Long-term survival and cost-effectiveness of five dental restorative materials used in various classes of cavity preparations.

This retrospective study examined the survival and cost-effectiveness of five different types of dental materials used to restore various classes of cavity preparations in permanent teeth. Information on the restorations was obtained from the casenote records of 100 long-term adult patients treated at various times by 20 dentists in three city practices. Patients attended for checkups and restorative treatments on a regular basis for around 25 years on average, ranging from 10 to 46 years. All of the restorative materials lasted well, despite the frequent patient checkups and changes of dentists. Cusp-covered amalgams were approximately 3.8 times more cost-effective than were either cast gold or ceramometal crowns, and resin composites were approximately 3.7 times more cost-effective than were cast gold inlays for restoring Class IV preparations. However, there were no significant differences found in the cost-effectiveness of using either resin composites or glass-ionomer cements to restore Class III preparations, or between using either of these two materials, or amalgams, to restore Class V preparations.

Long-term cost-effectiveness of single indirect restorations in selected dental practices.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of alternative methods for restoring large tooth substance loss in adults. METHODS: Long-term survival estimates and discounted costs for 245 large indirect restorations were used to calculate their incremental cost-effectiveness over 15 years when compared with direct placement Class II cusp-overlay amalgams and Class IV multisurface resin composites, placed in 100 patients from three private dental practices. RESULTS: The direct placement restorations were more cost-effective than the indirect restorations at all time intervals over the 15-year study period. The full gold crown and the ceramometal crown were the most cost-effective indirect posterior and anterior restorations respectively. The cast gold onlay and the porcelain jacket crown were the least cost-effective indirect posterior and anterior restorations respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When clinically practicable, large direct placement restorations should be placed initially in preference to indirect restorations.

Alternatives to gold.

Despite, or perhaps because of, its antiquity the lost wax casting process which we use in dentistry still produces the most accurate and durable restorations in our armamentarium. Although high-gold content alloys still act as the benchmark of quality, fit, and durability in the aggressive conditions of the mouth, their inherent cost, high density and low modulus have stimulated a search for alternatives. This has ranged widely through the metallurgical world and across the periodic table of the elements. As a result dental alloys for casting into inlays, crowns and bridges (with or without facings of dental porcelain) have become incredibly complex. This article will explain some of the reasons behind the developments.

Quantification of noble alloy used in 'porcelain-fused-to-metal' restorations.

High costs of gold alloys used in metal substructures of ceramo-metal restorations increase the cost of restorative treatment. This study determined the per unit weight of a noble metal alloy used in ceramo-metal crowns and three-unit fixed-partial dentures. Generally, tooth size and extent of the metal substructure determined the quantity of alloy used.