A perioperative study of Safusidenib in patients with IDH1-mutated glioma.

This is a single arm, open label perioperative trial to assess the feasibility, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of treatment with safusidenib following biopsy, and prior to surgical resection in patients with IDH1 mutated glioma who have not received radiation therapy or chemotherapy. Fifteen participants will receive treatment in two parts. First, biopsy followed by one cycle (28 days) of safusidenib, an orally available, small molecular inhibitor of mutated IDH1, then maximal safe resection of the tumor (Part A). Second, after recovery from surgery, safusidenib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (Part B). This research will enable objective measurement of biological activity of safusidenib in patients with IDH1 mutated glioma. Anti-tumor activity will be assessed by progression free survival and time to next intervention.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05577416 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Adult low-grade gliomas (aLGG) are primary brain cancers, defined by mutations in IDH1 or IDH2. When the IDH gene becomes abnormal (mutated), production of a metabolite that causes cancer cells to grow is increased. These tumors grow slowly but invade the normal functioning brain, making them nearly impossible to cure. The current standard of care treatment includes surgery, followed by radiation therapy and chemotherapy, the timing of which depends on the risk of cancer regrowth. Some patients may be suitable for monitoring with MRI scans alone, however recurrences will inevitably occur. Recently developed targeted mutant IDH inhibitors for aLGG patients may be beneficial both at diagnosis and recurrence. Notably, early treatment prior to radiation therapy and chemotherapy delays growth of aLGG and the need for subsequent radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Nevertheless, most patients will eventually suffer further tumor growth and the optimal timing and sequencing of these therapies remains an area of active research. This research investigates the mutant IDH1 inhibitor safusidenib. The researchers are conducting an innovative clinical trial where patients with aLGG, who have not received radiation therapy or chemotherapy, are treated with safusidenib following a biopsy and prior to surgical removal of their tumor. In this study they investigate whether this trial design is safe and feasible, and how safusidenib works; with the goal to better understand the optimal use of IDH inhibitors for patients with aLGG.

Phase 0 trials/ Intra-Target-Microdosing (ITM) and the lung: a review.

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of efficient drug discovery in respiratory disease. The traditional set up of clinical trials is expensive and allows for significant attrition of new drugs, many of which undergo extensive safety testing before being abandoned for lack of efficacy. Phase 0 trials, named as they sit between pre-clinical research and phase I, allow for the testing of sub-clinical microdoses in humans to gather early pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) and mechanistic data, before deciding on which drugs to advance further. This early data can improve the efficiency and cost effectiveness of drug development and reduce the extent of animal testing. Phase 0 trials traditionally have utilised sub-therapeutic microdoses of compounds administered intravenously with readouts focusing on PK - measured using highly sensitive methods such as accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) of peripheral blood, as well as whole-body positron emission tomography (PET). Mathematical models allow for extrapolation of this PK data to support the further testing of larger, systemically effective doses. However, this extrapolation method is limited at providing robust PD or target engagement/ mode of action data. Using an Intra-Target Microdosing (ITM) approach, a small compartment of the body (about 1% or less) is exposed to potentially clinically active local concentrations. This allows for the collection of PD data, evidence of target cell engagement, as well as the opportunity to extrapolate systemic PK and PD data. This approach has the potential within the pulmonary system for the study and rapid and cost-effective development of new and repurposed drugs.

ABTC-0904: targeting glioma stem cells in GBM: a phase 0/II study of hedgehog pathway inhibitor GDC-0449.

PURPOSE: Gliomagenesis and resistance of glioblastoma (GBM) are believed to be mediated by glioma stem cells (GSC). Evidence suggests that SHH signaling promotes GSC proliferation and self-renewal. METHODS: ABTC-0904 was a two-arm, multicenter phase 0/II study of GDC-0449, an oral inhibitor of Smoothened (SMO) in patients undergoing resection for recurrent GBM. All patients (Arms I and II) had surgery and received drug post-operatively. Only patients in Arm I received drug prior to surgery. The primary objective was to determine 6-month progression free survival (PFS-6). Secondary endpoints include median PFS (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS), response rate, and toxicity. Correlative studies included bioanalysis of GDC-0449, and inhibition of SHH signaling, GSC proliferation and self-renewal. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were enrolled. Pharmacokinetics of GDC-0449 in plasma demonstrated levels within expected therapeutic range in 75% of patients. The proportion of tumorcells producing CD133+ neurospheres, neurosphere proliferation, self-renewal, and expression of the SHh downstream signaling was significantly decreased in Arm I following GDC-0449 treatment (p < 0.005; p < 0.001 respectively) compared to Arm II (no drug pre-op). Treatment was well tolerated. There were no objective responders in either arm. Overall PFS-6 was 2.4% (95% CI 0.9-11.1%). Median PFS was 2.3 months (95% CI 1.9-2.6) and mOS was 7.8 months (95% CI 5.4-10.1). CONCLUSIONS: GDC-0449 was well tolerated, reached tumor, and inhibited CD133+ neurosphere formation, but had little clinical efficacy as a single agent in rGBM. This suggests growth and maintenance of rGBM is not solely dependent on the SHH pathway thus targeting SMO may require combined approaches.

The Future Glioblastoma Clinical Trials Landscape: Early Phase 0, Window of Opportunity, and Adaptive Phase I-III Studies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Innovative clinical trial designs for glioblastoma (GBM) are needed to expedite drug discovery. Phase 0, window of opportunity, and adaptive designs have been proposed, but their advanced methodologies and underlying biostatistics are not widely known. This review summarizes phase 0, window of opportunity, and adaptive phase I-III clinical trial designs in GBM tailored to physicians. RECENT FINDINGS: Phase 0, window of opportunity, and adaptive trials are now being implemented for GBM. These trials can remove ineffective therapies earlier during drug development and improve trial efficiency. There are two ongoing adaptive platform trials: GBM Adaptive Global Innovative Learning Environment (GBM AGILE) and the INdividualized Screening trial of Innovative GBM Therapy (INSIGhT). The future clinical trials landscape in GBM will increasingly involve phase 0, window of opportunity, and adaptive phase I-III studies. Continued collaboration between physicians and biostatisticians will be critical for implementing these trial designs.

Evaluation of two-stage designs of Phase 2 single-arm trials in glioblastoma: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Due to economical and ethical reasons, the two-stage designs have been widely used for Phase 2 single-arm trials in oncology because the designs allow us to stop the trial early if the proposed treatment is likely to be ineffective. Nonetheless, none has examined the usage for published articles that had applied the two-stage designs in Phase 2 single-arm trials in brain tumor. A complete systematic review and discussions for overcoming design issues might be important to better understand why oncology trials have shown low success rates in early phase trials. METHODS: We systematically reviewed published single-arm two-stage Phase 2 trials for patients with glioblastoma and high-grade gliomas (including newly diagnosed or recurrent). We also sought to understand how these two-stage trials have been implemented and discussed potential design issues which we hope will be helpful for investigators who work with Phase 2 clinical trials in rare and high-risk cancer studies including Neuro-Oncology. The systematic review was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-statement. Searches were conducted using the electronic database of PubMed, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov for potentially eligible publications from inception by two independent researchers up to May 26, 2022. The followings were key words for the literature search as index terms or free-text words: "phase II trials", "glioblastoma", and "two-stage design". We extracted disease type and setting, population, therapeutic drug, primary endpoint, input parameters and sample size results from two-stage designs, and historical control reference, and study termination status. RESULTS: Among examined 29 trials, 12 trials (41%) appropriately provided key input parameters and sample size results from two-stage design implementation. Among appropriately implemented 12 trials, discouragingly only 3 trials (10%) explained the reference information of historical control rates. Most trials (90%) used Simon's two-stage designs. Only three studies have been completed for both stages and two out of the three completed studies had shown the efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Right implementation for two-stage design and sample size calculation, transparency of historical control and experimental rates, appropriate selection on primary endpoint, potential incorporation of adaptive designs, and utilization of Phase 0 paradigm might help overcoming the challenges on glioblastoma therapeutic trials in Phase 2 trials.

Improving vision for surgeons during laparoscopy: the Enhanced Laparoscopic Vision System (ELViS).

BACKGROUND: For many abdominal surgical interventions, laparotomy has gradually been replaced by laparoscopy, with numerous benefits for the patient in terms of post-operative recovery. However, during laparoscopy, the endoscope only provides a single viewpoint to the surgeon, leaving numerous blind spots and opening the way to peri-operative adverse events. Alternative camera systems have been proposed, but many lack the requisite resolution/robustness for use during surgery or cannot provide real-time images. Here, we present the added value of the Enhanced Laparoscopic Vision System (ELViS) which overcomes these limitations and provides a broad view of the surgical field in addition to the usual high-resolution endoscope. METHODS: Experienced laparoscopy surgeons performed several typical procedure steps on a live pig model. The time-to-completion for surgical exercises performed by conventional endoscopy and ELViS-assisted surgery was measured. A debriefing interview following each operating session was conducted by an ergonomist, and a System Usability Scale (SUS) score was determined. RESULTS: Proof of concept of ELVIS was achieved in an animal model with seven expert surgeons without peroperative adverse events related to the surgical device. No differences were found in time-to-completion. Mean SUS score was 74.7, classifying the usability of the ELViS as "good". During the debriefing interview, surgeons highlighted several situations where the ELViS provided a real advantage (such as during instrument insertion, exploration of the abdominal cavity or for orientation during close work) and also suggested avenues for improvement of the system. CONCLUSIONS: This first test of the ELViS prototype on a live animal model demonstrated its usability and provided promising and useful feedback for further development.

Nintedanib plus letrozole in early breast cancer: a phase 0/I pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and safety clinical trial of combined FGFR1 and aromatase inhibition.

BACKGROUND: The combined use of a FGFR1 blocker and aromatase inhibitors is appealing for treating breast cancer patients with FGFR1 amplification. However, no pharmacodynamic studies have addressed the effects of this combined target modulation. We conducted a phase 0/I clinical trial in an adjuvant setting, with the goal of obtaining pharmacodynamic proof of the effects of combined aromatase and FGFR1 inhibition and to establish the RP2D for nintedanib combined with letrozole. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with early-stage luminal breast cancer were eligible for enrollment in the study. Dose level 1 was nintedanib (150 mg/bid) plus letrozole (2.5 mg/day) administered for a single 28-day cycle (DLT assessment period), followed by a classic 3 + 3 schedule. FGF23 and 17-B-estradiol levels were determined on days 0 and 15; pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed on days 1 and 28. Patients were allowed to continue treatment for 6 cycles. The primary study endpoint was a demonstration of FGFR1 modulation (defined as a 25% increase in the plasma FGF23 level). RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were enrolled in the study (10 in the expansion cohort following dose escalation). At the RP2D (nintedanib 200 mg/bid plus letrozole 2.5 mg/day), we observed a 55% mean increase in the plasma FGF23 level, and 81.2% of the patients had no detectable level of 17-B-estradiol in their plasma (87.5% of the patients treated with letrozole alone). Nintedanib and letrozole displayed a pharmacokinetic interaction that led to three- and twofold increases in their respective plasma concentrations. Most G3 toxic events (5 out of 6: 2 diarrhea and 3 hypertransaminasemia) occurred subsequent to the DLT assessment period. CONCLUSION: Combined treatment with nintedanib (200 mg/bid) plus letrozole (2.5 mg/day) effectively suppressed FGFR1 and aromatase activity, and these respective doses can be used as starting doses in any subsequent trials. However, drug-drug interactions may produce tolerability issues when these drugs are co-administered for an extended time period (e.g., 6 months). Patients enrolled in future trials with these drugs should be carefully monitored for their FGF23 levels and signs of toxicity, and those findings should guide individualized treatment decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov under reg. # NCT02619162, on December 2, 2015.

A human microdose study of the antimalarial drug GSK3191607 in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: GSK3191607, a novel inhibitor of the Plasmodium falciparum ATP4 (PfATP4) pathway, is being considered for development in humans. However, a key problem encountered during the preclinical evaluation of the compound was its inconsistent pharmacokinetic (PK) profile across preclinical species (mouse, rat and dog), which prevented reliable prediction of PK parameters in humans and precluded a well-founded assessment of the potential for clinical development of the compound. Therefore, an open-label microdose (100 µg, six subjects) first time in humans study was conducted to assess the human PK of GSK3191607 following intravenous administration of [14C]-GSK3191607. METHODS: A human microdose study was conducted to investigate the clinical PK of GSK3191607 and enable a Go/No Go decision on further progression of the compound. The PK disposition parameters estimated from the microdose study, combined with preclinical in vitro and in vivo pharmacodynamic parameters, were all used to estimate the potential efficacy of various oral dosing regimens in humans. RESULTS: The PK profile, based on the microdose data, demonstrated a half-life (~17 h) similar to other antimalarial compounds currently in clinical development. However, combining the microdose data with the pharmacodynamic data provided results that do not support further clinical development of the compound for a single dose cure. CONCLUSIONS: The information generated by this study provides a basis for predicting the expected oral PK profiles of GSK3191607 in man and supports decisions on the future clinical development of the compound.

Integrating Pharmacoproteomics into Early-Phase Clinical Development: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, and Recommendations.

Pharmacoproteomics is the study of disease-modifying and toxicity parameters associated with therapeutic drug administration, using analysis of quantitative and temporal changes to specific, predetermined, and select proteins, or to the proteome as a whole. Pharmacoproteomics is a rapidly evolving field, with progress in analytic technologies enabling processing of complex interactions of large number of unique proteins and effective use in clinical trials. Nevertheless, our analysis of clinicaltrials.gov and PubMed shows that the application of proteomics in early-phase clinical development is minimal and limited to few therapeutic areas, with oncology predominating. We review the history, technologies, current usage, challenges, and potential for future use, and conclude with recommendations for integration of pharmacoproteomic in early-phase drug development.

Phase 0 and phase III transport in various organs: combined concept of phases in xenobiotic transport and metabolism.

The historical phasing concept of drug metabolism and elimination was introduced to comprise the two phases of metabolism: phase I metabolism for oxidations, reductions and hydrolyses, and phase II metabolism for synthesis. With this concept, biological membrane barriers obstructing the accessibility of metabolism sites in the cells for drugs were not considered. The concept of two phases was extended to a concept of four phases when drug transporters were detected that guided drugs and drug metabolites in and out of the cells. In particular, water soluble or charged drugs are virtually not able to overcome the phospholipid membrane barrier. Drug transporters belong to two main clusters of transporter families: the solute carrier (SLC) families and the ATP binding cassette (ABC) carriers. The ABC transporters comprise seven families with about 20 carriers involved in drug transport. All of them operate as pumps at the expense of ATP splitting. Embedded in the former phase concept, the term "phase III" was introduced by Ishikawa in 1992 for drug export by ABC efflux pumps. SLC comprise 52 families, from which many carriers are drug uptake transporters. Later on, this uptake process was referred to as the "phase 0 transport" of drugs. Transporters for xenobiotics in man and animal are most expressed in liver, but they are also present in extra-hepatic tissues such as in the kidney, the adrenal gland and lung. This review deals with the function of drug carriers in various organs and their impact on drug metabolism and elimination.

The application of Phase 0 and microtracer approaches in early clinical development: past, present, and future.

Phase 0 microdosing studies were introduced to the drug development community approximately 20 years ago. A microdose is defined as less than 1/100th of the dose calculated based on animal data to yield a pharmacological effect in humans, with a maximum of 100 µg, or 30 nmoles for protein products. In our experience, Phase 0 microdose studies have not been fully embraced by the pharmaceutical industry. This notion is based on the number of Phase 0 studies that we have been involved in. Thus, we conducted at least 17 Phase 0 microdose studies in the Zero's (on average, two per year), but in the years beyond this, it was only 15 studies (1.4 per year); in these latter years, we did conduct a total of 23 studies which employed an intravenous (i.v.) microdose for absolute bioavailability (ABA) assessments (two per year on average), which are the most used and potentially informative type of clinical study using a microdose, albeit they are formally not microdose studies. In the current review, we summarize the past use of and experience with Phase 0 microdose designs in early clinical development, including intravenous 14C microdose ABA studies, and assess what is needed to increase the adoption of useful applications of Phase 0/microdose studies in the near future.

When to consider intra-target microdosing: physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling approach to quantitatively identify key factors for observing target engagement.

Intra-Target Microdosing (ITM), integral to Phase 0 clinical studies, offers a novel approach in drug development, effectively bridging the gap between preclinical and clinical phases. This methodology is especially relevant in streamlining early drug development stages. Our research utilized a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and Monte Carlo simulations to examine factors influencing the effectiveness of ITM in achieving target engagement. The study revealed that ITM is capable of engaging targets at levels akin to systemically administered therapeutic doses for specific compounds. However, we also observed a notable decrease in the probability of success when the predicted therapeutic dose exceeds 10 mg. Additionally, our findings identified several critical factors affecting the success of ITM. These encompass both lower dissociation constants, higher systemic clearance and an optimum abundance of receptors in the target organ. Target tissues characterized by relatively low blood flow rates and high drug clearance capacities were deemed more conducive to successful ITM. These insights emphasize the necessity of taking into account each drug's unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, along with the physiological characteristics of the target tissue, in determining the suitability of ITM.

Lessons learned from phase 3 trials of immunotherapy for glioblastoma: Time for longitudinal sampling?

Glioblastoma (GBM)'s median overall survival is almost 21 months. Six phase 3 immunotherapy clinical trials have recently been published, yet 5/6 did not meet approval by regulatory bodies. For the sixth, approval is uncertain. Trial failures result from multiple factors, ranging from intrinsic tumor biology to clinical trial design. Understanding the clinical and basic science of these 6 trials is compelled by other immunotherapies reaching the point of advanced phase 3 clinical trial testing. We need to understand more of the science in human GBMs in early trials: the "window of opportunity" design may not be best to understand complex changes brought about by immunotherapeutic perturbations of the GBM microenvironment. The convergence of increased safety of image-guided biopsies with "multi-omics" of small cell numbers now permits longitudinal sampling of tumor and biofluids to dissect the complex temporal changes in the GBM microenvironment as a function of the immunotherapy.

Early, precise, and safe clinical evaluation of the pharmacodynamic effects of novel agents in the intact human tumor microenvironment.

Introduction: Drug development is systemically inefficient. Research and development costs for novel therapeutics average hundreds of millions to billions of dollars, with the overall likelihood of approval estimated to be as low as 6.7% for oncology drugs. Over half of these failures are due to a lack of drug efficacy. This pervasive and repeated low rate of success exemplifies how preclinical models fail to adequately replicate the complexity and heterogeneity of human cancer. Therefore, new methods of evaluation, early in the development trajectory, are essential both to rule-in and rule-out novel agents with more rigor and speed, but also to spare clinical trial patients from the potentially toxic sequelae (high risk) of testing investigational agents that have a low likelihood of producing a response (low benefit). Methods: The clinical in vivo oncology (CIVO®) platform was designed to change this drug development paradigm. CIVO precisely delivers microdose quantities of up to 8 drugs or combinations directly into patient tumors 4-96 h prior to planned surgical resection. Resected tissue is then analyzed for responses at each site of intratumoral drug exposure. Results: To date, CIVO has been used safely in 6 clinical trials, including 68 subjects, with 5 investigational and 17 approved agents. Resected tissues were analyzed initially using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization assays (115 biomarkers). As technology advanced, the platform was paired with spatial biology analysis platforms, to successfully track anti-neoplastic and immune-modulating activity of the injected agents in the intact tumor microenvironment. Discussion: Herein we provide a report of the use of CIVO technology in patients, a depiction of the robust analysis methods enabled by this platform, and a description of the operational and regulatory mechanisms used to deploy this approach in synergistic partnership with pharmaceutical partners. We further detail how use of the CIVO platform is a clinically safe and scientifically precise alternative or complement to preclinical efficacy modeling, with outputs that inform, streamline, and de-risk drug development.

Perioperative clinical trials for glioma: Raising the bar.

Gliomas are a heterogeneous group of primary brain cancers with poor survival despite multimodality therapy that includes surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. Numerous clinical trials have investigated systemic therapies in glioma, but have largely been negative. Multiple factors have contributed to the lack of progress including tumour heterogeneity, the tumour micro-environment and presence of the blood-brain barrier, as well as extrinsic factors relating to trial design, such as the lack of a contemporaneous biopsy at the time of treatment. A number of strategies have been proposed to progress new agents into the clinic. Here, we review the progress of perioperative, including phase 0 and 'window of opportunity', studies and provide recommendations for trial design in the development of new agents for glioma. The incorporation of pre- and post-treatment biopsies in glioma early phase trials will provide valuable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data and also determine the target or biomarker effect, which will guide further development of new agents. Perioperative 'window of opportunity' studies must use drugs with a recommended-phase-2-dose, known safety profile and adequate blood-brain barrier penetration. Drugs shown to have on-target effects in perioperative trials can then be evaluated further in a larger cohort of patients in an adaptive trial to increase the efficiency of drug development.

Pilot Study to Predict Pharmacokinetics of a Therapeutic Gemcitabine Dose From a Microdose.

Microdose studies are exploratory trials to determine early drug pharmacokinetics in humans. In this trial we examined whether the pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine at a therapeutic dose could be predicted from the pharmacokinetics of a microdose. In this prospective, open-label microdosing study, a gemcitabine microdose (100 µg) was given intravenously to participants on day 1, followed by a therapeutic dose (1250 mg/m2 ) on day 2. Gemcitabine and its metabolite 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuracil (dFdU) were quantified in plasma and intracellularly by using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry). Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed. Ten patients participated in this study. The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-8 ) of gemcitabine after microdosing was 0.00074 h·mg/L and after therapeutic dosing was 16 h·mg/L. The mean AUC0-8 of dFdU following the microdose and therapeutic dose were 0.022 h·mg/L and 169 h·mg/L, respectively. Exposure to gemcitabine after the therapeutic dose was within 2-fold of the exposure following a microdose, when linearly extrapolated to 1250 mg/m2 . However, the shape of the concentration-time curve was different, as reflected by poor scalability in volume of distribution (939 L versus 222 L). Furthermore, intracellularly phosphorylated gemcitabine and phosphorylated dFdU levels could not be predicted from the microdose. The AUC0-8 of gemcitabine at therapeutic dose was accurately predicted by the pharmacokinetics of a microdose, when linearly extrapolated to 1250 mg/m2 . Volume of distribution, elimination rate constant, and intracellular pharmacokinetics of the therapeutic dose could not be predicted from the microdose, which demonstrates limitations of the microdose approach in this case.

Phase 0 and window of opportunity clinical trial design in neuro-oncology: a RANO review.

Glioblastoma is a devastating disease with poor prognosis. Few effective chemotherapeutics are currently available, and much effort has been expended to identify new drugs capable of slowing tumor progression. The phase 0 trial design was developed to facilitate early identification of promising agents for cancer that should undergo accelerated approval. This design features an early in-human study that enrolls a small number of patients who receive subtherapeutic doses of medication with the goals of describing pharmacokinetics through drug blood level measurements and determining intratumoral concentrations of the investigational compound as well as pharmacodynamics by studying the biochemical and physiological effects of drugs. In neuro-oncology, however, the presence of the blood-brain barrier and difficulty in obtaining brain tumor tissue warrant a separate set of considerations. In this paper, we critically reviewed the protocols used in all brain tumor related in-human phase 0 and phase 0-like ("window of opportunity") studies between 1993 and 2018, as well as ongoing clinical trials, and identified major challenges in trial design as applied to central nervous system tumors that include surgical specimen collection and storage, brain tumor drug level analysis, and confirmation of drug action. We therefore propose that phase 0 trials in neuro-oncology should include (i) only patients in whom a resection of the tumor is planned, (ii) use of clinical doses of an investigational agent, (iii) tissue sampling from enhancing and non-enhancing portions of the tumor, and (iv) assessment of drug-specific target effects. Standardization of clinical protocols for phase 0/window of opportunity studies can help accelerate the development of effective treatments for glioblastoma.

Phase 0 Radiopharmaceutical-Agent Clinical Development.

The evaluation of antibody-targeted or peptide-targeted radiopharmaceuticals as monotherapy or in oncological drug combinations requires programmatic collaboration within the National Cancer Institute (NCI) clinical trial enterprise. Phase 0 trials provide a flexible research platform for the study of radiopharmaceutical-drug pharmacokinetics, radiation dosimetry, biomarkers of DNA damage response modulation, and pharmacodynamic benchmarks predictive of therapeutic success. In this article, we discuss a phase 0 clinical development approach for human antibody-targeted or peptide-targeted radiopharmaceutical-agent combinations. We expect that early-phase radiopharmaceutical-agent combination trials will become a more tactical and more prevalent part of radiopharmaceutical clinical development in the near-term future for the NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program.

Animal Safety, Toxicology, and Pharmacokinetic Studies According to the ICH S9 Guideline for a Novel Fusion Protein tTF-NGR Targeting Procoagulatory Activity into Tumor Vasculature: Are Results Predictive for Humans?

BACKGROUND: CD-13 targeted tissue factor tTF-NGR is a fusion protein selectively inducing occlusion of tumor vasculature with resulting tumor infarction. Mechanistic and pharmacodynamic studies have shown broad anti-tumor therapeutic effects in xenograft models. METHODS: After successful Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) production and before translation into clinical phase I, ICH S9 (S6) guideline-conforming animal safety, toxicology, and pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were requested by the federal drug authority in accordance with European and US regulations. RESULTS: These studies were performed in mice, rats, guinea pigs, and beagle dogs. Results of the recently completed clinical phase I trial in end-stage cancer patients showed only limited predictive value of these non-clinical studies for patient tolerability and safety in phase I. CONCLUSIONS: Although this experience cannot be generalized, alternative pathways with seamless clinical phase 0 microdosing-phase I dose escalation studies are endorsed for anticancer drug development and translation into the clinic.

Phase 0 Clinical Trial Strategies for the Neurosurgical Oncologist.

In an era of escalating drug discovery costs, shifting priorities within the pharmaceutical industry, and longstanding challenges in central nervous system drug delivery, surgical trials offer an avenue to identify promising agents with demonstrable tumor penetration and molecular effects. The rise of pharmacodynamic- and pharmacokinetic-driven clinical trials, including phase 0 study designs, creates an opportunity for the neurosurgical oncologist to engage drug development for brain tumor patients directly. Here, we review the phase 0 clinical trial mechanism as well as its current and future applications within neurosurgical oncology.