Safety of methotrexate administration in women with pregnancy of unknown location at high risk of ectopic pregnancy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety of current guidelines on methotrexate (MTX) administration in women with pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) who are considered to have a high risk of underlying ectopic pregnancy (EP), and to investigate whether implementation of these guidelines would result in inadvertent exposure to MTX of viable intrauterine pregnancies (IUPs). METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of consecutive clinically stable women who were classified with PUL at the early pregnancy unit of Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia, between 2007 and 2021. PUL was defined as a positive pregnancy test in the absence of signs of IUP or EP on transvaginal ultrasound. Patients with a PUL that behaved biochemically like an EP, but for which the location of pregnancy was not confirmed on ultrasound, were eligible for MTX to minimize the risk of subsequent tubal rupture. Criteria discussed in the guidelines of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) were applied to the PUL database. The number of patients eligible to receive MTX and the number with an underlying viable IUP who would be inadvertently prescribed MTX were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 816 women with PUL were reviewed, of whom 724 had complete data and were included in the final analysis. Six patients had persistent PUL and the remaining 718 had a diagnosis of viable IUP, non-viable IUP, EP or failed PUL. According to the ACOG, ASRM, RCOG and NICE guidelines, the rate of MTX administration among patients with PUL would have been 2.76%, 4.56%, 0.41% and 35.36%, respectively. However, no persistent PUL would have received MTX according to the ACOG, ASRM and RCOG protocols (the NICE protocol identified patients with persistent PUL with a sensitivity of 100%), and the majority of MTX treatments were unnecessary because those patients were later classified as having non-viable IUP or failed PUL. Application of ACOG and ASRM guidance could result theoretically in inadvertent MTX administration to women with an underlying viable IUP at a rate of 4.1/1000 (3/724). CONCLUSIONS: Current guidelines used to predict high risk of EP in the PUL population lead to inadvertent MTX administration to women with an underlying viable IUP. These guidelines should be used wisely to ensure that no wanted pregnancy is exposed to MTX. Women with PUL should be monitored carefully, and MTX should be used judiciously when the location of pregnancy is yet to be confirmed. © 2024 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Efficacy and safety of isosorbide mononitrate plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone in the management of the first and second trimester abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: However, misoprostol is often used to terminate a pregnancy, but it can also cause side effects. Isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) can help the cervix mature by increasing the production of prostaglandin E2 and vasodilation. Considering that the results of studies in this field are contradictory, it is the purpose of this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vaginal ISMN plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone in the management of first- and second-trimester abortions. METHOD: The search process was conducted for MEDLINE through the PubMed interface, Scopus, Web-of-Science, Science Direct, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform until November 10, 2023. Our assessment of bias was based on version 2 of the risk-of-bias tool (RoB2) for randomized trials and our level of evidence quality was determined by GRADE. Meta-analysis of all data was carried out using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.1. RESULT: Seven randomized clinical trials were included in the systematic review and three in the meta-analysis, with mixed quality. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that in the second-trimester abortion, the inclusion of ISMN in conjunction with vaginal misoprostol results in a noteworthy reduction in the induction abortion interval, specifically by 4.21 h (95% CI: -7.45 to -0.97, P = 0.01). The addition of vaginal ISMN to misoprostol, compared to vaginal misoprostol alone, increased the odds of a completed abortion by 3.76 times. (95% CI: 1.08 to 13.15, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study can offer valuable insights aimed at enhancing counseling and support for non-surgical methods of medication abortion within professional settings. Moreover, it improves the effectiveness of clinical treatment and reduces the occurrence of unnecessary surgical interventions in the abortion management protocol.

Risk of teratogenicity in continued pregnancy after gestational exposure to mifepristone and/or misoprostol: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively assess the teratogenic risk to offspring associated with continuing pregnancy after administering mifepristone and/or misoprostol during gestation. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI, and CBM, from their inception to February 2024, with no language restrictions. We included cohort and case-control studies that analyzed the teratogenic effects of mifepristone and/or misoprostol on fetuses and newborns. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The odds ratios (OR) from individual studies were combined using meta-analysis. Sensitivity testing and heterogeneity analysis were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were eligible for inclusion, comprising 5193 cases of congenital malformations and 12,232 controls. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that the use of misoprostol during early pregnancy increased the risk of congenital abnormalities in offspring (OR = 2.69; 95% CI: 1.57-4.62). However, the potential teratogenic effect of mifepristone during pregnancy cannot be ruled out. Additionally, the use of mifepristone and/or misoprostol has been linked to a higher risk of certain congenital anomalies, such as hydrocephalus (OR = 3.41; 95% CI: 1.17-9.97), Möbius syndrome (OR = 26.48; 95% CI: 11.30-62.01), and terminal transverse limb defects (OR = 10.75; 95% CI: 3.93-29.41). (PROSPERO, CRD42024522093, 03182024).

Methotrexate: Use in the Post Dobbs v. Jackson Era.

ABSTRACT: Methotrexate is one of the most frequently used medications for the treatment of rheumatic diseases. Although initially developed for use as chemotherapy for both solid and hematologic malignancies, it was used as early as the 1960s with success for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis, ultimately being approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of RA in 1988. Beyond RA and psoriatic arthritis, methotrexate is used in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, and other inflammatory conditions. Methotrexate is cytotoxic to the trophoblast and has been used to treat both ectopic pregnancy and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, leading to studies in the early 1990s that showed it was effective and safe for early abortion in combination with prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol. Methotrexate is also a teratogen, causing serious birth defects in 6%-10% of patients taking it while pregnant. Additionally, women are more likely to be affected by both RA at SLE, as compared with males, thus worsening the burden of these adverse effects. Both methotrexate's history of use as an abortifacient and its teratogenic properties make its use more complicated in the current era of abortion policy in the United States following the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling. Recently published data suggest that this ruling has affected both provider perspectives and patient experiences as it relates to methotrexate use. In the post-Dobbs era, the role of the rheumatologist as it relates to patients' sexual and reproductive health is likely to expand.

Apoptosis versus necrosis in tubal ectopic pregnancies following Methotrexate.

Methotrexate administration for the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancies has been shown to cause tubal mass enlargement. Our hypothesis was that, by administrating Methotrexate, a local necrotic reaction occurs, leading to hematoma formation and eventually fallopian tube rupture. Salpingectomy specimens were collected, analysed and divided into three equal groups: patients who received Methotrexate but who ultimately failed medical treatment, patients who had a viable ectopic pregnancy and patients with a self-resolving ectopic pregnancy that were operated due to other medical indications. The specimens were dyed using the Cleaved Caspase-3 (Asp175) Rabbit mA. Specimens were divided into three equal groups and analysed. The patients in self-resolving ectopic pregnancy group were older and had more pregnancies. Rates of apoptosis were found to be less than 1% per slide. Necrosis was not evident in any of the pathological specimens. It seems Methotrexate administration does not lead to a significant tubal necrotic reaction. Further studies are required.

When Do Women with Second Trimester Pregnancy Loss Need Repeated Doses of Misoprostol? Insights from a Teaching Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Cases of second trimester pregnancy loss can be treated either pharmacologically or by surgical evacuation. Misoprostol, an E1-prostaglandin analog, is used to facilitate the evacuation of the uterus. OBJECTIVES: To determine the risk factors associated with patients who were treated with five or more repeated doses of misoprostol. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients treated with vaginal misoprostol at our institution between December 2016 and October 2021 for second trimester pregnancy loss. RESULTS: In total, 114 patients were eligible for analysis; 83 were treated with < 5 doses and 31 with ≥ 5. We recorded each case in which repeated doses were administered, irrespective of predetermined conditions such as gravidity, parity, maternal age, or gestational age. Moreover, cases of five or more misoprostol dosing were not associated with an increased complications rate, except for the increased duration of hospitalization (3.1 vs. 2.2 days, P-value < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated dosing could not be predicted before treatment among those treated with vaginally administered misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy loss. However, low complication rates of repeated dosing may reassure both physicians and patients regarding safety, efficacy, and future fertility.

Medical methods for first trimester abortion.

BACKGROUND: Medical abortion became an alternative method of pregnancy termination following the development of prostaglandins and antiprogesterone in the 1970s and 1980s. Recently, synthesis inhibitors of oestrogen (such as letrozole) have also been used to enhance efficacy. The most widely researched drugs are prostaglandins (such as misoprostol, which has a strong uterotonic effect), mifepristone, mifepristone with prostaglandins, and letrozole with prostaglandins. More evidence is needed to identify the best dosage, regimen, and route of administration to optimise patient outcomes. This is an update of a review last published in 2011. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness and side effects of different medical methods for first trimester abortion. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, and LILACs on 28 February 2021. We also searched Clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization's (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and reference lists of retrieved papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different medical methods for abortion before the 12th week of gestation. The primary outcome is failure to achieve complete abortion. Secondary outcomes are mortality, surgical evacuation, ongoing pregnancy at follow-up, time until passing of conceptus, blood transfusion, side effects and women's dissatisfaction with the method. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected and evaluated studies for inclusion, and assessed the risk of bias. We processed data using Review Manager 5 software. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: We included 99 studies in the review (58 from the original review and 41 new studies). 1. Combined regimen mifepristone/prostaglandin Mifepristone dose: high-dose (600 mg) compared to low-dose (200 mg) mifepristone probably has similar effectiveness in achieving complete abortion (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.33; I2 = 0%; 4 RCTs, 3494 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Prostaglandin dose: 800 µg misoprostol probably reduces abortion failure compared to 400 µg (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.78; I2= 0%; 3 RCTs, 4424 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Prostaglandin timing: misoprostol administered on day one probably achieves more success on complete abortion than on day three (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.58; 1489 women; 1 RCT; moderate-certainty evidence). Administration strategy: there may be no difference in failure of complete abortion with self-administration at home compared with hospital administration (RR 1.63, 95% CI 0.68 to 3.94; I2 = 84%; 2263 women; 4 RCTs; low-certainty evidence), but failure may be higher when administered by nurses in hospital compared to by doctors in hospital (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.39 to 5.22; I2 = 66%; 3 RCTs, 3056 women; low-certainty evidence). Administration route: oral misoprostol probably leads to more failures than the vaginal route (RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.46 to 3.87; I2 = 39%; 3 RCTs, 1704 women; moderate-certainty evidence) and may be associated with more frequent side effects such as nausea (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.26; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, 1380 women; low-certainty evidence) and diarrhoea (RR 1.80 95% CI 1.49 to 2.17; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, 1379 women). Compared with the vaginal route, complete abortion failure is probably lower with sublingual (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.22 to 2.11; I2 = 59%; 2 RCTs, 3229 women; moderate-certainty evidence) and may be lower with buccal administration (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.46; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, 479 women; low-certainty evidence), but sublingual or buccal routes may lead to more side effects. Women may experience more vomiting with sublingual compared to buccal administration (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.77; low-certainty evidence). 2. Mifepristone alone versus combined regimen The efficacy of mifepristone alone in achieving complete abortion compared to combined mifepristone/prostaglandin up to 12 weeks is unclear (RR of failure 3.25, 95% CI 0.81 to 13.09; I2 = 83%; 3 RCTs, 273 women; very low-certainty evidence). 3. Prostaglandin alone versus combined regimen Nineteen studies compared prostaglandin alone to a combined regimen (prostaglandin combined with mifepristone, letrozole, estradiol valerate, tamoxifen, or methotrexate). Compared to any of the combination regimens, misoprostol alone may increase the risk for failure to achieve complete abortion (RR of failure 2.39, 95% CI 1.89 to 3.02; I2 = 64%; 18 RCTs, 3471 women; low-certainty evidence), and with more diarrhoea. 4. Prostaglandin alone (route of administration) Oral misoprostol alone may lead to more failures in complete abortion than the vaginal route (RR 3.68, 95% CI 1.56 to 8.71, 2 RCTs, 216 women; low-certainty evidence). Failure to achieve complete abortion may be slightly reduced with sublingual compared with vaginal (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.28; I2 = 87%; 5 RCTs, 2705 women; low-certainty evidence) and oral administration (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.11 to 2.99; I2 = 66%; 2 RCTs, 173 women). Failure to achieve complete abortion may be similar or slightly higher with sublingual administration compared to buccal administration (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.74; 1 study, 401 women). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Safe and effective medical abortion methods are available. Combined regimens (prostaglandin combined with mifepristone, letrozole, estradiol valerate, tamoxifen, or methotrexate) may be more effective than single agents (prostaglandin alone or mifepristone alone). In the combined regimen, the dose of mifepristone can probably be lowered to 200 mg without significantly decreasing effectiveness. Vaginal misoprostol is probably more effective than oral administration, and may have fewer side effects than sublingual or buccal. Some results are limited by the small numbers of participants on which they are based. Almost all studies were conducted in settings with good access to emergency services, which may limit the generalisability of these results.

Forensic Toxicological Aspects of Misoprostol Use in Pharmacological Abortions.

The aim of this study was establishment of an UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS method for the deter-mination of misoprostol acid in biological specimens in cases of pharmacological abortions. Forensic toxicological examination was performed in three different biological samples (whole blood, placenta and fetal liver). The validation parameters of the method were as follows: limit of detection: 25 pg/mL; limit of quantification: 50 pg/mL, coefficient of determination: >0.999 (R2), intra- and interday accuracy and precision: not greater than 13.7%. The recovery and matrix effect were in the range of 88.3−95.1% and from −11.7 to −4.9%, respectively. Toxicological analysis of the mother's blood (collected two days after pregnancy termination) did not reveal any abortifacients; however, misoprostol acid was found in the placenta (793 pg/g) and fetal liver (309 pg/g). The second case involved a fetus found near a garbage container. The concentration of misoprostol acid in the placenta was 2332 pg/g. In the presented study, an extensive literature review of misoprostol pharmacokinetics studies was performed. To our knowledge, the UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS technique presented in this paper is the first quantitative method applied for forensic toxicological purposes. In addition, postmortem concentrations of misoprostol acid in miscarried fetuses due to illegal abortions were reported for the first time.

Risk factors of retained products of conception after miscarriage or termination with gemeprost in the second trimester of pregnancy: a retrospective case-controlled study in Japanese population.

Retained products of conception (RPOC) is a complication that occurs in the second trimester of pregnancy. We enrolled 98 women who had a miscarriage or termination with gemeprost in the second trimester of pregnancy. Eighteen cases (18.4%) were RPOC-positive. The gestational week at miscarriage or termination was earlier in the RPOC-positive group than those in the RPOC-negative group (p = .003). The period of the third stage of labour was longer in the RPOC-positive group than in RPOC-negative group (p = .040). The proportion of placental forceps use was higher in the RPOC-positive group than in RPOC-negative group (p = .003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that gestational week (OR: 3.53; p = .04) and use of placental forceps at delivery (OR: 2.21; p = .012) were independent risk factors for RPOC. Earlier gestational weeks at miscarriage or termination and use of placental forceps at delivery were predictive factors for RPOC after second trimester miscarriage or termination with gemeprost.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? There have been some reports on risk factors of RPOC. A previous report showed that the termination of pregnancy with misoprostol at earlier periods was associated with an increased risk of RPOC.What the results of this study add? There have been few studies on the risk factors of RPOC after miscarriage or termination with gemeprost. In this study, we evaluated the risk factors of RPOC after miscarriage or termination of pregnancy with gemeprost in the second trimester. We found that an earlier gestational age (between 12 and 17 weeks) at delivery and using placental forceps to remove placenta were significant risk factors of RPOC after miscarriage or termination of pregnancy with gemeprost in the second trimester.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? An earlier gestational age and using forceps to remove placenta may be significant risk factors for RPOC. The accurate evaluation and treatment for RPOC is important for maternal life-saving efforts and subsequent pregnancies. Further research is needed to draft a standardised protocol for RPOC.

Mifepristone Pretreatment for the Medical Management of Early Pregnancy Loss.

BACKGROUND: Medical management of early pregnancy loss is an alternative to uterine aspiration, but standard medical treatment with misoprostol commonly results in treatment failure. We compared the efficacy and safety of pretreatment with mifepristone followed by treatment with misoprostol with the efficacy and safety of misoprostol use alone for the management of early pregnancy loss. METHODS: We randomly assigned 300 women who had an anembryonic gestation or in whom embryonic or fetal death was confirmed to receive pretreatment with 200 mg of mifepristone, administered orally, followed by 800 µg of misoprostol, administered vaginally (mifepristone-pretreatment group), or 800 µg of misoprostol alone, administered vaginally (misoprostol-alone group). Participants returned 1 to 4 days after misoprostol use for evaluation, including ultrasound examination, by an investigator who was unaware of the treatment-group assignments. Women in whom the gestational sac was not expelled were offered expectant management, a second dose of misoprostol, or uterine aspiration. We followed all participants for 30 days after randomization. Our primary outcome was gestational sac expulsion with one dose of misoprostol by the first follow-up visit and no additional intervention within 30 days after treatment. RESULTS: Complete expulsion after one dose of misoprostol occurred in 124 of 148 women (83.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 76.8 to 89.3) in the mifepristone-pretreatment group and in 100 of 149 women (67.1%; 95% CI, 59.0 to 74.6) in the misoprostol-alone group (relative risk, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.43). Uterine aspiration was performed less frequently in the mifepristone-pretreatment group than in the misoprostol-alone group (8.8% vs. 23.5%; relative risk, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.68). Bleeding that resulted in blood transfusion occurred in 2.0% of the women in the mifepristone-pretreatment group and in 0.7% of the women in the misoprostol-alone group (P=0.31); pelvic infection was diagnosed in 1.3% of the women in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with mifepristone followed by treatment with misoprostol resulted in a higher likelihood of successful management of first-trimester pregnancy loss than treatment with misoprostol alone. (Funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; PreFaiR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02012491 .).

Mifepristone and Misoprostol for Early Pregnancy Loss and Medication Abortion.

Medication regimens using mifepristone and misoprostol are safe and effective for outpatient treatment of early pregnancy loss for up to 84 days' gestation and for medication abortion up to 77 days' gestation. Gestational age is determined using ultrasonography or menstrual history. Ultrasonography is needed when gestational dating cannot be confirmed using clinical data alone or when there are risk factors for ectopic pregnancy. The most effective regimens for medication management of early pregnancy loss and medication abortion include 200 mg of oral mifepristone (a progesterone receptor antagonist) followed by 800 mcg of misoprostol (a prostaglandin E1 analogue) administered buccally or vaginally. Cramping and bleeding are expected effects of the medications, with bleeding lasting an average of nine to 16 days. The adverse effects of misoprostol (e.g., low-grade fever, gastrointestinal symptoms) can be managed with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or antiemetics. Ongoing pregnancy, infection, hemorrhage, undiagnosed ectopic pregnancy, and the need for unplanned uterine aspiration are rare complications. Clinical history, combined with serial quantitative beta human chorionic gonadotropin levels, urine pregnancy testing, or ultrasonography, is used to establish complete passage of the pregnancy tissue.

Incidence of self-induced abortion with misoprostol, admitted to a provincial hospital in Papua New Guinea: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Misoprostol is a life-savingmedication in obstetric practice but the prevalence of misoprostol-related self-induced abortion is increasing in many communities. AIMS: To investigate the hospital incidence, clinical management, and legal framework of self-induced abortions with misoprostol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted over 18 months. All patients <20 weeks pregnant who were admitted with a diagnosis of misoprostol-induced abortion were included in the study. RESULTS: Of 186 women with abortion-related admissions during the study period, 51 (27.4%) women reported using misoprostol to induce abortion. The majority were young (27.8 ± 5.5) married women (32/51: 62.7%), particularly educated (27/51: 52.9%) employed women (27/51: 52.9%), who were not on any contraception (46/51: 90.1%). Most abortions were induced in the first trimester (39/51: 76.5%) and patients were admitted because of prolonged bleeding (23/51: 45.1%). A significant proportion of participants who did not receive the correct dose of misoprostol developed sepsis compared to those who received a correct dose (6/18 (33.3%) vs 1/30 (3.3%); P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The use of misoprostol as an abortifacient is increasing in Papua New Guinea, particularly among educated and employed women. A review of the laws to meet the demand for abortion services and to limit complications of unsafe abortion practices is required.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two combined misoprostol regimens for second trimester medical abortion.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two combined misoprostol regimens for second trimester medical abortion. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study examining data on singleton pregnancies that underwent second trimester medical abortion between November 2011 and November 2019 in a tertiary care centre in northern Greece. In the first study period (November 2011 to August 2015), the management protocol (protocol 1) consisted of 800 µg vaginal misoprostol followed by 400 µg oral misoprostol, every 3 h, for up to five doses. In the second study period (September 2015 to November 2019), a new protocol (protocol 2) was introduced, where the oral route was changed to sublingual, using the same dosage. The two routes were compared in terms of efficacy and safety. RESULTS: The study comprised 85 women: 43 (50.6%) received the protocol 1 regimen (vaginal-oral), while 42 (49.4%) received the protocol 2 regimen (vaginal-sublingual). The groups did not differ in terms of maternal age, gestational age and parity. Sublingual misoprostol was more effective than oral misoprostol, both in terms of dose needed (median 1600 µg vs 2000 µg; p = 0.031) and induction-to-abortion interval (8 h vs 11 h; p = 0.001). Surgical evacuation due to incomplete abortion was necessary in 11.9% of women in the sublingual group vs 18.6% in the oral group (p = 0.394). Women in the sublingual group reported a higher rate of severe pain (odds ratio [OR] 6.061; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.240, 29.619) and shivering (OR 4.632; 95% CI 1.788, 11.995). CONCLUSION: The administration of vaginal-sublingual misoprostol, when compared with the vaginal-oral regimen, was associated with a shorter induction-to-abortion interval but a higher incidence of severe pain and shivering.

Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy is the implantation of an embryo at a site lying outside the uterine cavity or fallopian tubes. Sites include a caesarean scar, the cornua uteri, the ovary, the cervix, and the abdomen. There has been an increasing trend in the occurrence of these rare conditions, especially caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of surgery, medical treatment, and expectant management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancy in terms of fertility outcomes and complications. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility (CGF) Group Specialised Register of Controlled Trials, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization (WHO) search portal and nine other databases to 12 December 2019. We handsearched reference lists of articles retrieved and contacted experts in the field to obtain additional data. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in all languages that examined the effects and safety of surgery, medical treatment, and expectant management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used Cochrane standard methodological procedures. Primary outcomes were treatment success and complications. MAIN RESULTS: We included five RCTs with 303 women, all reporting Caesarean scar pregnancy. Two compared uterine arterial embolization (UAE) or uterine arterial chemoembolization (UACE) plus methotrexate (MTX) versus systemic MTX and subsequent dilation and suction curettage; one compared UACE plus MTX versus ultrasonography-guided local MTX injection; and two compared suction curettage under hysteroscopy versus suction curettage under ultrasonography after UAE/UACE. The quality of evidence ranged from moderate to very low. The main limitations were imprecision (small sample sizes and very wide confidence intervals (CI) for most analyses), multiple comparisons with a small number of trials, and insufficient data available to assess heterogeneity. UAE/UACE versus systemic MTX prior to suction curettage Two studies reported this comparison. One compared UAE with systemic MTX and one compared UACE plus MTX versus systemic MTX, in both cases followed by a suction curettage. We are uncertain whether UAE/UACE improved success rates after initial treatment (UAE: risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.12; 1 RCT, 72 women; low-quality evidence; UACE: RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.38; 1 RCT, 28 women; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether UAE/UACE reduced rates of complications (UAE: RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.75; 1 RCT, 72 women; low-quality evidence; UACE: RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.48; 1 RCT, 28 women; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether UAE/UACE reduced adverse effects (UAE: RR 1.58, 95% CI 0.41 to 6.11; 1 RCT, 72 women; low-quality evidence; UACE: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.32 to 4.24; 1 RCT, 28 women; low-quality evidence), and it was not obvious that the types of events had similar values to participants (e.g. fever versus vomiting). Blood loss was lower in UAE/UACE groups than systemic MTX groups (UAE: mean difference (MD) -378.70 mL, 95% CI -401.43 to -355.97; 1 RCT, 72 women; moderate-quality evidence; UACE: MD -879.00 mL, 95% CI -1135.23 to -622.77; 1 RCT, 28 women; moderate-quality evidence). Data were not available on time to normalize ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG). UACE plus MTX versus ultrasonography-guided local MTX injection We are uncertain whether UACE improved success rates after initial treatment (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.60; 1 RCT, 45 women; very low-quality evidence). Adverse effects: the study reported the same number of failed treatments in each arm (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.92; 1 RCT, 45 women). We are uncertain whether UACE shortened the time to normalize ß-hCG (MD 1.50 days, 95% CI -3.16 to 6.16; 1 RCT, 45 women; very low-quality evidence). Data were not available for complications. Suction curettage under hysteroscopy versus under ultrasonography after UAE/UACE. Two studies reported this comparison. One compared suction curettage under hysteroscopy versus under ultrasonography after UAE, and one compared these interventions after UACE. We are uncertain whether suction curettage under hysteroscopy improved success rates after initial treatment (UAE: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.03; 1 RCT, 66 women; very low-quality evidence; UACE: RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.09; 1 RCT, 92 women; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether suction curettage under hysteroscopy reduced rates of complications (UAE: RR 4.00, 95% CI 0.47 to 33.91; 1 RCT, 66 women; very low-quality evidence; UACE: RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.72; 1 RCT, 92 women; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether suction curettage under hysteroscopy reduced adverse effects (UAE: RR 3.09, 95% CI 0.12 to 78.70; 1 RCT, 66 women; very low-quality evidence; UACE: not estimable; 1 RCT, 92 women; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether suction curettage under hysteroscopy shortened the time to normalize ß-hCG (UAE: MD 4.03 days, 95% CI -1.79 to 9.85; 1 RCT, 66 women; very low-quality evidence; UACE: MD 0.84 days, 95% CI -1.90 to 3.58; 1 RCT, 92 women; low-quality evidence). Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy other than CSP No studies reported on non-tubal ectopic pregnancies in locations other than on a caesarean scar. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For Caesarean scar pregnancies (CSP) it is uncertain whether there is a difference in success rates, complications, or adverse events between UAE/UACE and administration of systemic MTX before suction curettage (low-quality evidence). Blood loss was lower if suction curettage is conducted after UAE/UACE than after administration of systemic MTX (moderate-quality evidence). It is uncertain whether there is a difference in treatment success rates, complications, adverse effects or time to normalize ß-hCG between suction curettage under hysteroscopy and under ultrasonography (very low-quality evidence). There are no studies of non-tubal ectopic pregnancy other than CSP and RCTs for these types of pregnancy are unlikely.

Direct Methotrexate Injection into the Gestational Sac for Nontubal Ectopic Pregnancy: A Review of Efficacy and Outcomes from a Single Institution.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of nontubal ectopic pregnancy (NTEP) management with direct methotrexate (MTX) injection into the gestational sac. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review. SETTING: A tertiary academic and teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All cases of confirmed NTEP were retrospectively identified from 2012 to 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound-guided direct injection of MTX into the fetal pole and surrounding gestational sac and a single dose of systemic MTX with or without fetal intracardiac injection of potassium chloride. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Treatment failure, complications from treatment, operating time, and days to negative serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) after treatment were measured. Fourteen women (age 34 ± 5.2 years) with NTEP underwent direct MTX injection (cesarean scar, n = 4; interstitial, n = 6; cervical, n = 4). The mean estimated gestational age was 49 ± 11, CI (43, 56 days). One patient required laparoscopic intervention with a failure rate of 1 of 14 (a double interstitial, heterotopic pregnancy). There were no other major complications. The time in the operating room was similar for all NTEP types. The average time to negative serum hCG was not different for cesarean scar (84.5 ± 36 days), cervical pregnancies (70.5 ± 19 days), or interstitial pregnancies (45.3 ± 38 days, p = .15). CONCLUSION: Direct MTX injection into the gestational sac for NTEP treatment is safe and effective. The failure rate of 7% is considerably lower than what was previously reported for a failure of systemic MTX in similar cases (25%). Resolution of serum hCG after treatment can be quite prolonged even in uncomplicated cases.

Systematic Review of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Acceptability of Mifepristone and Misoprostol for Medical Abortion in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

OBJECTIVE: Abortion-related complications remain one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Nearly half of all abortions are unsafe, and the vast majority of these occur in low- and middle-income countries. The use of mifepristone with misoprostol for medical abortion has been proposed and implemented to improve abortion safety. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL. STUDY SELECTION: Criteria for study inclusion were first-trimester abortion, use of mifepristone with misoprostol, and low- or middle-income country status as designated by the World Health Organization. DATA EXTRACTION: Results for effectiveness, safety, acceptability, and qualitative information were assessed. DATA SYNTHESIS: The literature search resulted in 181 eligible articles, 52 of which met our criteria for inclusion. A total of 34 publications reported effectiveness data on 25 385 medical abortions. The average effectiveness rate with mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol 800 µg was 95% up to 63 days gestation. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assume that all women lost to follow-up failed treatment, and the recalculated effectiveness rate remained high at 93%. The average continuing pregnancy rate was 0.6%. A total of 22 publications reported safety and acceptability data on 17 381 medical abortions. Only 0.8% abortions required presentation to hospital, and 87% of patients found the side effects of treatment acceptable. Overall, 95% of women were satisfied with their medical abortion, 94% would choose the method again, and 94% would recommend this method to a friend. A total of 16 publications reported qualitative results and the majority supported positive patient experiences with medical abortion. CONCLUSIONS: Mifepristone and misoprostol is highly effective, safe, and acceptable to women in low- and middle-income countries, making it a feasible option for reducing maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide.

Myometrial Pseudoaneurysm and Myelosuppression Following Conservative Management of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy is based on clinical context. This report describes two rare complications of conservative management: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced methotrexate myelosuppression and myometrial pseudoaneurysm. CASE: A 34-year-old woman was treated conservatively for a cesarean scar pregnancy with systemic methotrexate and intragestational potassium chloride, resulting in pancytopenia secondary to concurrent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. She presented again with a myometrial pseudoaneurysm, which was treated with bilateral uterine artery embolization and, ultimately, hysterectomy. The final pathology report confirmed a pseudoaneurysm, retained villi within the myometrium, and acute endometritis and myometritis. CONCLUSION: Myelosuppression resulting from use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs affecting renal excretion of methotrexate can occur at low dosages. Additionally, there is a risk of pseudoaneurysms with vascular damage and trophoblastic tissue. Drug interactions and procedure-related risks must be considered when managing cesarean scar pregnancy conservatively.

Success rate of methotrexate treatment for recurrent vs. primary ectopic pregnancy: a case-control study.

The aim of this study was to compare the success rate of methotrexate (MTX) treatment in patients with recurrent ectopic pregnancy (REP) and primary EP (PEP). A retrospective cohort study. The study cohort comprised all patients diagnosed with an EP and treated by intention with single-dose regimen of intramuscular MTX in a tertiary medical centre during 2010-2018. Cases (REP) and controls (PEP) were compared.262 patients had PEP and 32 had a REP. Women with REP had significantly higher gravidity order and higher incidence of previous abortions (5 vs. 3, median, p < .001, 59.3% vs. 32.8%, p < .001, respectively). Women with REP had a higher proportion of a history of previous surgery in general, and specifically pelvic surgery (46.8% vs. 20.6%, p < .001, 24.4% vs. 7.2%, p < .001, respectively). Treatment success was lower in the REP group (40.6% vs. 66.4%, p = .006, Odds ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.16, 0.73). In a logistic regression analysis, the only factor found to be independently associated with treatment failure was REP (adjusted odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.12, 0.77, p = .01). Our study suggests that medical treatment success with a single-dose regimen of MTX is lower than expected among REP cases, suggesting that different treatment approach should be considered in this setting.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject ? There is paucity of data regarding success rate of methotrexate treatment for a recurrent ectopic pregnancy (REP).What do the results of this study add? Medical treatment success with a single-dose regimen of MTX in patients with a REP is lower than expectedWhat are the implications of these findings for future clinical practice and/or further research? As medical treatment success with a single-dose regimen of MTX for women with a REP is lower than expected, different treatment approach should be considered. Further and prospective studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm our findings.

Branch retinal artery occlusion in a patient undergoing Methotrexate therapy for ectopic pregnancy: A case report.

Methotrexate is a commonly used agent in the treatment of an un-ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Thromboembolic events are rarely seen side effects of such a medicine. We report the case of the 22-year-old woman who underwent Methotrexate therapy for an un-ruptured ectopic pregnancy without any history of thromboembolic risk factors. A second dose (50 mg/m2) was administered to the patient showing a nondecreasing pattern of ß-HCG levels after an initial standard dosage of Methotrexate (50 mg/m2). On the 12th day of the treatment, a sudden onset of painless vision loss was seen in the right eye. Fundal imaging and fluorescein angiography revealed an occlusion of the superior temporal branch of the right retinal artery. After a month of hyperbaric oxygen therapy, complete recovery without loss of vision was achieved.

Expanding a woman's options to include home use of misoprostol for medical abortion up until 76 days: an observational study of efficacy and safety.

INTRODUCTION: Home use of misoprostol for medical abortion is increasingly being practiced. With gestational length up to 70 days, it is considered effective, safe and acceptable by women. Knowledge of safety and efficacy with longer gestations is limited and studies are required to expand women's options to include this method of abortion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was designed to compare home use of misoprostol for medical abortion at gestational length 64-76 days to its use at 57-63 days. Primary outcome was success rate. Success was defined as complete uterine evacuation without the need of surgical intervention due to incomplete abortion and no failed abortion with ongoing pregnancy. Secondary outcomes were rates of unscheduled return visits, telephone consultations, admissions to hospital, infections and the need for blood transfusion. RESULTS: We included 397 women, 270 within 57-63 days of gestation and 127 within 64-76 days of gestation at abortion. Success rate was 95.6% at 57-63 days and 93.7% at 64-76 days. The difference was not statistically significant (P = .431). The rate of unscheduled return visits was high overall but not significantly different in relation to gestational length at abortion (> 63 days; 20.5% vs < 64 days; 16.3%, P = .308). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that home use of misoprostol for medical abortion at 64-76 days gestation may be as safe and effective as at 57-63 days. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm our findings and to explore the acceptance of and experiences among women performing abortion at home at greater gestational length, before further implementation in clinical practice.