RESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: What is the frequency and the associated factors of very early dropout following unsuccessful clomiphene citrate (CC)/gonadotropin treatment in the context of full coverage of treatment cost. SUMMARY ANSWER: Despite free treatment, almost one in four women had a very early dropout following unsuccessful CC/gonadotropin treatment, with patients below the poverty line being more likely to drop out early. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Success of infertility care is tarnished by very high dropout rates. Infertility care dropout has been considered as resulting principally from financial barriers because of the high cost of treatment. Nearly all previous work addressed dropout following IVF/ICSI. Factors associated with dropout following CC/gonadotropins may be different and also need to be investigated. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Nationwide population-based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Using the French national health insurance and hospital databases, we included in the cohort 27â416 women aged 18-49 years unsuccessfully treated with CC/gonadotropins in 2017. The main outcome was very early dropout, defined as discontinuation of all infertility treatment after unsuccessful treatment for 1-3 months. Very early treatment dropout was analysed by multivariate logistic regression. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among women unsuccessfully treated with CC/gonadotropins, 22% dropped out of infertility care within 3 months. In multivariate analysis, higher early dropout following unsuccessful CC/gonadotropin treatment was associated with older and younger ages (≥35 and <25 years), being below the poverty line, being treated with CC prescribed by a general practitioner and lack of infertility tests or monitoring. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is based on health administrative data that do not include reasons for dropout and record only a limited amount of information. It is thus not possible to analyse the reason for early dropout. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Despite full coverage of all infertility treatment, women under the poverty line have a higher risk of very early dropout following unsuccessful CC/gonadotropin treatment. Better understanding is needed of the non-financial barriers and difficulties faced by these patients. To address disparities in infertility treatment, practitioner training could be reinforced to adapt to patients from different social and cultural backgrounds. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by the ANR StimHo project, grant ANR-17-CE36-0011-01 from the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Asunto(s)
Clomifeno , Infertilidad Femenina , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios de Cohortes , Clomifeno/uso terapéutico , Infertilidad Femenina/epidemiología , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Gonadotropinas , Fertilización In Vitro/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Telehealth has been proposed as a safe and effective alternative to in-person care for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors associated with telehealth appropriateness in outpatient RA encounters. METHODS: A prospective cohort study (January 1, 2021, to August 31, 2021) was conducted using electronic health record data from outpatient RA encounters in a single academic rheumatology practice. Rheumatology providers rated the telehealth appropriateness of their own encounters using the Encounter Appropriateness Score for You (EASY) immediately following each encounter. Robust Poisson regression with generalized estimating equations modeling was used to evaluate the association of telehealth appropriateness with patient demographics, RA clinical characteristics, comorbid noninflammatory causes of joint pain, previous and current encounter characteristics, and provider characteristics. RESULTS: During the study period, 1823 outpatient encounters with 1177 unique patients with RA received an EASY score from 25 rheumatology providers. In the final multivariate model, factors associated with increased telehealth appropriateness included higher average provider preference for telehealth in prior encounters (relative risk [RR] 1.26, 95% CI 1.21-1.31), telehealth as the current encounter modality (RR 2.27, 95% CI 1.95-2.64), and increased patient age (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09). Factors associated with decreased telehealth appropriateness included moderate (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.96) and high (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.46-0.70) RA disease activity and if the previous encounters were conducted by telehealth (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.95). CONCLUSION: In this study, telehealth appropriateness was most associated with provider preference, the current and previous encounter modality, and RA disease activity. Other factors like patient demographics, RA medications, and comorbid noninflammatory causes of joint pain were not associated with telehealth appropriateness.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Telemedicina , Humanos , Artritis Reumatoide/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Adulto , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Reumatología , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Atención AmbulatoriaRESUMEN
Kidney transplantation is the most successful kidney replacement therapy available, resulting in improved recipient survival and societal cost savings. Yet, nearly 70 years after the first successful kidney transplant, there are still numerous barriers and untapped opportunities that constrain the access to transplant. The literature describing these barriers is extensive, but the practices and processes to solve them are less clear. Solutions must be multidisciplinary and be the product of strong partnerships among patients, their networks, health care providers, and transplant programs. Transparency in the referral, evaluation, and listing process as well as organ selection are paramount to build such partnerships. Providing early culturally congruent and patient-centered education as well as maximizing the use of local resources to facilitate the transplant work up should be prioritized. Every opportunity to facilitate pre-emptive kidney transplantation and living donation must be taken. Promoting the use of telemedicine and kidney paired donation as standards of care can positively impact the work up completion and maximize the chances of a living donor kidney transplant.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Donadores Vivos/provisión & distribución , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In previous research, older adults have been associated with reduced levels of health literacy (HL) influenced by a range of contextual factors. To optimise HL, it is essential to better understand the interactions between the ageing process and both personal and environmental factors as perceived by older adults. This study aimed to explore the experiences and needs of older community-dwelling adults when accessing, understanding, appraising and using health-related information. METHODS: An explorative, qualitative design was used within the social constructivism framework. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 20 adults aged 70-96 living at home in three areas in Northern Iceland. The transcribed interviews were constructed into categories and subcategories using qualitative content analysis. FINDINGS: Four categories emerged. "Expectations for responsibility" describes the experience that individuals are responsible for taking care of their health, including accessing, understanding, appraising and using information and services, showing initiative and keeping needed communications active. "A gap between expectancy and ability/context" includes experiences while taking responsibility for expectations not aligning with skills/situations, creating information gaps. "Finding one's own ways" comprises various adapted ways to access, understand, and use information and services. "Bridging the gap" describes experiences of needing shared responsibility and more manageable options to enable reasoned health-related decisions and navigation in the healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS: The participants valued and took full responsibility for accessing, understanding, appraising and using information and services as part of a social norm; however, they experience information gaps. They request shared responsibility by being provided with fundamental health-related information as a vital step in making reasoned health-related decisions and navigating the healthcare system. They also request more inclusive and accessible service opportunities to bridge the gaps and facilitate HL. It is necessary to critically address, at a systematic level, the conflict between expected individual responsibility and the existence of options to act upon this responsibility. In matters of health, health services and HL, the need to analyse and confront structural disadvantages experienced by older adults is highlighted.
Asunto(s)
Alfabetización en Salud , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alfabetización en Salud/métodos , Vida Independiente/psicología , Características de la Residencia , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Acceso a la Información , ComprensiónRESUMEN
To evaluate the drug persistence in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) during the current economic crisis in Lebanon and to estimate predictors of persistence. A nationwide multicentric cross-sectional study using an online questionnaire was conducted in Lebanon with patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRDs) and non-inflammatory RMDs controls between July and October 2022. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were categorized as conventional synthetic (cs), biological (b), subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV), and targeted synthetic (ts). Persistence was defined as "number of tablets or injections taken during the past month versus prescribed". The percentage of patients who discontinued or changed treatment due to cost or non-availability was reported. Factors associated with persistence were identified using multivariable linear regression. The study included 317 patients with RMDs (286 CIRDs); mean age 49.5 years, 68% females, 58% reporting currently low economic level. Persistence at one month was low for tsDMARDs (36%) and bDMARDs (SC55%, IV63%), and acceptable for csDMARDs (88%). A persistence ≥80% was found in 23.3% of patients on tsDMARDs, 42.9% on SC bDMARDs, 45.0% on IV bDMARDs, and 74.7% on csDMARDs. During the past 6 months, 55.8% of CIRD patients discontinued or changed treatment due to non-availability (45.3%) or cost (21.2%). Persistence was positively associated with finding alternative sources such as buying abroad (36%), depending on friends or families abroad (20%), charities (10%), and negatively associated with unemployment and low financial status. Persistence was significantly compromised for essential antirheumatic drugs and was mostly driven by treatment unavailability and cost.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Productos Biológicos , Enfermedades Musculares , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Recesión Económica , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The mental health of medical students is a national and international problem increasing in both demand and acuity. Medical students face barriers to accessing mental health support that is clinically effective, timely and appropriate for their needs. This mixed methods study aimed to explore experiences of these barriers and the challenges to health service delivery aligned to the Candidacy Framework. METHODS: One hundred three medical students studying at The University of Sheffield completed an online survey comprising the CCAPS-34 and follow-up questions about service access and use. Semi-structured interviews with a nested sample of 20 medical students and 10 healthcare professionals explored barriers to service access and provision. A stakeholder panel of medical students and professionals met quarterly to co-produce research materials, interpret research data and identify touchpoints by pinpointing specific areas and moments of interaction between a medical student as a service user and a mental health service. RESULTS: Medical students who experienced barriers to help-seeking and accessing support scored significantly higher for psychological symptoms on the CCAPS-34. Uncertainty and fear of fitness to practice processes were important barriers present across all seven stages of candidacy. The fragmented structure of local services, along with individual factors such as perceived stigma and confidentiality concerns, limited the progression of medical students through the Candidacy Framework (a framework for understanding the different stages of a person's journey to healthcare). CONCLUSION: This study outlines important areas of consideration for mental health service provision and policy development to improve access to and the quality of care for medical students.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud Mental , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven , Investigación Cualitativa , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Conducta de Búsqueda de Ayuda , Estigma SocialRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the influence of patient-, general practitioners (GP)-, and GP practice-level predictor variables on patient-experienced accessibility to GPs and GP practices. Additionally, we aimed to enhance our understanding of patient-experienced accessibility by analysing the free-text comments from patients who reported lowest accessibility scores to GPs and GP practices. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data from a 2021-2022 national Norwegian survey on patient experiences with their GP and GP practice. We identified seven accessibility-related items including experience and acceptance of regular waiting time and for urgent appointments, time spent with the GP, waiting time in the wating-room, and getting in touch with the GP practice by telephone. A composite accessibility score was computed. Predictor variables consisted of patient's self-reported characteristics, as well as background data about the GP and GP practice from National GP registry. The analysis included multiple linear regression of the composite accessibility score and seven accessibility items. Finally, a qualitative analysis was conducted of free-text survey comments among patients that had a score of 0 (unfavourable) on all the seven accessibility items. RESULTS: The key factor for patient-experienced accessibility to general practice was seeing their own GP, showing a statistically significant positive correlation (p<0.001) across all seven accessibility items and the composite accessibility score in regression analyses. Other associations with positive experience included better self-reported health, and at the GP-level, a specialization in general medicine. Conversely, a negative experience was associated with longer time since the last GP consultation, female patients, and a higher number of GPs at the practice. Qualitative data confirmed accessibility challenges, detailing quantitative scores and highlighted that low accessibility scores were related to difficulties in seeing one's own GP. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of continuity between patient and their GP in improving patients' experiences of accessibility to general practice. Several GP and GP practice-level factors were related to patient-reported accessibility. These results can be used to inform initiatives aimed at improving accessibility to general practice.
Asunto(s)
Medicina General , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Noruega , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Médicos Generales/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Centralized management of queues helps to reduce the surgical waiting time in the publicly funded healthcare system, but this is not a reality in the Brazilian Unified Healthcare System (BUHS). We describe the implementation of the "Patients with Surgical Indication" (PSI) in a Brazilian public tertiary hospital, the impact on waiting time, and its use in rationing oncological surgeries during the COVID-19 Pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of elective surgical requests (2016-2022) in a Brazilian general, public, tertiary university hospital. We recovered information regarding the inflows (indications), outflows and their reasons, the number of patients, and waiting time in queue. RESULTS: We enrolled 82,844 indications in the PSI (2016-2022). The waiting time (median and interquartile range) in days decreased from 98(48;168) in 2016 to 14(3;152) in 2022 (p < 0.01). The same occurred with the backlog that ranged from 6,884 in 2016 to 844 in 2022 (p < 001). During the Pandemic, there was a reduction in the number of non-oncological surgeries per month (95% confidence interval) of -10.9(-18.0;-3.8) during Phase I (January 2019-March 2020), maintenance in Phase II (April 2020-August 2021) 0.1(-10.0;10.4) and increment in Phase III (September 2021-December 2022) of 23.0(15.3;30.8). In the oncological conditions, these numbers were 0.6(-2.1;3.3) for Phase I, an increase of 3.2(0.7;5.6) in Phase II and 3.9(1,4;6,4) in Phase III. CONCLUSION: Implementing a centralized list of surgical indications and developing queue management principles proved feasible, with effective rationing. It unprecedentedly demonstrated the decrease in the median waiting time in Brazil.
Asunto(s)
Pandemias , Listas de Espera , Humanos , Brasil/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Hospitales Públicos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Health care technologies have the ability to bridge or hinder equitable care. Advocates of digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) report that such technologies are poised to reduce the documented gross health care inequities that have plagued generations of people seeking care in the United States. This is due to a multitude of factors such as their potential to revolutionize access; mitigate logistical barriers to in-person mental health care; and leverage patient inputs to formulate tailored, responsive, and personalized experiences. Although we agree with the potential of DMHIs to advance health equity, we articulate several steps essential to mobilize and sustain meaningful forward progression in this endeavor, reflecting on decades of research and learnings drawn from multiple fields of expertise and real-world experience. First, DMHI manufacturers must build diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging (DEIB) processes into the full spectrum of product evolution itself (eg, product design, evidence generation) as well as into the fabric of internal company practices (eg, talent recruitment, communication principles, and advisory boards). Second, awareness of the DEIB efforts-or lack thereof-in DMHI research trials is needed to refine and optimize future study design for inclusivity as well as proactively address potential barriers to doing so. Trials should incorporate thoughtful, inclusive, and creative approaches to recruitment, enrollment, and measurement of social determinants of health and self-identity, as well as a prioritization of planned and exploratory analyses examining outcomes across various groups of people. Third, mental health care advocacy, research funding policies, and local and federal legislation can advance these pursuits, with directives from the US Preventive Services Taskforce, National Institutes of Health, and Food and Drug Administration applied as poignant examples. For products with artificial intelligence/machine learning, maintaining a "human in the loop" as well as prespecified and adaptive analytic frameworks to monitor and remediate potential algorithmic bias can reduce the risk of increasing inequity. Last, but certainly not least, is a call for partnership and transparency within and across ecosystems (academic, industry, payer, provider, regulatory agencies, and value-based care organizations) to reliably build health equity into real-world DMHI product deployments and evidence-generation strategies. All these considerations should also extend into the context of an equity-informed commercial strategy for DMHI manufacturers and health care organizations alike. The potential to advance health equity in innovation with DMHI is apparent. We advocate the field's thoughtful and evergreen advancement in inclusivity, thereby redefining the mental health care experience for this generation and those to come.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Mental , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Salud Mental , Equidad en Salud , Telemedicina , Disparidades en Atención de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many health care systems have used digital technologies to support care delivery, a trend amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic. "Digital first" may exacerbate health inequalities due to variations in eHealth literacy. The relationship between eHealth literacy and web-based urgent care service use is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to measure the association between eHealth literacy and the use of NHS (National Health Service) 111 online urgent care service. METHODS: A cross-sectional sequential convenience sample survey was conducted with 2754 adults (October 2020-July 2021) from primary, urgent, or emergency care; third sector organizations; and the NHS 111 online website. The survey included the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ), questions about use, preferences for using NHS 111 online, and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Across almost all dimensions of the eHLQ, NHS 111 online users had higher mean digital literacy scores than nonusers (P<.001). Four eHLQ dimensions were significant predictors of use, and the most highly significant dimensions were eHLQ1 (using technology to process health information) and eHLQ3 (ability to actively engage with digital services), with odds ratios (ORs) of 1.86 (95% CI 1.46-2.38) and 1.51 (95% CI 1.22-1.88), respectively. Respondents reporting a long-term health condition had lower eHLQ scores. People younger than 25 years (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.87-5.62) and those with formal qualifications (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.99) were more likely to use NHS 111 online. Users and nonusers were likely to use NHS 111 online for a range of symptoms, including chest pain symptoms (n=1743, 70.4%) or for illness in children (n=1117, 79%). The users of NHS 111 online were more likely to have also used other health services, particularly the 111 telephone service (χ12=138.57; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: These differences in eHealth literacy scores amplify perennial concerns about digital exclusion and access to care for those impacted by intersecting forms of disadvantage, including long-term illness. Although many appear willing to use NHS 111 online for a range of health scenarios, indicating broad acceptability, not all are able or likely to do this. Despite a policy ambition for NHS 111 online to substitute for other services, it appears to be used alongside other urgent care services and thus may not reduce demand.
Asunto(s)
Alfabetización en Salud , Medicina Estatal , Telemedicina , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Masculino , Inglaterra , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alfabetización en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Anciano , AdolescenteRESUMEN
Prenatal diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) has improved over time, and previous studies have identified CCHD subtype and socioeconomic status as factors influencing rates of prenatal diagnosis. Our objective of this single-center study was to compare prenatal diagnosis rates of newborns with CCHD admitted for cardiac intervention from the COVID-19 pandemic period (March 2020 to March 2021) to the pre-pandemic period and identify factors associated with the lack of CCHD prenatal diagnosis. The overall rate of CCHD and rates of the various CCHD diagnoses were calculated and compared with historical data collection periods (2009-2012 and 2013-2016). Compared with the 2009-2012 pre-pandemic period, patients had 2.17 times higher odds of having a prenatal diagnosis of CCHD during the pandemic period controlling for lesion type (aOR = 2.17, 95% CI 1.36-3.48, p = 0.001). Single ventricle lesions (aOR 6.74 [4.64-9.80], p < 0.001) and outflow tract anomalies (aOR 2.20 [1.56-3.12], p < 0.001) had the highest odds of prenatal diagnosis compared with the remaining lesions. Patients with outflow tract anomalies had higher odds for prenatal detection in the pandemic period compared with during the 2009-2012 pre-pandemic period (aOR 2.01 [1.06-3.78], p = 0.031). In conclusion, prenatal detection of CCHD among newborns presenting for cardiac intervention appeared to have improved during the pandemic period.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiopatías Congénitas , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Humanos , Cardiopatías Congénitas/epidemiología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Retrospectivos , PandemiasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Raue and Sirey proposed a theoretical treatment engagement model for older adults outlining steps from identifying mental health problems, referral to specialty care, and involvement in treatment. Using this model as a guide, the current study aimed to explore patient perspectives of their experience in the process of referral and first meeting with geriatric mental health services. Furthermore, the current study aimed to identify opportunities to enhance patient engagement in these beginning steps of the treatment engagement process. METHOD: Thirteen geriatric outpatients (7 psychology, 6 psychiatry) presenting with concerns of anxiety, depression, and/or stress were interviewed. Interviews were analyzed using the framework method. RESULTS: Themes emerged as suggested by Raue and Sirey's model, including attitudes toward treatment (e.g. stigma), treatment expectations, and treatment preferences. In addition, new themes emerged related to modifiable individual factors (the patient as a passive recipient of care, mental health literacy, and ageism) as well as social influences on treatment engagement. Participants primarily noted opportunities for psychoeducation as a potential treatment engagement intervention to implement within the current referral system. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to examine the applicability of Raue and Sirey's theoretical engagement model in a clinical sample. Findings both support and expand the model and offer several recommendations for improving treatment engagement for older patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no standardized approaches to care or evaluation for tone dysfunction in Canada. The study authors hypothesize that there is significant practice variation across the country. This environmental scan is aimed to describe the current practice for management of paediatric patients with hypertonia across Canada. METHODS: A web-based survey was developed by the authors with a multi-disciplinary approach and sent to representative paediatric rehabilitation sites in each province in Canada. Disciplines at the rehabilitation sites surveyed included all or some of the following disciplines: physiatry, neurology, neurosurgery, plastic surgery, orthopaedic surgery, physiotherapy and occupational therapy. All statistical analyses were performed using the R statistical software version 4.0. Fifteen rehabilitation sites were contacted, and 12 sites were used for the final analysis. RESULTS: Cerebral palsy was found to be the most common diagnosis for tone dysfunction, with 58% of sites diagnosing greater than 20 new patients per year. In 67% of sites, patients were seen within a formal multidisciplinary clinic to manage hypertonia. All 12 sites utilized oral baclofen and gabapentin, and 92% of sites utilized trihexyphenidyl. Botulinum toxin injections were offered at 50% of sites. Upper and lower extremity surgical procedures were offered in 83% of the sites. CONCLUSION: The information gained from this study provides some insight into the current practice across Canada for children with hypertonia. This study may assist in the development of a national, standardized strategy to tone management, potentially facilitating more equitable access to care for patients.
Asunto(s)
Baclofeno , Parálisis Cerebral , Niño , Humanos , Hipertonía Muscular , Gabapentina , CanadáRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Waiting lists for community-based paediatric therapy services are common and lead to poorer health outcomes, anxiety and missed opportunities for treatment during crucial developmental stages. The Specific Timely Appointments for Triage (STAT) model has been shown to reduce waiting lists in a range of health settings. AIMS: To determine whether providing training and support in the STAT model to champions within five community health centres using a remote 'hub and spoke' approach could reduce waiting time from referral to first appointment. METHODS: Representatives from five community health centres providing paediatric therapy services (speech therapy, occupational therapy and other allied health services) participated in five online workshops over 6 months. They were guided sequentially through the steps of the STAT model: understanding supply and demand, reducing backlogs, preserving space for new patients based on demand and redesigning models of care to maintain flow. Waiting time was measured in three consecutive years (pre, during and post intervention) and compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Employee satisfaction and perception of the model were explored using surveys. RESULTS: Data from 2564 children (mean age 3.2 years, 66% male) showed a 33% reduction in waiting time from the pre-intervention (median 57 days) to the post-intervention period (median 38 days, p < 0.01). The total number of children waiting was observed to reduce from 335 immediately prior to the intervention (mean per centre 67, SD 25.1) to 112 (mean 22, SD 13.6) after implementation (t[8] = 3.56, p < 0.01). There was no impact on employee satisfaction or other aspects of service delivery. CONCLUSION: Waiting lists are a major challenge across the health system. STAT provides a practical, low-cost, data-driven approach to tackling waiting times. This study demonstrates its effectiveness in paediatric therapy services and provides evidence for a 'hub and spoke' approach to facilitate implementation that could be provided at scale.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Ocupacional , Listas de Espera , Humanos , Masculino , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Triaje , Ansiedad , Trastornos de AnsiedadRESUMEN
This article analyzes the state of social participation in health in the Region of the Americas, framing it within the regional context and commitments assumed by the Member States of the Pan American Health Organization. It aims to provide regional input to the discussion of a resolution on social participation for universal health coverage, health, and well-being at the 77th World Health Assembly in 2024. In the Americas, social participation has evolved from a utilitarian approach to a fundamental aspect of health system governance, enshrined within legal frameworks and recognized as a citizen's right. Regional resolutions emphasize inclusive policies and intersectoral action to tackle health inequities, meanwhile the World Health Organization handbook on social participation underscores the need for inclusive governance mechanisms and addressing power imbalances. Informed by Member States' recommendations and scientific literature, the article emphasizes the importance of addressing power imbalances, strengthening legal frameworks, and enhancing capacities of governments and populations. It stresses adapting social participation mechanisms to diverse cultural contexts and ensuring meaningful community involvement in decision-making. Finally, the article advocates for a comprehensive approach to social participation grounded in principles of equity, democracy, and human rights; and fundamentally as an essential component of the primary health care approach. It calls for integrating social participation into health system governance, policy dialogues, capacity-building, and evaluation to ensure effective participatory processes.
En este artículo se analiza el estado de la participación social en materia de salud en la Región de las Américas dentro del marco del contexto regional y los compromisos asumidos por los Estados Miembros de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud. El objetivo es proporcionar aportes regionales para las deliberaciones en torno a una resolución sobre la participación social para la cobertura universal de salud, la salud y el bienestar en la 77.a Asamblea Mundial de la Salud en el 2024.En la Región de las Américas, la participación social ha evolucionado de un enfoque utilitarista a ser considerada un aspecto fundamental de la gobernanza de los sistemas de salud, consagrado en los marcos jurídicos y reconocido como un derecho ciudadano. Las resoluciones regionales hacen hincapié en las políticas inclusivas y las medidas intersectoriales para abordar las inequidades en materia de salud, mientras que el manual de la Organización Mundial de la Salud sobre participación social destaca la necesidad de mecanismos de gobernanza inclusivos y el abordaje de los desequilibrios de poder.Basándose en las recomendaciones de los Estados Miembros y la bibliografía científica, el artículo subraya la importancia de abordar los desequilibrios de poder, fortalecer los marcos jurídicos y mejorar las capacidades de los gobiernos y las poblaciones. Hace hincapié en adaptar los mecanismos de participación social a contextos culturales diversos y garantizar una participación trascendente de la comunidad en la toma de decisiones.Por último, el artículo aboga por un enfoque integral de la participación social basado en principios de equidad, democracia y derechos humanos; y, fundamentalmente, como un componente esencial del enfoque de atención primaria de salud. Insta a integrar la participación social en la gobernanza del sistema de salud, los diálogos sobre las políticas, la creación de capacidad y la evaluación para garantizar procesos participativos eficaces.
Este artigo analisa a situação da participação social em saúde na Região das Américas tendo em conta o contexto regional e os compromissos assumidos pelos Estados Membros da Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde. O objetivo é oferecer contribuições regionais para a discussão de uma resolução sobre participação social para cobertura universal de saúde, saúde e bem-estar na 77ª Assembleia Mundial da Saúde, em 2024.Na Região das Américas, a participação social evoluiu, deixando de ser uma abordagem utilitarista para se tornar um aspecto fundamental de governança do sistema de saúde, consagrada por marcos legais e reconhecida como um direito dos cidadãos. As resoluções regionais enfatizam políticas inclusivas e ações intersetoriais para combater iniquidades em saúde, e o manual da Organização Mundial da Saúde sobre participação social ressalta a necessidade de contar com mecanismos inclusivos de governança e abordar desequilíbrios de poder.Com base nas recomendações dos Estados Membros e na literatura científica, o artigo destaca a importância de abordar desequilíbrios de poder, reforçar marcos legais e fortalecer as capacidades dos governos e das populações. Além disso, enfatiza a necessidade de adaptar mecanismos de participação social a diversos contextos culturais e assegurar um envolvimento significativo da comunidade na tomada de decisões.Por fim, o artigo defende uma abordagem abrangente de participação social com base em princípios de equidade, democracia e direitos humanos e, fundamentalmente, como um componente essencial da abordagem de atenção primária em saúde. O artigo urge a integração da participação social na governança do sistema de saúde, em diálogos sobre políticas, no desenvolvimento de capacidades e na avaliação, a fim de assegurar processos participativos efetivos.
RESUMEN
Background: Tele-rehabilitation programs have emerged as a promising approach to improve access to physiotherapy services for athletes with sports-related injuries. This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the effectiveness of a tele-rehabilitation program with traditional in-person physiotherapy in improving outcomes for this population. Methods: This randomized controlled trial enrolled a large sample of 780 athletes with sports-related injuries to compare the effectiveness of tele-rehabilitation and traditional in-person physiotherapy. Blinding procedures were implemented to minimize bias. The intervention group received tele-rehabilitation physiotherapy, whereas the control group received traditional in-person physiotherapy. Pre- and post-intervention assessments were conducted to measure outcome measures, including range of motion, muscle strength, pain levels, and functional performance. Results: Significant improvements were observed in all outcome measures in both the tele-rehabilitation and in-person groups from baseline to postintervention. Independent t tests demonstrated no significant differences between the two groups in any of the outcome measures. These findings indicate that the tele-rehabilitation program was as effective as traditional in-person physiotherapy in improving the outcomes of athletes with sports-related injuries, even in a large sample size of 780 participants. Conclusion: This study provides robust evidence supporting the feasibility and effectiveness of tele-rehabilitation programs as viable alternatives to traditional in-person physiotherapy for athletes with sports-related injuries. These findings highlight the potential of tele-rehabilitation to significantly expand access to high-quality physiotherapy services for a large number of athletes. Further research should focus on evaluating the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of tele-rehabilitation programs in sports rehabilitation using larger sample sizes.
Asunto(s)
Telerrehabilitación , Humanos , Modalidades de FisioterapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This umbrella review aims to synthesise and summarise the role of teledentistry in improving oral health outcomes and access to dental care. METHODS: We searched the databases PubMed (Medline), Scopus, CINHAL, OVID, ScienceDirect, JSTOR, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews through March 2024. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on teledentistry were eligible for inclusion. No publication time or language restrictions were applied. Our search retrieved 24 studies for which we conducted quality assessments using the Joanna Biggs Institute (JBI) for Systematic Reviews and Research Synthesis Critical Appraisal Tool. Results were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Studies addressed clinical oral health outcomes, health-related quality of life and patient experience, access to dental care and cost-effectiveness of teledentistry compared to conventional, face-to-face dental consultations. We found that there was consensus that teledentistry enhanced oral health through the early detection of oral lesions and increased access to dental care in remote areas and was time- and cost-saving. CONCLUSION: Teledentistry can improve oral health outcomes and access to dental care. Future research on its impact on oral health equity is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Atención Odontológica , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Salud Bucal , Telemedicina , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Análisis de Costo-EfectividadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this scoping review was to summarize the literature that reported on the experiences of people who use injection drugs' access to hepatitis C testing and diagnosis in Western countries. METHODS: The initial search was conducted in 2020 and an updated review was completed in 2022. Seven electronic databases were searched using a peer-reviewed search strategy and included: full-text, peer-reviewed studies with people who inject(ed) drugs, hepatitis C testing or diagnosis, conducted in Western countries. Excluded were studies published prior to 2014 and intervention studies. Two-step screening was conducted in duplicate. Conventional content analysis was used. RESULTS: Six studies were found from the search. The studies were published between 2014 and 2021 in Australia, United Kingdom, and United States. A total of 19 participant characteristics were extracted to contextualize their experiences, demonstrating a lack of demographic data. Four themes were found: Awareness and Knowledge, Stigma, Healthcare Service, and Psychological Responses. There were 58 occurrences of client quotes where participants described their experiences, 29 occurrences of quotes describing client-identified barriers, and 14 occurrences of quotes describing client-identified facilitators. CONCLUSION: A scoping review was conducted to present the experiences, barriers, and facilitators of people who use injection drugs to hepatitis C testing. The lack of demographic data and connection to client quotes further exacerbates the inequities among the population by overlooking their intragroup identities. Understanding their experiences of accessing hepatitis C testing and collecting demographic data will help advance health policies and interventions targeting people who use injection drugs.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C , Atención de Enfermería , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Hepacivirus , Australia , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
Introduction. A fall may impact a person's physical, emotional, and psychological well-being. Fall prevention programs are being implemented to reduce these negative outcomes. However, linguistic barriers in health services may reduce access to such prevention programs. A telehealth fall prevention program was designed to increase access to such programs in French for Francophone minority communities in Canada. This capacity-building project aimed to support community partners to deliver this telehealth program and document strategies used to reach, adopt, and implement the program within various Francophone and Acadian Minority Communities. Methods. A sequential explanatory mixed methodology was used to document reach, adoption, and implementation strategies and describe the lived experiences of program facilitators and organization representatives. Reach, adoption, and implementation were documented and analyzed descriptively, while lived experiences were analyzed using content analysis following the Consortium Framework for Implementation Research. Results. Twelve organization representatives or program facilitators from eight organizations operating in four different provinces participated in the study. Three themes emerged from the qualitative data on reach and adoption: external context, internal context, and capacity building. Four themes were identified as barriers and facilitators to implementation: level of preparation and time management, interpersonal relations and telepresence, exercise facilitation and safety, and technological problem-solving. Conclusion. Using tailored reach and adoption strategies such as prioritizing provinces with higher proportions of needs and training local community program facilitators may lead to the successful implementation of a new telehealth fall prevention program. Results from this study could potentially inform other primary prevention programs or telehealth program implementation.
RESUMEN
Make Well Known Foundation (MWKF), a nonprofit organization focused on supporting the health of minoritized and underserved populations, piloted the Community Health Builders (CHB) program. This connected MKWF Steering Committee members-national thought leaders in health-with leaders of underserved populations in Greensboro, NC, with the goal of translating research into practice. Steering Committee members provided education, instruction, and resources to community leaders that could then be transferred to area residents to cultivate better health. A roundtable meeting was first organized to allow community leaders to share insights into the highest priority needs of Greensboro's Black residents. Four topics resulted that became the focus of the training modules (called "accelerator forums") that formed the core of the CHB program. Each accelerator forum was led by Steering Committee members and local-level topic experts to educate and share resources with community leaders. The program concluded with a local health and resource fair, which exposed Greensboro residents to the resources shared during CHB program trainings. Overall, the CHB program pilot demonstrated success in the collaborative engagement between national- and community-level leaders based on measures of increased knowledge and self-efficacy in supporting Greensboro residents in the four accelerator forum topics. In a final debrief session, CHB participants shared their perspective that the progress achieved in the community needed to be sustained through continued national- and community-level collaboration and ongoing community training. This key insight and the need for sustained engagement will be incorporated into all future programs.