Impact of introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing on uptake of genetic testing in fetuses with central nervous system anomalies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) on the uptake of invasive testing in pregnancies complicated by fetal central nervous system (CNS) anomalies. METHODS: Retrospective review of all singleton pregnancies complicated by fetal CNS anomalies seen at a single tertiary center between 2010 and 2017. Cases who had undergone invasive testing or NIPT prior to the diagnosis of the CNS anomaly were excluded. Cases were segregated according to whether they were seen prior to introduction of NIPT (group A, 2010-2013) or thereafter (group B, 2014-2017). We examined the rate of invasive and noninvasive genetic testing in each group. RESULTS: We retrieved 500 cases: 308 (62%) were isolated CNS anomalies, and 192 (38%) had additional structural anomalies. In the total cohort, 165 women (33%) underwent expectant management with no further prenatal genetic testing, 166 (33%) had invasive testing, 52 (10%) had NIPT, and 117 pregnancies (23%) were terminated without further prenatal investigations. The introduction of NIPT significantly decreased the number of pregnancies having no testing (44% group A vs 22% in group B, p < .0001), particularly in the group presenting with isolated ventriculomegaly, but did not affect the uptake of invasive testing (34% vs 32%, respectively; p = .61). NIPT would have missed 4% of pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) in the group of cases with isolated brain anomalies and 11% of CNVs in cases with complex anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of invasive prenatal testing in fetuses with brain anomalies was not affected by NIPT. However, the incidence of no genetic testing was significantly reduced. NIPT was a suboptimal testing strategy in this population as it missed a significant number of subchromosomal genetic anomalies.

Why do patients decline amniocentesis? Analysis of factors influencing the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, determination of personalized risk for fetal chromosomal anomalies emerged as an important component of prenatal genetic counseling. Women in whom fetal risk for chromosomal aberrations is elevated are offered further testing. The aim of this study was to identify factors that may influence the decision to refuse invasive prenatal testing aimed at determination of fetal karyotype in a group of patients at increased risk of trisomy 21. METHODS: The analysis included 177 patients with singleton pregnancy, whose personalized risk score for trisomy 21 calculated on the basis of the combined test exceeded 1:300. Diagnostic amniocentesis was performed in 125 patients from this subset, since the remaining 52 women declined invasive prenatal testing. The following factors were analyzed as potential determinants of the decision to refuse amniocentesis: maternal age (≥35 years), gravidity, number of miscarriages in previous pregnancies, educational status, marital status, indications to prenatal testing, gestational age at the time of prenatal testing, personalized risk score for fetal chromosomal aberrations and nuchal translucency (NT) value. RESULTS: A statistically significant relationship was found between the decision to refuse amniocentesis and the number of previous miscarriages, maternal educational level, NT values and personalized risk score for fetal chromosomal aberrations. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified primary maternal education and history of more than two miscarriages as independent significant predictors of declining amniocentesis. Women with personalized risk scores for trisomy 21 greater than 1:100 opted out of invasive prenatal diagnosis significantly less often than the remaining participants. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the key role of high quality and accuracy of non-invasive diagnostic tests conducted in the first trimester should be emphasized as personalized risk score for fetal chromosomal aberrations determined based on their results is pivotal for further management of pregnancy. Equally important is to provide the patients with an accurate and comprehensible information about potential benefits and risks of invasive testing.

Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing Recommendations are Influenced by Maternal Age, Statistical Misconception and Perceived Liability.

Funding policy and medico-legal climate are part of physicians' reality and might permeate clinical decisions. This study evaluates the influence of maternal age and government funding on obstetrician/gynecologist recommendation for invasive prenatal testing (i.e. amniocentesis) for Down syndrome (DS), and its association with the physician's assessment of the risk of liability for medical malpractice unless they recommend amniocentesis. Israeli physicians (N = 171) completed a questionnaire and provided amniocentesis recommendations for women at 18 weeks gestation with normal preliminary screening results, identical except aged 28 and 37. Amniocentesis recommendations were reversed for the younger ('yes' regardless of testing results: 6.4%; 'no' regardless of testing results: 31.6%) versus older woman ('yes' regardless of testing results: 40.9%; 'no' regardless of testing results: 7.0%; χ2 = 71.55, p < .01). About half of the physicians endorsed different recommendations per scenario; of these, 65.6% recommended amniocentesis regardless of testing results for the 37-year-old woman. Physicians routinely performing amniocentesis and those advocating for amniocentesis for all women ≥ age 35 were approximately twice as likely to vary their recommendations per scenario. Physicians who perceived risk of liability for malpractice as large were nearly one-and-a-half times more likely to vary recommendations. The results indicate physicians' recommendations are influenced by maternal age, though age is already incorporated in prenatal DS risk evaluations. The physician's assessment of the risk that they will be sued unless they recommend amniocentesis may contribute to this spurious influence.

Amniocentesis test uptake for congenital defects: Decision of pregnant women in Vietnam.

Our study aimed to identify the knowledge, attitude, and factors associated with uptake of amniocentesis test amongst pregnant women of advanced maternal age (35+ years old). A cross-sectional survey was performed on 481 participants in 2016. Women with higher educational attainment, higher income level, having a baby with congenital defects, and women with better knowledge and/or attitude about amniocentesis test were more likely to accept the test. Our study suggested the importance of counseling for women and more time should be given for them to absorb information before they make their decision to uptake the amniocentesis test.

Effect of Supportive Information on Anxiety Levels in Pregnant Women Awaiting Amniocentesis Results: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of supportive information on anxiety levels in women awaiting amniocentesis results. Material and Method: Women underwent amniocentesis were randomized into two groups according to whether they did (group A) or did not (group B) receive supportive information. Anxiety levels were measured using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory at four time points, (1) after amniocentesis, (2) before phoning for test result appointment confirmation, (3) after phoning, during which supportive information was given to group A, and (4) before receiving the test results. Semistructured interviews were conducted after the last anxiety measurement. Results: There were no significant differences in the state anxiety scores between the two groups after amniocentesis and before phoning to confirm that the amniocentesis results were available. The state anxiety scores after telephoning and before receiving the test results in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (36.69 vs. 42.50, p<0.001, and 39.16 vs. 42.82, p<0.05, respectively). We identified three stages of psychological distress, uncertainty of fetal safety, uncertainty of the test results, and hopefulness concerning the test results. Women in group B experienced only the two early stages of distress, whereas after receiving supportive information, the psychological state of women in group A further progressed to the hopefulness concerning the test result Conclusion: Supportive information could alleviate the anxiety level of women awaiting amniocentesis results. Providing appropriate supportive information for each psychological stage should be considered for women underwent amniocentesis.

The acute autonomic stress response and amniotic fluid glucocorticoids in second-trimester pregnant women.

OBJECTIVE: The maternal autonomic nervous system (ANS) has received little attention in the investigation of biological mechanisms linking prenatal stress to fetal cortisol (F) excess. In vitro, norepinephrine and epinephrine inhibit placental 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (11ß-HSD2), which protects the fetus from F overexposure by inactivating it to cortisone (E). Here, we investigated the acute ANS stress response to an amniocentesis and its association with amniotic fluid F, E, and E/(E + F) as a marker of fetoplacental 11ß-HSD2 activity. METHODS: An aliquot of amniotic fluid was obtained from 34 healthy, second-trimester pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis. Repeated assessment of mood states served to examine the psychological stress response to amniocentesis. Saliva samples were collected to measure stress-induced changes in salivary α-amylase concentrations in response to amniocentesis. Cardiac parameters were measured continuously. RESULTS: Undergoing amniocentesis induced significant psychological and autonomic alterations. Low-frequency (LF)/high-frequency (HF) baseline, suggested to reflect sympathovagal balance, was negatively correlated with amniotic E/(E + F) (r=-0.53, p = .002) and positively with F (r = 0.62, p < .001). In contrast, a stronger acute LF/HF response was positively associated with E/(E + F) (r = 0.44, p = .012) and negatively with F (r=-0.40, p = .025). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the maternal ANS is involved in the regulation of the fetoplacental barrier to stress. Allostatic processes may have been initiated to counterbalance acute stress effects. In contrast, higher LF/HF baseline values, possibly indicative of chronic stress exposure, may have inhibited 11ß-HSD2 activity in the fetoplacental unit. These results parallel animal findings of up-regulated placental 11ß-HSD2 in response to acute stress but impairment under chronic stress.

'And then you can decide'--antenatal foetal diagnosis decision making in South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Decision making is integral to genetic counselling and the premise is that autonomous decisions emerge if patients are provided with information in a non-directive manner. The pivotal activity in antenatal diagnosis counselling with at-risk pregnant women is decision making regarding invasive procedures. This process is not well understood in multicultural settings. OBJECTIVE: This study examined multicultural genetic counselling interactions with women of advanced maternal age (AMA). It aimed to investigate the participants' orientation towards the amniocentesis decision. DESIGN: Data were collected during 14 video-recorded consultations between six genetic counsellors and 14 women of AMA in a genetic counselling clinic in South Africa. The design was qualitative and conversation analysis was used for analysis. RESULTS: Analysis revealed that counsellors used several strategies to facilitate discussions and decision making. However, the invitation to make a decision regarding amniocentesis was not perceived as being neutral. Both the counsellors and the women appeared to treat the offer as one which should be accepted. This resulted in a paradox, as strategies intended to allow neutral discussion seem to achieve the opposite. It is suggested that these results may be linked to the local health-care setting. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the understanding of decision-making processes and enhancing autonomy may require a more detailed investigation into psychosocial, political and historical factors in the local health-care setting. Models of practice as well as the training of genetic counsellors need to be sensitive to these influences. A closer examination of interactional variables may yield new and relevant insights for the profession.

Factors that affect the decision to undergo amniocentesis in women with normal Down syndrome screening results: it is all about the age.

BACKGROUND: Risk for foetal Down syndrome (DS) increases as maternal age increases. Non-invasive screening (maternal serum triple test) for DS is routinely offered to pregnant women to provide risk estimates and suggest invasive amniocentesis for definitive pre-natal diagnosis to high-risk women. OBJECTIVE: We examined women's decision process with regard to pre-natal screening, and specifically, the degree to which they take into account triple serum screening results when considering whether or not to undergo amniocentesis. DESIGN: Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted to assess recall of DS screening results, understanding of risk estimates and their effect on women's decision whether to undergo amniocentesis. The study included 60 pregnant Israeli women (half younger than 35 and half advanced maternal age - AMA), with normal DS screening results and no known ultrasound abnormalities. RESULTS: Age appeared to determine the decision process. The vast majority of AMA women had amniocentesis, many of them before receiving their DS screening results. Most AMA participants knew that their risk estimate was 'normal', but still considered themselves at high risk due to their age. Procedure-related risk (miscarriage) and other factors only had a minor effect on their decision. A minority of younger women had amniocentesis. Younger women mentioned procedure-related risk and having normal screening results as the main factors affecting their decision not to have amniocentesis. CONCLUSION: Age 35 is an anchor for the pre-determination regarding performing or avoiding amniocentesis. AMA women mention 'age' as their main reason to have amniocentesis and considered it an independent risk factor.

Influence of anchoring on miscarriage risk perception associated with amniocentesis.

One factor women consider when deciding whether to pursue amniocentesis is the risk of miscarriage. People use mechanisms like anchoring, or the prior belief regarding the magnitude of risk, as a frame of reference for new information. This study aimed to determine a woman's perception of miscarriage risk associated with amniocentesis before and after genetic counseling and to determine what factors anchor a woman's perception of miscarriage risk. One hundred thirteen women being seen for prenatal genetic counseling and possible amniocentesis at six Houston clinics participated in the two-part anonymous survey. While most women (56.7 %) perceived the risk as low or average pre-counseling and indicated the numeric risk of amniocentesis as <1 %, significantly more patients (73 %) correctly identified the numeric risk as <1 % post-counseling (p < 0.0001). However, the majority of patients' qualitative risk perception did not change after the genetic counseling session (60 %). Those who changed their feeling about the risk after counseling showed a decreased perception of the risk (p < 0.0001). Participants who elected amniocentesis had a significantly lower perception of the risk (p = 0.017) whereas those who declined amniocentesis were more likely to view the risk as high (p = 0.004). The only two anchoring factors that had an effect were having a friend or relative with a personal or family history of a genetic disorder (p = 0.001) and having a child already (p = 0.038); both were associated with a lower risk perception. The lack of significant factors may reflect the uniqueness of each patient's risk assessment framework and reinforces the importance of genetic counseling to elucidate individual concerns, particularly as non-invasive prenatal testing becomes more widely available and further complicates the prenatal testing landscape.

Maternal Anxiety and the Second-Trimester Prenatal Screening: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Assessing the effects of maternal anxiety on the markers and results of quadruple screening and on maternal anxiety after receiving positive results. METHODS: This prospective cohort study evaluated 1,595 pregnant women referred for prenatal visits. Maternal state/trait anxiety levels were measured, then quadruple screening was performed by measuring serum α-fetoprotein (AFP), ß-human chorionic gonadotropin, inhibin A, and unconjugated estriol (UE3). After receiving the results, the state/trait anxiety was remeasured. Amniocentesis was performed for screening-positive mothers. RESULTS: High prescreening maternal anxiety was associated with lower rates of elevated AFP (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.1-0.74) and elevated inhibin A (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15-0.98). High maternal anxiety was associated with higher rates of decreased UE3 (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.06-3.08). There were no significant associations between prescreening maternal anxiety and the final screening or amniocentesis results. Among the screening-positive mothers, those who had high state/trait anxiety before screening had higher anxiety scores after receiving positive results compared to those with low prescreening anxiety levels (52.9 ± 10.8 vs. 43.7 ± 10.3). CONCLUSION: High prescreening maternal anxiety is associated with lower rates of elevated AFP and inhibin A and higher rates of decreased UE3. However, maternal anxiety does not affect the final screening or amniocentesis result. High maternal state/trait anxiety before screening is associated with significantly higher maternal anxiety after the receipt of positive results.

Reducing Pain and Anxiety during Second Trimester Genetic Amniocentesis Using Aromatic Therapy: A Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefit of aromatic therapy using menthol for decrease pain perception during amniocentesis. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A prospective randomized study was conducted to compare pain level between groups ofpregnant women who underwent amniocentesis with and without aromatic therapy using menthol. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was usedfor pain assessment. The participants were askedfor their anticipated pain and anxiety level and level ofpain before and immediately after the procedure. RESULTS: Three hundred seventeen pregnant women were recruited into the present study, 158 in the menthol group and 159 in the non-menthol group. Mean VAS score of the post-procedure pain and anxiety did not differ significantly between the two groups. Mean VAS score of the anticipated pain influenced the mean VAS score of the pre-procedure anxiety and post-procedure pain and anxiety irrespective of the group. Mean VAS score of the pre-procedure anxiety and post-procedure pain and anxiety increased about 0.3 cm for each 1 cm of increasing mean VAS score of anticipated pain. CONCLUSION: Aromatic therapy using menthol was not significantly effective in reducing pain and anxiety during second trimester genetic amniocentesis.

Development and validation of the Prenatal Diagnostic Procedures Anxiety Scale.

OBJECTIVES: As there are currently no specific measures of anxiety due to prenatal diagnostic procedures, the aim of the study was to develop and validate a new measure called the Prenatal Diagnostic Procedure Anxiety Scale (PDPAS). METHODS: Seventy-four pregnant women scheduled for amniocentesis and ultrasound completed the PDPAS, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and the Perceived Stress Scale before undergoing the diagnostic procedure. Reliability, concurrent validity, factor structure, scale sensitivity, and specificity were analyzed. Differences between amniocentesis and ultrasound groups in the PDPAS score were analyzed with a t-test. RESULTS: The final scale comprised 11 items and two subscales measuring 'fear of procedure' and 'fear of abnormal result'. Concurrent validity analysis showed that the PDPAS is an independent measure of anxiety. At a cut-off score of >11, sensitivity was 75.0% and specificity was 72.01% with moderate accuracy. Fear of procedure was higher in the amniocentesis group, whereas fear of abnormal result was equally present in both amniocentesis and ultrasound groups. CONCLUSION: The PDPAS has good internal consistency and concurrent validity with satisfactory psychometric characteristics. As a short measure of situation-specific anxiety, it can be used as a screening tool in prenatal clinical settings.

Trait anxiety, information modality, and responses to communications about prenatal genetic testing.

Decisions to undergo invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures can be anxiety provoking. Individuals receive information about these procedures in one of three modalities: written text, audio (verbal description), or video. We examined whether modality influences emotional responses and testing decisions, and whether trait anxiety, a disposition linked with heightened sensitivity to threatening information, moderates these effects. New Zealand adults (N = 176) completed a trait anxiety measure before random allocation to view a text, audio, or video message about amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling. Participants completed measures of child related worry, anticipated emotional distress, anticipated coping efficacy, perceived likelihood of miscarriage, and testing interest. High-anxious individuals reported greater distress and lower coping efficacy in response to the video message compared to the audio message. They also reported greater miscarriage likelihood in response to the video message compared to the text message. These findings suggest that use of video, assumed to be most informative for educating patients, could induce greater distress about prenatal testing in individuals prone to anxiety.

Physician recommendation for invasive prenatal testing: the case of the 'precious baby'.

STUDY QUESTION: Do clinicians manage pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technologies (ART) differently from spontaneous pregnancies? SUMMARY ANSWER: Clinicians' decisions about prenatal testing during pregnancy depend, at least partially, on the method of conception. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Research thus far has shown that patients' decisions regarding prenatal screening are different in ART pregnancies compared with spontaneous ones, such that ART pregnancies may be considered more valuable or 'precious' than pregnancies conceived without treatment. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: In this cross-sectional study, preformed during the year 2011, 163 obstetricians and gynecologists in Israel completed an anonymous online questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS: Clinicians were randomly assigned to read one of two versions of a vignette describing the case of a pregnant woman. The two versions differed only with regard to the method of conception (ART; n = 78 versus spontaneous; n = 85). Clinicians were asked to provide their recommendations regarding amniocentesis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The response rate among all clinicians invited to complete the questionnaire was 16.7%. Of the 85 clinicians presented with the spontaneous pregnancy scenario, 37 (43.5%) recommended amniocentesis. In contrast, of the 78 clinicians presented with the ART pregnancy scenario, only 15 (19.2%) recommended the test. Clinicians were 3.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-6.6) times more likely to recommend amniocentesis for a spontaneous pregnancy than for an ART pregnancy. LIMITATIONS AND REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study is limited by a low response rate, the relatively small sample and the hypothetical nature of the decision, as clinician recommendations may have differed in an actual clinical setting. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our findings show that fertility history and use of ART may affect clinicians' recommendations regarding amniocentesis following receipt of screening test results. This raises the question of how subjective factors influence clinicians' decisions regarding other aspects of pregnancy management. STUDY FUNDING AND COMPETING INTEREST: There was no funding source to this study. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Comparison of the effectiveness of different counseling methods before second trimester genetic amniocentesis in Thailand.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of counseling methods before second trimester genetic amniocentesis. STUDY DESIGN: The design of this study is a randomized controlled study comparing the improvement in patients' knowledge satisfaction anxiety and perceived pain between computer-assisted instruction (CAI) and leaflet self-reading (LSR) and subsequent individual counseling among pregnant women scheduled for second trimester genetic amniocentesis in a developing country. RESULTS: There were 164 and 157 participants in the LSR and CAI groups, respectively. In both groups, knowledge improved significantly after LSR/CAI (p < 0.001) and increased further after individual counseling (p < 0.001). After combined counseling, knowledge was significantly higher in the LSR than in the CAI group (p = 0.032). Knowledge was associated with higher level of education and previous exposure to genetic counseling. Pain decreased more in the CAI than in the LSR group after completion of counseling (p = 0.021). Reduction in anxiety and increase in satisfaction did not differ between the groups. Counseling method did not affect the final decision of patients to accept amniocentesis. CONCLUSION: Both counseling methods improved patients' knowledge and satisfaction and reduced pain and anxiety. In combination with individual counseling, LSR was more effective than CAI in improving patients' knowledge before second trimester genetic amniocentesis.

The psychological effects of prenatal diagnostic procedures: maternal anxiety before and after invasive and noninvasive procedures.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To examine the change in anxiety before and after prenatal diagnostic procedures in women undergoing invasive (amniocentesis) and noninvasive (ultrasound) procedures; and (2) to examine predictors of anxiety before the diagnostic procedure. METHODS: A short-term follow-up study was conducted on a sample of pregnant women in the second trimester. Questionnaires were administered to women scheduled for amniocentesis (n = 37) and ultrasonography (n = 37) before and immediately after the procedure. The following questionnaires were administered: the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Affect Intensity Measure, the COPE inventory, and the Optimism-Pessimism Scale. RESULTS: Prior to the administration of the prenatal diagnostic procedure, measured anxiety levels were the same in both groups of women (p > 0.05). An interaction effect of a two-way ANOVA revealed that anxiety decreased after the procedure in the ultrasound but not the amniocentesis group (F(1, 72) = 5.01, p = 0.028). Although coping styles and affect intensity were found to be related to anxiety (p < 0.05), they were not significant predictors of anxiety before the diagnostic procedure when controlling for trait anxiety and procedure type. CONCLUSION: Anxiety levels associated with noninvasive but not after invasive, prenatal diagnostics tests decrease immediately following the procedure.

Maternal anxiety and pain during prenatal diagnostic techniques: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore anxiety and pain felt by women undergoing chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and amniocentesis (AC). METHOD: We prospectively questioned 254 women (67 undergoing CVS, 187 AC) before the procedure on their anxiety, after the procedure on their pain felt, and the support they received or desired. The medical team collected technical information concerning each procedure. RESULTS: The level of anxiety was significantly higher in women undergoing CVS than AC, in those who had received complete information before the procedure, and when indication for the procedure was fetal structural abnormalities. The level of pain was significantly higher in cases of anxious women, those undergoing a CVS rather than AC, those who had undergone invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures in previous pregnancies, in procedures deemed difficult by the operator, and with needle insertion in the lateral part of the uterus. About 30% of women undergoing CVS and 8% of those undergoing AC would have desired some form of pain prevention, mostly with nonpharmacologic therapy. CONCLUSION: Prenatal diagnosis is frequently associated with anxiety and pain. We identified factors that could exacerbate either one. When questioned, patients would desire a nonpharmacologic means for pain prevention.

Design and usability of heuristic-based deliberation tools for women facing amniocentesis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that in decision contexts characterized by uncertainty and time constraints (e.g. health-care decisions), fast and frugal decision-making strategies (heuristics) may perform better than complex rules of reasoning. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether it is possible to design deliberation components in decision support interventions using simple models (fast and frugal heuristics). DESIGN: The 'Take The Best' heuristic (i.e. selection of a 'most important reason') and 'The Tallying' integration algorithm (i.e. unitary weighing of pros and cons) were used to develop two deliberation components embedded in a Web-based decision support intervention for women facing amniocentesis testing. Ten researchers (recruited from 15), nine health-care providers (recruited from 28) and ten pregnant women (recruited from 14) who had recently been offered amniocentesis testing appraised evolving versions of 'your most important reason' (Take The Best) and 'weighing it up' (Tallying). RESULTS: Most researchers found the tools useful in facilitating decision making although emphasized the need for simple instructions and clear layouts. Health-care providers however expressed concerns regarding the usability and clarity of the tools. By contrast, 7 out of 10 pregnant women found the tools useful in weighing up the pros and cons of each option, helpful in structuring and clarifying their thoughts and visualizing their decision efforts. Several pregnant women felt that 'weighing it up' and 'your most important reason' were not appropriate when facing such a difficult and emotional decision. CONCLUSION: Theoretical approaches based on fast and frugal heuristics can be used to develop deliberation tools that provide helpful support to patients facing real-world decisions about amniocentesis.

Clinical correlates of pain and anxiety in prenatal diagnostic procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To study patient perception of pain and anxiety before and after amniocentesis (AC) and transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and the clinical correlates of pain and anxiety. METHODS: 92 women underwent AC and 78 CVS. Visual analog scale was used to quantify pain and anxiety, immediately before and after the procedure. Factors which could affect pain and anxiety were noted. RESULTS: The pain and anxiety anticipated before the procedures were significantly less than actually perceived. The pre-procedure anxiety did not correlate with post-procedure pain. There was no correlation between anticipated pain or anxiety and age, parity, education, socioeconomic status, and history of procedure in previous pregnancy in both the AC and CVS groups. Post-procedure pain did not correlate with age, parity, education, socioeconomic status, abdominal scar, placental location, number of needle insertion, repeat procedure or abdominal wall thickness in either group. However, on multiple linear regression the overall post-procedure pain was associated with the number of needle insertions. CONCLUSION: Though pre-procedure pain and anxiety levels are high, most patient experience less pain and anxiety after the procedure.

Beyond the first trimester screen: can we predict who will choose invasive testing?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine what factors, in addition to a positive first trimester aneuploidy screen, correlate with a pregnant patient's decision to undergo invasive prenatal testing. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies referred to the Johns Hopkins Prenatal Diagnosis and Treatment Center between 2001 and 2009 with an indication of positive first trimester screen. We compared demographic factors and numerical first trimester screen results with invasive testing uptake. Risk difference calculations and linear modeling were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 171 eligible patients were identified. Maternal age, race, residual risk, marital status, and year of first trimester screen correlated significantly with invasive testing uptake. Family history was predictive of invasive testing uptake for patients younger than 35 years only. Type of elevated risk (trisomy 21 vs. 18 and 13), assisted reproductive technology status, parity, and increase from age-related risk were not predictive. A general linear model for relative risk with Gaussian error showed significant interaction between the variables of age and family history, so the two traits were analyzed separately (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with positive first trimester screen results, several demographic traits are predictive of invasive testing uptake. This information can help providers to identify patients at increased risk of declining invasive testing and can help providers anticipate educational needs. Further investigation should be conducted to elucidate the causes of these differences, which may relate to misinformation about the testing options and differences in values systems.