Social and Clinical Determinants of Compulsory and Voluntary Admissions within the Framework of an Italian Community Mental Health System.

Social and clinical determinants of 30 compulsory admissions (CAs) to a psychiatric ward during a six-month period were compared to 134 voluntary admissions (VAs), and outcomes of hospitalisation were assessed in relation to its types. Psychosocial and clinical characteristics at admission and discharge were measured using 5 scales. Unemployment, hospitalisations >7 days and continuing hospitalisation in Community Mental Health Centres were positively associated with CA. At admission, CAs showed lower functioning, while outcome at discharge was similar. Social determinants had a main role in determining CAs. Clinical and psychosocial outcomes might have been improved by a mental health system community-based.

Are We Ready for the CARE Act?: Family Caregiving Education for Health Care Providers.

The CARE Act, law in 40 states and territories in the United States, requires hospitals to identify and include family caregivers during admission and in preparation for discharge. Although the number of family caregivers has been steadily increasing, health care providers are ill-prepared to address their needs, and caregiving remains a neglected topic in health care providers' education. A market analysis was performed to explore the availability of and interest in interprofessional courses and programs focused on preparing health professionals to support family caregivers. Although nurses and chief nursing officers agreed on the importance of supporting caregivers, they were less likely to endorse formal educational preparation for this complex role. The current study elucidates a gap between what caregivers report they need and the preparation of health care professionals to advance family-centered approaches to care. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 45(3), 7-11.].

The Vexed Question of the Voluntary Patient.

The current statutory framework in Ireland provides certain key safeguards for people who are admitted involuntarily for mental health treatment and care; the same legislation makes scant reference to the person who seeks treatment and care on a voluntary basis. This has led to concerns in relation to deprivation of liberty and to non-consensual medical treatment for these patients. This article seeks to examine the development of the law in relation to voluntary patients in Ireland and to assess in light of recent developments where Ireland now stands in terms of protecting the right of the voluntary patient to liberty.

[Health and survival in Icelandic nursing homes 2003 - 2014, before and after the setting of stricter criteria for nursing home admission in December 2007].

INTRODUCTION: Many factors influence the nursing needs and survival of nursing home residents, including the admission criteria. The aim of the study was to compare health, survival and predictors for one- and two-year survival of people entering Icelandic nursing homes between 2003-2007 and 2008-2014. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive, comparative study. The data was obtained from a Directorate of Health database for all interRAI assessments of Icelandic nursing homes from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2014 (N = 8487). RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the health and survival of new nursing home residents before and after December 31, 2007. In the latter period, the mean age was 82.7 years. In the previous period, it was 82.1 years, and the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, diabetes and COPD increased between the periods. One-year survival decreased from 73.4% to 66.5%, and two-year survival decreased from 56.9% to 49.1%. The strongest mortality risk factors were heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as well as high scores on the CHESS scale and ADL long scale. CONCLUSION: After 2007, new residents were older, in poorer health, and their life expectancy was shorter than for those moving to nursing homes before that. The results suggest that the aim of the regulatory change was achieved, i.e., to prioritise those in worst health. Their care needs may therefore be different and greater than before.

[Standards for treatment in forensic committment according to § 63 and § 64 of the German criminal code : Interdisciplinary task force of the DGPPN]. / Standards für die Behandlung im Maßregelvollzug nach §§ 63 und 64 StGB : Interdisziplinäre Task-Force der DGPPN.

People who have been convicted of a crime due to a severe mental disorder and continue to be dangerous as a result of this disorder may be placed in a forensic psychiatric facility for improvement and safeguarding according to § 63 and § 64 of the German Criminal Code (StGB). In Germany, approximately 9000 patients are treated in clinics for forensic psychiatry and psychotherapy on the basis of § 63 of the StGB and in withdrawal centers on the basis of § 64 StGB. The laws for treatment of patients in forensic commitment are passed by the individual States, with the result that even the basic conditions differ in the individual States. While minimum requirements have already been published for the preparation of expert opinions on liability and legal prognosis, consensus standards for the treatment in forensic psychiatry have not yet been published. Against this background, in 2014 the German Society for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Neurology (DGPPN) commissioned an interdisciplinary task force to develop professional standards for treatment in forensic psychiatry. Legal, ethical, structural, therapeutic and prognostic standards for forensic psychiatric treatment should be described according to the current state of science. After 3 years of work the results of the interdisciplinary working group were presented in early 2017 and approved by the board of the DGPPN. The standards for the treatment in the forensic psychiatric commitment aim to initiate a discussion in order to standardize the treatment conditions and to establish evidence-based recommendations.

[Treatment structures for men with pedosexual problems]. / Versorgungsstrukturen für Männer mit pädosexueller Problematik.

Pedophilia is defined as a persistent or dominating sexual preference for prepubescent children characterized by persistent thoughts, fantasies, urges, sexual arousal and behavior. Less than 50% of all child abusers fulfill the diagnostic criteria and an even smaller part exclusively has a preference for children. Following psychiatric classification systems, pedophilia must be distinguished from child sexual abuse. Outpatient treatment and treatment in forensic psychiatry clinics, sociotherapeutic facilities and in correction facilities are different aspects of prevention. So-called grey area projects (Dunkelfeldprojekte) are special facilities of primary and secondary prevention. The aim is to prevent sexual abuse by reducing and controlling of risk factors.

[Current legislation in the healthcare system 2015/2016]. / Aktuelle Gesetzgebung im Gesundheitswesen 2015/2016.

The energy of the legislator in the healthcare system was barely stoppable in 2015. Many new laws have been brought into force and legal initiatives have also been implemented. The Hospital Structure Act, the Treatment Enhancement Act, amendments of the official medical fee schedules for physicians, the Prevention Act, the E-Health Act, the Anti-corruption Act, the hospital admission guidelines and amendments of the model specialty training regulations are just some of the essential alterations that lie ahead of the medical community. This article gives a review of the most important new legislative regulations in the healthcare system and presents the fundamental consequences for the practice.

[Acute inpatient multimodal pain therapy and rehabilitation: Framework conditions, tasks and differentiated patient allocation]. / Akutstationäre multimodale Schmerztherapie und Rehabilitation: Rahmenbedingungen, Aufgaben und differenzierte Patientenzuweisung.

Multimodal pain treatment programs are widely accepted as the medical treatment standard in the management of patients with chronic pain syndromes. The concepts and treatment strategies are based on the biopsychosocial model of pain and programs for early restoration of function. Although this concept is primarily implemented in the curative field, i.e. in hospitals for the treatment of patients with chronic pain diseases, modified programs based on the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) can now also be found in rehabilitation clinics. Despite the assumed similarities, significant differences in, for example the aims of the therapy and relevant structural and process variables have to be kept in mind when allocating patients to a program as provided by a hospital or a rehabilitation clinic. The aim of this article is to present the framework structures of both treatment levels with respect to the implementation of multimodal pain therapy programs and to elucidate the differential diagnostic approach to the indications.

Safety of a liberal policy for extended-date preadmission testing samples.

BACKGROUND: Regulations governing pretransfusion testing allow specimen expiration to be extended past 3 days before the transfusion if a patient has not been transfused or pregnant in the preceding 3 months. Our hospital allows extension of the expiration of a presurgical specimen to 28 days if 1) the patient has neither been transfused nor pregnant in the past 3 months, 2) the patient does not have an antibody history, and 3) the current antibody screen (ABSC) is negative. Patients not meeting Criteria 2 and 3 are required to have specimens redrawn on the day of surgery (DOS). We evaluated the necessity of this policy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: From October 2009 to September 2010, there were 132 patients who did not meet the above criteria for specimen extension. Equivalent tests were performed on preadmission testing (PAT) and DOS specimens, and the results were compared. RESULTS: The majority (113, 86%) of the samples redrawn on the DOS showed no change in antibody serology upon reinvestigation. Of the remaining patients, DOS specimens did not identify any new antibodies or change in blood product choices. CONCLUSION: Of the PAT specimens rejected for antibody history or positive ABSC, none had new significant serologic findings on DOS. Based on these results, requiring a repeat specimen on the DOS may not be clinically necessary. Our facility changed the PAT policy to extend specimen acceptability to patients with red blood cell antibody history or positive ABSC at time of PAT. A 6-month follow-up period showed that this practice is safe.

'She can't come here!' Ethics and the case of birth centre admission policy in the UK.

Using ethnographic data lifted from an investigation into midwifery talk and practice in the South of England, this paper sets out to interrogate the ethics underpinning current admission policy for Free Standing (midwifery led) Birth Centres in the UK. The aim of this interrogation is to contest the grounds upon which birth centres admissions are managed, particularly the over-reliance on abstract calculations of risk--far removed from the material lived experience of the mother wishing to access these birth centre services.

[The imminent peril in the law of July the fifth 2011, two years later: the impact on health?]. / Le péril imminent dans la loi du 5 juillet 2011: quelles implications sur les soins?

In 1938, the French government decided to enact a first legislation to enforce admission of the mentally ill to hospitals. Later in 1990, the law took into consideration the evolution of practices with an increase of free admissions and the right to maintain the mentally ill in cities. Three types of psychiatric hospitalization were defined: free, on third party request and for involuntary confinement. A review had theoretically to be conducted every 5 years. In practice this was not the case, probably due to the balance between individual freedom, patient care and public safety always hard to find. However, considering the imperative European harmonization and the fact the Constitutional Council declared a double unconstitutionality of the law, the Act of July 5th was enacted in a hurry during the summer 2011. The Act defines the "rights and the protection of people subject to psychiatric care and methods of coverage". In this document, we will briefly review the context of this law. We will also explore the clinical implications of the very innovative measure: the "péril imminent". We will use the admissions at the Sainte-Anne hospital in Paris in 2010 to 2012. Three major key points were introduced in the law: a judge controls an agreeable release after 15 days and 6 months of continuous hospitalization. The law let the new possibility to provide ambulatory cares under constraints, and these to make an involuntary confinement without a third party request, using the "imminent peril". This law implies the involvement of the judge and the lawyer. This one has to defend a client who needs care, he controls the formal validity of decisions concerning the patient. To provide treatment without consent in "imminent peril" to someone, conditions are requested: these mental disorders make his consent impossible and his mental state requires immediate care with immediate care of constant medical monitoring justifying a full hospitalization or regular medical monitoring for support under another form of full hospitalization (Article L.3212. 1 of the Code of Public Health). Moreover, a demand for care by a third party has also to be impossible to obtain and an imminent peril to the person's health has to exist, supported by a medical certificate from a doctor who does not belong to the patient's psychiatric hospital. The imminent peril would be an immediate danger to the health or life of the patient. What has been the impact of this law adopted in emergency at Sainte-Anne hospital? This psychiatric hospital is in charge of the population in southern Paris, where reside about 655,000 people. This work observes the evolution of the type of hospitalization and care before and after the adoption of the law. We can observe an overall increase in entries under constraints. There is a decrease in admissions for involuntary confinement for the benefit of imminent peril. This imminent peril corresponds to only a small proportion of hospitalizations without consent but are rising between 2011 and 2012, perhaps in part due to a better understanding of the law. But this progression is to monitor to ensure compliance with the restrictive conditions laid down by this law. Also note that the imminent peril may be used at the refusal of the family or entourage to make the demand for care. The number of hospitalizations at the request of a third party with two certificates is down, which is probably due to a change in status of the CPOA, emergency structure within Sainte-Anne, which is no longer seen as extraterritorial. The imminent peril has advantages: it allows access to the care of people isolated and desocialized, of people whose identity is unknown, of pathological travellers. It avoids hospitalization at the request of the representative of the State for social reasons and not for risks to the safety of persons, even when this type of hospitalization is more stigmatizing and often more difficult to remove. It protects the entourage sometimes, when the family is ambivalent or hostile to care, or has been designated as a persecutor. The imminent peril also has disadvantages. One of them is the risk of its misuse to allow rapid hospitalization without taking the time to seek a third party. The imminent danger made when there is an entourage but which refuses to request care can undermine the development work on information about the disease, the need for care and treatment and the importance of the involvement of the entourage in the care plan. The alliance with the patient may be compromised. In some cases, a decision of care by the request of the representative of the State is more appropriate than the "imminent peril". The "imminent peril" may be preferred because of the administrative burden of prefectural measures when patient presents clinical improvement and we would go up to the ambulatory care in a care program. Yet, the use of a symbolic third, carrying authority, can avoid the too direct confrontation with the patient. Do not use it can complicate the management of the patient. Finally, with desocialized patients, imminent peril can facilitate access to care, but not continuity of care. Indeed, for the care program it is necessary to have an address for the patient. Once the crisis is not to develop a plan of care. Finally in some situations of desocialized patients, the imminent peril can promote access to care but not the continuity of care as to the care program it is necessary to have an address for the patient. Once the crisis is past, it is impossible to implement a program of care. The Law of 5 July 2011 marks a change in the practice of psychiatrists. Take into account the fundamental rights of the patient and to harmonize legislation at EU level was necessary. Some measures are designed to promote access to care as the "imminent peril", we now need to be vigilant to ensure that it is not diverted to promote an increase in care under constraints and that psychiatrists remain in an obligation of means and not of result.

"The uncooperative nearest relative and admission under sections 2 and 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983".

Compulsory admission of patients to hospital for assessment and for treatment is governed by sections 2 and 3, respectively, of the Mental Health Act 1983. The nearest relative of a patient plays an important role in the admission of a patient under those two sections. The term, 'uncooperative nearest relative', is used to describe the nearest relative who objects unreasonably to the making of an application for treatment under section 3 of the Act. The uncooperative nearest relative and admission under sections 2 and 3 is a topic that has been treated in the literature but not to the same extent as this article does. This article aims to contribute to the literature by looking at not only the nearest relative and sections 2 and 3 of the Act generally but also at two problems concerning the uncooperative nearest relative that have been lurking in the background over the years and then proposing solutions for them.

[Surveillance of antibiotic consumption : clarification of the "definition of data on the nature and extent of antibiotic consumption in hospitals according to § 23 paragraph 4 sentence 2 of the IfSG"]. / Antibiotika-Verbrauchs-Surveillance : Ausführungen und Erläuterungen zur Bekanntmachung "Festlegung der Daten zu Art und Umfang des Antibiotika-Verbrauchs in Krankenhäusern nach § 23 Abs. 4 Satz 2 IfSG"

According to § 23 paragraph 4 of the German Infection Prevention Act (IfSG; July 2011), hospitals and clinics for ambulatory surgery are obliged to establish a continuous monitoring system of antibiotic consumption. This is aimed at contributing to an optimization of antibiotic prescription practices in order to confine the development and spread of resistant pathogens. The general requirements (restricted to hospitals) on the method and extent of data collection are provided by the national public health institution after discussion with representatives of various professional societies (Robert Koch-Institut, Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 59, 2013). The article aims to clarify these specifications and to provide background details. In agreement with national and European surveillance systems, the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC)/Defined Daily Dose (DDD) classification system recommended by the WHO should be used as reference standard. Antibiotic consumption should be expressed as the number of DDDs per 100 patient days and per 100 admissions. The categories of antimicrobials and hospital organizational units to be monitored and the time intervals in which analyses should be conducted are determined. Furthermore, various approaches of data assessment are described.

[A descriptive study of the procedures of psychiatric admissions at Razi hospital]. / Etude descriptive des modalités d'hospitalisation en psychiatrie á l'hôpital Razi.

BACKGROUND: The law 92-83, has established the rights of the mentally ill to respect for individual freedom and to appropriate care. However some gaps in its implementation led to the revision by Act 2004-40. AIM: To study the evolution of the number of admissions with and without consent (hospitalizations at the request of a third party and compulsory hospitalizations), between 2000 and 2009. METHODS: Retrospective study of the archives of the mental health unit of Razi hospital. The study population included inpatients under the mode of voluntary and involuntary admission either compulsory hospitalizations or at the request of a third party. RESULTS: An increase in the number of hospitalizations without the consent from 2000 to 2009 was noted. The number of compulsory hospitalizations and the one of hospitalizations at the request of a third party rose respectively from 1,048 to 1,443 and from 22 to 1,323. So the number of free hospitalizations has decreased while the number of involuntary hospitalizations has increased, leading to a constant number of total hospitalizations. The sex ratio for compulsory hospitalizations has increased from 2.04 to 5.83 while it markedly decreased for hospitalizations at the request of a third party (from 10 to 1.7).Men, unlike women, were more likely to be hospitalized compulsorily than at the request of a third party. CONCLUSION: There is a larger use of hospital admissions under constraints than free ones; is it due to a concern for the respect of law or an abuse in the deprivation of freedom for some patients?

Caught in the middle. Under tough scrutiny from the CMS over which patients should be admitted for care, hospitals are frustrated--and patients are fighting back.

As hospitals face growing pressure to reclassify inpatients to "observation" status, patients are the ones being hit with unexpected bills to pay what Medicare won't. One solution to the dilemma is a bill that would restructure the rules on when skilled-nursing care is paid for. "We have very broad-based support," says U.S. Rep. Joe Courtney (D-Conn.), left, one of the House sponsors.