Early non-response as a predictor of later non-response to antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: It remains a challenge to predict the long-term response to antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia who do not respond at an early stage. This study aimed to investigate the optimal predictive cut-off value for early non-response that would better predict later non-response to antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: This multicenter, 8-week, open-label, randomized trial was conducted at 19 psychiatric centers throughout China. All enrolled participants were assigned to olanzapine, risperidone, amisulpride, or aripiprazole monotherapy for 8 weeks. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) was evaluated at baseline, week 2, week 4, and week 8. The main outcome was the prediction of nonresponse. Nonresponse is defined as a < 20% reduction in the total scores of PANSS from baseline to endpoint. Severity ratings of mild, moderate, and severe illness corresponded to baseline PANSS total scores of 58, 75, and 95, respectively. RESULTS: At week 2, a reduction of < 5% in the PANSS total score showed the highest total accuracy in the severe and mild schizophrenia patients (total accuracy, 75.0% and 80.8%, respectively), and patients who were treated with the risperidone and amisulpride groups (total accuracy, 82.4%, and 78.2%, respectively). A 10% decrease exhibited the best overall accuracy in the moderate schizophrenia patients (total accuracy, 84.0%), olanzapine (total accuracy, 79.2%), and aripiprazole group (total accuracy, 77.4%). At week 4, the best predictive cut-off value was < 20%, regardless of the antipsychotic or severity of illness (total accuracy ranging from 89.8 to 92.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Symptom reduction at week 2 has acceptable discrimination in predicting later non-response to antipsychotics in schizophrenia, and a more accurate predictive cut-off value should be determined according to the medication regimen and baseline illness severity. The response to treatment during the next 2 weeks after week 2 could be further assessed to determine whether there is a need to change antipsychotic medication during the first four weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03451734).

Efficacy and safety/tolerability of antipsychotics in the treatment of adult patients with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotics are widely used in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), but there has been no comprehensive meta-analytic assessment that examined their use as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy. METHODS: A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted on randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) that reported on the efficacy and safety/tolerability of antipsychotics for the treatment of adults with MDD. Data of both monotherapy and adjunctive antipsychotic use were extracted, but analyzed separately using a random-effects model. Co-primary outcomes were study-defined-treatment response and intolerability-related discontinuation. We also illustrated the risk/benefit balance of antipsychotics for MDD, using two-dimensional graphs representing the primary efficacy and safety/tolerability outcome. Secondary outcomes included psychopathology, remission, all-cause-discontinuation, inefficacy-related discontinuation, and adverse events. RESULTS: Forty-five RCTs with 12 724 patients were included in the analysis. In monotherapy (studies = 13, n = 4375), amisulpride [1.99 (1.55-2.55)], sulpiride [1.50 (1.03-2.17)], and quetiapine [1.48 (1.23-1.78)] were significantly superior to placebo regarding treatment response. However, intolerability-related discontinuations were significantly higher compared to placebo with amisulpride and quetiapine. In adjunctive therapy (studies = 32, n = 8349), ziprasidone [1.80 (1.07-3.04)], risperidone [1.59 (1.19-2.14)], aripiprazole [1.54 (1.35-1.76)], brexpiprazole [1.41 (1.21-1.66)], cariprazine [1.27 (1.07-1.52)], and quetiapine [1.23 (1.08-1.41)] were significantly superior to placebo regarding treatment response. However, of these antipsychotics that were superior to placebo, only risperidone was equivalent to placebo regarding discontinuation due to intolerability, while the other antipsychotics were inferior. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that there are significant differences regarding the risk/benefit ratio among antipsychotics for MDD, which should inform clinical care.

Age, Sex, and Comedication Effects on the Steady-State Plasma Concentrations of Amisulpride in Chinese Patients with Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Amisulpride, a second-generation atypical antipsychotic drug, was first marketed in Europe in the 1990s. This study aimed to provide a reference for the clinical application of amisulpride. The effects of age, sex, or specific comedications on amisulpride concentrations in Chinese patients with schizophrenia in the real world were investigated. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of data on amisulpride based on the therapeutic drug monitoring service database at the Zigong Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University. RESULTS: Based on the inclusion criteria, 195 plasma samples from 173 patients (67.05% female and 32.95% male patients) were included for in-depth analysis. The median daily dose of amisulpride was 400 mg/d, median plasma concentration was 457.50 ng/mL, and median concentration/dose (C/D) ratio was 1.04 ng/mL/mg/d. The daily dose of amisulpride positively correlated with measured steady-state plasma concentrations. A significant difference was observed in the subgroup analysis of the combination with valproic acid, zopiclone, or aripiprazole on plasma concentrations. Combining amisulpride with these drugs increased the C/D ratios by 0.56-, 2.31-, and 0.77-fold, respectively. After adjusting for age, the median C/D ratio was found to be significantly different between female and male patients. However, no significant differences in daily dose, plasma concentration, and C/D ratio were noted with respect to sex and age of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences were inferred for the first time in this study, with differential effects on daily dose, steady-state plasma concentration, and C/D ratio associated with the population. In the included study samples, blood concentrations were distributed in the range of 223.25-823.55 ng/mL, which perhaps needs to be evaluated in line with the reference range of ammonia-sulfur ratios in the Chinese population.

Clinical insight among persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorders treated with amisulpride, aripiprazole or olanzapine: a semi-randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic treatment may improve clinical insight. However, previous studies have reported inconclusive findings on whether antipsychotics improve insight over and above the reduction in symptoms of psychosis. These studies assessed homogeneous samples in terms of stage of illness. Randomised studies investigating a mixed population of first- and multiepisode schizophrenia spectrum disorders might clarify this disagreement. METHODS: Our data were derived from a pragmatic, rater-blinded, semi-randomised trial that compared the effectiveness of amisulpride, aripiprazole and olanzapine. A sample of 144 patients with first- or multiepisode schizophrenia spectrum disorders underwent eight assessments during a 1-year follow-up. Clinical insight was assessed by item General 12 from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). We analysed latent growth curve models to test if the medications had a direct effect on insight that was over and above the reduction in total psychosis symptoms. Furthermore, we investigated whether there were differences between the study drugs in terms of insight. RESULTS: Based on allocation analysis, all three drugs were associated with a reduction in total psychosis symptoms in the initial phase (weeks 0-6). Amisulpride and olanzapine were associated with improved insight over and above what was related to the reduction in total psychosis symptoms in the long-term phase (weeks 6-52). However, these differential effects were lost when only including the participants that chose the first drug in the randomisation sequence. We found no differential effect on insight among those who were antipsychotic-naïve and those who were previously medicated with antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that antipsychotic treatment improves insight, but whether the effect on insight surpasses the effect of reduced total psychosis symptoms is more uncertain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01446328, 05.10.2011.

Amisulpride as a potential disease-modifying drug in the treatment of tauopathies.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperphosphorylation and aggregation of the microtubule-associated protein tau cause the development of tauopathies, such as Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). We recently uncovered a causal link between constitutive serotonin receptor 7 (5-HT7R) activity and pathological tau aggregation. Here, we evaluated 5-HT7R inverse agonists as novel drugs in the treatment of tauopathies. METHODS: Based on structural homology, we screened multiple approved drugs for their inverse agonism toward 5-HT7R. Therapeutic potential was validated using biochemical, pharmacological, microscopic, and behavioral approaches in different cellular models including tau aggregation cell line HEK293 tau bimolecular fluorescence complementation, primary mouse neurons, and human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons carrying an FTD-associated tau mutation as well as in two mouse models of tauopathy. RESULTS: Antipsychotic drug amisulpride is a potent 5-HT7R inverse agonist. Amisulpride ameliorated tau hyperphosphorylation and aggregation in vitro. It further reduced tau pathology and abrogated memory impairment in mice. DISCUSSION: Amisulpride may be a disease-modifying drug for tauopathies.

Prediction of Self-Report Cognitive Function for the Symptomatic Remission in Schizophrenia Treated with Amisulpride: a Multicenter, 8-Week Case-Control Study.

This study aimed to determine whether self-report cognitive function is a predictor of symptomatic remission in amisulpride-treated schizophrenia. Patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia diagnoses who received amisulpride treatment, were recruited. Each patient received amisulpride with a flexible-dose strategy of 400-800 mg daily for eight weeks. Remission was defined by a shorter version of the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale(PANSS)criteria, which includes six items (PANSS-6) with scores of less than three in each item(criteria A) or total six scores of less than fourteen(criteria B). Three hundred and three patients completed the study in 15 hospitals in China. By criteria A, 244 (80.5%) achieved symptomatic remission at endpoint, and 258 (85.1%) by criteria B. Duration of illness (DOI) (criteria A: t = 2.31, P = 0.025,criteria B:t = 2.24,p = 0.026) and perceived deficits questionnaire at baseline (PDQ20 Day0) (criteria A: t = 3.32, P = 0.001,criteria B:t = 2.76,p = 0.006) in remission groups were less than that in non-remission groups. Logistic regression analysis took into account sex, age, age-onset, DOI, and PDQ20(Day0), and showed that PDQ20(Day0) was a predictor for symptomatic remission in criteria A (B = - 0.02, P = 0.014) and criteria B (B = - 0.03, P = 0.005). The odds ratio (OR) of achieving remission will be reduced by 2% in criteria A and 3% in criteria B. There were no significant differences in gender composition, age, BMI, education level, age-onset, a daily dose of amisulpride and the percentage of PDQ20 Improvement between remission and nonremission in criteria A or criteria B. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves were found for PDQ20(Day0) to define the precise scores to predict remission of schizophrenia (criteria A:AUC = 0.614, S.E. = 0.041, 95% CI = 0.535-0.694, p = 0.007; criteria B:AUC = 0.633, S.E. = 0.045, 95% CI = 0.545-0.721, p = 0.005). Our data suggest that an early self-report cognitive function in amisulpride-treated schizophrenia is important in predicting for symptomatic remission, the fewer scores of PDQ20 at baseline mean the patients have less daily cognitive difficulty, the more likely the patient is to achieve symptomatic remission.

New Drugs 2021, Part 2.

ABSTRACT: The second of a two-part series, this article describes eight recently approved drugs, including the first drug approved for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2, a first-in-class HIV attachment inhibitor, and a new intravenous injection indicated for the treatment of acute pain in adults for whom other treatments are ineffective.

The relation between dopamine D2 receptor blockade and the brain reward system: a longitudinal study of first-episode schizophrenia patients.

BACKGROUND: Psychotic symptoms have been linked to salience abnormalities in the brain reward system, perhaps caused by a dysfunction of the dopamine neurotransmission in striatal regions. Blocking dopamine D2 receptors dampens psychotic symptoms and normalises reward disturbances, but a direct relationship between D2 receptor blockade, normalisation of reward processing and symptom improvement has not yet been demonstrated. The current study examined the association between blockade of D2 receptors in the caudate nucleus, alterations in reward processing and the psychopathology in a longitudinal study of antipsychotic-naïve first-episode schizophrenia patients. METHODS: Twenty-two antipsychotic-naïve first-episode schizophrenia patients (10 males, mean age 23.3) and 23 healthy controls (12 males, mean age 23.5) were examined with single-photon emission computed tomography using 123I-labelled iodobenzamide. Reward disturbances were measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) using a modified version of the monetary-incentive-delay task. Patients were assessed before and after 6 weeks of treatment with amisulpride. RESULTS: In line with previous results, patients had a lower fMRI response at baseline (0.2 ± 0.5 v. 0.7 ± 0.6; p = 0.008), but not at follow-up (0.5 ± 0.6 v. 0.6 ± 0.7), and a change in the fMRI signal correlated with improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale positive symptoms (ρ = -0.435, p = 0.049). In patients responding to treatment, a correlation between improvement in the fMRI signal and receptor occupancy was found (ρ = 0.588; p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that salience abnormalities play a role in the reward system in schizophrenia. In patients responding to a treatment-induced blockade of dopamine D2 receptors, the psychotic symptoms may be ameliorated by normalising salience abnormalities in the reward system.

A systematic review and combined meta-analysis of concentration of oral amisulpride.

AIMS: Amisulpride, a first-line schizophrenia treatment, has shown large interindividual variability in plasma/serum levels, often outside the reference range (100-320 ng/mL). This study aims to clarify the impact of dose, sex, age and related factors for the interpatient variability in amisulpride plasma/serum concentration. METHODS: Both English and Chinese databases were searched from their inception to May 16, 2019, using the terms: amisulpride and (plasma OR serum OR blood OR "drug monitoring" OR concentration). Studies reporting concentrations and either a dose, associated factor, clinical outcome or side effect were included. RESULTS: Fourteen studies with 1628 participants were eventually included. Eligible articles yielded data on drug concentration and dose, averaging 333.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 294.5-373.3) ng/mL and 636.2 (95% CI: 549.7-722.6) mg/d, respectively. The calculated mean concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratio was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.52-0.67) (ng/mL)/mg. Subgroup analysis suggested that female patients on combined lithium-amisulpride have higher concentration levels and C/D ratios. Age was slight positive associated with C/D ratio while not for plasma level. Smoker patients have high concentration level than nonsmoking patients but not for C/D. Responsive and nonresponsive groups did not differ in concentration and C/D. CONCLUSION: Pooled concentration levels of amisulpride were higher than recommended with wide individual variation, especially in older patients, female patients and patients taking amisulpride combined with lithium. The specific therapeutic reference range for amisulpride may require reconstruction, which should consider the influence of age, sex, kidney function, drug-drug interactions, different dose regimens and sampling times in future study.

Cognitive Effects of Combined Amisulpride and Quetiapine Treatment in Patients With Refractory Schizophrenia: A Naturalistic, Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Regarding the treatment of patients with resistant schizophrenia, different options exit, although they are supported by limited evidence. In this study, antipsychotic polypharmacy, comprising 1200 mg of amisulpride and 600 mg of quetiapine, was used. Clinical change evaluation was performed using neurocognitive evaluations. STUDY QUESTION: The use of amisulpride and quetiapine will imply a clinical improvement in patients affected by schizophrenia, which will be specially reflected in a cognitive improvement. STUDY DESIGN: Naturalistic and prospective study. Twenty-six patients were applied and assessed by a battery of neurocognitive evaluations since the pretreatment baseline until 6-month treatment. The patients had no biological response to medication, high social maladjustment, and a long clinical history of the disease. Kane and Brenner criteria for treatment-resistant schizophrenia were applied to choose the subjects. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: The cognitive improvement will imply a significant betterment, from the pretreatment baseline until 6-month treatment, in the following cognitive tests: Stroop Test, WAIS Coding Subtest, and Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT). An improvement in the Calgary Depression Scale, Simpson-Angus Scale, and Visual Analogue Scale (EVA) will also be observed. This scales were been used during the baseline, 3 months after, and then, 6 months. RESULTS: Subjects, after 6-month treatment with amisulpride and quetiapine, did show statistically significant differences in the assessed areas: WAIS Coding Subtest (P < 0.001), CTMT A and B (CTMT A P < 0.034; CTMT B P < 0.000), and Stroop Tests: Word (P < 0.001), Word-Color (P < 0.007), and Interference (P < 0.039). Furthermore, they showed a statistically significant difference in the Calgary Depression Scale (P < 0.002), Simpson-Angus Scale (P < 0.019), and EVA (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this report show a cognitive and clinical improvement in refractory patients after the administration of amisulpride and quetiapine.

Efficacy of amisulpride on postoperative nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM AND BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains a significant clinical problem for surgical patients. Amisulpride is a well-studied D2/D3 antagonist that has the potential to be used for preventing and treating PONV. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of amisulpride for prevention and treatment of PONV through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHOD: A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from their inception to Feb 15th, 2019. The efficacy outcome was the incidence of complete response, defined as no emesis and no rescue antiemetic use in a 24-h period after study drug administration. The safety outcomes were the adverse effects associated with amisulpride. RESULTS: Five studies comprising 3243 patients met inclusion critieria. Compared with placebo, amisulpride showed a significantly improved incidence of complete response [relative risk (RR): 1.30; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-1.41; P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%] with firm evidence from the trial sequential analysis. Particularly, the amisulpride at 5 mg dose indicated a significant benefit than placebo [relative risk (RR): 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-1.39; P < 0.00001, I2 = 4%]. The adverse event profile of amisulpride was generally similar to the placebo. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, low-dose, intravenous amisulpride is safe and efficacious for the prevention and treatment of PONV compared to placebo. Further studies are needed to explore the optimal dose and timing. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42019121483.

Amisulpride for the Rescue Treatment of Postoperative Nausea or Vomiting in Patients Failing Prophylaxis: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Phase III Trial.

BACKGROUND: Although antiemetics are commonly used to prevent postoperative nausea or vomiting, the failure rate is appreciable and there is currently no generally accepted standard for rescue treatment of postoperative nausea or vomiting after failed prophylaxis. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was designed to test the hypothesis that intravenous amisulpride, a dopamine D2/D3-antagonist, is superior to placebo at treating established postoperative nausea or vomiting after failed prophylaxis. METHODS: A total of 2,285 adult patients undergoing surgery under general inhalational anesthesia and receiving standard antiemetic prophylaxis were enrolled at 23 sites in Canada, France, Germany, and the United States. Of these, 702 patients experienced postoperative nausea or vomiting in the 24-h period after surgery and were randomized to receive a single dose of 5 or 10 mg intravenous amisulpride or matching placebo. The primary endpoint was complete response, defined as no emesis or rescue antiemetic use for 24 h after study drug administration, excluding emesis in the first 30 min. Secondary endpoints included incidence of emesis and rescue medication use, nausea burden, time to treatment failure, and length of stay in postanesthesia care unit and hospital. RESULTS: Complete response occurred in significantly more patients receiving 10 mg amisulpride (96 of 230, 41.7%) than placebo (67 of 235, 28.5%), a 13.2% difference (95% CI, 4.6 to 21.8; odds ratio, 1.80; P = 0.006). A 5-mg dose of amisulpride did not show a significant benefit (80 of 237, 33.8%); the difference from placebo was 5.2% (95% CI, 3.1 to 13.6; odds ratio, 1.24; P = 0.109). The total number of adverse events recorded and proportion of patients with at least one adverse event were comparable between the placebo and amisulpride groups. No clinically relevant toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A single 10-mg dose of intravenous amisulpride was safe and more effective than placebo at treating established postoperative nausea or vomiting in patients failing postoperative nausea or vomiting prophylaxis.

Amisulpride prevents nausea and vomiting associated with highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remain significant clinical problems, especially in the delayed phase (24-120 h after chemotherapy). Amisulpride is a dopamine D2/D3-receptor antagonist previously shown to be an effective intravenous antiemetic. We conducted a randomised, double-blind study to characterise the dose response of oral amisulpride in delayed phase CINV. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients receiving cisplatin ≥ 70 mg/m2 or an anthracycline-cyclophosphamide regimen for breast cancer received, on day 1, 20 mg amisulpride and 8-16 mg ondansetron intravenously followed, once daily on days 2-4, by 10, 20 or 40 mg oral amisulpride or placebo. A control group receiving standard three-drug prophylaxis was enrolled for assay sensitivity purposes. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR), defined as no emesis or rescue medication use, in the delayed phase. RESULTS: Three hundred eighteen subjects were evaluable per protocol. CR rate (24-120 h) was 20% with placebo and 46% with 10 mg amisulpride (p = 0.006 after multiplicity adjustment); in the three-drug control group, it was 59%. Emesis, nausea and 0-120-h CR rate were significantly improved with 10 mg amisulpride compared to placebo. Higher doses of amisulpride were not more effective than 10 mg. In patients with acute phase CR, delayed phase CR rate was 44% for placebo, 75% for 10 mg amisulpride (p = 0.022) and 70% for the 3-drug control. No significant differences were seen between groups in safety parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Amisulpride 10 mg orally is safe and superior to placebo at preventing delayed CINV caused by highly emetogenic chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01857232.

Amisulpride as an Augmentation Agent in Treatment Resistant Depression: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Amisulpride (AMS) in low dosage has been used effectively for treatment of dysthymia. Yet there is a dearth of reports on its use as an augmentation agent in therapy-resistant depression. We deal with this issue presenting case reports and a review of the literature. The addition of 50 mg amisulpride (AMS) to antidepressant therapy in seven patients with depression at different stages of treatment resistance, one of them a case of recurrent brief depression, is described in this report. Augmentation with AMS led to a profound improvement in psychopathology in most patients. The only side effects were elevation of prolactin levels and occasional weight gain. In most cases, improvement occurred early, after only 1-2 weeks of treatment. In some patients, reduction or cessation of AMS led to an immediate and intense recurrence of depressive symptoms that resembled a withdrawal syndrome. Further investigations into the clinical utility and the mode of action of AMS as an augmentation agent are warranted.

Therapeutic D2/3 receptor occupancies and response with low amisulpride blood concentrations in very late-onset schizophrenia-like psychosis (VLOSLP).

OBJECTIVE: Antipsychotic drug sensitivity in very late-onset schizophrenia-like psychosis (VLOSLP) is well documented, but poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate blood drug concentration, D2/3 receptor occupancy and outcome in VLOSLP during open amisulpride prescribing, and compare this with Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Blood drug concentration, prolactin, symptoms and extrapyramidal side-effects (EPS) were serially assessed during dose titration. [18 F]fallypride imaging was used to quantify D2/3 receptor occupancy. Average steady-state amisulpride concentration (Caverage, ng/ml) was estimated by incorporating pharmacokinetic (PK) data into an existing population PK model (25 AD participants, 20 healthy older people). RESULTS: Eight patients (target 20) were recruited (six women; 76 + - 6 years; six treatment compliant; five serially sampled; three with paired imaging data). Mean + - SD symptom reduction was 74 ± 12% (50-100 mg/day; 92.5 + -39.4 ng/ml). Mild EPS emerged at 96 ng/ml (in AD, severe EPS, 50 mg/day, 60 ng/ml). In three participants, imaged during optimal treatment (50 mg/day; 41-70 ng/ml), caudate occupancy was 44-59% (58-74% in AD across a comparable Caverage). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small sample size, our findings are highly relevant as they suggest that, as in AD, 50 mg/day amisulpride is associated with >40% occupancy and clinically relevant responses in VLOSLP. It was not possible to fully characterise concentration-occupancy relationships in VLOSLP, and it is thus unclear whether the greater susceptibility of those with AD to emergent EPS was accounted for by increased central drug access. Further investigation of age- and diagnosis-specific threshold sensitivities is warranted, to guide amisulpride prescribing in older people, and therapeutic drug monitoring studies offer a potentially informative future approach. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Comparative efficacy and safety between amisulpride and olanzapine in schizophrenia treatment and a cost analysis in China: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost-minimization analysis.

BACKGROUND: Amisulpride was introduced into China in 2010 as a second-generation atypical antipsychotic, while olanzapine has been on the market since 1999 as one of the leading treatments for schizophrenia in China. Since more Chinese patients are gaining access to amisulpride, the study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and costs between amisulpride and olanzapine for schizophrenia treatment in China. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang database were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to July 2018. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was utilized to assess the quality of included studies. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of amisulpride and olanzapine, followed by a cost-minimization analysis using local drug and medical costs reported in China. RESULTS: Twenty RCTs with 2000 patients were included in the systematic review. There were no significant differences between amisulpride and olanzapine on efficacy measures based on scores from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity or Improvement. For safety outcomes, amisulpride was associated with lower fasting blood glucose and less abnormal liver functions as well as significantly lower risks of weight gain, constipation, and somnolence; olanzapine was associated with significantly lower risks of insomnia and lactation/amenorrhea/sexual hormone disorder. No significant differences were found in risks of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), tremor, akathisia, abnormal corrected QT interval. Cost-minimization analysis showed that amisulpride was likely to be a cost-saving alternative in China, with potential savings of 1358 Chinese Yuan (CNY) per patient for a three-month schizophrenia treatment compared with olanzapine. CONCLUSION: As the first meta-analysis and cost-minimization analysis comparing the efficacy, safety and cost of amisulpride and olanzapine within a Chinese setting, the study suggests that amisulpride may be an effective, well-tolerated, and cost-saving antipsychotic drug alternative in China.

A clinical trial inclusion criteria to enrich for patients presenting with canonical symptom structure in bipolar depression.

Clinical drug development in psychiatry is challenging due to heterogeneous patient populations and the uncertainty of measuring neuropsychiatric constructs with symptom rating scales. Here we describe the development and implementation of an enrichment algorithm that identifies canonical versus anomalous symptom presentations, at the individual subject level, based on MADRS ratings obtained at screening and baseline. Data from 5 randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials in bipolar I disorder was used (N = 2026 subjects and 15,239 MADRS assessments). A variance-covariance difference (VCD) vector was developed to encode individual symptom structure using the 10 items of MADRS from the two sequential assessments. An anomaly score, calculated from each subject's VCD vector was derived by isolation forest to quantify the degree of disparity from the hypothesized canonical item structure. A retrospective application of the algorithm reliably identified a threshold anomaly score above which the psychometric properties of MADRS deteriorate. Consistent with increasing the certainty of MADRS ratings, subjects with a canonical symptom structure at baseline demonstrated greater effect sizes post-baseline in a phase 2 placebo-controlled trial of non-racemic amisulpride (SEP-4199) for bipolar depression, analyzed retrospectively. Our analyses show that the developed algorithm can reduce the symptom structure heterogeneity at baseline and thus improve the measurement certainty of psychiatric symptoms in clinical trials. This novel enrichment method has been prospectively implemented in a Phase 3 clinical study of SEP-4199 and is consistent with regulatory guidelines aimed at increasing the statistical power and lowering patient-burden in clinical trials. Clinical Trials Registry: NCT00868452, NCT00868699, NCT01284517, NCT01986101, NCT03543410, NCT05169710.

Amisulpride Decreases Tau Protein Hyperphosphorylation in the Brain of OXYS Rats.

AIM: In this study, OXYS rats of three ages (1, 3, and 6 months), a proven model of Alzheimer's disease (AD), at various stages of disease progression were used to thoroughly study the effects of amisulpride on behavior and tau protein phosphorylation. BACKGROUND: With the growing number of patients with AD, the problem of finding a cure is very acute. Neurodegeneration in AD has various causes, one of which is hyperphosphorylation of tau protein. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether amisulpride would affect pathological tau phosphorylation in AD. METHODS: We assessed the influence of chronic administration of amisulpride (3 weeks, 3 mg/kg per day, intraperitoneally)-a 5-HT7 receptor inverse agonist-on behavior and tau hyperphosphorylation in OXYS rats (at ages of 1, 3, and 6 months). RESULTS: Chronic administration of amisulpride dramatically decreased tau phosphorylation in the frontal cortex and hippocampus of 3-month-old OXYS rats. Additionally, in 1- and 3-month-old rats' hippocampi, amisulpride diminished the mRNA level of the Cdk5 gene encoding one of the main tau kinases involved in the 5-HT7 receptor-induced effect on tau phosphorylation. CONCLUSION: Thus, We found that chronic administration of amisulpride could reduce pathological tau hyperphosphorylation while reducing anxiety. We propose amisulpride to have therapeutic potential against AD and that it can be the most effective in the early stages of the disease.

Generalizability of the Results of Efficacy Trials in First-Episode Schizophrenia: Comparing Outcome and Study Discontinuation of Groups of Participants in the Optimization of Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Europe (OPTiMiSE) Trial.

Objective: In the majority of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in schizophrenia populations, patients suffering from a substance use disorder (SUD) or suicidality are excluded. Excluding these patients from RCTs might impact the generalizability of results. The aim of this study is to determine whether excluding patients with suicidality and/or SUD impacts RCT results on symptomatic remission, premature study discontinuation, symptom severity, and social functioning.Methods: Across Europe and Israel, 481 patients with first-episode schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or schizoaffective disorder, based on DSM-IV criteria, were recruited between May 26, 2011, and May 15, 2016, for the Optimization of Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Europe (OPTiMiSE) trial. Baseline characteristics and follow-up assessments were compared between patients with versus without baseline SUD and/or suicidality.Results: A total of 446 patients met eligibility criteria for the OPTiMiSE trial and initiated amisulpride treatment, of whom 404 (91%) had data available on suicidality, SUD, duration of illness, and CDS score. Of the 360 eligible patients with baseline data on suicidality and SUD, 106 patients had comorbid suicidality and/or SUD while 254 patients had neither of these comorbidities. No significant differences in the likelihood to achieve symptomatic remission or to prematurely discontinue the study were found when comparing comorbid versus non-comorbid patients (P = .27). There were no significant differences in symptom severity and social functioning between the groups. Comorbid patients had a higher level of depressive symptoms and more impaired social functioning compared to non-comorbid patients.Discussion: Excluding first-episode schizophrenia patients with comorbidities from clinical trials unlikely affects key outcome measures. It is recommended to include patients with comorbidities in clinical trials while carefully monitoring suicidality and implementing safety plans to gain insight into efficacy and safety of treatment in this substantial patient population.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01248195.

Relapse in patients with schizophrenia and amisulpride-induced hyperprolactinemia or olanzapine-induced metabolic disturbance after switching to other antipsychotics.

Hyperprolactinemia and metabolic disturbance are common side effects of antipsychotics that cause intolerance. Despite its potential influence on relapse, there are no established guidelines for antipsychotic switching. This naturalistic study explored the association between antipsychotic switching, baseline clinical status, metabolic changes, and relapse in patients with schizophrenia. In total, 177 patients with amisulpride-induced hyperprolactinemia and 274 with olanzapine-induced metabolic disturbance were enrolled. Relapse was determined by assessing changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores from baseline to 6 months (increased over 20% or 10% reaching 70). Metabolic indices were measured at baseline and 3 months. Patients with baseline PANSS >60 were more likely to relapse. Further, patients switching to aripiprazole had a higher risk of relapse regardless of their original medication. Participants who originally used amisulpride had reduced prolactin levels following medication change, while switching to olanzapine caused increased weight and blood glucose levels. In patients originally using olanzapine, only switching to aripiprazole reduced insulin resistance. Adverse effects on weight and lipid metabolism were observed in patients who switched to risperidone, while amisulpride improved lipid profiles. Changing schizophrenia treatment requires careful consideration of multiple variables, particularly the choice of substituted drug and the patient's baseline symptoms.