Unrepresented human leucocyte antigen alleles in single-antigen bead assays: A single-centre cohort study.

Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) alleles may generate antibodies that are undetectable by routine single-antigen beads (SABs) assays if their unique epitopes are unrepresented. We aimed to describe the prevalence and explore the potential impact of unrepresented HLA alleles in standard SAB kits in our cohort. All individuals who had undergone two-field HLA typing (HLA-A/B/C/DRB1/DQA1/-DQB1/-DPA1/-DPB1) from February 2021 to July 2023 were included. Two-field HLA-DRB3/4/5 typing was imputed. Each unrepresented allele was compared with the most similar represented allele in the standard LABScreen, LABScreen ExPlex (One Lambda) and the LIFECODES (Immucor) SAB kits. Differences in eplet expression (HLA Eplet Registry) were identified. Differences in three-dimensional molecular structures were visualized using generated models (SWISS-MODEL). Two-field HLA typing was performed for 116 individuals. Overall, 16.7% of all HLA alleles, found in 36.2% of individuals, were unrepresented by all SAB test kits. Four eplets, found in 12.9% of individuals, were unrepresented in at least 1 SAB kit. Non-Chinese individuals were more likely to have unrepresented HLA alleles and eplets than Chinese individuals. There were differences in HLA allele and eplet representation amongst the different SAB test kits. Use of supplementary SAB test kits may improve HLA allele and eplet representation. Although some HLA alleles were unrepresented, most epitopes were represented in current SAB kits. However, some unrepresented alleles may contain epitopes which may generate undetectable antibodies. Further studies may be needed to investigate the potential clinical impact of these unrepresented alleles and eplets, especially in certain ethnic populations or at-risk individuals.

Caveats of HLA antibody detection by solid-phase assays.

Solid-phase assays for human leukocyte antigens (HLA) antibody detection have clearly revolutionized the field of HLA diagnostics and transplantation. The key advantages are a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of HLA antibodies compared with cell-based assays, as well as the potential for standardization. Solid-phase assays enabled the broad introduction of tools such as "virtual crossmatching" and "calculated panel reactive antibodies," which are essential components in many organ allocation systems, kidney-paired donation programs, and center-specific immunological risk stratification procedures. The most advanced solid-phase assays are the so-called single antigen beads (SAB). They are available now for more than 15 years, and the transplant community embraced their significant advantages. However, SAB analysis and interpretation is complex and many pitfalls have to be considered. In this review, we will discuss problems, limitations, and challenges using SAB. Furthermore, we express our wishes for the improvements of SAB as well as their future use for immunological assessment and research purposes.

Pretransplant Kinetics of Anti-HLA Antibodies in Patients on the Waiting List for Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Patients on organ transplant waiting lists are evaluated for preexisting alloimmunity to minimize episodes of acute and chronic rejection by regularly monitoring for changes in alloimmune status. There are few studies on how alloimmunity changes over time in patients on kidney allograft waiting lists, and an apparent lack of research-based evidence supporting currently used monitoring intervals. METHODS: To investigate the dynamics of alloimmune responses directed at HLA antigens, we retrospectively evaluated data on anti-HLA antibodies measured by the single-antigen bead assay from 627 waitlisted patients who subsequently received a kidney transplant at University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, between 2008 and 2017. Our analysis focused on a filtered dataset comprising 467 patients who had at least two assay measurements. RESULTS: Within the filtered dataset, we analyzed potential changes in mean fluorescence intensity values (reflecting bound anti-HLA antibodies) between consecutive measurements for individual patients in relation to the time interval between measurements. Using multiple approaches, we found no correlation between these two factors. However, when we stratified the dataset on the basis of documented previous immunizing events (transplant, pregnancy, or transfusion), we found significant differences in the magnitude of change in alloimmune status, especially among patients with a previous transplant versus patients without such a history. Further efforts to cluster patients according to statistical properties related to alloimmune status kinetics were unsuccessful, indicating considerable complexity in individual variability. CONCLUSIONS: Alloimmune kinetics in patients on a kidney transplant waiting list do not appear to be related to the interval between measurements, but are instead associated with alloimmunization history. This suggests that an individualized strategy for alloimmune status monitoring may be preferable to currently used intervals.

Influence of test technique on sensitization status of patients on the kidney transplant waiting list.

The exquisitely sensitive single antigen bead (SAB) technique was shown to detect human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in sera of healthy male blood donors. Such false reactions can have an impact on critical decisions, especially with respect to the determination of unacceptable HLA-antigen mismatches in patients awaiting a kidney transplant. We tested pretransplant sera of 534 patients on the kidney waiting list using complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and SAB in parallel. Evidence of HLA antibodies was obtained in 5% of patients using CDC, 14% using ELISA, and 81% using SAB. Among patients without history of an immunizing event, 77% showed evidence of HLA antibodies in SAB. In contrast 98% of these patients were negative in ELISA and CDC. In patients without an immunizing event, SAB-detected antibodies reacted not always weakly but with mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values as high as 14 440. High-MFI-value antibodies were found in some of these patients with HLA specificities that are rather common in general population, consideration of which would lead to unjustified exclusion of potential kidney donors. False SAB reactions can be unveiled by testing with additional antibody assays. Denial of donor kidneys to recipients based on HLA-antibody specificities detected exclusively in the SAB assay is not advisable.

The correlation of results of panel reactive antibody, identification, and single antigen beads in detection of anti-HLA antibodies: Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, tissue typing laboratory experience.

BACKGROUND: We have performed a retrospective analysis of anti-HLA class I MHC and class II MHC antibodies measured using a single antigen bead (SAB) assay and a panel reactive antibody (PRA) assay. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A group of 256 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was tested for anti-HLA antibodies in the tissue typing laboratory between 2017 and 2020. In the cohort, the serum samples of patients waiting for transplantation were tested. Both the PRA and SAB tests of these patients were analyzed using the Luminex (Immucor) method. The threshold of positivity was accepted as median fluorescence intensities (MFI) ≥1000 for PRA screening and MFI ≥750 for SAB screening. RESULTS: Overall, antibodies to HLA antigens were detected in 202 (78.9%) out of 256 patients in the PRA study. Antibodies against both class I/II antigens were detected only in 15.6% of these patients, whereas antibodies against only against class I HLA in 31.3% and only against class II HLA in 32.0%. By comparison, the SAB study found that 66.8% of patients were positive for HLA antigens. Furthermore, donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were detected in 52.0% of PRA-positive patients and 52.6% of SAB-positive patients. It was shown that 168 patients (83.2%) out of 202 PRA-positive patients were found to be SAB-positive. In addition, 51 patients negative in the SAB assay (94.4%) were also negative in the PRA assay. Statistical analysis established a significant correlation between the PRA and SAB positivity (p > 0.001). It was also shown that MFI ≥3000 PRA positivity for class I HLA antigens (p = 0.049) and MFI ≥5000 PRA positivity for class II antigens (p < 0.001) correlated with the SAB positivity in patients. CONCLUSION: Our results showed the importance of both PRA and SAB assays to define the status of sensitization in patients.

Cumulative mean fluorescent intensities of HLA specific antibodies predict antibody mediated rejections after kidney transplantation.

It is still not fully elucidated which pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) are harmful after kidney transplantation. In particular, it needs to be clarified whether cumulative mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) against multiple HLA specificities have a predictive value for allograft function. Our retrospective single centre study analyzed preformed HLA antibodies determined by Luminex™ Single Antigen Bead (SAB) assay, including C1q addition, in relation to rejection and clinical outcome in 255 cross match negative kidney allograft recipients. Only 33 recipients (13%) of the total cohort showed early AMR during the first year posttransplant, but in patients with pre-transplant DSA the rate was increased to 15 out of 40 (38%). Three year graft survival was significantly shorter in patients with histological signs of AMR compared with patients without AMR or with no biopsy (74%, 92%, and 97%, respectively, p < 0.0001). In patients with HLA-DSA, a cumulative MFI value of all HLA antibodies of more than 103.000 indicated the highest risk for AMR posttransplant (p = 0.01). In conclusion, in patients with HLA-DSA, the cumulative MFI value may help to further stratify the risk of AMR after kidney transplantation.

Antibodies to cryptic epitopes on HLA class I and class II heavy chains bound to single antigen beads: Clinically relevant?

Cell surface HLA class I consists of trimers, i.e., alpha - heavy chain, beta - 2 - microglobulin, and a peptide, termed closed conformers (CC) on non-activated lymphocytes. HLA class I and class II may also exist, respectively, as alpha-chain only or alpha and beta - chain only on activated cells termed open conformers (OC). We extend previous studies using an OC-specific monoclonal antibody that demonstrate LABScreen HLA class I and II single antigen beads (SABs) contain a mixture of open and closed conformers. LIFECODES SABs have bound CC only. More HLA class I and class II LABScreen SABs were reactive than LIFECODES SABs due to the presence of OC on LABScreen SABs. We hypothesized that antibody against OC on HLA B antigens would not be detected in cell based cross matches (XMs) with typical lymphocyte targets since anti-HLA OC antibodies would not react with native HLA CC on the cell surface. To test this hypothesis, we performed flow cytometry XM (FCXM) assays with sera of sufficient strength that most laboratories would likely predict positive FCXMs. Sera that reacted strongly with LABScreen SABs (>13,000 MFI) but weakly or not at all with LIFECODES SABs (<1000 MFI) gave negative T and B cell FCXMs. In contrast, sera that reacted with LIFECODES SABs (>13,000 MFI) but weakly with LABScreen SABs (<2100 MFI) exhibited positive FCXMs. Detection of antibodies directed against OC in SAB assays, may lead to inappropriate listing of unacceptable antigens, a decision not to XM or pre-or post - transplant desensitization procedures.

Luminex screening first vs. direct single antigen bead assays: Different strategies for HLA antibody monitoring after kidney transplantation.

MAIN PROBLEM: Luminex panel and single antigen beads (SAB) are used for screening and DSA specificity determination respectively. The cost of SAB may limit its general use, so some labs perform SAB tests only after positive screening. METHODS: We compared both strategies: 1) SAB only if positive screening with kits from manufacturer A, and 2) direct SAB from manufacturer B, and correlate their sensitivity with histological findings. RESULTS: We selected 118 kidney transplant recipients with a normal biopsy (n = 19), histological antibody-mediated damage (ABMR, n = 52) or interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA, n = 47) following Banff 2015 and 2017 classification. Direct SAB detected DSA in 13 patients missed by screening. Strategy 1 detected DSA in 0% normal, 61.5% ABMR and 8.5% IFTA patients; percentages with strategy 2 were 5.2%, 78.8% and 14.8% (p=0.004). Strategy 2 identified DSA allowing full ABMR diagnosis in 17% cases missed by strategy 1. Thereafter, direct SAB from manufacturer A confirmed DSA in 46% DSA-positive cases with strategy 2 (55.5% ABMR cases). CONCLUSIONS: Luminex screening failed to identify clinically relevant HLA antibodies, hampering DSA detection in patients with possible ABMR. Direct SAB testing should be the chosen strategy for post-transplantation monitoring, albeit direct SAB from the two existing manufacturers may diverge in as much as 50% of cases.

Impact of Preformed Donor-Specific Anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibody C1q-Binding Ability on Kidney Allograft Outcome.

The consolidation of single antigen beads (SAB-panIgG) assay in the detection of preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies has improved transplantation success. However, its high sensitivity has limited the allograft allocation for sensitized patients, increasing their waiting time. A modification of the standard SAB-panIgG assay allows the detection of that subset of antibodies capable of binding C1q (SAB-C1q assay). However, the clinical usefulness of SAB-C1q assay for determining the unacceptable mismatches is under discussion. We retrospectively analyzed the impact of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) according to the C1q-binding ability on allograft outcome, examining 389 single-kidney transplanted patients from deceased donors. Recipients with preformed C1q-binding DSA showed the lowest allograft survival up to 7 years (40.7%) compared to patients with preformed non-C1q-binding DSA (73.4%; p = 0.001) and without DSA (79.1%; p < 0.001). Allograft survival rate was similar between patients with preformed non-C1q-binding DSA and patients without preformed DSA (p = 0.403). Interestingly, among the high-mean fluorescence intensity DSA (≥10,000) population (n = 46), those patients whose DSA were further capable of binding C1q showed a poorer allograft outcome (38.4 vs. 68.9%; p = 0.041). Moreover, in our multivariate predictive model for assessing the risk of allograft loss, the presence of C1q-binding DSA (HR 4.012; CI 95% 2.326-6.919; p < 0.001) but not of non-C1q-binding DSA (HR 1.389; CI 95% 0.784-2.461; p = 0.260) remained an independent predictor after stratifying the DSA population according to the C1q-binding ability and adjusting the model for other pre-transplantation predictive factors including donor age, cold-ischemia time, and HLA-DR mismatches. In conclusion, the unacceptable mismatch definition according to the SAB-C1q assay would improve the risk stratification of allograft loss and increase the limited allograft allocation of highly sensitized patients, shortening their waiting time.

Detection of alloantibody-mediated complement activation: A diagnostic advance in monitoring kidney transplant rejection?

OBJECTIVE: Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is an important cause of kidney allograft injury. In the last two decades, detection of complement split product C4d along transplant capillaries, a footprint of antibody-mediated classical complement activation, has evolved as a useful diagnostic marker of ABMR. While it was recognized that ABMR may occur also in the absence of C4d, numerous studies have shown that C4d deposition may indicate a more severe rejection phenotype associated with poor graft survival. Such studies suggest a possible diagnostic benefit of ex vivo monitoring the complement-activating capability of circulating alloantibodies. DESIGN AND METHODS: We reviewed the literature between 1993 and 2015, focusing on in vivo (biopsy work-up) and in vitro detection (modified bead array technology) of HLA antibody-triggered classical complement activation in kidney transplantation. RESULTS: Precise HLA antibody detection methods, in particular Luminex-based single antigen bead (SAB) assays, have provided a valuable basis for the design of techniques for in vitro detection of HLA antibody-triggered complement activation reflected by C1q, C4 or C3 split product deposition to the bead surface. Establishing such assays it was recognized that deposition of complement products to SAB, which critically depends on antibody binding strength, may be a cardinal trigger of the prozone effect, a troublesome in vitro artifact caused by a steric interference with IgG detection reagents. False-low IgG results, especially on SAB with extensive antibody binding, have to be considered when interpreting studies analyzing the diagnostic value of complement in relation to standard IgG detection. Levels of complement-fixing donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were shown to correlate with the results of standard crossmatch tests, suggesting potential application for crossmatch prediction. Moreover, while the utility of pre-transplant complement detection, at least in crossmatch-negative transplant recipients, is controversially discussed, a series of studies have shown that the appearance of post-transplant complement-fixing DSA may be associated with C4d deposition in transplant capillaries and a particular risk of graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: The independent value of modified single antigen bead assays, as compared to a careful analysis of standard IgG detection, which may be affected considerably by complement dependent artifacts, needs to be clarified. Whether they have the potential to improve the predictive accuracy of our current diagnostic repertoire warrants further study.

Nothing's perfect: the art of defining HLA-specific antibodies.

The advent of solid phase assays and in particular the single antigen bead (SAB) assay, on the Luminex platform has led to previously unheralded levels of HLA-specific antibody characterisation. However, it soon became apparent that the detection of antibodies detected by these assays was less than perfect and that not all antibodies determined could be considered clinically relevant. Thus, the major challenges currently faced by HLA laboratories are to interpret the complex data provided by these assays and use this to devise a safe and practical algorithm for the definition of a clinically relevant HLA-specific antibody. Taking into consideration recent evidence and scientific opinion in this area we aim here to put forward the viewpoint of our laboratory in how best to manage the tricky problem of defining HLA-specific antibodies. By taking a balanced approach which is less reliant upon a single technique we propose that the aim should be to define antibodies to a level that does not discriminate against the highly sensitised patient, but also maintains clinical safety and efficacy. Knowing that not all of the antibodies detected by SAB are clinically relevant should lead to giving greater opportunity for patients with these antibodies having a crossmatch performed. In the future, more emphasis should be given to epitopes when interpreting the results of these assays.

Practical value of identifying antibodies to cryptic HLA epitopes in cardiac transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Identification of antibodies to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) by single antigen bead arrays has led to the common practice of virtual crossmatching. However, inappropriate assignment of anti-HLA specificities can lead to false-positive virtual crossmatching, resulting in the decline of potentially crossmatch-negative organ offers. In this study we describe identification of antibodies to cryptic HLA present on denatured forms of HLA on single antigen bead array and provide a reassessment of calculated panel-reactive antibody (CPRA) based on elimination of false-positive reactions due to antibodies to cryptic HLA epitopes. METHODS: Sera from 96 patients with positive HLA antibodies detected on a standard single antigen bead platform were tested under denaturing conditions and with a new single antigen bead product (iBeads; One Lambda, Inc., Canoga Park, CA) to identify antibodies to cryptic HLA vs. native HLA. Flow cytometry crossmatching and complement-fixation assays were performed to assess clinical relevance. RESULTS: Antibodies to cryptic HLA were present in approximately 21% of patients on our waiting list for cardiac transplantation. These antibody responses were not associated with factors commonly thought to be associated with antibody responses to HLA such as age, gender, transfusions or presence of circulatory support. CONCLUSIONS: Antibodies to cryptic HLA can be reliably identified by iBeads technology, and usually do not fix complement nor produce positive flow cytometry crossmatches. Identification and removal of antibodies to cryptic HLA from the panel of unacceptable antigens may have dramatic and meaningful effects on CPRA and virtual crossmatch strategies.

Poor kidney allograft survival associated with positive B cell - Only flow cytometry cross matches: a ten year single center study.

The presence of donor specific antibody (DSA) to class 1 or class 2 HLA as detected respectively in T cell or B cell - only flow cytometry cross matches (FCXMs) are risk factors for renal allograft survival, though the comparative risk of these XMs has not been definitively established. Allograft survival and FCXM data in 624 microcytotoxicity (CDC) XM negative kidney transplants were evaluated. Short and long term allograft survival was significantly less in recipients with T(-) B(+) FCXMs (1 year, 74%, 10 year, 58%) compared to T(+) B(+) FCXMs (1 year, 84%, 10 year, 68%) and to T(-) B(-) FCXM (1 year, 90%, 10 year, 85%). Risk factors were positive FCXM, deceased donor (DD) transplantation and donor age, but not race, gender, recipient age or previous transplant. Recipients with T(-) B(+) and T(+) B(+) FCXMs were at 4.5 and 2.5 fold greater risk, respectively, of DD allograft failure compared to patients with T(-) B(-) FCXMs. The quantitative value of FCXM did not correlate with the duration of graft survival. We conclude that patients with DSA to class 2 HLA have a greater risk of early and late allograft failure compared to patients with DSA to class 1 HLA.