, sagittal, and rotational planes, is surgical correction. The two surgical techniques most typically used to correct spine alignment are simple rod derotation (SRD) and direct vertebral derotation (DVR). AIM: The study's goal was to assess the effectiveness of two treatment methods for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: simple rod derotation and direct vertebral rotation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled research involving 36 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis was done. Patients were randomly split into one of two groups: 18 patients in group A had DVR treatment, while 18 patients in group B received SRD with a 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Apical Vertebral Rotation measured from CT scans in DVR group was 24.4° ± 8.38° preoperatively and it decreased significantly postoperatively to 14.4° ± 4.61° with (42.22%) correction rate, while in SRD group, it was 25.03° ± 7.99° preoperatively and it also decreased significantly postoperatively to a mean value of 21.41° ± 7.01° with (14.65%) correction rate. There were statistically significant differences between both groups post-operative (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The apical vertebral rotation was greatly enhanced in both procedures, with direct vertebral rotation being better. Both Simple rod derotation and direct vertebral rotation reduce the rib hump, although the improvement is much greater with direct vertebral rotation.
Asunto(s)
Escoliosis , Humanos , Escoliosis/cirugía , Escoliosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Femenino , Masculino , Rotación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Niño , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and clinical outcomes of 3D-printed guides versus computer navigation for pedicle screw placement in the correction of congenital scoliosis deformities. METHODS: The study was a single-centre retrospective controlled study and was approved by the hospital ethics committee for the analysis all patients under the age of 18 years with at least 2 years of follow-up. Sixty-three patients who underwent surgical correction for congenital scoliosis deformities in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2020 were divided into two groups based on the decision following preoperative doctorâpatient communication. Among them, 43 patients had pedicle screws placed with 3D-printed guider plates, while the remaining 20 patients had screws inserted with the assistance of computer navigation. The perioperative period, follow-up results and imaging data were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The operation was completed successfully for patients in both groups. The 3D-printed guide-assisted screw placement technique proved to be significantly superior to the computer navigation technique in terms of operation time, screw placement time, and intraoperative blood loss (p < .05), although the former had more frequent intraoperative fluoroscopies than the latter (p < .05). The mean follow-up time was 41.4 months, and the SRS-22 scores significantly improved in both groups over time postoperatively (p < .05). The 3D-printing group had better SRS-22 scores than the navigation group 6 months after surgery and at the last follow-up (p < .05). Compared with preoperative values, the coronal Cobb angle, local kyphotic Cobb angle, C7-S1 coronal deviation (C7PL-CSVL), and sagittal deviation (SVA) were significantly improved in both groups after surgery (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Both techniques achieve the purpose of precise screw placement and proper correction of the deformities. In contrast, the 3D-printed guide-assisted screw placement technique showed advantages in terms of operation time, screw placement time, intraoperative blood loss and patient satisfaction with outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Tornillos Pediculares , Escoliosis , Fusión Vertebral , Cirugía Asistida por Computador , Humanos , Adolescente , Escoliosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Escoliosis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Impresión Tridimensional , Fusión Vertebral/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the radiographic outcomes, clinical outcomes and complications of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) with and without posterior pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) in the treatment of severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (sOVCF) with nonunion. METHODS: This study involved 51 patients with sOVCF with nonunion who underwent PKP or PPSF + KP. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, volume of injected bone cement, operation costs and hospital stays were all recorded. In addition, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were assessed separately for each patient before and after surgery. RESULTS: Compared with the PPSF + KP group, the PKP group had shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stays and fewer operation costs. However, cobb's angle improvement (13.4 ± 4.3° vs. 21.4 ± 5.3°), VWR improvement ratio (30.4 ± 11.5% vs. 52.8 ± 12.7%), HA (34.9 ± 9.0% vs. 63.7 ± 7.6%) and HM (28.4 ± 11.2% vs. 49.6 ± 7.7%) improvement ratio were all higher in PPSF + KP group than that in PKP group. In addition, the ODI index and VAS score in both groups were significantly decreased at the postoperative and final follow-up. PKP group's postoperative VAS score was significantly lower than that in PPSF + KP group, but there was no statistically significant difference in VAS score at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: PKP and PPSF + KP can both effectively relieve the pain associated with sOVCF with nonunion. PPSF + KP can achieve more satisfactory vertebral reduction effects compared to PKP. However, PKP was less invasive and it has more advantages in shortening operation time and hospital stay, as well as decreasing intraoperative blood loss and operation costs.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas por Compresión , Cifoplastia , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Tornillos Pediculares , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Fracturas por Compresión/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas por Compresión/cirugía , Fracturas por Compresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/cirugía , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
(1) Background: The amount of blood loss during oblique lumber interbody fusion (OLIF) surgery is often underestimated and may contribute to adverse postoperative outcomes. This study aims to evaluate hidden blood loss (HBL) in patients who underwent OLIF for degenerative lumbar spine disease and to analyze its risk factors. (2) Methods: The medical records of 179 patients who underwent OLIF surgery from 2015 to 2022 were reviewed. The HBL and total blood loss (TBL) were estimated using the Gross formula. Pearson correlation, Spearman correlation, and multivariate linear regression analyses were used to investigate risk factors for HBL. (3) Results: The mean HBL was 675.2 mL, and the mean hemoglobin loss was 1.7 g/dL during OLIF surgery. In the multivariate linear regression analysis, TBL (p < 0.001), estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), and pedicle screw fixation type (p = 0.039) were identified as independent risk factors of HBL. (4) Conclusions: The OLIF is associated with substantial perioperative HBL, for which we identified risk factors of TBL, EBL, and pedicle screw fixation type. Notably, OLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation resulted in greater HBL than stand-alone OLIF or OLIF with open pedicle screw fixation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are no reports discussing anatomic distribution of basivertebral foramen (BVF) in the osteoporotic vertebral body, which is critical in the analysis of the risk of epidural cement leakage (ECL) after cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation (CAPSF). METHODS: 371 osteoporotic patients using 1898 cement-augmented screws were included. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) was used to determine the frequency, width, height, and depth of magistral BVF in T10~L5. Additionally, we measured the distance between BVF and the left/right borders of vertebral body as well as the distance between BVF and upper/lower endplates. Following CAPSF, the severity of ECL and the position of pedicle screws were determined by postoperative CT. Finally, significant risk factors for extensive ECL were identified through binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 2968 vertebral bodies ranging from T10 to L5, 801 (42.2%) had a magistral BVF. From T10 to L5, the frequency of magistral BVF appeared to gradually increase. The magistral BVF was much closer to the upper endplate and the depth accounted for about a quarter of anteroposterior diameter of vertebral body. Overall, there were 19 patients (5.1%) and 32 screws (1.7%) with extensive ECL, nine of whom had neurological symptoms. The independent risk factors for extensive ECL were the magistral BVF (OR = 8.62, P < 0.001), more volume of cement injected (OR = 1.57, P = 0.031), reduced distance from screw tip to vertebral midline (OR = 0.76, P = 0.003) and vertebral posterior wall (OR = 0.77, P < 0.001) respectively. CONCLUSION: When planning a CAPSF procedure, it is important to consider anatomical distribution of BVF and improve screw implantation methods.
Asunto(s)
Cementos para Huesos , Tornillos Pediculares , Humanos , Cementos para Huesos/efectos adversos , Tornillos Pediculares/efectos adversos , Cuerpo Vertebral , Relevancia Clínica , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with posterior screw fusion is a safe and effective treatment for patients suffering from degenerative spine disorders. While LLIF has been shown to restore disc height, decompress neural components, correct sagittal imbalances, and improve pain scores, the approach requires repositioning patients for posterior pedicle fixation, which requires 2 separate surgeries. The evolution of surgical techniques, navigation, and robotics has allowed for a single position approach to LLIF with the patient in the prone position. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the prone single position (PSP) LLIF approach to the dual position LLIF approach. We hypothesized that PSP LLIF will have a reduced operative time, complication rate, and blood loss compared with the dual position LLIF procedure. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. PubMed and Embase databases were searched with key terms: (lateral AND [interbody OR "inter body"] AND lumbar AND fusion) AND (prone OR single). Results were extracted and reviewed by 2 authors (MR and RB) per selection criteria. Patient demographics were extracted from the selected studies, along with surgical, patient-reported, and radiographic outcomes. A meta-analysis was performed using an unstandardized mean difference or log odds ratio with a confidence level of 95%. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included in the systematic review and 5 studies compared PSP LLIF to dual position LLIF for meta-analysis. PSP LLIF had a reduced operative time and length of stay compared with the dual position approach, although there was no significant reduction in estimated blood loss. Additionally, PSP LLIF improved lumbar lordosis more effectively than dual position LLIF. There was no difference in segmental lordosis or pelvic tilt. There was no difference in intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, or reoperations. CONCLUSIONS: PSP LLIF reduces operative time and length of stay, with no relative increase in complications or reoperations compared with the dual position approach. Additionally, PSP LLIF improves lumbar lordosis relative to dual position LLIF, which may improve functional outcomes and reduce the risk of developing adjacent segment disease. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The associated operative and postoperative benefits of PSP LLIF may improve long-term outcomes of patients undergoing spinal fusion.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Less invasive spine surgery (LISS) has become well-established for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits. However, notable controversy persists regarding the adequacy of LISS for more unstable AO type B and C injuries, as it does not allow for formal open fusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey experienced spine surgeons of the Dutch Spine Society were invited to participate (56 participants). They were asked to indicate the most appropriate treatment for AO type B1, B2 (L1: A1 and L1: A3), B3 and C (L1: A4) injuries at level Th12-L1. Taking into account: age, AO N0-N1, or polytrauma. Specific agreement between participants was obtained applying Variation Ratio (VR). RESULTS: A significant level of overall agreement was observed for AO type-B1 injuries with 73.8% of participants opting for percutaneous short-segment fixation (VR 0.775). For AO type-B3 injuries, 79.4% of participants favored percutaneous long-segment fixation (VR 0.794). for AO type-B2 injuries, there was less overall agreement (VR 0.571-0.657). Nonetheless, when considering all AO type-B injuries combined, percutaneous fixation emerged as the most preferred treatment option with substantial agreement (VR 0.871-0.923). Conversely, for AO type-C injuries, there was less agreement among the participants (VI 0.411), 26.5% of them chose additional open spinal fusion. CONCLUSION: For all AO type-B injuries there was substantial agreement to treat these fractures with percutaneous techniques. For AO type-C injuries, the survey results do not support a consensus. Nevertheless, the responses raise important questions about the necessity of spinal fusion for such injuries.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas por Compresión , Tornillos Pediculares , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Cirujanos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of monoplanar screws (MSs) versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws (HSs) in percutaneous short-segment intermediate screw fixation (PSISF) for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures (TTBFs) in patients without neurologic impairment. METHODS: A consecutive series of 100 patients with single-segment TTBFs and no neurologic impairment who underwent PSISF with 6 monoplanar screws (MS group) or correct were retrospectively enrolled. The demographic data, radiologic evaluation indicators, perioperative indicators and clinical assessment indicators were analysed between the MS group and HS group. RESULTS: The demographic data and perioperative indicators were not significantly different in the two groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative anterior vertebral height ratio (AVHR), kyphosis Cobb angle (KCA), vertebral wedge angle (VWA) and spinal canal encroachment rate (SCER) were significantly improved in both groups (*P < 0.05). The MS group obtained better correction than the HS group in terms of improvement in the AVHR, KCA and VWA after surgery (*P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the MS group had less correction loss of AVHR, KCA and VWA (*P < 0.05). The MS group presented greater improvement in the SCER at the last follow-up (*P < 0.05). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of all patients were significantly better postoperatively than those preoperatively (*P < 0.05), and the scores collected at each follow-up visit did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). In the MS group, no internal fixation failure was observed during the follow-up period, but, in the HS group, two cases of internal fixation failure were observed at the last follow-up (one case of rod loosening and one case of screw breakage). CONCLUSIONS: Both MSs and HSs fixation are effective treatments for TTBFs and have comparable clinical outcomes. In contrast, MSs fixation can improve the correction effect, better improve the SCER, and further reduce correction loss as well as reduce the incidence of instrumentation failure. Therefore, MSs fixation might be a better option for treating TTBFs in patients without neurological deficits.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Conminutas , Cifosis , Humanos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Retrospectivos , Columna Vertebral , Tornillos ÓseosRESUMEN
Intraoperative navigation is critical during spine surgery to ensure accurate instrumentation placement. From the early era of fluoroscopy to the current advancement in robotics, spinal navigation has continued to evolve. By understanding the variations in system protocols and their respective usage in the operating room, the surgeon can use and maximize the potential of various image guidance options more effectively. At the same time, maintaining navigation accuracy throughout the procedure is of the utmost importance, which can be confirmed intraoperatively by using an internal fiducial marker, as demonstrated herein. This technology can reduce the need for revision surgeries, minimize postoperative complications, and enhance the overall efficiency of operating rooms.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of studies on various posterior pedicle screw fixation (PSF) methods used for treating neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures and to identify the most effective and safe approaches. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, with the study registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024531093). The inclusion criteria were: (1) publication dates from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2023; (2) availability of full-text articles in English; (3) thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits; (4) patients aged over 18; (5) reports on treatment outcomes or complications; (6) a mean follow-up period of at least 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 69 articles covering 116 patient groups were included. Our analysis highlighted the advantages of short-segment fixation without fusion over monosegmental, short-segment and long-segment fusion in terms of shorter operation times and reduced intraoperative blood loss (pâ¯=â¯0.001 and pâ¯<â¯0.001, respectively). Extensive fusion was associated with a significantly higher frequency of deep surgical site infections compared to other PSF methods (pâ¯=â¯0.043). Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, applied to patients with lower body compression rates and kyphotic deformities, led to less potential for correction (pâ¯=â¯0.004), yet significantly decreased blood loss (pâ¯=â¯0.011), operation duration (pâ¯<â¯0.0001), and hospitalization duration (pâ¯<â¯0.0001). No significant benefits were observed with the use of additional intermediate screws in short-segment PSF. CONCLUSIONS: Short-segment pedicle screw fixation could be the optimal surgical treatment method for neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures. The use of posterior lateral fusion in this context may increase the deep surgical site infection rate without reducing the frequency of implant-related complications or improving long-term treatment outcomes. The percutaneous approach remains the preferred technique; however, its limited reduction capabilities should be carefully considered during surgical planning for patients with severe kyphotic deformities. The application of intermediate screws in such patients has not demonstrated significant advantages. Removing the fixation system has not led to a significant decrease in implant-related complications or improvement in quality of life. The data obtained from the systematic review may assist surgeons in selecting the most appropriate surgical treatment method for patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures, thereby avoiding ineffective procedures and improving both short-term and long-term outcomes.
RESUMEN
Aim The aim of this study was to perform a bibliometric analysis of the articles published on posterior instrumentation of cervical spine and to study the general publishing trends over the years in this topic in terms of journals, authors, topics, keywords, collaborating countries, etc. Material and Methods Articles were searched on the web of science using appropriate keywords. A bibliometric analysis was performed using Bibliometrix R package Results A total of 1,953 studies were identified between 1991 and 2023 including 1,782 articles and 171 reviews from 198 sources. A total of 3,421 author's keywords were used by 6,725 authors. Thirty-four documents are single authored. The average co-author per document is 5.63. The average citation per document is 22.62. There is international co-authorship in 13.11% documents. RM Xu and Sonntag VKH have maximum publications ( n = 28). The "Spine" journal has the maximum number of publications ( n = 335) and best H index of 64. United States has maximum number of publications ( n = 1,720) and citations ( n = 19,573). Publication by Harms et al in the "Spine" in 2001 has the highest global ( n = 956) & local ( n = 272) citations. Three-dimensional printing and atlantoaxial fixation are emerging trends. Conclusion The findings of this study enhance the knowledge on the topic of posterior instrumentation of cervical spine and shall guide the trends and directions of future research and innovation.
RESUMEN
Background Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) poses physical and psychological challenges for affected individuals, necessitating effective and less invasive treatment approaches. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of low-density posterior pedicle screw fixation in AIS correction, exploring its impact on deformity parameters, patient quality of life, and potential complications. Methodology A prospective study involving 20 AIS patients, employing low-density pedicle screw fixation, was conducted. Clinical, radiological, and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22) outcomes were assessed. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 26 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results Significant reductions in major and minor curve Cobb angles were observed (mean major curve reduction: 79.14%, p < 0.001; mean minor curve reduction: 68.91%, p < 0.001), indicating substantial deformity correction. As measured by the SRS-22 questionnaire, quality of life showed noteworthy improvements (mean pain score increase: 0.54, p < 0.05; mean self-image score increase: 1.22, p < 0.01), reflecting enhanced patient satisfaction and well-being. Complications were documented in four (20%) cases, including infection, adding-on phenomenon, proximal junctional kyphosis, and thoracic hypokyphosis. Conclusions Our study highlights the efficacy of low-density pedicle screw constructs in AIS correction. Significant deformity reductions and improved quality of life underscore the success of the approach. However, long-term studies with larger cohorts are crucial for confirming durability.
RESUMEN
Pedicle screw fixation (PSF) demands rigorous training to mitigate the risk of severe neurovascular complications arising from screw misplacement. This paper introduces a patient-specific phantom designed for PSF training, extending a portion of the learning process beyond the confines of the surgical room. Six phantoms of the thoracolumbar region were fabricated from radiological datasets, combining 3D printing and casting techniques. The phantoms were employed in three training sessions by a fifth-year resident who performed full training on all six phantoms; he/she placed a total of 57 pedicle screws. Analysis of the learning curve, focusing on time per screw and positioning accuracy, revealed attainment of an asymptotic performance level (around 3 min per screw) after 40 screws. The phantom's efficacy was evaluated by three experts and six residents, each inserting a minimum of four screws. Initial assessments confirmed face, content, and construct validity, affirming the patient-specific phantoms as a valuable training resource. These proposed phantoms exhibit great promise as an essential tool in surgical training as they exhibited a demonstrable learning effect on the PSF technique. This study lays the foundation for further exploration and underscores the potential impact of these patient-specific phantoms on the future of spinal surgical education.
RESUMEN
The aim of this study is to describe the Chiropractic BioPhysics® (CBP®) (Chiropractic BioPhysics, Eagle, USA) technique in alleviating the persistent spine pain syndrome (PSPS) and dysfunction in a 50-year-old female who suffered for many years. The purpose of this study is to provide clinicians with a potential treatment option for failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) and PSPS that doesn't respond to other treatments. The patient did not receive benefits from pharmaceutical and conservative therapies following a low back lifting injury in 2004. After several years of suffering from widespread spinal pain and dysfunction, she received a lumbosacral pedicle screw surgical fixation. The initial surgery was unsuccessful and a follow-up revision and expansion of the fusion failed to alleviate the pain and dysfunction as well. After treatment using CBP, the patient received subjective, objective, and radiographic improvements with long-term stability measured at follow-up. Given that spine pain and low back pain are the number one cause of disability in the world, having economical, repeatable, and measurable techniques to improve even difficult cases is important for astute clinicians treating spine pain.
RESUMEN
Objectives:To explore the safety and early effectiveness of decompression under full-endoscope and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of single-level thoracolumbar burst fractures.Methods:The clinical data of 9 patients with single-segment thoracolumbar burst fracture treated with spinal canal decompression under full-endoscope and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation from April 2021 to June 2022 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively,including 7 males and 2 females.The age ranged from 23 to 61(39.3±9.1)years old.According to AO classification,there were 6 cases of type A,2 cases of type B and 1 case of type C.Fracture segments were T12 in 2 cases,L1 in 3 cases,L2 in 3 cases,and L3 in 1 case.According to the classification of American Spinal Injury Association(ASIA)grading,there were 2 cases of type C,2 cases of type D,and 5 cases of type E.The decompression and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation were operated through the same incision in the injured vertebrae for screw placing.The operation-related indexes and complications were recorded.The patients'low back pain was evaluated by visual analogue scale(VAS)score before operation,on 3rd day after operation and at the last follow-up.The sagittal Cobb angle,height ratio of vertebral anterior edge,and the rate of spinal canal occupation were measured on spinal X-ray and CT images,and the recovery of neurological function was evaluated at the last follow-up.Results:All 9 patients successfully completed the operation,and the operative time was 105-145min(1 12.4± 21.2min),bleeding volume was 50-110mL(83.9±19.6mL),and hospitalization time was 7-13d(9.1±1.3d).No serious complications such as wound infection,cerebrospinal fluid leakage,aggravated nerve injury occurred.The follow-up time was 6-13months(8.4±3.9 months),all the fractures healed successfully,and the healing time was 3-6 months(4.7±1.6 months).The VAS score of low back pain on the 3rd day after operation and at final follow-up significantly improved compared with that before operation(P<0.05),and it was also significantly improved at the last follow-up compared with that on the 3rd day after operation(P<0.05).The Cobb angle,anterior height ratio of injured vertebrae,and invasion rate of spinal canal were significantly improved compared with those before operation(P<0.05),respectively,but there was no statistical difference between the last follow-up and postoperative 3d(P>0.05).One patient recovered from grade C to grade D of ASIA classification,while another three patients with neurological injury recovered completely.Conclusions:Decompression under full-endoscope and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation through the same incision in the injured vertebrae for screw placement in the treatment of single-level thoracolumbar burst fractures can obtain effective nerve root and spinal canal decompression,with good correction and small operative trauma,which is a safe and effective option.